Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
(Redirected from
Wikipedia:RFD
)
"WP:RFD" redirects here. For other requests for deletion, see
Wikipedia:Deletion venues. For requests for discussion, see Wikipedia:Requests for comment
.
Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion
XFD backlog
V Jan Feb Mar Apr Total
CfD 0 0 0 13 13
TfD 0 0 0 8 8
MfD 0 0 0 17 17
FfD 0 0 0 1 1
RfD 0 0 0 37 37
AfD 0 0 0 15 15

Redirects for discussion (RfD) is the place where potentially problematic redirects are discussed. Items usually stay listed for a week or so, after which they are deleted, kept, or retargeted.

  • If you want to replace an unprotected redirect with an article, do not list it here. Turning redirects into articles is wholly encouraged. Be bold!
  • If you want to move a page but a redirect is in the way, do not list it here. For non-controversial cases,
    requested move
    .
  • If you think a redirect points to the wrong target article, this is a good place to discuss what should be the proper target.
  • Redirects should not be deleted just because they have no incoming links. Please do not use this as the only reason to delete a redirect. However, redirects that do have incoming links are sometimes deleted, so that is not a sufficient condition for keeping. (See § When should we delete a redirect? for more information.)

Please do not unilaterally rename or change the target of a redirect while it is under discussion. This adds unnecessary complication to the discussion for participants and closers.

Before listing a redirect for discussion

Please be aware of these general policies, which apply here as elsewhere:

The guiding principles of RfD

Shortcut
  • The purpose of a good redirect is to eliminate the possibility that readers will find themselves staring blankly at "Search results 1–10 out of 378" instead of the article they were looking for. If someone could plausibly enter the redirect's name when searching for the target article, it's a good redirect.
  • Redirects are cheap
    . They take up little storage space and use very little bandwidth. It doesn't really hurt things if there are a few of them scattered around. On the flip side, deleting redirects is also cheap because recording the deletion takes up little storage space and uses very little bandwidth. There is no harm in deleting problematic redirects.
  • If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no discussion after at least 7 days, the default result is delete.
  • Redirects nominated in contravention of Wikipedia:Redirect will be speedily kept.
  • RfD can also serve as a central discussion forum for debates about which page a redirect should target. In cases where retargeting the redirect could be considered controversial, it is advisable to leave a notice on the talk page of the redirect's current target page or the proposed target page to refer readers to the redirect's nomination to allow input and help form consensus for the redirect's target.
  • Requests for deletion of redirects from one page's talk page to another's do not need to be listed here. Anyone can remove the redirect by blanking the page. The
    G6
    criterion for speedy deletion may be appropriate.
  • In discussions, always ask yourself whether or not a redirect would be helpful to the reader.

When should we delete a redirect?


Shortcuts

Further information: Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Common outcomes and Wikipedia:Moving a page § Moving over a redirect

The major reasons why deletion of redirects is harmful are:

  • a redirect may contain non-trivial edit history;
  • if a redirect is reasonably old (or is the result of moving a page that has been there for quite some time), then it is possible that its deletion will break incoming links (such links coming from older revisions of Wikipedia pages, from edit summaries, from other Wikimedia projects or
    from elsewhere on the internet, do not show up in "What links here"
    ).

Therefore consider the deletion only of either harmful redirects or of recent ones.

Reasons for deleting

Shortcut
See also: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion § Redirects

You might want to delete a redirect if one or more of the following conditions is met (but note also the exceptions listed below this list):

  1. The redirect page makes it unreasonably difficult for users to locate similarly named articles via the search engine. For example, if the user searches for "New Articles", and is redirected to a disambiguation page for "Articles", it would take much longer to get to the newly added articles on Wikipedia.
  2. The redirect might cause confusion. For example, if "Adam B. Smith" was redirected to "Andrew B. Smith", because Andrew was accidentally called Adam in one source, this could cause confusion with the article on Adam Smith, so the redirect should be deleted.
  3. The redirect is offensive or abusive, such as redirecting "Joe Bloggs is a Loser" to "Joe Bloggs" (unless "Joe Bloggs is a Loser" is legitimately discussed in the article), or "Joe Bloggs" to "Loser". (
    G3 may apply.) See also § Neutrality of redirects
    .
  4. The redirect constitutes self-promotion or spam. (
    Speedy deletion criterion G11
    may apply.)
  5. The redirect makes no sense, such as redirecting "Apple" to "Orange". (
    Speedy deletion criterion G1
    may apply.)
  6. It is a
    Speedy deletion criterion R2
    may apply if the target namespace is something other than Category:, Template:, Wikipedia:, Help:, or Portal:.)
  7. If the redirect is broken, meaning it redirects to an article that does not exist, it can be immediately deleted under
    speedy deletion criterion G8
    . You should check that there is not an alternative place it could be appropriately redirected to first and that it has not become broken through vandalism.
  8. If the redirect is a
    candidates for speedy deletion criterion R3
    , if recently created.)
  9. If the target article needs to be moved to the redirect title, but the redirect has been edited before and has a history of its own, then the title needs to be freed up to make way for the move. If the move is uncontroversial, tag the redirect for
    round-robin move. If not, take the article to Requested moves
    .
  10. Shortcut
    If the redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject.

Reasons for not deleting

Shortcut

However, avoid deleting such redirects if:

  1. They have a potentially useful page history, or an edit history that should be kept to comply with the licensing requirements for a merge (see Wikipedia:Merge and delete). On the other hand, if the redirect was created by renaming a page with that name, and the page history just mentions the renaming, and for one of the reasons above you want to delete the page, copy the page history to the Talk page of the article it redirects to. The act of renaming is useful page history, and even more so if there has been discussion on the page name.
  2. They would aid
    duplicate articles less likely, whether by redirecting a plural to a singular, by redirecting a frequent misspelling to a correct spelling, by redirecting a misnomer to a correct term, by redirecting to a synonym, etc. In other words, redirects with no incoming links are not candidates for deletion on those grounds because they are of benefit to the browsing user. Some extra vigilance by editors will be required to minimize the occurrence of those frequent misspellings in the article texts because the linkified misspellings will not appear as broken links; consider tagging the redirect with the {{R from misspelling
    }} template to assist editors in monitoring these misspellings.
  3. They aid searches on certain terms. For example, users who might see the "
    Keystone State" mentioned somewhere but do not know what that refers to will be able to find out at the Pennsylvania
    (target) article.
  4. Deleting redirects runs the risk of breaking incoming or internal links. For example, redirects resulting from page moves should not normally be deleted without good reason. Links that have existed for a significant length of time, including
    WolVes) and old subpage links, should be left alone in case there are any existing links on external pages pointing to them. See also Wikipedia:Link rot § Link rot on non-Wikimedia sites
    .
  5. Someone finds them useful. Hint: If someone says they find a redirect useful, they probably do. You might not find it useful—this is not because the other person is being untruthful, but because you browse Wikipedia in different ways. Evidence of usage can be gauged by using the wikishark or pageviews tool on the redirect to see the number of views it gets.
  6. The redirect is to a closely related word form, such as a plural form to a singular form.

Neutrality of redirects

Shortcut

Just as article titles using non-neutral language

verifiable redirects should point to neutrally titled articles about the subject of the term. Non-neutral redirects may be tagged with {{R from non-neutral name
}}.

Non-neutral redirects are commonly created for three reasons:

  1. Articles that are created using non-neutral titles are routinely moved to a new neutral title, which leaves behind the old non-neutral title as a working redirect (e.g. Climategate → Climatic Research Unit email controversy).
  2. Articles created as
    POV forks may be deleted and replaced by a redirect pointing towards the article from which the fork originated (e.g. Barack Obama Muslim rumor → deleted and now redirected to Barack Obama religion conspiracy theories
    ).
  3. The subject matter of articles may be represented by some sources outside Wikipedia in non-neutral terms. Such terms are generally avoided in Wikipedia article titles, per the
    neutral point of view policy. For instance the non-neutral expression "Attorneygate" is used to redirect to the neutrally titled Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy
    . The article in question has never used that title, but the redirect was created to provide an alternative means of reaching it because a number of press reports use the term.

The exceptions to this rule would be redirects that are not

reliable sources, it should be kept even if non-neutral, as it will facilitate searches on such terms. Please keep in mind that RfD is not the place to resolve
most editorial disputes.

Closing notes

Details at Administrator instructions for RfD

Nominations should remain open, per policy, about a week before they are closed, unless they meet the general criteria for speedy deletion, the criteria for speedy deletion of a redirect, or are not valid redirect discussion requests (e.g. are actually move requests).

How to list a redirect for discussion

Shortcut
STEP I.
Tag the redirect(s).

  Enter {{subst:

rfd
|content= at the very beginning of the redirect page you are listing for discussion and enter }} at the very end of the page.

  • Please do not mark the edit as minor (m).
  • Please include in the edit summary the phrase:
    Nominated for RfD: see [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion]].
  • Save the page ("Publish changes").
  • If you are unable to edit the redirect page because of protection, this step can be omitted, and after step 2 is completed, a request to add the RFD template can be put on the redirect's talk page.
  • If the redirect you are nominating is in template namespace, consider adding |showontransclusion=1 to the RfD tag so that people using the template redirect are aware of the nomination.
  • If you are nominating multiple redirects as a group, repeat all the above steps for each redirect being nominated.
STEP II.
List the entry on RfD.

 Click here to edit the section of RfD for today's entries.

  • Enter this text below the date heading:
{{subst:Rfd2|redirect=RedirectName|target=TargetArticle|text=The action you would like to occur (deletion, re-targeting, etc.) and the rationale for that action.}} ~~~~
  • For this template:
    • Put the redirect's name in place of RedirectName, put the target article's name in place of TargetArticle, and include a reason after text=.
    • Note that, for this step, the "target article" is the current target of the redirect (if you have a suggestion for a better target, include this in the text that you insert after text=).
  • Please use an edit summary such as:
    Nominating [[RedirectName]]
    (replacing RedirectName with the name of the redirect you are nominating).
  • To list multiple related redirects for discussion, use the following syntax. Repeat line 2 for N number of redirects:
{{subst:Rfd2|redirect=RedirectName1|target=TargetArticle1}}
{{subst:Rfd2|multi=yes|redirect=RedirectName2|target=TargetArticle2}}
{{subst:Rfd2|multi=yes|redirect=RedirectNameN|target=TargetArticleN|text=The actions you would like to occur (deletion, re-targeting, etc.) and the rationale for those actions.}} ~~~~
  • If the redirect has had previous RfDs, you can add {{
    Oldrfdlist
    |previous RfD without brackets|result of previous RfD}}     directly after the rfd2 template.
STEP III.
Notify users.

  It is generally considered good practice to notify the creator and main contributors of the redirect(s) that you nominate.

To find the main contributors, look in the page history of the respective redirect(s). For convenience, the template

{{subst:Rfd notice|RedirectName}} ~~~~

may be placed on the creator/main contributors' user talk page to provide notice of the discussion. Please replace RedirectName with the name of the respective creator/main contributors' redirect and use an edit summary such as:
Notice of redirect discussion at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion]]

Notices about the RfD discussion may also be left on relevant talk pages.

  • Please consider using What links here to locate other redirects that may be related to the one you are nominating. After going to the redirect target page and selecting "What links here" in the toolbox on the left side of your computer screen, select both "Hide transclusions" and "Hide links" filters to display the redirects to the redirect target page.

Current list

Shortcuts

April 25

Ian Walsh (Fair City character)

bundle Utopes (talk / cont) 02:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ama Chisenga

bundle Utopes (talk / cont) 02:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kerri-Ann Boyle

bundle Utopes (talk / cont) 02:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Debbie O'Brien

bundle Utopes (talk / cont) 02:24, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eoghan O'Brien

bundle Utopes (talk / cont) 02:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jackie Ferguson

bundle Utopes (talk / cont) 02:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rose O'Brien

bundle Utopes (talk / cont) 02:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Emmet O'Brien (Fair City character)

bundle Utopes (talk / cont) 02:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ciarán Holloway

bundle Utopes (talk / cont) 02:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trigger Foley

bundle Utopes (talk / cont) 02:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Meredith Montera

bundle Utopes (talk / cont) 02:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oisin Brennan

bundle Utopes (talk / cont) 02:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cathal Spillane

bundle Utopes (talk / cont) 02:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alannah Walsh

bundle Utopes (talk / cont) 02:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Amanda Ryan (Fair City)

bundle Utopes (talk / cont) 02:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jake Martin (Fair City)

bundle Utopes (talk / cont) 02:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

James Oakley (Fair City)

bundle Utopes (talk / cont) 02:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Miriam O'Reilly (Fair City)

bundle Utopes (talk / cont) 02:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nikki Duff

A (possibly) long list of characters from Fair City not mentioned at the target in any form. In many of these cases, a "mention" is generous because this is just a list of characters on a table that are only said once, but nevertheless at least they exist, which the titles included in this nomination cannot say re: themselves. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sanju Bhagat

No mention of "sanju" or "bhagat" at the target, or any context of his case of fetus in fetu. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Samlor mcheu

No mention at the target, and could not find evidence of this spelling missing a vowel, and including an extra e. Seems implausible to me, although perhaps content at the page or a translation could clear this up. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

S from Hell

No mention of this meme, or "hell", at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rute Gunnay

No mention of "Rute" or "Gunnay" mentioned at the target article, hasn't had content at this title since 2006. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rush (Leland Remix)

No mention of "Leland" or a remix of Rush is mentioned at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RTV News Inc.

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

No mention of RTV News at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Roshutsu

Seems to be an alternate language version of exhibitionism, not mentioned at the target, and with no strong association to the target outside of what would be expected of

WP:RLANG. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Ross and Rachel (song)

No mention of "Ross" or "Rachel" at the target singer's page, but also no mention at Jake Miller discography either. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Roses (SoMo song)

No mention of a song called Roses at the target article, not a helpful redirect and indicates that we have content when we don't. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Romantic Homicide (Jaden Hossler song)

No mention of this song, "Romantic", or "Homicide" at the target article. The existence of a redirect indicates content that we don't have on Wikipedia. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rockman 4 Minus Infinity

This ROM hack is not discussed at the target. No mention of "Minus", "infinity", "ROM", or "Hack" at the target page. The existence of a redirect indicates content at the target that we don't have and is never addressed, making this not a very useful redirect. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rkkody

No mention of this former cult member at the target article, in any form, it seems. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. He is actually mentioned. According to CBS News this was Chuck Humphrey's cult name. Humphrey is mentioned here. I could add a mention this was his name in the group, if you'd like? PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Riksenergi

No mention of this fictional agency/company (derived from the deleted categories) at the target role-playing game. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redwop

No mention or context as to what "redwop" is at the target article. Seems to be a company based on external searches, but such a company is not discussed at the article. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recursive X-Y cut

No mention of "recursive", "x-y" or "cut" at the target article. Used to be it's own article, but this seems to be a topic that isn't discussed at the overarching topic of "bitmaps". Utopes (talk / cont) 00:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rail transport in Socotra

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

We have nothing to say about rail transport at the target article. Anyone that types in "rail transport in socotra" but doesn't click on the article or glosses over the unrelated info about minibuses (on a hunt to find information on rail transport) will get the faulty impression that rail transport is discussed at the target. We don't have redirects for topics that DON'T exist on an island, and aren't mentioned as not existing. We wouldn't have Horse transport in Socotra, Plane transport in Socotra, or Spaceship transport in Socotra just because "the article says minibus transport, so therefore it's helpful to know that these don't exist." Alternatively, a red link is more explicit that a topic doesn't exist, as it doesn't make people question the topic's existence, and think "Why does this redirect exist if rail transport doesn't, is the article wrong? Surely there must be something to explain this discrepancy..." Utopes (talk / cont) 00:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Rail transport in X is one of those topics we have myriad links for for historical (cultural?) reasons, unlike horse plane and spaceships. Suspect this is one of those. I lean towards delete, but not strongly. CMD (talk) 01:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per my arguments in the previous discussion. This is misleading due to the target not discussing this topic. -- Tavix (talk) 01:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rail Sim Pro

No mention of "Rail", "Sim" or "Pro" at the target article. Was redirected here after a 2015 AfD as an "obvious alternative to AfD", but this topic seems to have never been discussed at the target before, and certainly not after. Not a helpful redirect in its current form. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Inns

No mention of Inns at the target article. Used to exist standalone, before being redirected into the list where it was presumably mentioned, but no longer. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

R@ygold

No mention of "raygold" or "r@ygold" at the target article. Seems to be a tagline or username, maybe, although I haven't looked too far into how incorporable this topic might be into the article. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quantum realm

Realms are not discussed at the target page. With the existing of a conflicting

Quantum Realm, there's no diffcaps differentiation in topics. Should have matching targets, with a hatnote at Features of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, not the other way around. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

April 24

Sucking peepee

I think the title makes it obvious why. Yes, it's technically pointing to the correct page, but seriously. I doubt "Sucking peepee" is really an encyclopedic redirect to have. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 23:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - Redirects are allowed to be "unencyclopedic". This is an unambiguous redirect, so it's valid. Fieari (talk) 23:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Helicopter dick

Not sure this is a plausible typo (or what people would expect when searching this term, so it's worse than having nothing). Previously was discussed (and deleted) at RfD and no one suggested this target. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Clearly violates
    WP:LEAST... this is very much and obviously not what someone would be looking for when searching for this term, and I don't think we have the actual information that this term refers to, so... since we don't have it, delete it. (if someone finds the actual information on wikipedia or wiktionary, please change my !vote to redirect there instead, but I'm at work so I can't search this right now) Fieari (talk) 23:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

List of lists
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

From previous discussions (in 2013 and 2016), three pages have come up as potential valid redirect targets for this page, List of lists of lists, Wikipedia:Contents/Lists, and Category:Lists.

The current target, List of lists of lists, is in the same namespace, but it's not a complete "list of lists" as not all lists on Wikipedia are listed in "Lists of X" articles, and it's a "list of lists of lists" rather than a direct "list of lists." Next, Wikipedia:Contents/Lists has an approachable format and it's a "list of lists" rather than a "list of lists of lists," but it is also incomplete. And finally, Category:Lists is a complete "list of lists," but it's a category.

I propose that a disambiguation page be created containing these three pages as they all have their pros and cons, making none of them suitable as the sole redirect target. – BrandonXLF (talk) 09:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep and hatnote the other two. Jay 💬 11:59, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 22:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, local targets are preferred when feasible. I don't see the issue with the current target; it need not be complete. I don't think someone searching this is going to be misled or confused by where they end up. -- Tavix (talk) 01:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Striped Tiger (band)

Target was redirected to a different subject per an AfD so is no longer about a band. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Netflix films no longer mentioned

The titles of these Netflix original films are no longer mentioned in their target. 2607:FEA8:761F:4600:301D:BAB0:803F:CEE (talk) 21:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars™

with the deletion of Peppa Pig TM, this probably also deserves a discussion in the same vain. Okmrman (talk) 19:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no one is going to go out of their way to try and get the special characters for TM to search for that when Star Wars would have come up by then anyway. Canterbury Tail talk 19:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete™ per Canterbury Tail, implausible search term. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 23:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Larissa Hodge

Not discussed at target with sufficient substance to warrant a redirect. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bundled with other similar redirects.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Larissa Hodge, we have information on this person and it's found at this target. It doesn't matter that it's very little information - this is what we have and that's where it is. Delete the others as they are unsourced alternates and nicknames and also not described at the target. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 12:48, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Larissa Hodge is shown as her contestant name Bootz which is referred to as Larissa Aurora in another section of the article. So I'm not on board with the logic of keeping one but not the other. Jay 💬 12:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:59, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ductal

Ductal is a product of Lafarge but isn't mentioned on the article at all. The redirect exists due to a 2015 deletion discussion of the article [1], I believe a redirect to duct would be better given ductal is the adjectivial form of duct. Traumnovelle (talk) 07:27, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Redirected via an AFD, no longer mentioned in the article ... it's time. Steel1943 (talk) 18:52, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comedy Shorts Gamer (entertainer)

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I just added mention. Brother of the subject - refine to the #Early life section. If kept, Comedy Shorts Gamer which is protected, may also be recreated as a redirect. Jay 💬 12:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The "added mention" Jay is referring to spells the subject as "ComedyShortsGamer" (no spaces). Stating this for editors to be able to find the mention, otherwise I have no opinion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

National culture

"National culture" is mentioned on the target page, but it isn't a subhead, and this seems to me to be a strange article to redirect this to. I'm not sure someone who searches for "national culture" will understand why they're on this page. I'm not excited about any of the alternatives I considered (Nationalism?), maybe someone here has a better idea? asilvering (talk) 03:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe Cultural nationalism? Traumnovelle (talk) 07:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Technofascism and Techno-fascism

Same terminology, different meanings. Does its meaning depend on the absence/presence of the hyphen, or can it have both meanings either way? – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 21:09, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • My thought exactly.
    or else it is POV and should be deleted. Which of these it is, I will leave to smarter contributors than myself – the top Google “hit” points to one of the target Wikipedia articles and the second one points to this RfD itself! (and subsequent “hits” point to academic articles that are way “above my head.”) Bwrs (talk) 05:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
did some looking around and "technofascism" apparently means "fascism that uses technology", not "fascism in technology", so both of those are wrong
either retarget them to fascism or a more fitting target, or cause them to mysteriously disappear delete cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 14:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I imagined "technofascism" being a portmanteau of technocracy and fascism (with the former referring to governance by experts, not technology itself) and that it would refer to a blend of both. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 19:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
probably true Bwrs (talk) 22:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

F-Bomb (film)

Per

WP:RDEL #8 BilledMammal (talk) 03:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The F-Bomb (film)

Per

WP:RDEL #8 BilledMammal (talk) 03:13, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"The F-Bomb (documentary)" redirect was deleted today, but I don't know why. I didn't know it was listed at RfD. When I had made the above comment, it was not. Jay 💬 17:42, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

F-Bomb (movie)

Per

WP:RDEL #8 BilledMammal (talk) 03:07, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: 2x (edit conflict)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:FLUFF

Should have the same target as

MOS:PUFFERY. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:42, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

2022 abortion performed on a 10-year-old in Ohio

Delete as inaccurate and implausible. The abortion was performed in Indiana, not Ohio. -- Tavix (talk) 18:11, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - Keep per
    WP:CHEAP. --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:40, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    @
    WP:CHEAP doesn't explain why this redirect should be kept, it explains the general state of redirects. That's why you'll rarely see others cite it at RfD, it doesn't say anything in particular. Instead, it'd be more helpful to explain why you created it and why it may be a useful redirect, despite being inaccurate. -- Tavix (talk) 15:16, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Delete per nom. Also see this discussion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_April_5#10-year-old_Ohio_rape_victim_required_to_cross_state_lines_to_obtain_abortion Okmrman (talk) 21:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Searching this term is entirely plausible, as the title lends itself to potential confusion by mentioning both Ohio and Indiana. TNstingray (talk) 23:08, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This is fine. Someone searching for this term will find out the facts of the case. BD2412 T 02:59, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, Wikipedia is not a search engine, redirects should not be accommodating inaccurate keywords cobbled together into a never-before-seen title. As the abortion was not performed in Ohio, this cannot be an alternative name for the subject. Typing this into the search bar is far more insightful than maintaining this as a redirect, as readers will see the correct title and realize "Ah, it was the Indiana abortion case; the abortion was not performed in Ohio". This redirect currently causes confusion and presents a faulty equalization that a Ohio-abortion case = Indiana-abortion case, as there's no mention of a "Ohio-abortion misconception" or anything that would imply such a misconception. The redirect in question does not appear written at the target page (as it's untrue), nor does it appear anywhere on Wikipedia (as it's untrue). Utopes (talk / cont) 07:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Redirects don't have to be mentioned in the article; there is no requirement for that. WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I never said that being mentioned is a requirement. Thousands don't, probably. But not being mentioned, heck, not even ever alluded to, absolutely demolishes any of the little motivation for keeping misleading information in the form of a redirect void-of-context. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:35, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as a plausible – though apparently not popular – search term, because not everyone is going to remember where the abortion physically happened. It sounds like the concern is that some editors parse the title as meaning that Ohio was the location of the abortion, rather than the (usual) location of the child – i.e., that "2022 abortion performed on a 10-year-old in Ohio" is equal to "2022 abortion performed in Ohio on a 10-year-old" and is factually inaccurate, but "2022 abortion performed on a 10-year-old from Ohio" would be accurate. I see their point, but I think that asking for grammatical perfection in a redirect is not necessary. The point of a redirect is to get people to the article that contains the accurate facts, and this will achieve that goal. Just as I think the incorrect hyphenation is not a good reason to delete a redirect, I think the suboptimal preposition isn't a good reason to delete it. Also, it looks like an RM during the first weeks of the article's existence introduced the "in Ohio" idea. WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    "Plausible, but not very popular" is a wild misrepresentation of the fundamental facts. This makes the assumption that A: writing a backwards, incorrect, non-existent / Google search prompt is "plausible", and B: a grand total of zero views with the last 12 months is "apparently not popular"... "Apparently"?? Even with the clunky overly-specific and still somehow incorrect title out of the way, was there a world that this title was even going to get a view? No, it's completely unnatural and would be expected to exist by zero people on Wikipedia. If you ask 100 people to describe the case in 30 different ways, I'm nearly positive that this title wouldn't appear ever, much less make the shortlist for likely and useful redirects. This is a search term, not worthy of a redirect. Search terms as redirects are a horrible precedent as is, as there's literally infinite search terms in existence and not worthwhile to entertain as long as Wikipedia has a build-in search box that captures every single variety, and everything I've tried has led to 100% accurate results as long as the text exists.
    And yet, with all of those tests, there are thousands of theoretical implausible search-term-redirects that could (and don't) exist. And all of the thousands would be far better options that
    WP:RDEL #2. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:15, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Wikipedia is not Google, and even if it was, the redirect is still inaccurate. DrowssapSMM 13:58, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete inaccurate and implausible search term. TarnishedPathtalk 09:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Wikipedia is not a search engine StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 15:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - search term with enough relevant facts to identify the target, and catches searches where the reader doesn't know (or care) which particular state the specific events occurred in. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:57, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    So does this mean that as long as a redirect is 80% correct, it doesn't matter if the remaining 20% is wrong/misleading because 80 is still a passing grade? There's an infinite number of 100% correct titles out there, I feel we should be focusing on redirecting those rather than phrases that are 90% or 80% or 70% correct; "close enough" isn't enough to redirect (the search bar solves all of those problems). Utopes (talk / cont) 17:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, that's exactly what it means. A redirect is meant to get readers to the information they're looking for, not penalize them for not already knowing certain specific (and to non-Americans, largely irrelevant) details of an event. Unless we have many articles on American children being sexually assaulted and then forced to travel to a different state for critical medical care that's denied to them in their home states for stupid religious reasons, "close enough" is just that: close enough. Taking them to the information they're obviously looking for is clearly better than taking them to an error message. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 01:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Okay... so throwing a hodgepodge of accurate enough words in a title gives one freedom to fill the remaining 20% with lies, I guess? Maybe nobody outside of America cares about the details and whether the abortion was in Indiana or Tennessee or Alaska or on the moon. Having unexplained lies in a title is inherently confusing, given that the 30 other ~implausible redirects that were created to this article are going to autofill here first. "Details being irrelevant" and "true accuracy doesn't matter" isn't just a pandora's box, it's a crushing typhoon of redirection malpractice. What error message would people see? The search results?? That's where readers go for 99.9% of the infinite search terms out there anyway. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:37, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as a plausible search term. Frank Anchor 20:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete because often times you don't see the redirection header when viewing the article; hence, such incorrect redirects may cause confusion. Bwrs (talk) 05:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 17:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

F-Bomb (documentary)

Per

WP:RDEL #8 BilledMammal (talk) 03:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"The F-Bomb (documentary)" redirect was deleted today, but I don't know why. I didn't know it was listed at RfD. When I had made the above comment, it was not. Jay 💬 07:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The F-Bomb (movie)

Per

WP:RDEL #8 BilledMammal (talk) 03:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dulah, California

Originally this was a stub article that was PRODded by me; another user removed the PROD and converted the article to a redirect. The problem is, the target does not mention Dulah at all, and (per the original stub) Dulah was nothing more than a rail siding located near Solimar. I find it incredibly unlikely that anyone would search for a rail siding, and even if they did, they won't find any information about it here. The article should have been simply deleted and so should this redirect. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: The page was partially merged. I've made an attribution notice in an edit summary at the target to avoid attribution issues in case the page does get deleted. --Paul_012 (talk) 10:29, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I redirected the page because I merged content to Solimar Beach and redirects are cheap. The only other reason to keep the redirect is that if you search for the Solimar Beach community in GNIS, the only entry that comes up is Dulah; that's the only reason I started an article under Dulah in the first place, since Solimar Beach is used on local signage and I started the article way back when I assumed GNIS was reliable. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 04:27, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak restore article (per
    WP:PROD, can be taken to AfD if desired), but could this name not be added to the current target? As things stand this is confusing for someone searching this. A7V2 (talk) 00:05, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 04:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as a {{r from merge}} to maintain proper attribution. We can revisit the redirect if that situation changes. - Eureka Lott 02:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Colonia Ulpia Traiana

In 2018, Colonia Ulpia Traiana was redirected to Xanten. The page has had some debates in the history, and another user is now indicating that this should not redirect to Xanten, though they haven't created a page, only a 'See also' section to Vetera. Given that they have reverted the redirect, I figured it should come to RfD. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:33, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging JoNeuen: Instead of reverting the redirect, please discuss here why you think the current redirect target is incorrect and where you think the page should redirect to. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:34, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have proposed this on the Xanten page. The reason for reverting is that Colonia Ulpia Traiana is an archaeological/historical site, which is only briefly discussed in the Xanten article. JoNeuen (talk) 02:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The piped link mentioning Colonia Ulpia Traiana at the current target goes to
    Talkback) 03:01, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Hi there! So, the link to Vetera was made because I created this article myself. As with Colonia Ulpia Traiana, the Vetera article was redirecting to Xanten before, but I cancelled it because I was working on a translation from the German article. I considered this justified, because I didn't get a response on the Xanten talk page in over a week. Since translating and complementing articles using translation is what I mostly do here, my intention is to do the same with Colonia Ulpia Traiana. The Xanten page is already considered incomplete and these German pages are full of valuable historic and archaeological information that might benefit English speaking Wikipedia. JoNeuen (talk) 22:40, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 16:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • How about restoring this version? The editor in question was a suspected sock, but the article was neither deleted nor the edits hidden for socking. Jay 💬 17:42, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Strongly oppose doing that. It wasn't deleted because there was a pre-sock version to revert to. It wasn't revdelled because that's generally not done. We don't reward socking like that. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:2021 Wikimedia Foundation's actions in Chinese Wikipedia

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Culture Jam (mixtape)

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 14:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per
    Talkback) 15:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Kawaii Leonard

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:59, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as a plausible typo, especially given the similarly pronounced Japanese term "Kawaii." The fact that no page links to this title is irrelevant, as it is reasonable for a person to search for this term. Frank Anchor 14:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as a plausible typo pbp 16:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LeBron Jim

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as redirect creator (though I oppose a G7 speedy). While "Jim" is a common abbreviation for the given name "James", it does not appear to translate the same way for the surname, thus making the redirect more unnecessary than I thought when creating it in 2009. Frank Anchor 14:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LeOld LeBald Le4and6

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Frank Anchor 15:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep A variety of Le____ have been used to refer to LeBron James and nominator hasn't demonstrating any harm in this redirect existing. There are reasons other than typos for redirects existing and therefore nomination hasn't met deletion criteria. pbp 15:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Who is going to search "LeOld LeBald Le4and6" to find LeBron James? Someone just put together three random nicknames that are used to mock him, what is the point of having this? Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 20:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom + disparaging nickname. Not every string of three vaguely plausible nicknames deserve a redirect, and there isn't evidence for these three specifically being found together as a nickname. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 23:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nba allstar 2007 mvp

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The ceiling is the roof

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

God's team

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete This phrase appears to come from a quote by
    Talkback) 15:52, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Draft:Taylor Swift

Pointless redirect from a supposed draft article. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

King Kev

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. It is the most common nickname for him, but dates back to the 1970s. Anyone looking for him would surely be aware of his name and just type that. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep If It is the most common nickname for him as Crowsus asserts, then it should be added to the article. I don't see how this would be an implausible search term in that case. -
    Talkback) 15:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Keep per Presidentman, navigationally useful. Nickname should be sourced and added to article. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:5450:3A3:46CC:17EC (talk) 17:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eleven of Hearts

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - not included in this article and the section name after the # does not even exist any more. However, there are external links which has that but since Eleven of Hearts is more than one entity [3], it is best served as it's own article, subject to notability, excluding the Gareth Bale trademark celebration. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 16:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Leo Di

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:22, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regordinho

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Also a possibly insulting redirect: "regordinho" is Portuñol for "very fat" (literally), which is a play on Ronaldinho (similarly pronounced). Bedivere (talk) 00:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Originaldo

No page links here, also an implausible misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Diego Marradonna

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Plausible misspelling tbh but the site would probably offer the correct page immediately. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The King of Football

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The lead states that He was nicknamed O Rei (The King). There are multiple people with this nickname in various fields (see, e.g.,
    Talkback) 15:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

You cant see me move

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

John Seena

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Plausible misspelling tbh but the site would probably offer the correct page immediately. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scorsesi

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Plausible misspelling tbh but the site would probably offer the correct page immediately. Crowsus (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Plausible misspelling pbp 15:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per
    WP:CHEAP. Homei (talk) 20:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Scorsezi

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cris Ron

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Ronaldo

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rehan ronaldo

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The World's Top Goal Scorer 2011

No mainspace page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Messidona

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per
    WP:CHEAP. If found via Internet search, clarifies that it refers to Messi (and not Maradona). Homei (talk) 20:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Messimagician

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LM19

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Joever

Per

Fram (talk) 08:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Weak keep as creator per
WP:CHEAP. Duckmather (talk) 01:33, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it's not joever til it's joever, and that entry is goated with the sauce
...apologies for whatever that was, and for the somewhat hidden pun. keep as there are sources cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 11:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Seuss Enterprises

Company not mentioned at target. Should be tagged as {{

R without mention}} if kept. CycloneYoris talk! 10:07, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep It's mentioned in these articles. Nightscream (talk) 16:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kannagi (upcoming film)

This film released just about 4 months ago and is no longer upcoming. Plenty of time has past to the point that there is no more confusion for a 2023 movie, as it's well into 2024 now. Nobody ending up here who sees "upcoming film" in the title would be surprised by it's removal for a movie releasing last year. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 18:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Phone computer

This seems overly technical. Nobody would really refer to smartphones as a phone computer outside of drawing some comparisons between smartphones and computers. Okmrman (talk) 04:04, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. This is what a smartphone is, and I wouldn't be surprised if the terms were used before "smartphone" became the established term (I can't check as Google is refusing to show me results that are both verbatim and before a given time, and either one alone is overwhelmed by irrelevant results where the two words happen to be adjacent, especially in lists in adverts). Thryduulf (talk) 18:43, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment shouldn't this actually link to telco equipment? Such as a PBX or other phone computers -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 07:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The phrasing of these redirects makes me believe they could also refer to Modem, thus making these redirects ambiguous. Steel1943 (talk) 04:59, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I reaffirm my "delete" per Ivanvector's comment: A disambiguation page would not be the solution since none of the subjects mentioned so far are title matches. Let Wikipedia search do its job instead. Steel1943 (talk) 16:51, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 15:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. I think it is easy for English first speakers (or young people) to say they aren't needed, but they probably serve some utility and they perfectly describe what they are. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 11:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dabify. As Steel mentioned, a viable interpretation of this would be Modem, being "a phone used by a computer". However, I'd also think that VoIP phone-- a phone that uses the Internet instead of normal phone lines-- or softphone-- a software program that could call other people, which could be downloaded and installed on a PC-- would be valid interpretations of "Phone computer" or "Computer phone". Given I'm sure none of the above- including Smartphone (a phone which is a computer)-- would be a primary target, dabification is warranted. edited at 14:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC) 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 12:03, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - disambiguation pages are for topics that have the same title, not for manually compiled search indexes of possibly related keywords. We have a search engine for that, let it do its job. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:08, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more go…
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Colonial haiti

Delete. Grammatical errors. (Haiti warrants capitalization and there is currently no redirect for “Colonial Haiti”). Orphan. Serves no useful purpose. Obvious technical error in its creation. Creator is currently serving an indefinite ban. Savvyjack23 (talk) 02:35, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not useful, only has 255 pageviews per WMFcloud since it starting counting views back in 2015. CitationsFreak (talk) 02:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Side-dump condola

Not a likely typo (the correctly spelled phrase is

side dump gondola which has existed as a redirect for a decade). Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]


April 23

Format string

Reopening as a separate nomination this time. Again, this shoud be dabified since the name also refers to

Nickps (talk) 18:52, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

  • disamig per nom -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 03:42, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move %d to Format specifiers. Retarget Format string to Format specifiers. Jay 💬 16:11, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • A fleshed out Disambig would make sense, but I don't see a disambig as called for just between printf and scanf. Unix manuals and technical manuals are always referring to Printf Format Strings (which are used by many tools), when the word Format String is used, but it's exceptionally rare to find anything other than C manuals referring to scanf strings. The concept of a Format String is a much broader topic, and there are many other kinds of format strings that could be discussed besides the C stdio library - such as strftime strings, Awk, Python f-strings, .Net Format strings , etc. Scanf is a specialization of printf - these two redirect targets would be referring to the same subject matter and Printf and Scanf should link to each other (or a common topic) anyway, regarding the discussion of Format strings, because Scanf format strings are Printf format strings with some additions, removals, and a change of interpretation. The current Scanf article doesn't really address how Scanf formats are different and unique from Printf strings, For example the %[ or %* syntax for strings such as %80[^\n] are not laid out. That is not really an issue.. I would not expect either of the Printf and Scanf articles on Wikipedia to serve as a technical manual or programming tutorial for these functions. I would think it should suffice to have a discussion on what format strings are for Printf and Scanf in one place, and Link to the official BSD or GNU C library's documentation. I say Printf, because the printf article has the better discussion of Format specifiers, and Scanf's is limited, except where they link to the Printf article --Mysidia (talk) 03:35, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cremastra (talk) 19:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes (talk / cont) 04:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This will be the last. Any thoughts on deletion?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 22:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Format specifiers

Reopening as a separate nomination this time. Again, this shoud be dabified since the name also refers to

Nickps (talk) 18:52, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Cremastra (talk) 19:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Disambig or move?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes (talk / cont) 04:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This will be the last. Any thoughts on deletion?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 22:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DZHH-AM

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 22:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thermodynamics of nanostructures

The redirect should be deleted. The name of the page was an error, it appears that an editor thought that Thermodynamics was short for Thermal dynamics which it is not. The page has been changed to the more appropriate title Thermal transport in nanostructures. The redirect is incorrect, as it is not on thermodynamics, so would take readers in the wrong direction. I cannot find an actual page on thermodynamics in nanostructures, so it should be removed for the moment. Ldm1954 (talk) 04:52, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Thermal transport is akin to ocean heating or magma flow. Thermodynamics is the (theoretical) study of ergodic systems with a large number of particles and the conservation of energy. It would seem the original article was created with a typo in the title; its pointless to preserve typos. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 15:17, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 05:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • This was moved two weeks back. Internal incoming links need to be fixed first per Synpath. Jay 💬 15:56, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes (talk / cont) 23:52, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: All incoming links bypassed or removed. This discussion can now be relisted to determine what to do with this redirect. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:18, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This will be the last relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 22:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Thermal dynamics and thermodynamics are not the same thing. The article is very much not about thermodynamics of nanostructures (which would be how their properties change with temperature, pressure, energy, etc. at the statistical level), but about how heat moves between things. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 13:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Irreducible manifold

These should point at the same target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 20:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Reducible manifold should redirect to Prime manifold#Irreducible manifold, the target of Irreducible manifold. Tea2min (talk) 08:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with the change of target proposed just above. jraimbau (talk) 13:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Fort Blakely and Spanish Fort

WP:XY, Battle of Spanish Fort is a separate article; both battles/forts are mentioned in both articles, so there is no obvious target, and Battle of Spanish Fort occurred first, making the order confusing. Moreover, Fort Blakeley is misspelled. Delete. Mdewman6 (talk) 20:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Hulks

The characters have no plural form, so should we retarget to Hulk (disambiguation), soft redirect to wiktionary:hulks, or delete? 176.42.16.148 (talk) 20:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Druggie

For possible deletion, or maybe a redirect to a page which discusses the slur rather than the addiction. Note that this initially redirected to

drug addict GnocchiFan (talk) 20:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Battle of appommatox courthouse

The misspelling combined with the miscapitalization make this not very useful. Delete. Mdewman6 (talk) 20:17, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep "Courthouse" and "Court House" are variant spellings, and it isn't too surprising that someone would type it in lowercase. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 20:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but Appomattox is also misspelled. Mdewman6 (talk) 20:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, didn't catch this. Yeah, delete in this case. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 13:06, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dextette

i thought it was a

peachette deal, but it's not even that. two characters in the gen 3 anime refer to the pokédex as that sometimes maybe probably, and that's as far as it seems to go cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Boulder Badge

that's brock's badge, for context. not notable on its own, aside from how boring it looks, and this probably wouldn't be the right target anyway cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to recommend retargeting to Brock (Pokémon), but it somehow doesn't mention the Boulder Badge by name. Which is exceedingly odd? You'd think that'd be one of the more notable details about the character, the fact that he's a gym leader that gives out the Boulder Badge. The entire article needs a coat of Rock Polish anyways tbh... 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 19:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aku Type

what cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i did some looking, and it's a word in some languages, and could refer to the fire, water, electric, and dark types, given some mental gymnastics, but it's mostly an informal-ish first person pronoun. no idea what basis i think this should be deleted on, but i want this gone cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:23, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pokédex (Sinnoh)

retarget to the list of gen 4 pokémon? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The Sinnoh Pokédex doesn't only include Gen 4 pokémon, but it isn't unlikely that someone would be looking for these specifically when typing it. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 20:22, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Full Pokedex

retarget to the list of pokémon or delete, this ain't the full pokédex cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:58, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget, as that is what a reader would likely expect. ("Full Pokedex" not even having a mention there.) CitationsFreak (talk) 02:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bird Pokémon

not sure if this is referring to bird pokémon (like

the worse corviknight), in which case i'd say retarget to the list of pokémon or delete (more so delete) or to the unused bird type, in which case redirect to missingno without a second or first thought cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

List Of Legendary Pokémon

i'd say retarget to the list of pokémon, even though it's a list of all the pokémon cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:47, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support There isn't even a Legendary Pokémon anchor at the current target, while List of Pokémon does have legendary pokémon indicated. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 20:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weather Legendary Pokémon

i'd say retarget to

kyogre, as it's the first in the weather trio cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Support Retargeting to List of generation III Pokémon#Kyogre shows the whole Weather Trio on the page. Again, current anchor is non-existent. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 20:26, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pokémon Master

is this really the best place to target, as opposed to pokémon masters ex? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:34, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pokémon Crystal Health Items list

not a list of health items (whatever that's supposed to mean), or focused specifically on crystal cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Legendary Pokémon

maybe retarget to the list of pokémon as with

mythical pokémon? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Retarget to match
Mythical Pokémon as per Cogsan. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 18:34, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
just noticed the 4rd one has a minor spelling mistake, should it be deleted? i'd say delete cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:42, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hazeltown

This is not attested anywhere, and its addition to the article was solely referenced to the article's "version history". 1234qwer1234qwer4 12:56, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Just added a {{
    cn}} at the target. The article was titled Hazeltown and mention has been there right from the first edit in 2008 - Keep as long as the mention is there. Jay 💬 13:34, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: any thoughts on keeping the redrect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 18:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete due to lack of attestation; just because something has been there since 2008 doesn't mean it's right. (Of course, just because something cannot be cited doesn't mean it isn't true - but it does mean we should exclude it and the redirect from Wikipedia until we're 100% sure). --GnocchiFan (talk) 20:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Province of Bessarabia

Nonsense redirects. Bessarabia is a region in Eastern Europe. Budjak is a subset of it. Super Ψ Dro 12:44, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 18:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Bessarabia given the ambiguity of several historical provinces being named "Bessarabia". Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 20:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moldavia Province, Ottoman Empire

The

Principality of Moldavia was never a "province" of the Ottoman Empire. It was never a part of the empire. It always remained a separate country with its own laws and administration under vassalage. These redirects are inaccurate and misleading. Also the "Bogdan/Bogdania/Boğdan" redirects are made up original research. Super Ψ Dro 12:27, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

I do not see why should we keep blatantly inaccurate redirects. Moldavia (known in Turkish as Boğdan) was never a formal part of the Ottoman Empire, much less something organized into a province. If anything some parts of Moldavia, fractions, were formally annexed and organized into distinct sanjaks ("provinces") that did not even border each other [11] [12], adding a layer of ambiguity to this issue. That sources with a wide general scope have chosen to use a common word to describe a detail that was clearly not given much attention do not change Moldavia's status in the past. Professional academic sources on the history of Romania will never refer to Moldavia as a "province". Super Ψ Dro 23:37, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you are concerned about the inaccuracy, the redirects can be tagged with {{
Talkback) 03:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
This idea (I do not see why should we keep blatantly inaccurate redirects) seems to come up fairly often. The
telephone game by which we teach editors how Wikipedia works is not good at this kind of subject. So, because a lot of editors don't know, let me say that the point of a redirect is not to be accurate information, but to take readers to accurate information. An incorrect name can make a perfectly fine redirect. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 18:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adelaide–Darwin rail corridor

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy keep

Law of fives

No mention at target, I propose deletion. Veverve (talk) 22:40, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a discordian concept (e.g. [13]), so the redirect should go to Discordianism. Furius (talk) 10:10, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect whose topics are not mentioned at the target do not help the reader at all. Veverve (talk) 11:34, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Okmrman (talk) 03:33, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 18:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, but restore if the secondary sources mentioned above are used to write about the Law of Fives in the main article. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 20:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pronomian

The target article does not mention the word “Pronomian” nor explain what the word means. Bwrs (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This seems to be an R from antonym, given the "Anti-" in the target article is getting swapped for "Pro-", with the implication that the views of "Pronomians" are opposite that of "Antinomians". That said, I'd like to point out that R from Antonym as an rcat is one of those rcats that populates a maintenance category, so we can't just tag as Antonym and keep. (Which is odd to me? If we don't have an article on something, but we have an article on its direct opposite, and we can reasonably and competently explain the first thing as "the complete opposite of this second thing", then that seems to be a good place to have a redirect. Why is this rcat populating a maintenance category?) 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 12:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do we really know for a fact that pronomianism is the opposite of antinomianism, or do we merely assume so based on the fact that “pro-” is the opposite of “anti-”? Now, if I really wanted to rid Wikipedia of these redirects I can tell you that they were made by somebody who is the subject of an
Wikipedia:Office never publishes the reasons for its actions, and I hope that discussing it here might raise the attention of subject matter experts who know what pronomianism actually is. Bwrs (talk) 23:04, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
I think maybe we should redirect to Christian views on the Old Covenant. Antinomianism is usually used to mean a particular deviation from the mainstream Christian view (though we do a bad job of defining it in the article), so I don’t think this is an antonym, just another niche view.— JFHutson (talk) 01:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Although that might be the most appropriate redirection target, it does not define the term either. Nowhere does the string “pronomian” appear in either the current target or in the new proposed target. This is one of my pet peeves, when a word I do not know redirects to an article that does not define this word. Bwrs (talk) 16:23, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be fine with deletion as well, as I doubt the redirect could be helpful to anyone.-- JFHutson (talk) 13:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 18:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Mountain (logo)

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

While the logo might be a mountain, the words "dark" nor "mountain" do not appear anywhere at the target page. We don't have any encyclopedic about a dark mountain logo, which encyclopedic content about a logo seems to be specifically requested through this search term, by including "logo" in the title. With this being tagged as a "related meme without a mention", I'm not too convinced about its plausibility standalone. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:48, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 18:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not specific enough, a description of the logo shouldn't be a redirect target if the logo hasn't actually be called like this. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 20:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: The logo doesn't seem to be referred to as this nor does this seem to be a meme. The mountain in the logo is white anyways. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 21:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Deco

I presume this might have once been [mentioned], but now this concept of Dark Deco is not mentioned at the target. It has minor mentions across Wikipedia in reference to properties such as Batman: The Animated Series (across this and 2 other related pages, Gotham City and Andrea Beaumont), and also at Skullgirls in a quote. As it looks like 75% of all mentions of "Dark Deco" are at Batman pages, perhaps sending this to Batman: The Animated Series is the primary topic? Searching "Dark Deco" externally, 50% of my results are all Batman, with the rest of the topics being neologism hodgepodge across blogs and such. Now that I look into this more, I'm close to believing that "Dark Deco" is a specific Batman-related topic, and one that we cover across multiple Batman pages and basically nowhere else, but I wanted to bring this here as the current target has been fairly longstanding. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:51, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 18:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dream Catching

A film that is not mentioned at the target article. I presume it's about the target, but with no mentions to Mill, the connection is unclear?

Dreamcatching is a similar redirect that currently points to Dreamcatcher, which this is a variation of. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:14, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:53, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 18:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Winged spear

Between Corseque, Spetum, and the fact that this redirect is not mentioned in the current target, it's not clear which subject readers are desiring to locate when searching this term. (However, used to be a section at Polearm#Winged spear, a section which was present in 2012, but was removed at some point that year.) Steel1943 (talk) 17:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I must admit the Bohemian Earspoon is not the most obvious redirect. Winged spears are probably ancestral to the spetum and corseque too. If I were to plump for one, it would probably be spetum. But there is an argument that a separate article or article section on the weapon would ultimately be preferable. Be hard to make it above a start though. Monstrelet (talk) 09:07, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, makes me wonder if the section I linked which existed over a decade ago should be restored, or even used to overwrite the nominated redirect with an article. Steel1943 (talk) 15:37, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Link baiting

Deletion, link baiting differs from clickbait to the degree that the redirect is misleading. Link baiting does not have the deceptive nature of clickbait. [1] Acalc79 (talk) 14:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://books.google.com/books?id=9WE1AQAAQBAJ&pg=PT112&dq=%22linkbaiting%22&hl=&cd=2&source=gbs_api#v=onepage&q=%22linkbaiting%22&f=false
I don't suppose I could ask how you're defining "link baiting?" 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 15:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
apparently, the difference is the target demographic
clickbait is for general #ContentConsumers™ who love consuming content. for examples, uh, open up youtube and go to incognito mode
link bait is for creators, to try to get them to advertise, sponsor, or otherwise promote your slop. for an example, get offered a raidy shady sponsorship i think
so my pedantic ass would say delete unless a section or article on link bait can be made cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The term is ambiguous. Link bait can mean both "clickbait" as well as "content designed to attract incoming links". We have no content to link to for the latter meaning, so there is nothing to do for now. Paradoctor (talk) 20:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Japanator.com

Target article doesn't mention Japanator. Anyone has any idea? Neocorelight (Talk) 01:43, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I actually tried digging around, including the history of the (now community banned) person that created the redirect. Maybe a troll creation? No valid reason can be found, so Delete. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 11:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, not a troll creation. I found this redirect by a link from another article. Neocorelight (Talk) 12:51, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Japanator should be bundled as well, I think? Not a super simple history. It was a sibling-ish site of Destructoid for quite awhile,[14][15] then was merged into Siliconera [16]. And so was part of Enthusiast Gaming (a possible retarget since it's mentioned there) but then Gamurs acquired some sites from Enthusiast (including Siliconera). So I think retarget to Enthusiast Gaming since it's mentioned there, including the transfer to Gamurs, and most of its system was part of that. Gamurs would be a fine (future) retarget if it's expanded. And open to other ideas if people know more (sadly lots of noise from the, hm, particular era that impacted gaming sites). (Pinging Neocorelight and Dennis Brown.) Skynxnex (talk) 16:43, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Skynxnex Please do the bundling. I don't know how to. Neocorelight (Talk) 22:22, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Neocorelight added (I think, oddly this is something I haven't done a ton of). Skynxnex (talk) 22:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you. Neocorelight (Talk) 22:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Gamurs would be an ideal target, but if no one's gonna write a mention of Japanator then I'm fine with retargeting to Enthusiast Gaming. Neocorelight (Talk) 22:46, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think redirecting it to an article with an unsourced single line mention is a good idea. For the redirect to stay, somewhere there needs to be a cite at least demonstrating it existed. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 04:41, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have added one. Neocorelight (Talk) 06:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 17:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is this the way to Aberystwyth


Not mentioned at target. Youtube suggests it's a parody version of the song, but it's not mentioned here, and doesn't look to be widely covered, and thus an implausible search term in my opinion. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sorry,
    WP:TWINKLE notified you by default. I have added the other capitalisation of this too. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:52, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

52nd International Film Festival Rotterdam

Misleading redirect, actually pointing to the 51st edition of the festival. Per

WP:REDLINK a redlink would be more useful, as it would encourage editors to create the page, and not giving them the impression the page already exists. Cavarrone 16:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per Joseph. CitationsFreak (talk) 02:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Romanian concession in Sarandë

Romanian Institute in Albania was originally created under this title. The author, blocked since 2019, appears to have misread the sources he used. Albania granted a Romanian historian property in Sarandë and he established an institute on it and granted half of the land to the Romanian state, but this does not mean a part of Sarandë stopped being a sovereign part of Albania to become part of Romania. The "concession" thing is original research. No sources talk about this using the word "concession" [17]. This is ultimately a hoax. Draft:Romanian concession in Sarandë should be deleted too. Super Ψ Dro 13:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also bundled Draft:Romanian concession in Sarandë and notified of this discussion at the target talk.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 13:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bessel potential space

Sobolev space#Bessel potential spaces seems like a more precise target (though the articles should also ideally link to each other). 1234qwer1234qwer4 12:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Balon D´Or

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 10:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep single character omission typo using English language title case capitalization, thus a plausible typo -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 09:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Balon de Oro

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 10:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

European footballer of the year

No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 10:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yuno Miles

PROD'ed but redirects are ineligible for that process. The original PROD statement was: Redirects to an article that doesn't mention Miles. Appears reasonable to me, this person doesn't seem notable enough to be mentioned in the target article as far as I can tell and I don't immediately see a good alternative target. Pinging original nominator: @Frankoceanreal. Tollens (talk) 07:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appomatox coart house surrender

The double misspelling (both Appomattox and Court) with the miscapitalization on top makes this highly unlikely to be useful. Delete. Mdewman6 (talk) 07:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - unlikely misspelling. Odd that this has been around for 12 years but it doesn't seem to be an {{R from move}} or anything else that we'd usually keep for an odd reason. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bounding Into Comics

The two seem unrelated. --62.166.252.25 (talk) 06:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 22

Climate change in Bahrain

We currently have many "Climate change in country x" titles that redirect to either "Geography of country x" or "Climate of country x". The style guide of WikiProject Climate change describe many aspects that should be in "Climate change in country x" articles that do not belong in articles about the climate or geography of country x. E.g. an article about climate change in a given country is supposed to discuss the greenhouse gas emissions that the country produces and the policies around emissions reductions in the country. The presence of these redirects discourages the creation of more complete articles so I propose that they be deleted. There are many other redirects following the pattern but I am starting with four of them to get community feedback before mass-nominating dozens. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 17:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment
    Nickps (talk) 18:17, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
@Clayoquot: Deleting these redirects might also discourage the creation of more complete articles. Should an article about the climate of a given country not describe the effects of climate change in that country? Jarble (talk) 18:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that "Climate in country x" articles should describe the effects of climate change in that country. These redirects are not necessary to make those expansions happen. What these redirects do is leave no place to talk about the role of the country in causing climate change. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 18:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mild support. If the deletion of the redirects is likely to lead to creations of new CCC articles then I am all for it (CCC = climate change in country X). I've been disappointed myself on a few occasions when I followed a link of "climate change in Country X", only to find that I was being redirected to "Country X#Climate" which then had only minimal info on climate change in that country. EMsmile (talk) 09:26, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Chinese FA Super Cup

The subject never existed to begin with, similar to the 2022 edition in the same compeition.— Preceding unsigned comment added by IDontHaveSkype (talk • contribs) 10:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The redirect was not tagged for RfD, I have now done it.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 16:37, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: Possible search term based on the other yearly versions that exist. There's a brief explanation that the cup for this season was cancelled, which is contextually relevant and useful. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:58, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Sensible redirect, as the main article explains it was cancelled. Also assists with categorisation, which clearly lists the event in the cancelled category. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:52, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deplorable

Another confusing vocabulary word redirect. Not everything that is deplorable is part of Hillary Clinton's "basket of deplorables". We don't have deplore, so maybe a soft redirect to Wiktionary will have to do. Duckmather (talk) 06:47, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Crosswiki to wiktionary per nom Okmrman (talk) 21:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:
  • Delete I'm partial to the stance in the previous discussion that search results are adequate here and there does not need to be a DAB page for partial title matches. However, there are partial title matches so I don't think a soft redirect to Wiktionary is the best option. Though, I'm not really familiar with when it is best to use them. ― Synpath 06:21, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:41, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Combine a {{Wiktionary}} link with a “see also” section as well. Bwrs (talk) 05:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 15:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

📵

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

I'm going to mark this for speedy deletion since there were suggestions in the original deletion discussion to redirect it to Etiquette in technology#Cell phone etiquette, which quickly got put down but someone still redirected it here anyways. I'm just gonna make this discussion to see if the discussion still holds up since it happened all the way back in 2015. Okmrman (talk) 00:40, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment previous discussion: Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 August 6#📵 Okmrman (talk) 00:43, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment At the time of that discussion in August 2015 this was a redirect to Mobile phones and driving safety, the present target was considered but rejected and it closed with a consensus to delete. The present iteration was created in February 2016, but as it has a different target (and things might have changed in 9 years) I've declined a G4 speedy deletion nomination. Thryduulf (talk) 01:32, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget, disambig or write a broad concept article. There should be a disambig or broad concept article about prohibition/restriction and similar of mobile phone use. In addition to the current target, such is discussed (in various contexts) at
    Mobile phones in prisons, Mobile phones on aircraft, Mobile phone use in schools, Mobile phones and driving safety, Radio quiet zone and possibly others. In the absence of such a page, then we should target where the character is mentioned. There are three such pages but No symbol#Unicode and fonts is by far the most helpful. Thryduulf (talk) 01:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Delete since there are so many different ways to interpret this emoji, the majority of readers are going to be disappointed.
    Cremastra (talk) 21:46, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    In what ways other than "no mobile phones" can you interpret this? Thryduulf (talk) 08:25, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Mobile phone#Use. That section has subsections on the prohibition/restriction of mobile phones in various contexts, such as while driving, while walking and in schools. -- Tavix (talk) 22:53, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Given that the main section, and most of the subsections, are about the opposite of "no mobile phones" I think this would be a very confusing target so I don't support this suggestion. Thryduulf (talk) 08:29, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That is a good thing; explaining where mobile phones are allowed is good context for establishing where mobile phones are not allowed. -- Tavix (talk) 17:23, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    If I were to use this redirect I would be looking for information about where, why and/or how mobile phone use is prohibited or restricted, not information about where they aren't. I was confused about why you were suggesting a target that was the opposite of what the symbol means, having already read your rationale for suggesting it. Someone who doesn't have that context will likely be even more confused.
    I intend to draft something better (probably a broad concept page, but I'm not certain yet) but it'll likely be Monday or Tuesday before I get time. Thryduulf (talk) 21:37, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    As I originally explained, the section I recommend does have information about where, why and/or how mobile phone use is prohibited or restricted. That section could be better formatted to suit those needs, as well as include other information and links to eg mobile phones in prison or mobile phones on aircraft. If you feel that section is confusing (I have no idea where you get that sense from), that is where I would suggest your efforts be spent. -- Tavix (talk) 23:51, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The section is not confusing in the context of the article. Arriving at that section when searching 📵 is what is confusing. Rearranging the article to account for one incoming redirect to it would not be an improvement. Thryduulf (talk) 07:50, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've drafted disambig/broad concept article hybrid at Restrictions on mobile phone use, it needs work but it's a better target than anything else we have. Thryduulf (talk) 19:32, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    So you've taken the relevant concepts from Mobile phone#use and turned it into an outline form. To demonstrate that all it takes is a bit of rearranging and adding of sections to make it "less confusing", I present Mobile phone#Restrictions. A separate page is wholly unnecessary. -- Tavix (talk) 00:43, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes (talk / cont) 04:07, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep or redirect to a better target, do not delete. An emoji is a valid search term. Gonnym (talk) 08:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 14:59, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment For context, when the emoji was added as part of Unicode 6.0, its definition is where phones are forbidden. Just like the "no one under 18" emoji means that anyone under 18 is forbidden. That's the best way to interpret the emoji as how it's formally defined from the discussion above. – The Grid (talk) 18:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per the close of
    WP:PAM).
    All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 09:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Sultan Abd-al-Rahman I of the Umayyad Sultanate

Unique for Wikipedia. Not seen in the wild. Unlikely to be typed due to complexity.. Delete. Викидим (talk) 00:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 14:58, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Walter Rhodes (murderer)

Since Walter Rhodes was not convicted of murder, the title of this page is misleading and an injustice. As there are multiple people by this name at Walter Rhodes, I am not sure if this page should simply be deleted or disambiguated differently. Gjs238 (talk) 13:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment the relevant section is incompletely sourced, but currently reads: "Rhodes entered into a plea agreement for a reduced sentence of second degree murder in exchange for his testimony against Tafero and Jacobs.[4] At their trial, he testified that Jacobs fired first from the back seat, then Tafero took the gun from her and shot the two officers.[5] Rhodes later recanted his testimony on three occasions, in 1977, 1979 and 1982, stating that he shot the policemen, but ultimately reverted to his original testimony.[8]...Tafero and Jacobs were convicted of capital murder and were sentenced to death while Rhodes was sentenced to three life terms.
So it appears that he was convicted of murder, though he switched his plea a few times. Am I reading the references incorrectly? Wikishovel (talk) 13:38, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Rhodes was sentenced to three life terms." If that reference is correct, than it would seem that the redirect should remain in place and is accurate. Gjs238 (talk) 16:16, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Added another RS for the three life terms: [18]. Wikishovel (talk) 16:51, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment This seems like a bad modifier altogether. In the past, the article Michael Peterson (criminal) had several issues until we got it moved to a more neutral Michael Peterson trial. As this is a redirect, I don't know what a more neutral modifier would be. – The Grid (talk) 18:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In Category:American murderers there are four redirects and one article disambiguated by "(murderer)", and three by "(criminal)", so there's precedent for both. Wikishovel (talk) 10:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:←

Ambiguous with

Nickps (talk) 12:46, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Donkey Koung 64

implausible misspelling cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:36, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hollywood and the United Kingdom and Ireland

Recently accepted at

WP:R#D2, as the inclusion of Ireland in these redirects (when it isn't mentioned at the target article) could cause confusion. All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 10:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Hollywood and the Republic of Ireland

Recently

WP:REDLINK. All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 10:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Doesn't mention Ireland once. There is no reason why a redirect about Ireland should point to a page about another country. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 22:06, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: as misleading. Republic of Ireland is not the UK. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:06, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A. A. Abbott

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:53, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep and add to target. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 12:50, 31 March 2024 (UTC).[reply]
  • Delete. The name today (according to a quick Google search) is more closely associated with Helen Blenkinsop, for which we don't have an article. While Samuel Spewack also used the name as a pseudonym and would warrant a disambiguating hatnote should an article exist on the primary topic, redirecting as-is is more likely to confuse readers. --Paul_012 (talk) 12:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:55, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Blenkinsop is a recent user of the name (there's also the author of The Bazique-player's Hand-book, and various others). If you are prepared to write an article for her, then great. If not, don't destroy a valid redirect on that basis. (There also some other A. A. Abbotts.) All the best: Rich Farmbrough 22:58, 8 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]
    Also the founder of this town: Kalkaska, Michigan. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 23:25, 8 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]
  • comment would this is better off as a set index? --Lenticel (talk) 09:11, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Mention has not yet been added to the target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:36, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep adding a mention at the target is most appropriate here. Frank Anchor 20:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, and others as ambiguous. I tried to see if I can add a mention to the current target, but did not find sources. The current target is also poorly sourced. Jay 💬 07:03, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Delete or keep?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oorum Unavum

Not mentioned at target. jlwoodwa (talk) 02:54, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:28, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete seems to be a Tamil food show. Probably better off as a
    WP:REDLINK unless someone can build an article with Tamil references --Lenticel (talk) 09:14, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the pre-redirect page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 04:26, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: per nom. Page history didn't seem very useful either. DrowssapSMM 14:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Restore and send to AfD if not notable, was an article for 7 years before being single-handedly blanked by an IP a couple months ago. Utopes (talk / cont) 15:36, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or restore?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lev Trotskij

Delete per

WP:RFD#D8. This appears to be the spelling of Trotsky's name in various North Germanic languages and this spelling isn't used in the article. voorts (talk/contributions) 04:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Easing function

Without a mention of "easing", making this already not a great target, there's also no mention of a "function" at the target either. While the page admittedly talks about an "ease-in" and an "ease-out", this is not necessarily an "easing function" and several other topics deal with "easing" as well. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Easing function is a common term in computer graphics, see [20] [21]. Maybe there's a better redirect target, or a new article is warranted, but this was the best I could find. 11wx (talk) 01:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jackahuahua

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Dog breed redirected at a 2008 AfD, seemingly been unmentioned at the target for over a decade. It's misleading to maintain breed redirect for a dog type that holds zero information on Wikipedia. Utopes (talk / cont) 16:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could go to list of dog crossbreeds but that page doesn't mention it; however, it's only had 3 views in the past 30 days which probably includes me looking at it. I don't think this designer dog breed has much notability. Traumnovelle (talk) 19:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 1, 2003

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

No information about this date at the target page, although contains some further unique history. Unlike Jan 2, this has been to RfD before, and closed as no consensus. Utopes (talk / cont) 16:46, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2, 2003

No information about this date at the target page, although contains some history. Utopes (talk / cont) 16:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kyra Tierney

No discussion of a character called "Kyra Tierney" at the target article. Only mention on Wikipedia is at the disambig page for Tierney linking here, but the presence of a blue link implies we have content about this character, which we do not. Utopes (talk / cont) 16:58, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lean Keep. It seems "Kyra Tierney" is an actual character in the show, so it’s reasonable to expect someone searching the character's name on Wikipedia would be interested in that particular article. Slamforeman (talk) 13:04, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:00, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 French Open – Men's doubles

The events are currently a month away. It is the case of

WP:TOOSOON

All these also redirects towards 2024 French Open#Events

PrinceofPunjabTALK 05:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • @PrinceofPunjab, FYI, this isn't the correct format to use for a multi-RfD. I'll reformat the listing & tag the other redirects for you now. All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 08:07, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Reformatted nomination and tagged all nominated redirects :) ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 08:21, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Even though the sections are currently blank, they are all mentioned in the article. I don't see the harm in going ahead and establishing these redirects. -
    Talkback) 14:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Keep: This doesn't fit the definition of
    WP:CRYSTALBALL, as the events have indeed been confirmed and scheduled. These are useful redirects that can be expanded later on if/when the individual articles are notable enough to standalone. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:56, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

10-year-old Ohio rape victim required to cross state lines to obtain abortion
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Nominating for deletion. The redirect is overly specific and too long and is therefore an unlikely search term. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 19:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Nothing has changed since the discussion closed a year ago last week. Thryduulf (talk) 21:24, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Keep per Thryduulf and
    WP:CHEAP. --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Close I didn't realise that their had already been a previous discussion on this redirect, I was kind of tired when I nominated it and forgot to check. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 10:04, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not mentioned anywhere in the article, but most importantly, not mentioned ANYWHERE on the Internet. If this was a news headline that could be hypothetically copied in, that'd be understandable(??) but still incredibly unlikely to be naturally searched. This is just, bits and pieces of the articles opening sentence and lead, but as a redirect. Restating the prose of the article, but as a redirect, makes these specific 14 words a novel and obscure synonym for the subject, (evidenced from no user on the Internet has said this ever with zero results outside of Wikipedia). It can't even be a synonym, it's a synopsis. It's unsearchable as a string of words that exists nowhere else, and a year later has STILL never been stated anywhere else on the Internet. The alternative redirect being: 10-year-old (the rest of the title) "from Ohio to Indiana" already exists and is the stylization that seemingly headlined in reports. I don't really like that redirect either, but at least the title benefits from existing, and can be copied into the search bar and/or can appear first when users start typing this in, if they happen to start their search with "ten-dash-year-dash-old" exactly. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:13, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Redirects are not the way to promote very tenuous news reporting. See the NPR reporting in some detail on (probably?) this case, [22]. Essentially, we will most likely never get the facts straight (whatever the truth is, due to privacy concerns), so there is nothing of notability here for the article. Redirecting a headline of a single-source new story with no corroboration to our article where for this very reason the story cannot be published does not seem to be useful for anyone. --Викидим (talk) 07:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above Okmrman (talk) 04:56, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - not a plausible search term, largely due to its length. Shocking to me that this was apparently discussed before and it didn't lead to a delete then... Sergecross73 msg me 22:49, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The title is a variation of
    10-year-old rape victim forced to travel from Ohio to Indiana for abortion which I brought up at the previous RfD and suggested bundling. Either both would have been deleted, or neither, and there was support for keeping the latter as an actual headline, the reason I didn't vote the last time, and also because I probably expected the previous RfD to go for a second relist. Jay 💬 08:04, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a novel and very obscure synonym for the subject, deleteable per
WP:SYNTH taken from pieces of the article's synopsis and extended in an unnatural fashion that is more of a Google-search random-selection of details and explanations, also appears nowhere on the entire Internet. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:02, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Let's try this one more time. Keep or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: extremely implausible search term. DrowssapSMM 02:26, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete keeping every potential news headline as a redirect on the very small chance someone may look it up is quite useless and is a
    WP:SYNTH concern. Traumnovelle (talk) 04:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Keep - nobody has made a very convincing argument that this redirect is harmful other than being an "implausible search term", which in fact is not one of the
    WP:SYNTH
    issue or actively confusing don't make sense to me:
    • "10-year-old" - the girl was 10 years old at the time
    • "Ohio" - these events occurred at least partially in Ohio
    • "child rape victim" - the girl is a victim of sexual assault
    • "required to cross state lines to get an abortion" - law prevented her getting an abortion in the state she was in, thus in order to obtain an abortion she was required to travel to another state
None of this is synth: it's all described in the very first sentence of the article, with multiple citations. In the absence of compelling arguments for deletion,
redirects are cheap. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
For the record, while my vote for this redirect is keep as per
WP:COSTLY. There's a reason I didn't. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 18:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Chinatown, Auckland

This redirect was added by an account who also added a Chinatown template to the Balmoral article, this was later reversed. Whilst Balmoral and Dominion Road especially has a large Chinese presence the area is still overwhelmingly European and I've never heard it known as Chinatown. Traumnovelle (talk) 01:17, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Universe (Benee song)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy delete

April 21

Priscilla Sebastian

No mention of "Priscilla" or "Sebastian" at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:59, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Poop On Your Neighbor

Well uh, even with replacement words I wouldn't consider "screw" to be equivalent to "poop on", and it's not like there's a pooping variation at play discussed at the target article, either... Utopes (talk / cont) 22:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pokok

No mention of Pokok at the title, making this a confusing target. What I've found is that this is a word that can be found in various languages, which this usecase seems to be one as well. There is [23] on hu.wiki, [24] on ms.wiki, [25] on en.wikt, but even with just hu and ms wikis, without any mention of a translation it's unclear to readers which definition has a "higher priority" for an

WP:RLANG. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Point of interaction

A "point of interaction component" is not discussed at the target article. Existed as an uncited couple-sentence stub for 14 years before being redirected into the page it was involved with, but is not actually a topic we cover on Wikipedia at this time. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:52, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Plumbus

Undiscussed thing(?) from Rick and Morty not discussed at the target page. A 2016 AfD established that this thing(?) is not inherently notable, but I guess not even notable for inclusion at the target page. Not a useful redirect as an undiscussed concept, especially when it has the potential to steal searchers from OTHER articles (in this case,

plumbous for lead), only to be taken to A: An article they didn't want to go to, and B: An article they're not sure why it exists, as "plumbus" never gets discussed so this doesn't even help the pure "plumbus" searchers either. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete, this is
WP:CRUFT. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 18:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Ploopy

No mention of this term at the target article. I fear the other location this redirect has pointed at isn't much better either. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Kingdom of the Isles

A location from The Riftwar Cycle fictional universe, but not mentioned in article. Should redirect to Kingdom of the Isles, but this redirect has the history of Riftwar. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 18:13, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to Kingdom of the Isles. A hatnote should be sufficient to send readers to other articles about topics with similar names, perhaps a disambiguation page. P Aculeius (talk) 02:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per Aculeius -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 09:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinkblood

No substantial mention of "Pinkblood" anywhere on Wikipedia; is only stated once in a citation on a different article. If this is a possibly notable group, seems to be worthwhile to keep as a red link to encourage article creation. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:59, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perry the Platypus Plumber?

No mention of this singular joke-line from the show at the target. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete, and look through the creator's other redirects, they're also mostly oddly specific phineas and ferb lines cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:38, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peodeiktophilia

Originally created as a redirect to exhibitionism before being retargeted to anasyrma, this term is mentioned at neither of the articles in question and is not something that we have good coverage on at the moment, with the only mention of this word anywhere on Wikipedia being at the List of paraphilias. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:55, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect back to exhibitionism, since this term apparently refers to sexual arousal or gratification arising from exposing one's genitals (some definitions seem to specify male genitals), while anasyrma seems to be primarily a jesting or ritual exposure of genitalia (frequently women's) in a religious context or to ward off evil. As with all nominations dealing with "the term is not mentioned in the target article", it would be a good idea to find somewhere to mention and define it within the article, thereby making renomination less likely. P Aculeius (talk) 13:27, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    "Peo" (from
    Nickps (talk) 14:28, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Penitent tangent

No mention of "penitent" or "tangent" at the target article. This might just be a character based on the edit summary(?) but with zero context at the target article there's no reason for people to think such, as readers are left with no context to this search term. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:51, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: This character only appears briefly in a Halo 2 cutscene with the Gravemind and is never seen again. Not worth a mention on Wikipedia. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:22, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pearland NGC

No mention of "NGC" at the target page; this title has always been a redirect. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:49, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Utopes: Retarget: NGC means "Ninth Grade Center". The article and previous revisions don't mention it, though Pearland Independent School District does. Perhaps the redirect should be retargeted to "Pearland Independent School District"? WhisperToMe (talk) 18:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pawanism

No mention of "Pawanism" at the target page. 7 years ago, it was said that "Pawanism isn't notable on its own, but should be discussed on Pawan Kalyan" in an edit summary. However, it is not. There are multiple people named Pawan on Wikipedia; "Pawanism" is too vague in its current state. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:47, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Parade (Jake Miller song)

No mention of this song at the target page, nor is there one at the more expectedly Jake Miller discography listing. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:46, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Panther Memorial Stadium, McBee

No longer mentioned at the target after a 2012 merge/redirect AfD closure. A high school's stadium does not need to be a redirect to the school if the stadium has no discussion at the target page, although the history may need to be dealt with. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:44, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

P-hunting

The article in question does not discuss the "hunting" aspect. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:35, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:→

Ambiguous with

Nickps (talk) 14:29, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Though I've recommended disambiguate I'd be happy to see this just redirect to AES as that is probably more likely given people see that in the history. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the talk of the proposed target Help pages.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 13:50, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bioterrorism Security Assessment Alliance

Non-existing now at List of Resident Evil characters since they are not characters but a minor company. 🥒Greenish Pickle!🥒 (🔔) 10:30, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Special Tactics and Rescue Service

Non-existing now at List of Resident Evil characters since they are not characters but a minor company. 🥒Greenish Pickle!🥒 (🔔) 10:27, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nizzotch

No edit summary or rcats, confusing why this exists and had to look for myself. Apparently a nickname, although not mentioned at target and not visibly useful. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This is a corruption of Persson's usual alias of "Notch". —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 15:02, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - This is the name of Persson's (I believe now unused) Youtube channel. – dudhhr talkcontribssheher 17:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Har har

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Raja Mahendra

This redirect is to a section of the article that no longer exists. The section was added by a now-blocked sockpuppeteer, and the redirect was also provided by the sockpuppeteer. The section no longer exists, so the redirect is useless. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spray paint

Keep Closed discussion, see
WP:RM
.

First Battle of Siversk

Delete.

Battle of Siversk was merged on the basis that there was no substantial event that would be identified by the article title (see Talk:Battle of Siversk#Merge proposal). First Battle of Siversk was created on the premise that there soon would be a "second battle". However, if there were to be a battle for this town, either now or in the future, it would not be known as either the "first" or the "second" battles. Cinderella157 (talk) 03:30, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Creek Massacre

Terrible redirect, there were numerous Foo Creek massacres, such as Indian Creek massacre, Myall Creek massacre, Waterloo Creek massacre, and on and on. Delete. Mdewman6 (talk) 02:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Mixed feelings, a Google search suggests that the Sand Creek massacre is by far the most common topic for the phrase, though it is never referred to without the "Sand. Perhaps Dabify? Rusalkii (talk) 02:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It would only make sense to have a primary redirect or a dab page if it (or any of the others) were referred to by simply "Creek massacre". I don't believe there is evidence for that. We shouldn't have dab pages for phrases that are only partial title matches, as
WP:PTMs should not be included on disambiguation pages. Mdewman6 (talk) 03:18, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
The closest I can find on that front is the Fort Mims massacre. -- Tavix (talk) 21:07, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Games

The Summer Olympics are not known simply as "Games". See also Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 January 3#2022 Games. Mia Mahey (talk) 02:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: I'll note, they are in many occasions, such as [26] [27] [28], none of which use the "summer" qualifier but do refer to the 2024 as Games. These aren't the Winter Olympics. There's the colloquial Olympics, and the Winter Olympics. The word "summer" is often dropped on most occasions when discussing the Olympics that take place in the summer, so I wouldn't consider the winter games to be on the same level.
    2014 Winter Games as expected. These were created through AfC so I don't have a strong attachment, but if you have any alternate titles that have a higher significant usage of "2020 Games" that could be useful to note. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
disambiguate, or retarget to 2020 in slop, since it ignores the winter olympics and those other things people refer to almost exclusively as "games"
would suggest "2020 summer games", but that also seems to refer mostly to games released in the summer of 2020 cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 14:39, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong disagree on the summer games part, 2020 Summer Olympics has 50x more views than 2020 in games. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 20

Royal tart

Should delete as to

WP:FANCRUFT. BaduFerreira (talk) 17:19, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Finite dimensional Hilbert spaces

The current target may be too technical for the search term. Alternatives could be Hilbert space or Euclidean space (or Euclidean space#Technical definition). Also note that the singular Finite dimensional Hilbert space, or the more correct hyphenations Finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces/Finite-dimensional Hilbert space do not currently exist. 1234qwer1234qwer4 18:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pluri-

Pluri indeed means plural, but the current target is about grammatical person, and this prefix is used in other contexts (eg.

plurisexual, etc.) and it's not mentioned in the target page either. It could be dabified in line with multi. --MikutoH talk! 22:46, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Cocklass

Unlikely misspelling, and web search only shows a bunch of unrelated results. 1234qwer1234qwer4 21:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. might as well mark it up for speedy delete since it's such an implausible error Okmrman (talk) 22:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
delete per nom (it's pronounced in such a way that the k wouldn't make sense), and don't retarget it to futanari either, they're completely different things cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 11:17, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Six word story

Sure it's the first six-word story but I don't think that when people refer to six word stories, they specifically refer to this one. Maybe retarget to flash fiction or Six-Word Memoirs. Okmrman (talk) 20:09, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jake the Jailbird

Not mentioned in the target article, leaving the connection between the redirect and the target article unclear. Steel1943 (talk) 18:04, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Mr. Monopoly#History, which mentions the name-- In the book, all of the characters that appear on the Monopoly board or within the decks of cards received a name. Uncle Pennybags' full name was given as Milburn Pennybags, the character "In Jail" is named "Jake, the Jailbird", and the police officer on Go to Jail is named "Officer Mallory". 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 22:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 20:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of deputy chief ministers of Puducherry

no such role exists or has existed -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 20:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Animals (2023 film)

Should be retargeted to Animal (disambiguation)#Films, like Animal (film) currently, or be deleted. Per the above DAB there are two 2023 films called "Animal", so targeting one specifically is inappropriate. Additionally, neither (including the Indian film) seems to actually be called "Animals". Toadspike (talk) 16:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Animal (disambiguation)#Films - this seems plausible enough a typo that a redirect to the dab doesn't seem too out there. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 16:48, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as confusing, while plural and singular are often interchangeable "Animals" doesn't appear in either of the 2023 films named "Animal". Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:34, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 20:06, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to
    WP:XY
    .
108.21.221.8 (talk) 12:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. There is no 2023 film entitled "Animals". Mdewman6 (talk) 04:03, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Multistorey

pretty sure multistorey can refer to any building with multiple floors and not just car parks Okmrman (talk) 20:04, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to Building for consistency with Multi-story. Not mentioned at target, but I can't imagine there's a more reasonable target. --NYKevin 04:03, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Welp, I was wrong. Storey, as suggested by Nyttend, is obviously a better target. --NYKevin 22:18, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to storey which explains the concept better than building. Multi-story can be retargeted there too. Nyttend (talk) 20:56, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unuk

Also Unuk River. 1234qwer1234qwer4 18:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Disambiguate. Rivers are forever. --Викидим (talk) 19:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dabify per above --Lenticel (talk) 00:39, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • What is there to even discuss? :) the only question I have in these cases is whether to execute the disambiguation by editing the redirect and replacing the formatting inline, or by first doing a move of the redirect to
    WP:BUILDTHEWEB). --Joy (talk) 12:33, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Dabify per above. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 22:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

W2000

The first result I get when google searching is Walther WA 2000. There is also Hercules W-2000. Okmrman (talk) 16:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Hercules W-2000 as the most likely target, with a seealso link at top to Walther WA 2000. "W2000" to refer to the OS isn't really a thing to my knowledge. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 17:34, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate No evidence that either the software, the gun, or the motorcycle is the primary topic. -
    Talkback) 04:28, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Flexes

Someone that performs a Flex, or perhaps are flexing (and/or doing the flexing (dance) all the while), can be said to be someone who "flexes". Flexion does not seem to be the only use for this term. Wiktionary or disambiguation might also be suitable here? Utopes (talk / cont) 23:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 07:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget per ip Okmrman (talk) 19:12, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My, my, this here Anakin guy

No mention of this lyric at the target page. Anakin never mentioned, people searching for this lyric instead of the title of the song are left without the context that was sought. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - "The Saga Begins" is
Weird Al Yankovich's parody of "American Pie", with this lyric being the first bar of the chorus. It's a plausible search term given the name of the song never appears in the lyrics at all, to my knowledge. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 03:47, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 07:44, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Most songs have lots of lines, so each one provides near-unlimited possibilities to create redirects. It is not up to us to judge which ones are memorable, unless this is stated in the text of article itself, with sources. --Викидим (talk) 19:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Many people may search for a song even if they don't know its title. In this case, the title isn't mentioned in the lyrics, so that's more plausible. The first line of the chorus is a very likely way to search for it. I believe that this can be useful even if the number of pageviews is low, because when people type it in the search bar, The Saga Begins will appear and they will likely click on that. Kk.urban (talk) 22:56, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above. This is a plausible {{
    Talkback) 15:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The One Piece is real!

Retarget either to Dark Fantasy (song)#Legacy or Patrick Fabian#Personal life as those sections both mention the subject, but the article it is redirecting to does not. 108.21.221.8 (talk) 23:59, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I would like to state that the redirect is in fact a quote by the fictional character
Whitebeard, which are his final words. This quote confirms that the One Piece (the treasure that the main character, Monkey D. Luffy, is looking for, and the namesake of the entire manga) exists. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 Stupid stuff I did 08:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Retarget to
Dark Fantasy#Legacy or something along those lines) may be an option, although I can't make the same recommendation for Patrick Fabian-- someone looking for information on the meme itself probably wouldn't be looking for a random celebrity who was asked to read off multiple internet memes, only one of which was the One Piece meme. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 12:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the talk pages of the current and proposed targets.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 07:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Garv Sangwan

Not mentioned at target. jlwoodwa (talk) 02:26, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:31, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • This was originally an article with two inline citations.
    WP:RFD#DELETE. Since there's more than just the redirect in the page history, I wonder whether we should be considering whether the subject is notable per Wikipedia:Notability (sports), rather than just whether we want it to be redirected to this page. WhatamIdoing (talk) 07:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For further opinion on the pre-redirect page history.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 06:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Amc interview with the vampire

Redirects are not the same thing as search engines, this version seems unlikely to be directly linked. Mason (talk) 03:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:58, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per #8 because "Amc interview with the vampire" verbatim is not found in the article. TarnishedPathtalk 13:26, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more go.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 06:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep The capitalization is poor but it seems like a plausible search term.★Trekker (talk) 02:18, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rajnibala

The redirect is for non-notable character not listed in the target article. The Google search returns many more relevant results that can be notable. Delete to avoid confusion. Alternatively, within Wikipedia, a plausible possible redirect is Saglikade Bombabomb where Rajnibala is a character. Викидим (talk) 05:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For an opinion on the pre-redirect page history.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 06:30, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Dwayne

This was speedy deleted as R3 claiming No mention of a Tim Dwayne in target article. Since the redirect was created in 2010 R3 doesn't apply, so I've undeleted and am sending to RfD. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:51, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete for being an extremely unlikely typo/misnomer. 108.21.221.8 (talk) 14:00, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tape worm

Retarget to

tapeworm redirects there. 108.21.221.8 (talk) 01:26, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Retarget to Eucestoda. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 Stupid stuff I did 07:35, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 19

Turkish bath

The target of this redirect should likely be reconsidered. The most helpful solution may to turn this into a DAB, merging with Turkish Bath (disambiguation). Reason: The term "Turkish bath" in a Western context is fairly generic and might also denote other types of

Victorian Turkish bath
article now exists. Other articles might also be relevant to link. Note: This came out of a discussion at Talk:Turkish Bath (disambiguation) between myself and Ishpoloni. Feel free to read there for more context & explanation. R Prazeres (talk) 00:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget: I don't know the correct Wiki terminology to use, but searchers from different communities seeking information on so-called 'Turkish baths' (which no longer appears as an article) could equally be looking for Hammam or Victorian Turkish baths and some type of 'See:' reference should offer these two clear redirecting link options.

Hammam is neither primary nor secondary. Hammam and Victorian Turkish baths only have in common that they are baths, and are both derived from the ancient Roman thermae. Victorian Turkish baths are not steam baths. Nor are they really, as the Hammam article states, "A variation on the Muslim bathhouse"—which is why in France and Germany they are called Roman-Irish baths.

The only guiding principle here should be: 'Save the time of the reader' Ranganathan's 4th law. Ishpoloni (talk) 13:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On Wikipedia, we follow our own
hatnotes to the appropriate disambiguation pages. voorts (talk/contributions) 17:39, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Penny station

Unlikely a flag stop is the primary topic for this generic term. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Not only is this the primary topic according to my research, it's the the only notable topic with this exact name - the only other thing that might be notable (but I'm not convinced it actually is) is called Copper Penny Station and there is no content about that on en.wp anyway. Additionally, this redirect is the result of a BLAR so it should be taken to AfD if you want it deleted, but as previous AfDs for Canadian flag stops resulted in a consensus to redirect we'd likely be back here anyway. Thryduulf (talk) 09:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of minor characters in MÄR

The target contains no such list. Both of these have prior article history but Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of MÄR characters establishes sufficient agreement from AfD that there's no need to restore. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Given that nobody has imported any information in the spirit of
WP:PRESERVE, perhaps that can be done by somebody if they can provide an attribute to it while also suggesting it to the other MÄR articles as I had suggested in the AFD that was mentioned. Any objections? Rtkat3 (talk) 02:27, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Nanashi (MÄR)

Separating this out from the below because there is an episode of the manga titled just "Nanashi" so this could justifiably be thought of as a redirect for that. But really people typing this are likely to be looking for the character, on whom there's not enough substance to warrant a redirect. Has prior history but Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of MÄR characters establishes sufficient agreement from AfD that there's no need to restore. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Various MAR characters

Not mentioned at target at all. Most of these have prior article history but Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of MÄR characters establishes sufficient agreement from AfD that there's no need to restore. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Various MAR characters (2)

Discussed at target ones or twice in passing but without enough substance to warrant a redirect. Most of these have prior article history but Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of MÄR characters establishes sufficient agreement from AfD that there's no need to restore. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

El Loco (wrestler)

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

El Loco (Los de Abajo song)

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Na Sé Contaethe

Not a plausible search term. Also not mentioned in target (I tried ctrl+f/F3) JuniperChill (talk) 21:58, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Epic Fail Guy

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While I'm the creator, I'm not the "originator". I created it per a
Anonymous is a bit more noteworthy since 2009, I am surprised there is no mention at that article, as while EFG isnt notable in itself as a 4chan meme (there are loads of them) it is relevant to the Anonymous group. Only in death does duty end (talk) 10:46, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
      Created. Why couldn't you do it? Is there some blacklist that prevented you? Nyttend (talk) 22:06, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
        I didn't happen to notice what exactly was precluding its creation, but without the admin flag it definitely wasn't happening. CMBJ 04:34, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

(Probably the issue was "Epic Fail", which I can imagine being common in attack pages, and very uncommon in good-faith use.) User:CMBJ hasn't edited in nearly a year, so you're not likely to get any further explanation from him. Nyttend (talk) 12:39, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
You're right about the issue: "Epic Fail" is on the title blacklist for pretty much the reason you suspected. I didn't notify you of this discussion since I could see that, and I didn't notify CMBJ either since it's my practice not to notify long-gone users. None of this is relevant now, though. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:13, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for making me think I had gone back in time before I had my morning cup of tea though (I had a notification from the cut'n'paste)... I was briefly happy to think Trump was all a dream. Only in death does duty end (talk) 08:31, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pppery, no worries; I don't mind not being notified. I knew there was a chance you'd found this already, but I wanted to provide it in case you hadn't, and I knew that other RFD participants would benefit. Nyttend (talk) 20:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ELLIS, DICK

No affinity for ALL CAPS. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. It's common for encyclopedias and other reference works to begin an entry with the title in all caps. This page on another wiki cites Ellis' article in the Dictionary of British Intelligence, and the article apparently uses ELLIS, DICK rather than Ellis, Dick or Dick Ellis. Maybe you'll try this version if you've not used Wikipedia much (or if it's been a while), or you may copy/paste it into Wikipedia from somewhere else that uses the all-caps. Nyttend (talk) 12:46, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eclipse.org

Probably Eclipse Foundation is a more precise target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 21:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy yes, change it. Perhaps back in 2005 this could have required some discussion regarding whether the foundation or their flagship software suite was a more appropriate redirect, but today the website in question is clearly about the Eclipse Foundation, which administers hundreds of projects other than just Eclipse (software), so changing the redirect is clearly appropriate. Besides which, there are only two inbound links to this redirect, so the change is not a big deal. Also only one of those needs fixing for the change, and I've fixed it already. I appreciate that you took the time to put this up for discussion before changing the redirect, but I don't think it was strictly necessary. (I created the original redirect) —Pengo 05:22, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Qwik Crisp

Not mentioned at target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 20:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navy League of Great Britain

Retarget to Sea Cadets (United Kingdom). Current target does not mention the term "Navy League", which seems to apply to the Sea Cadets organization prior to merging with the Marine Society. Hoof Hearted (talk) 19:52, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Re-redirect - this is a simple and logical change, so I'm not sure why this is a RfD instead of
    [OMT] 20:04, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

H***** S***

Unlikely search terms and it's unclear how they should relate to the target. These redirects don't even use the proper number of asterisks to replace the letters. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete as implausible censorship of things not worth censoring (even as a joke, there are other burgerland states more worth censoring), create h******** s***, and delete that too cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The term H******** S*** appears in the title of a YouTube video by Tom Scott. Mia Mahey (talk) 00:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 01:41, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hekt

Not mentioned at the target. External searches don't pull up anything related to this scale, although it appears to be an alternative name for Heqet, says Google. However, it does not appear at Heqet (our page on Wikipedia uses "Heket", but Google's definitely uses "Hekt"). In any case, "Hekt" is short enough to have a surplus of other mentions on Wikipedia as a word, appearing across the board in terms of viability as a redirect. Also sometimes short for "Hektor" and several others. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 17:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

جمادى الآخر أو جمادى الثان

Unlikely search term. MSMST1543 (talk) 16:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 17:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete; if it were merely a typo we'd delete it (don't need redirects for foreign-language typos), and "X or Y" in a foreign language seems even less plausible than a typo by itself. Nyttend (talk) 20:51, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saint John High School Fencing Club

Unnecessary redirect, clubs of specific schools would typically not be made into an article (or redirect for that matter) unless it is notable. This is the only redirect to High school fencing aside from a different capitalization redirect. B3251 (talk) 16:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppa Hitler Style

The target section discusses the "Hitler reacts" Downfall/Untergang memes generally, but not specific ones, and I don't think it really needs to. Thus, I'm skeptical of redirecting the names of specific parodies. --BDD (talk) 15:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:LITTLEORPHAN

While seemingly in reference to the pronunciation of "ANI" as being for "(Little orphan) Annie", I fully thought a shortcut with this name would have been in reference to

orphaned pages on Wikipedia. Anyone familiar enough with the WP culture of "ANI sounds like Annie therefore Little Orphan is a functional redirect", and can solve those literary gymnastics on the dime, would also be familiar enough to use one of the several other more-convenient avenues of reaching this noticeboard. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 12:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per
    WP:XY as it's a plausible shortcut for both Wikipedia:Orphan and Wikipedia:Stub (as in, a "little orphan") but isn't a useful redirect to ANI. Don't disambiguate: the "humorous" elements of Wikipedia are a walled garden for good reason. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

I'm sorry Dave
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

We have successfully kicked the can down the road with this one. Months later, no mention of this quotation from the movie. If it's as important as claimed, it would either A: have its own article, B: be covered SOMEwhere, or C: be a red link to encourage content creation wherever it makes sense to do so. As it stands, A and B are off the table (or at least not yet done), and with nothing on Wikipedia about this quote, this is still not a helpful redirect. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

La, la

Retarget to La La, where La la and the lowercase la la also target. This was supposedly the title of an unreleased Madonna song (but the title is incorrect, and the song is actually called "Pala Tute"). Regardless, it's still ambiguous with other "La la" titles and should target the dab instead. CycloneYoris talk! 04:27, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was up above it

No mention of this lyric at the target. People that search for this lyric do not receive any pertinent content, especially when it's easy enough to find the name of the actual song. Wikipedia is not a lyric compendium. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I See You (Kap G song)

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

I just farted

Proud of you for saying something so bold, but this is not a useful redirect in its current form. Used to target 9gag, not mentioned there either. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:57, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have a bad feeling about this
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

A quote not mentioned at the target article. It was suggested at a past RfD that this is a significant quote that people have wrote about externally. Great! It should remain as a red link to encourage article creation, or cited in the page if viable. In the meantime, for the last X years we have had zero content about this quote, so there doesn't need to be a redirect if we don't have anything further to say besides "it exists". People who make the conscious decision to type this instead of "Star Wars" are looking for something related to this, and we don't have it. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I Beheld His Glory

A TV episode for a program not on Wikipedia, and not discussed at the hosting show article either. Not currently a helpful redirect for people interested in this topic, as it would otherwise not exist for people that read the target. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hubert’s Lemonade

Neither "Hubert" nor, surprisingly, "Lemonade" comes up at the target article. Seems to be a brand of lemonade owned by Coca-Cola, but targeting this specific brand to the overarching company is not useful for people looking for Hubert's Lemonade. If people wanted to read about the Coca Cola company instead, they'd just search for the Coca Cola company directly. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Horse News

This redirect survived CSD through a charitable BLAR. Not mentioned at the target, not likely to be mentioned at the target. Not a useful redirect in the page's current form. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This was/is a site run by 4chan's /mlp/ board as an alternative to Equestria Daily. Break that down-- this is a fansite run by a subsection of the MLP fandom because the main, more-notable site used by the rest of the fandom didn't conform to that subsection's views (because... it's 4chan.) I challenge ANYONE to find a credible secondary source for this, which would be required to mention it on any of the possible non-mention targets of My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic fandom, Equestria Daily, or 4chan#/mlp/. Send it to the moon. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 10:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

King Karlomann

This misspelling is unique to Wikipedia, Google does not know about it. Delete. Викидим (talk) 00:14, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete two errors so unlikely misspelling --Lenticel (talk) 00:20, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above as an unlikely search term. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 13:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Carloman, a disambiguation page listing the many kings of the Franks known by the same name. The Franks spoke a Germanic language in which the kings were called Karlmann, and it's also written in Latin as Karlomanus; Karlomann is a plausible misspelling of both. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 03:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep.
    Karlomann also redirects to this target, which has "Karlomann" bolded in the very first sentence. It's not an error, apparently not a misspelling (either likely or unlikely), and not unique to Wikipedia. No objection to retargeting to Carloman if others think that's better than the current target. It has three Kings Karlomann and four non-Kings Karlomann, if that matters at all. Nyttend (talk) 12:51, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Hold On To This

No song with this name appears at the target page, NOR does it appear at Jake Miller discography either, although a "Hold On" does appear at the discography... Without a disambiguator here though this is already a fairly vague term. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hitler Reacts (Internet meme)

The word "react" does not appear in any form at the target article, nor are Hitler's reactions ever alluded to. Does not seem helpful as effectively an "R from unmentioned, related meme term to Internet section" Utopes (talk / cont) 03:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Highnoon

R from merge that does not seem to be mentioned at the target any longer. Confusable with High Noon as is, but as an R from merge perhaps there's a deeper noteworthy-ness of the missing space... Utopes (talk / cont) 03:43, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heaven’s Gate (AJ Mitchell song)

No song with either of these names is discussed at the target article; nothing present for people searching for this song, only to be given a page with zero relevant information. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:37, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HDIV

Apparently HDIV is now a part of Datadog. However, this framework is never mentioned anywhere at the target article. This undone PROD seems to be either suited for a standalone article (hard as there were no references previously), or no article at all. The status quo of retargeting this to the parent of Datadog does not seem helpful for people searching for this term to find out what HDIV means perhaps, and not having any content at the target to answer these questions. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heavytread

No mention of a heavytread, and could seemingly be confused with other treads. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heartbroken (Hrvy song)

No mention of a song called "Heartbroken" at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Harmonious Claptrap

No mention of a harmonious claptrap at the target, creator blocked for disruptive editing. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:58, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://heavy.com/entertainment/2019/11/dan-harmon-harmonious-vanity-card-new/
Only marginally useful proof I could find about this, might not be substantial enough to ensure the redirect's existence. MimirIsSmart (talk) 09:23, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Halo 1 pistol

According to the halo wiki, there are "many different pistols used in the Halo universe". I don't think this is a useful search term, zero evidence that "Halo 1 pistol" is an alternate name for this pistol even if used by Master Chief. Wikipedia is not a search engine to figure out "what's the name of the pistol that Master Chief uses in Halo 1". Not a great precedent for titles, i.e. based on

MOS:POPCULT, and franchises that reference a real model of pistol. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Half-holing

No mention of "half" or "holing" at the target article. Through my own experience I'm fairly sure this is meant to indicate "putting your finger over half of a hole on a wind instrument", but the fact of the matter is that this technique doesn't come up at the target, so people who look this up will not be given the content they were seeking with this search term. Wanting to learn about fingering as a whole, they'd just search for the base article without having to use this particular terminology. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:52, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Halahel

Not mentioned at target. Was a remnant of an R2 that was retarget to avoid deletion, after the base page was moved (and later eventually deleted) at Draft:Halahel. Not useful without any context as to what Halahel is. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OperaMail.com

Neither Opera mail nor "OperaMail" are mentioned at the target, much less its supposed .com domain. This domain currently exists on the web as a redirect to opera dot com, and as for Wikipedia, without a mention of operamail this does not seem to be the most helpful currently. (Even if it's a mail site that was acquired by Opera from 2010 to 2013. Notably, this redirect was created in 2011 when the "opera" description was accurate, but Fastmail became independent again very shortly after and has been so for the last decade.) Utopes (talk / cont) 01:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open Floor

No information about "Open Floor" at the target, which is noted in the edit history as being an "entirely different school than 5Rhythms". Was blanked for a moment in 2021, but was restored as a redirect due to no content being added. In any case, this title is ambiguous with

Open floor plan which is a redirect to the article of Open plan, who's content is directly pertinent to open floors. Utopes (talk / cont
) 01:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC) Open Floor is a style of modern dance, as is 5Rhythms. The two are not the same so the redirect (from a dance point of view) should go to Modern dance, with a brief mention of the approach to be added there. Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open Access Directory

No mention of anything being "open access", or a "directory" at the target page. Currently, this redirect is not helpful as people who might be looking for this directory are instead taken to information about the university instead of information about the directory that they specified. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Most of the incoming links are not related to the university, suggesting there is an opportunity to create a new article here. -
    Talkback) 02:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

One World (imprint)

No mention of this imprint at the target article, anyone specifying this would not receive any content about their search term. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. There's no mention of the term at the target article, which is why {{
    WP:RKEEP #5. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 01:41, 19 April 2024 (UTC) (See new comment below. 01:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC))[reply
    ]
There's 7 mainspace links sans the dab page, only in refs and infoboxes. Why couldn't these be replaced with piped links instead? Seven isn't several unless one is David Jelinsky, so it shouldn't be too bad to replace, and doesn't seem to be the end-all-be-all for keeping or deleting. For anyone that actually is searching for the imprint specifically, we have nothing for, so the existence of links can be avoided by linking to the main Random House article, allowing to prioritize useful redirects that are able to actually provide aid to readers. (There also might be a discrepancy with Oneworld Publications, but the link is unclear to me. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:14, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Using a piped link such as [[Random House|One World]] would provide no more information to the reader than linking via the redirect. {{R to article without mention}} is currently used on hundreds of pages besides this one. I just don't see the harm in such a redirect, and it's useful for linking. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 12:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There's no need to prioritize any redirect, since
redirects are cheap. The existence of this one doesn't prevent the creation of any other, or searching via different keywords. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 01:07, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
And not to be pedantic, but several actually means "more than two but not many". So you are effectively saying there are many incoming mainspace links, which bolsters the "keep" argument. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 01:12, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just added an entry under Penguin Random House#Random House Publishing Group, so I think the best course now is to retarget to that page and section. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 01:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Odiogo

Redirected to the history of podcasting after an AfD, because there was no sourced content worth merging. However, it doesn't appear at the target any longer, if it appeared to begin with if the merge idea fell through. Does not seem to be a useful redirect in the target's current form. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:18, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep/add mention to target. The site isn't mentioned at the target article because an editor disregarded the outcome of the
    WP:BLARed the article instead of merging it properly. - Eureka Lott 22:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Nutrient Recovery and Reuse

No mention of "Nutrient" at the target page. Was created as a redirect without mention at the target. Afterward, the creator proceeded to link this term in the See Also sections of high profile pages that had very stringent connections to the "Recovery and Reuse of Nutrients". Seems to be an effort to establish notoriety to this term, which appears nowhere on Wikipedia in an academic context, sans the randomly piped See Also mentions. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nonstop Sampler

No mention of Nonstop Sampler at the target discography, does not seem to be a likely search term without any content pertinent to it. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-crypto Public Chain

No mentions of "non-crypto" or "public chain" appear at the target page for Blockchain. It's worth noting that the creator of this article-ish was blocked for

WP:UPE later that year (2022). Utopes (talk / cont) 00:58, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

"one word: decentralized personal server. take back your data"
delete per "what does that even mean?". the "article" was moved from draftspace with what seems to be no evidence of ever being accepted, and consisted almost solely of incomprehensible cryptobro jargon. not actually entirely sure that last part is a valid basis cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I... uh. If you want a personal server, just... buy... a server...???? No blockchain necessary?????? 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 19:34, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
that's part of the joke from the line's source. "decentralized personal server" isn't one word, doesn't actually mean anything, and sure as hell doesn't need to involve biocurrency i mean cryptocurrency
with that in mind, i guess retargeting it to server would be technically a bit less wrong, but still not correct enough to avoid deletion cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:07, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nine to Noon

Neither nine nor noon are noted near this novella. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Programme schedule added, including Nine to Noon. Paora (talk) 21:52, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nights' Science

Similarly, not even "science" appears at the target article, and Nights has been established to not as well. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nights (program)

No mention of a program called "Nights" at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Programme schedule added, including Nights. Paora (talk) 21:52, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NetApp FlexVol

This page came into existence as 300 bytes of unreferenced product description which was BLAR'd within a handful of minutes. "FlexVol" does not appear at the topic, and people specifying this product will receive no information about the subject. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neohapantotype

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Neb-er-tcher

Apparently a god in Egyptian mythology, however this god is not ever described at the Osiris article, and bears no mention. People who search this term are left confused as to the correlation between this god and Osiris. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:41, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. This redirect seems to be an error on the part of the creator (
    Geraldine Pinch
    (2002), Egyptian Mythology).
The redirect obviously should not lead to Osiris, who isn't directly related to this deity. Nor should it be retargeted to Atum, because nobody refers to him by this obsolete transcription of his epithet. (Note the pageviews.) A. Parrot (talk) 05:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Atum per A. Parrot's finding. A published work in Modern English refers to this god with this spelling of this name; that's all we need. Someone could read that page and decide to search Wikipedia for it. Obviously it's not going to be any problem for other aspects of redirects (causes confusion, ambiguous, etc.), and implausibility is not a factor if we can prove that it's been used like this. Nyttend (talk) 12:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 18

Favorability

I just created it but I'm not sure anymore. I noticed

willingness could mean the same. Or should it be targeted to Wiktionary? --MikutoH talk! 23:38, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Could perhaps Dabify? 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 23:45, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The personality trait of agreeableness has very little to do with the transient state of being favorable about something. Jcbutler (talk) 17:31, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm now wondering if Attitude (psychology) would be appropriate, because attitude can be defined as some level of favorability or unfavorability. Jcbutler (talk) 23:47, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Let's get some !votes in here. If you're proposing to disambiguate, please mention which pages might be listed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:27, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:07, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - I think the most common reason someone would search for this is to find what a "Favorability rating" is, in the context of
    WP:REDLINK would be best? I'm not sure! Fieari (talk) 23:37, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Retarget to wikt:favorability. Redirects are cheap and making it a soft redirect makes it much more helpful than having the reader stare at a bunch of search results. Also, both Google and DuckDuckGo mostly bring up dicdefs, so I don't think it'd hurt if we had another. Duckmather (talk) 16:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as a generic term incapable of disambiguation. The sole incoming link meaning of sex-favorable may be created as a different titled redirect, if needed. Jay 💬 14:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 22:37, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I kind of feel like we should have an article on the concept of favorability of opinion at this title. Polling for favorability is not always reserved for politicians. BD2412 T 00:28, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gribbly

No mention of "grib" at the target article, much less a something or someone that's "gribbly". Alternatives include

Grunger, which is where it used to point back in 2005). These 2005 redirects are... surely something, lol. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 22:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gorbino's Quest

A fictional element and/or creative work that is not mentioned at the target. "Gorbino" does not appear at the target, nor does "Gorbino" appear anywhere on Wikipedia. Much less their quest appearing anywhere on Wikipedia; no quest is ever alluded to at the target page either. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:41, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • gorbino's quest is a fictional game and recurring... "thing" there, and probably maybe the setting of one of the levels
this is just like gorbino's quest. this is the gorbino's quest of redirects i'd keep if a mention can reasonably be made (probably in the plot section), or weak delete otherwise cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:51, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 22:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

General OneFile

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Gender and authoritarianism

Used to target a section, since removed. The article does not talk about gender, and is a

WP:XY situation as it stands. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 22:32, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Communist Party of Nepal—Maoist

Apparently this specific political party's formal name at one point in the past included the em dash. Since readers are unlikely to be familiar with the way Nepalese political parties copy each other's names with minor pertubations this should be retargeted to the dab at Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist). * Pppery * it has begun... 20:19, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as is It is not a good idea to link to disambiguation pages at all. The Banner talk 20:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hmm?? Inline links to disambig pages from article space are usually incorrect, but I don't see any reason a redirect shouldn't point there. --Trovatore (talk) 00:20, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per nom. Ambiguous. -
    Talkback) 02:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Edmonton Strathcona

No evidence the current target is the primary topic for this specific spelling, retarget to dab at Strathcona#Canadian electoral districts. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

0–20

Second target doesn't mention it at all. First target mentioned it in passing but not with sufficient substance to warrant a redirect. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete both - the first target does list a few examples of teams finishing their season with a 0-20 record, but each one is in a league without a set number of games that each team plays (
    Ajax Amsterdam (which was moved to the current target some time ago) but the article does not mention this at all, and I did not find anything in a Google search that suggests this is true. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 21:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --BDD (talk) 15:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: As List of winless seasons has only one mention of 0-20 (one match of all the sports listed there had the outcome once) and AFC Ajax doesn't mention 0-20 anywhere, neither are sensible redirect targets. Not clear what people would be looking for when searching this, so better to delete and let people use Wikipedia search function to find what they want when searching 0-20. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:02, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both as above. GiantSnowman 14:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

0–1

Vague term - are either of these really the primary topic. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • No idea about the latilactobacillus one, but 0-1 is a standard chess notation indicating that black won the match; the article describes this. I also have no idea how we would determine if that is the primary usage. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 21:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both. Both are expressions that could show up in all sorts of contexts, and the targets are far too specific (particularly the bacillus). No obvious alternative target. --Trovatore (talk) 00:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Note The most obvious target from my perspective is zero–one law, but that's likely biased by my background. --Trovatore (talk) 00:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate. BD2412 T 01:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • I suppose that's also reasonable. --Trovatore (talk) 03:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • Disambiguate what? Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 11:25, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        • Well, we could redirect one to the other, and list the three targets that have been mentioned, for a start. Not the most useful disambig page ever, but not completely implausible. --Trovatore (talk) 19:26, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
          • Three targets is plenty for disambiguation. Also, there are several O-1 constructions (letter O rather than number 0), which could easily be confused for 0-1. BD2412 T 02:38, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
            • Even two targets is enough for disambiguation if there's no primary topic. My hesitation here is that none of them are particularly good targets for the search terms in question. We could add all three targets to O-1 and reword the top of the page; I wouldn't be actively opposed to that. But there is a cost to making disambig pages longer; it means it takes longer to find the page you're looking for. So I think that (small) cost has to be weighed against the (also small) value of helping people who type 0-1 or 0–1 into the search bar, and who could probably type something more specific if they wanted to. --Trovatore (talk) 17:49, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: overly broad term with no clear primary topics or sensible targets for a disambiguation page. Let people decide what they want to see when they type this by directing them to the search, rather than random redirects or a dab page that wouldn't be very useful. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Represents too many hockey and football game scores. Steel1943 (talk) 03:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

World – Seeks Worldwide Online Participatory Democracy

Not mentioned at either target. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Winter storms of 2006–07

WP:XY * Pppery * it has begun... 19:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

State Route 221 (Virginia 1923–1928)

Not mentioned at either target. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

South African cricket team in India in 2021–22

Not the same thing, no real discussion at either target. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: as misleading, the series was held in South Africa, and was never planned to be held in India like these redirects incorrectly suggest. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:28, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Islamist insurgency in Somalia (2007–present)

Not appropriate for a "2007-present" redirect to point to events from a decade ago. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Baker–Unity Highway No. 13

"Baker–Unity Highway" is mentioned at both targets. "No. 13" is mentioned nowhere, leaving the context confused. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget both to
    Talkback) 02:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Bader–Ofer method

Not mentioned at either target. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is mentioned in D'Hondt method. – gpvos (talk)User:Gpvos 04:50, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep/retarget to
    Talkback) 14:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Bluster Kong

That section no longer exists. This character is mentioned exactly once in the whole article, and that mention is in passing. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Leaning keep, mentioned exactly once is still mentioned. I have changed the target section to the one that mentions the character. BD2412 T 17:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @BD2412: One mention in passing while talking about a different character would disappoint anyone who was trying to look up information about this character. QuicoleJR (talk) 18:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I would read it as that being everything of encyclopedic value that there is to say about the character. BD2412 T 19:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I think the one mention is fine, a minor character which is related to the character the redirect leads to. I have also added sources to that section just in case it is flagged as unsourced. CaptainGalaxy 18:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: not sure dropping a reader into a search result with a mix of partial matches, this article, and Donkey Kong Country (TV series) (which the target section links to) is an improvement. Skynxnex (talk) 18:35, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, as it stands this is a correctly-targeted redirect. If anyone were to add more information at any point, here is where they'd add it. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 11:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Qazwsxedcrfvtgbyhnujmikolp

Per

Queen of Hearts, and NasssaNser: — pinging participants in the MfD discussion. BD2412 T 16:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep: A lot of bored people in work/school (I would know) end up just mashing random key combinations. Also, As Alalch pointed out, this is still a rendition of the QWERTY layout. Just look at the pageviews for
redirects are cheap. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 19:26, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
This argument would make sense if the qwerty keyboard were called the qaz keyboard instead, but Qaz is about a village in Iran with no mention. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per Alalach, this is a firmly incorrect and non-standard rendition, but it is still a rendition of the qwerty keyboard. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 13:03, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per my comment at the MfD. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral - A stupid redirect, but not a misleading redirect, and redirects are cheap. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:37, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I think this is an unlikely search term and I can't find where this term is mentioned on the target article. I did a word search and nothing popped up. Liz Read! Talk! 03:43, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dougie (disambiguation)

The set index is not a disambiguation. I can only find Dougie as a dance, and Dougie (given name), but I can't find the 3rd. If you can't find the 3rd one, will this page be deleted or kept? 176.42.17.150 (talk) 16:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SpaceX Mars propellant plant

PROD'd by user:Ergzay, who states "Destination page no longer contains info regarding this and no page on Wikipedia exists for this. Best to return this to non-existence and let someone create it when it's needed." PROD can only be used on actual articles, so I'm moving this here as a courtesy. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 01:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't aware you couldn't use the template for this purpose. The documentation isn't very clear.
As to the matter at hand, even with the change in the redirect done by @N2e it still doesn't talk anything about a propellant plant. It looks like N2e did a bunch of editing to add some details quickly, but I'm not sure if this was just restoring old content that was previously deleted or not. It might get removed again given that that page has been pared down a ton from what it was because of low quality sourcing. Ergzay (talk) 02:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, propellant plant is mentioned and discussed at target. No other conflicting articles on Wikipedia according to nom,
    WP:CHEAP. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Retarget to Interplanetary spaceflight#Propellant plant on a celestial body where the plant is actually discussed. A propellant plant is mentioned at the current target, but only in passing, and in such a manner that one would have to alreay know what it was to get anything useful from it (the kind of place a bluelink would be useful). A7V2 (talk) 04:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That target only has a passing mention of "SpaceX propellant plant", although it does go more in depth with propellant plants there. Going to the SpaceX specific article might be preferable for people that include "SpaceX" in the search term, although I don't mind either option. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It was my interpretation (perhaps incorrect) that the section, while not written that well, was more or less entirely about the SpaceX plan. The last paragraph at least is entirely about it, not what I'd call a passing mention. A7V2 (talk) 22:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. SpaceX need for, and intent to place on Mars, propellant equipment is discussed at the target. There are clearly few details, but the notable SpaceX endeavor to build a Mars-capable large spacecraft is covered in hundreds of sources, and that spacecraft (now flying in a test program), will need the Mars-generated propellant to refill it on Mars making SpaceX discussion of the propellant facility also notable, as also shown by sources at the redirect target. N2e (talk) 10:56, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:41, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the current and proposed target talk pages.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 15:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hornsea88

Unattributed

WP:COPIES of Hornsea Pottery bizarrely changed to be exactly 8888 bytes long. Flounder fillet (talk) 15:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Paramount Television International Studios

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Per the outcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 3#Paramount Television International Studios, where incoming links were the hurdle straight after a page move, I've given it enough time for the actual targets and/or rdr targets to be sorted out. The reason or rationale is the same as its/the original listing. Intrisit (talk) 06:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Goulash (magazine)

This is a local(?) satirical(?) magazine published by a boarding school. Zero standalone notability, existed as two sentences that were BLAR'd immediately into the school it was published from. No mention of "goulash" anywhere at the target page. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No mention No redirect. To be honest, I doubt if this magazine is even real. Couldn't find anything in Jstor and Gscholar Ca talk to me! 15:15, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I believe it's probably real, honestly, but just so local that it has no electronic archives, as many a student magazine do 😅 Utopes (talk / cont) 22:17, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Community of Geometry Dash

Nothing about a "community" mentioned, very unlikely to be a search term. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 11:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Mori Calliope fan talk 15:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Pointless redirect to a page which does not mention the search term. JBW (talk) 20:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Muttering Idiot

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy delete

Modmin

No mention of this term at the target article. Almost assuredly has a plethora of other uses outside of... just Fark. The portmanteau of "mod" and "admin" is likely to come up in a number of other more relevant contexts related to moderation and administration. Cautiously though, this term has zero mentions on all Wikipedia, so I'm hesitant to just "retargeting and calling it good". Utopes (talk / cont) 06:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mimoid

No mention of this novel feature(?), aspect? mentioned at the target article. Has three other mentions on Wikipedia in different contexts, also Mimoides exists with a number of subarticles on species. Not currently a useful redirect without context at the target. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was linking it to the wrong page it was supposed to link to Aniara, not Solaris (novel).
That might be typical, but it is the lack of mention of the word Mimoid in the article that made me make the redirect. If someone searchs for the term, they will be lead to the article. The solution is to mention them in the Article as they were a critical part of the book.
I understand that the book was written in Swedish, so other translators might have used a different word. If someone finds a different word used, but it is still unique to Aniara, then they could make a redirect to the article, where a standard term can be referred on.
If someone encounters the concept, it is highly likely that it is from Aniara and yet without the redirect, neither human nor bot would know that the word is associated with the book, and since as far as I know it is not associated with another novel. I had not fully completed reading the story yet when I made the link.
My intention is to add further discussion to the article, using the word, but I hoped the redirect would help others find the article. I also think it is worthy of an article in its own right, so if someone is really ambitious they can turn it into an article.
It doesn't refer to the moth. The reasons you are giving are why I made the redirect.
I don't think I need to make a list of all of the alien races and species that have a page on wikipedia. In the case where it doesn't refer to a dictionary word or a concept used in other novels, then it should be uncontroversial.
The moth name is pronounced meemo-eedays not mimoids, if someone types Mimoid I assume they are searching for the concept from Aniara, and it right now similarity search leads to you to the moth, when the page you are looking for is Aniara.
I think I might have directed it to the wrong page, it was supposed to link to Aniara not Solaris (novel).
Mechachleopteryx (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 10:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mental gymnastics

I had to do some serious mental gymnastics to wrap my head around why this redirect exists. Sure, some people may perform mental gymnastics when "they're uncomfortable from their beliefs being inconsistent and contradictory". A similar idea I feel could be people perform the act of running to get from Point A to Point B, although that doesn't make the "running" a good redirect to "pathfinding". It's a singular mean to the end, and not everyone that has cognitive dissonance is "performing mental gymnastics", and not everyone that does mental gymnastics has cognitive dissonance. Example: I'm fairly sure I'm performing mental gymnastics right now in an attempt to jump through the logical hoops that went into this redirect, and I don't think I'm too uncomfortable from cognitive dissonance. I believe I've come to understand why, although I don't think it's a great end-all-be-all redirect that takes people to the right location at 100% intentions every time. To me, I feel like Convergent thinking or Divergent thinking are what I would have associated mental gymnastics with, i.e. following along with someone's thought process jumping through hoops with twists and turns to an eventual endpoint. Also, "mental gymnastics" is not mentioned at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Soft redirect to wiktionary Okmrman (talk) 16:35, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PanoramaMaker

There is no information about a panorama maker at the target stub, much less a brand called PanoramaMaker. Not currently a helpful redirect. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TotalMedia Theatre

No mention of TotalMedia or TotalMedia Theatre at the target article. This is not a helpful redirect as there is no content about this subtopic, and the stub for ArcSoft does not help enlighten readers here. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaImpression

No mention of MediaImpression at the target page. Neither this, nor "ArcSoft MediaImpression" are useful redirects in the article's current state, as we have no information at the stub for this subtopic. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Though I don't remember creating the ArcSoft MediaImpression redirect, checking the history confirms that it was in the article at that time but was later removed.
Further checking backs up my guess that I most likely created it as an EXIF redirect for "software used".
In order to address this issue that is causing you concern, I have updated the article to mention it.
The redirect can now be left as-is or changed to ArcSoft#Products.
Ubcule (talk) 18:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Manta (Unreal Tournament)

No character (?) that uses the name Manta appears at the target article; this does not appear to be a useful redirect in its current state. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it's a vehicle
still not mentioned, so do with the redirect what epic games did with the first unreal tournament in 2017. which is to say delete it cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 11:27, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Man’s red fire / flower

Pretty confused by this redirect; neither the word "man's", nor the phrase "red fire" appear at the target article. Not sure why someone would type this instead of the very likely alternative of searching for just "Fire"; this title does not seem useful as a redirect. Neither have any links or mentions on Wikipedia. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Interstellarity: can you give some context for these? They seem like nonsense. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 08:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ivanvector: Thanks for asking. These terms refer to fire from the movie The Jungle Book specifically from the song I Wanna Be Like You. If you don't think this is a good target for them, I could support retargeting them to The Jungle Book (1967 film) or I Wan'na Be Like You (The Monkey Song). I hope you understand. Interstellarity (talk) 12:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • I know redirects are cheap, but this seems too trivial. What is the value of having this redirect, versus the (admittedly also minor) nuisance of having this title pop up in searches when it isn't relevant? --Trovatore (talk) 19:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also note that these contain curly quotes rather than standard apostrophes. Inclined to delete for that reason alone. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:12, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Pppery: I created redirects for these that have the correct apostrophes. Interstellarity (talk) 11:39, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 18:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Pppery, the correct-apostrophe version can be kept. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 19:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A man has fallen into a river in Lego City

A meme not mentioned at the target article. For anyone that wanted to read about Lego City, Lego City is the perfectly natural search term. Prefacing it with the meme line from the Lego City commercial implies an interest in the man falling into the river in Lego City. Unfortunately, the man is nowhere to be found in the river, much as this line is nowhere to be found in the article. Not a helpful redirect in the article's current form. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Making televsion

Implausible typo for the unmentioned search term of "Making television", which is already a roundabout way of reaching the target article. Errors in "avoided double redirects" are even more unlikely than errors in a page's actual title, and the misspelling coupled with the "making" verb pretense makes this too far out to salvage.

Making television didn't use to exist, this probably could have been moved with redirect suppression as the original was initially aired as implausible in its former state. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Make Me A World

There is no mention of this imprint at the target article. "Make" and "A World" are not ever mentioned at the target article. As it stands, people who specifically search for the imprint instead of the publishing house itself are left without any context to the phrase that they typed in. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maha (cat)

There is no cat called "Maha" discussed at the target. Moreover, there is no character called Maha discussed there, or at the associated

List of .hack characters. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Magnetic air car

No mention of anything about a magnetic air car at the general-ish page for hybrid vehicles. As it stands, if people really wanted to search for hybrid vehicles, one would have used that search term outright. Specifying a magnetic air car and ending up at a page about hybrid vehicles in general is not a useful redirect for readers as it currently stands. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:55, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - there's an article in the history about a theoretical compressed-air vehicle which used a magnetic motor to compress the air for propulsion, rather than needing to be refuelled with compressed air. It was not a hybrid vehicle by our definition as it had only one source of power for propulsion. It also was never built: there was some hype about it about 10 years ago (around the same age as the article) and some patents filed, but then it vanished. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 09:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fucktarded

Salt evasion of Fucktard. Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 05:51, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - I disagree that this is salt evasion, there was 5 years between the deletion of the salted title and the creation of the new one, and the creator never edited the original. The original page was salted because it was only being used for vandalism, while the new title was created explicitly with a target in mind. However, the term should be removed from the target: the one source given that's not paywalled happens to mention the word, but with no context other than an odd story about gluten sensitivity. Wikipedia is not censored but we are also not
    offensive for no reason; maybe Fucktard could be recreated as a Wiktionary redirect (wikt:fucktard exists) but this modified title should be deleted. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 09:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Insurance goal

Not mentioned at the target page. Tea2min (talk) 15:08, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Wiktionary redirect to wikt:insurance goal. There it's given in the context of soccer but it's the same meaning. Preferable to adding it back to the list of hockey terms since it also applies to other sports. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:03, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Add back to the list, or delete per
    WP:REDYES for both the soccer/football and hockey terms. This search for "insurance goal on Wikipedia returns a surprising amount of articles that mention the phrase for its soccer/football and hockey uses, but surprisingly none of the results are articles that define the term. For this reason, the phrase seems notable enough in some regard to be included and defined either in an existent article or a standalone article. Steel1943 (talk) 20:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The term has not yet been added back to the list.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 05:50, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hockey bag

Not mentioned anymore at target page

hockey equipment" but was cleaned up in 2011.) Tea2min (talk) 14:58, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 05:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nikolas Macko

Macko is not listed at the page for this shooting. What I will note, is that looking up "Nikolas Macko", the shooting almost didn't come up on the first page (was the very last result for me)" This might make sense as it took place in 2007, and as time progresses, older results are less likely to be promoted higher. But in any event, we have no content on this individual. In 2007, they attempted to fend off the shooting from taking place. But, these efforts are not described anywhere on the page or on Wikipedia, to my understanding. I don't think that this is a particularly useful redirect, in the article's current state. Just as Google displays a wide assortment of topics related to different "Nikolas Macko"s, if he isn't discussed in the article any longer, I don't think this redirect is necessary either. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As it should be worth noting, this redirect was fully protected almost IMMEDIATELY after creation in 2007, and remained fully protected for another 17 years up until just a month ago. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Utopes: Judging by the Google search results for "Nikolas Macko" "shooting", a mention could potentially be added to the article. What do you think? QuicoleJR (talk) 17:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@QuicoleJR: I mean, it used to be a part of a pretty hefty section a long time back, during the revisions I checked in 2007. The shooting article was getting what looks like 1-2k edits every day during the timeline and immediate aftermath of the shooting (the article now has nearly 14k revisions). I have to imagine that Macko's segment was removed for a reason. The article was mainly talking about his eye-witness reporting. I don't really see a need to mention Macko, especially when looking at recent Google search results, the shooting is now really low. I don't want to force in his name into the article if it doesn't need to be. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lynn Thomas (That's So Raven)

No mention of a character called Lynn Thomas at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lower Quebec

No information about Lower Quebec at the target article. Doing a spot check for other locations around the world, I could not find Lower Foobar ever be a redirect to Foobar, as the specification of lower almost certainly implies a different, undiscussed topic. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Look how they massacred my boy

This redirect is categorized as follows: A meme quotation from film and television, that is not mentioned at the article. Wikipedia is not an infinite compendium of unmentioned memes. Not a helpful redirect as people who want to read about The Godfather would search for The Godfather. Specifying a meme implies a search for specific content that we don't have on WP. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support, how often do people search for films via quotes? Regardless a simple search engine search will tell them the film's title and they can search for the title from there. Traumnovelle (talk) 07:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Long life motor oil

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Living foods diet

There's no context about the idea of "living foods" at the target article, and mentions across Wikipedia are rough all around. Indeed, Living foods is a red link as it stands as well. Without any further context about this particular diet, it does not serve as a very useful redirect in the meantime if readers are left looking for material we don't have, it seems. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per
    WP:NEO - Google reveals many different diet fads trying to rebrand as "living foods", most of it pseudoscientific bunk. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 09:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Liquid nails
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Lower case version of what's apparently a brand of glue...? Adhesive? In any case, liquid nails are not mentioned at the target, and anyone typing this in instead of adhesive seems to be looking for something else. Has some history, but has also been to RfD before (13 years ago). Utopes (talk / cont) 05:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Yu-jeong (singer)

No singer with this name is discussed at the target article. Does not help to redirect here, suggesting content that we do not have. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to Lightsum. Note that members of South Korean K-pop group rarely uses their full name in their promotion, it is always without the surname or a stage name. I created it before Lightsum was published in mainspace but forgotten to retarget. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 11:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Leave The Light On (Johnny Orlando song)

No song with this title discussed at the target article, not a helpful redirect in its current state. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lamb Chop (The Sheep-Pig)

No character with this name discussed at the target article. Not helpful as a redirect in its current state. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Godiva syndrome

Lady Godiva is never mentioned or referred to at the target article. Redirect a hyper-specific reference to an apparent synonym where it never is talked about is not very helpful. People looking for exhibitionism would have gotten to that point through just searching Exhibitionism. The current title might just be more helpful pointed at Lady Godiva, if anything, as the presence of a name within the title makes it seem like the name is the most defining aspect. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of imagination

A lack of imagination isn't an "argument from ignorance". It's not being able to imagine and doesn't have to do with arguments. If anything, it's Aphantasia. However, this has been a redirect here for the last 21 years. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hlist1

The existence of this redirect implies that there are multiple {{hlist}} templates (e.g. {{hlist1}} and {{hlist2}}), but that is not the case. (And, as far as I can tell, has never been the case.) Delete as actively misleading. HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support as nom seems reasonable. Sdkb talk 03:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, not transcluded anywhere (only linked in page alerts related to this RfD, in {{hlist}}'s documentation, or in transclusions of the RfD page). Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 11:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 17

Moira Sullivan (Smallville)

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:16, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • While not directly mentioned with the surname, the character Moira is mentioned at Smallville season 6#ep128, though only appears in that one episode. The character's name in full is listed at Lynda Carter#Filmography and Superman (franchise)#Recurring cast, so I would suggest retarget to that episode description or to Lynda Carter's article, though leaning closer to the episode description as it does offer more details on this character and Carter's role than the other two sections do. Trailblazer101 (talk) 21:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:51, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per Trailblazer101, as the character is mentioned at the target. Given the disambiguator it makes more sense to target the TV season article than the other suggested targets. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 08:48, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    It is worth discussion where the (currently salted due to someone else with the same name) Moira Sullivan should point, though. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Linda Baldwin (Coronation Street)

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Jeez

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Oncotype DX Colon Cancer Assay

Salt evasion of Oncotype_DX. Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment, this was accepted through AfC in 2012 and BLAR'd in 2017, while Oncotype DX was salted at the same time in 2017, so not salt evasion. Unless there was something visible in the deleted histories that you saw, @Pppery:. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Nope. That matches what I can see. Still not mentioned at the target, though, so should still be deleted. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:19, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this isn't salt evasion then, it should be restored and sent to AfD if non-notable, as this is an article which made it through AfC by User:Graeme Bartlett and survived as a standalone topic for years, before being BLAR'd into a page without mention. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:25, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Superhero landing

Page has no (non-tangentially) relevant content. If someone can find a page that talks about these then I'd support a retarget, but for now, I'm leaning delete. Aaron Liu (talk) 23:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - I'm most familiar with the term from the Deadpool films but none of our series of related articles mentions this, and it's not specific enough to this franchise for a {{
    R without mention}}. The phrase appears in Carrot and Stick, an episode of Better Call Saul, but doesn't describe what it is at all. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 08:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    Carrot and stick? I don't think reliable sources analyzed the title. Aaron Liu (talk) 10:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    No, Carrot and Stick (capital S). The phrase is quoted in a description of a stunt performed on the TV show. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 11:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, I know, but I don't think reliable sources analyzed that part to be about the expression, and we have a link to the expression anyways. Aaron Liu (talk) 12:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete
    WP:REDLINK someone can write an article on the stereotypical landing position found in comic books for superheros -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 10:06, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Drama Juniors Marathi

No mention of any programming with this title at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jau Bai Gavat Unseen

This seems to be a piece of programming, although it is not mentioned or discussed at the target article, and creates the picture that we have something about this topic when we do not. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Basilan Unity Party

No mention of "Unity" or this party at the target page, people searching for this topic will not receive any information about this at the target page. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:55, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Asenso Abrenio is another example of an undiscussed party that was recently deleted. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:59, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I luv u

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget to I Love You.

Hornless unicorn

Unicorns are not real. The article makes no mention of unicorns. It would be impossible for a hornless unicorn to be a horse because that would require a fictional creature variant to be real, which it is not and never will be. The target page does not mention unicorns in the slightest. Anyone that specifies "unicorn" instead of "horse" is likely looking for a unicorn related subtopic, instead of the general

WP:SYNTH explanation for horse. Unicorn, Unicorn horn, or deletion are all preferable outcomes for this title which currently exists unmentioned at the horse page. Utopes (talk / cont) 19:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

All of those are fine titles. Urban dictionary is not a reliable source. People searching for the unmentioned "horses are hornless unicorns" meme will not receive any content at the target page, so that's another reason why a redirect would be harmful to those readers. At least with Unicorn and Unicorn horn, people can get context as to the crucial adjective of "hornless" in their search term, especially when the Horse article mentions neither "hornless" nor "unicorn". For all other cases you've provided, the article on Unicorn actually does a DEEP dive into those topics. "Magic" and "magical" comes up a bunch, and the topic of "horns" is thrown around in basically every paragraph. Nobody is confused when they type in a fictional phrase (i.e. "magic horse") and end up at a fictional article (unicorns). The same is not true of the inverse. The horned and magic horse redirects should be kept. Utopes (talk / cont) 19:55, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not about urban dictionary being a reliable source, it's about whether it's a valid search term, is relatively unambiguous, and contextually makes sense. I strongly believe, based on some searching, that hornless unicorn is synonymous with a horse and fits these criteria. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:59, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's impossible, and also already a stretch. Unicorns are a fictional species. Any variant of a fictional creature cannot be synonymous with a real creature. And especially for using such a specific term as "hornless unicorn", targeting "Horse" instead of a unicorn related article is
original research. My childhood would be highly eager to see the reliable, published source that says that unicorns exist, in order for a hornless version to as well and justify this redirect targeting a real animal and not a mythology-related article. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:08, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
OR? C'mon now. It's simply a reversal of a common description of a unicorn.
  • Unicorn's short desc on en-wiki: Legendary single-horned horse-like creature
  • Wikidata: Legendary animal, that looks like a horse with a horn on the forehead
If a horned (magical) horse is a unicorn then it's entirely reasonable to assume or draw a connection to a hornless unicorn being a horse. Again though, I urge you to do some Googling and see that it's a common thing to refer to a horse as. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm just quoting what OR says: "On Wikipedia, original research means material for which no reliable, published source exists.". The term "hornless unicorn" does not appear at the target page. Moreover, it does not appear ANYWHERE on Wikipedia besides one passing mention at Henry Manners, 2nd Earl of Rutland. But definitely not at Horse. Even including a mention at the horse page would be wholly inappropriate there, as it's a real animal, fundamentally rooted in biology. The article isn't about how horses appear in pop culture or mythology, so unicorns shouldn't ever come up. Because we are redirecting a unicorn variation to a real animal, if there is no reliable, published source exists for this redirection-equation material, it is considered original research. Citing Urban Dictionary would also be considered original research, if no reliable, published source exists. A Google search funneling into various memes and the RuneScape wiki is also not a reliable source. If there is a reliable source that suggests that unicorns are a real thing, in order to justify the existence of hornless versions and target a real biological animal, then please let me know. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:32, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is a description in Unicorn article: "depicted as a white horse-like or goat-like animal with a long straight horn with spiralling grooves, cloven hooves, and sometimes a goat's beard" and often "an ox tail". Far from a horse; closer to cattle. If someone wants to know what a "hornless unicorn" is, they can go to Unicorn and figure it out. Going to Horse won't help them at all, since horses don't have cloven hooves, horns, beards, or tails like that.   ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 21:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
...Huh. That's... not usually what I think of when I think of unicorns. In the modern day, unicorns really are depicted as "just slap a horn on a horse"-- after all, if you need a live-action shot of a unicorn, getting cloven hooves and an ox tail is a tall order, and the thing people notice first has always been the horn anyways. There's also the My Little Pony franchise, where unicorns are simply ponies with horns, but given a pony is just a horse with dwarfism...
My point is that that article needs some work, clearly-- it completely fails to talk about contemporary understanding/depiction of unicorns. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 19:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@
WP:NOTFORUM. This RFD is about whether or not to delete or change the redirect Hornless unicorn. You're welcome to edit Unicorn to add whatever you can appropriately source, but based on your edit history you don't actually do any content editing, but just post comments on RFDs. I can't even imagine being holed up here. You really should branch out and get more experience around Wikipedia. It's much more fun.   ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 20:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
I don't think this falls under NOTFORUM, as people's impressions of unicorns are indeed relevant to the deciding factor of this discussion. Though I agree that one might have a source. Aaron Liu (talk) 21:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't really think My Little Pony ponies are horses either: they have no separate hooves at all, and you can't really distinguish if that's an ox tail or a horse tail, so you can't see if they're unicorns that fit the article's description. I agree that you should probably get a really reliable source that says that hornless unicorns are just horses. Aaron Liu (talk) 21:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cat:NN

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Honestly, I have no idea how this

CAT:NN has 500+ links. Cat:NN has zero, besides the deletion notifications. If someone wants to campaign for the existence of a new lowercase "Cat" namespace, that should be done before the existence of these redirects. (Which as per Pandora's WikiBox, the existence of one has since introduced two more also bundled). Utopes (talk / cont) 18:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - Misleading, found no kitties inside the namespace. More seriously, having lowerspace variants of pseudo-namespaces would be unmaintainable. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 21:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I only made this two because of the existence of Cat:NN and because using caps lock sucks on phones, you're more than welcome to speedy them under author requests deletion so we don't have to drag this out for a week. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 21:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the comment! I was kind of confused why those two came about. A discussion seems inevitable though at minimum for Cat:NN as that was kept a few months ago. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:38, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Cat:prod averages about 2 pageviews each day, since it's convenient to just keyboard type lowercase stuff. However the search thing "redirects" capitalization already anyways Aaron Liu (talk) 23:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Cat:prod was created a month ago. I'm not surprised that it gets views because CAT:PROD also gets a substantial amount of views, and people type in lowercase expecting to autocorrect by the software (which it does). If redirects are meant to optimize view-numbers, we'd get rid of capitals entirely. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmed adoodie

Gag name not mentioned at the target article. Additionally, I have not found any mention of it on this list (although it is user-generated and could be incomplete).

A variant of this gag name had been used in the Simpsons episode 24 Minutes according to the article, but spelt as 'Ahmed Adoudi'. Regardless, I am unsure that this joke name is notable enough to be a redirect to any articles involving this. Xeroctic (talk) 18:29, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Democratic Labour Party (historical)

A spelling variation of recently deleted Democratic Labor Party (historical). Likely not the same case as the Labor vs Labour spelling distinction has proven to represent different parties, but this disambiguation still might not be the most helpful as well. Utopes (talk / cont) 18:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heil mein Führer!

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Joever

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Joever

Windows 8.3

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: deleted

Ten News First Late

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

List of lists

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#List of lists

Death is a preferable alternative to communism

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Ductal

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Ductal

Comedy Shorts Gamer (entertainer)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Comedy Shorts Gamer (entertainer)

Extinct World

I noticed several redirects at RfD disambiguated with Extinct World - The Lich, BMO, Ice King, Gunter, etc., and wanted to know what this is. However, this too turned out to be a redirect which led to an episode which had no information about the term.

The episode plot has a link to Finn the Human and Jake the Dog which has a mention of extinction of all life, but this too is insufficient to justify a redirect like Extinct World which is a generic term (not considering the caps). Delete. Jay 💬 05:32, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Per Jay. The name "Extinct World" is fan-dubbed and is not ever mentioned in the show; even if it was, I doubt the notability and necessity of the supposed redirect and it may too trivial. I believe the name is too general and it is totally possible that it can refer to something more notable. Delete. - George6VI (talk) 00:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Animals in Media

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

National culture

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#National culture

Freeze, everybody clap your hands!

The addition of "Freeze" means that it can't be confused with Live at Tokyo Dome, but despite that, without a mention of this lyric, we don't have anything for readers that search the specific lyric of "everybody clap your hands" instead of the song itself. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fil d'Ecosse

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Factor through

Neither "factor" nor "through" are mentioned at the target article. Hypothetically this seems to be much more plausible as a redirect to Factoring or Factorization, but even then this may not be incredibly necessary for either... Utopes (talk / cont) 21:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Factoring through" is a mathematical English idiom for situations in which the Fundamental theorem on homomorphisms applies. See, e.g. [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37] (one site but many users); it likely also appears in standard abstract algebra texts, e.g. Dummit and Foote, or Lang; and some quick Ctrl+F's show that Pete Clark's expositions use the term, although never with a clear definition. It is certainly unfortunate that this usage does not appear on the current target, although I think this is a flaw in that page and not the redirect.
I do not think
polynomial arithmetic
described that way.
A less surprising target might be Glossary of mathematical jargon § factor through, although I personally find that target less useful (for one thing, the phrase is hardly restricted to "category theory"; for another, the definition fails to make the connection to the Fundamental Theorem explicit). Bernanke's Crossbow (talk) 23:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:53, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Larissa Hodge

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Larissa Hodge

April 16

Watch channel

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Draft:Windows 8.25

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy deleted

DSRL

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Entire (animal)

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: Keep (Nomination Withdrawn).

Sam Malone (DJ)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

2012: Doomsday

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

The F-Bomb (documentary)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Kannagi (upcoming film)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Kannagi (upcoming film)

The beach that makes you old

Related meme not mentioned at target. Implausible to be searched on Wikipedia, not including people going onto Google and asking "what's the beach that makes you old", after which point one would find the source film for the topic; also, the Wikipedia page pops up there too. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:27, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Even as a meme, there is no mention of the meme on the film article, so this is just a joke re-direct that doesn't really help anyone. Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 18:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paradise Airport

This is an inaccurate redirect. Paradise Airport is a small airfield in Paradise, California, nowhere near Paradise, Nevada (and nowhere near the size or importance of Las Vegas' international airport). Mistaken redirect that should just be deleted; the airport itself is non-notable so its article was converted to redirect in 2022. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 13:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as potentially confusing, per
    WP:R#DELETE item 2. As well as the California "Paradise airport" indicated by the nom [38], there's another in New York state [39], but neither seem to be notable. Rosbif73 (talk) 14:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 23:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Paradise Skypark on which we have an article. It is unclear from the nomination which is the airport article being referred to that was converted to a redirect in 2022. Jay 💬 15:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 18:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Winged spear

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Winged spear

General Dollar

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Link baiting

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Link baiting

Romanian concession in Sarandë

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Romanian concession in Sarandë

Phone computer

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Phone computer

Faulty thinking

I just created this. But to be on the safe side, I wanted to ask for opinions, as this is actually a psychological term that does not appear in the given target as such, in fact.

Hildeoc (talk) 12:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 16:50, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 10:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Poopoo

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Immigration control in Russia

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Pepitos

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Dale Becker

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Japanator.com

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Japanator.com


April 15

Drew Curtis' FARK.com

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Dream Catching

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Dream Catching

Dark Deco

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Dark Deco

Dark Mountain (logo)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Dark Mountain (logo)

Actions Prior to Grant's Landing

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Pronomian

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Pronomian

Baffle Of Chancellorsville

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Clean vocals

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

No mentions of "clean" at the target page. At the target page, the act of singing is never implied to be "clean", or even consist of "clean vocals". The primary justification for this redirect existing is that

unclean vocals is a redirect to death growl. Yet, its antonym has no mention at the general page for "singing". If clean and unclean vocals are antonyms, and both are redirects, this seems to imply that the concepts of "singing" and "death growl" are also "antonyms" in regard to vocal quality? Likely true, but never addressed (nor does it need to be imo). For someone specifically looking for information on the topic of "clean vocals", it seems to be preferable for these readers to end up at a topic that is directly pertinent to vocal quality. If people wanted to end up at Singing instead, they'd type singing, a concept everyone would have already been familiar with. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:14, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Of note, an RfD for Clean vocals closed as retarget in 2015, but was pointed back to Singing after its conclusion three different times by two users, citing different material at the page for Screaming (music) (the resulting retarget). Utopes (talk / cont) 21:23, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I agree with the nominator that someone searching for "Clean vocals" or "Clean vocalist" is looking for more than the page on singing, and wants to know about the quality of the voice instead. I've been searching around, and the best page for information on vocal quality appears to be at
    WP:REDLINKing it (that is, deletion) would be appropriate to encourage article creation. But I'm on the fence, so no formal !vote from me as of now. Fieari (talk) 06:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Comment Clean vocals is a highly likely search term Geschichte (talk) 07:29, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Independent MPs

Template:Independent MPs in Canada used to be at this pagename until I moved it to clarify its scope and avoid potential confusion with other navboxes, e.g. Template:Independent MPs in the United Kingdom. Now that the Canadian navbox is transcluded directly through its new name, I suggest that the old name be deleted to avoid any future mix-ups, e.g. being added to a British MP's biography by mistake. — RAVENPVFF · talk · 20:26, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Disambiguate make a template-space dab page (yes, those exist). It would show an error message when transcluded. -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 05:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I agree with the IP editor who says to disambiguate (although the resulting disambiguation page could potentially get very long, couldn't it?) Bwrs (talk) 04:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Not really, the only other relevant template is the UK one linked above. In most other countries with members of parliament, laws forbid anyone running or sitting in parliament without affiliation with a registered party, or independents sit so rarely that a template is moot. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 00:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Good point! I didn't notice the word “independent”; probably all the independent members of
    US Congress and independent sitting state legislators in the United States put together would fit in a single infobox, as they are so rare. All the more reason to disambiguate. Bwrs (talk) 16:32, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    Also, US legislators are not "members of parliament". Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 11:47, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - as noted above there are only two Independent MPs templates, Canada and United Kingdom. The redirect already has zero transclusions, deleting it is cleaner than a template dab - they exist but they're clunky. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 11:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ace Deuce

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Not mentioned alternative name. Basically any time it comes up on Wikipedia, is people (including residents) saying that they've never heard this alternative name. The sources raised have all been mediocre, and as this was never added post-discussion-conclusion, it does not seem to have any use and only adds confusion for those who search this term and end up at a city where its colloquial(?)/uncommon nickname is not mentioned. Utopes (talk / cont) 19:58, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Soft retarget to wikt:acey-deucey? 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 04:23, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Would advise against that. Wiktionary redirects are good for likely dictionary terms. And redirecting Title A to a completely separate Title B across different projects, with several variations between each, is highly unideal. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ace deuce craps wants four
delete, i guess. from some looking, i found gambling jargon and... nothing else worth a specific redirect. there's a rapper with this name and a one piece character named "masked deuce" whose leader is named ace, though, so do with that what you will cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 22:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Who wants the, who wants the hard four? Five want four
For the record, I don't terribly oppose deletion. There's really not very many good places to redirect. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 12:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Technofascism and Techno-fascism

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Technofascism and Techno-fascism

GWGFJ

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Awooo

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

7.92

searching it up on google doesn't result in 8 mm but it does show another bullet type Okmrman (talk) 21:21, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dabify, there are quite a fair number of ammunition types and/or firearms that we have articles on, that could be targeted to. Of note are the following:
7.92mm Bergmann MG15Na 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 23:05, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
oh yeah i also found out related redirect
7.92 mm. Might as well put this out there as well for you to decide on it. Okmrman (talk) 04:14, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Dabify or keep?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:29, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably gonna go with Dabify per Luna and redirect
7.92 mm to that disambig Okmrman (talk) 16:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Changing to Retarget per Travix Okmrman (talk) 21:01, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to 7 mm caliber, which is for the 7.00 to 7.99 millimetres (0.2756 to 0.3146 in) caliber range. Anything at 7.92 mm should be listed there. -- Tavix (talk) 16:42, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment Might as well bundle
    7.92mm along with this Okmrman (talk) 17:54, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 18:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Shhhnotsoloud: What is your opinion about the 7mm target? Jay 💬 16:59, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deplorable

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 22#Deplorable

The F-Bomb (movie)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#The F-Bomb (movie)

F-Bomb (documentary)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#F-Bomb (documentary)

F-Bomb (film)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#F-Bomb (film)

The F-Bomb (film)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#The F-Bomb (film)

F-Bomb (movie)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#F-Bomb (movie)

The American Dodgeball Association of America

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Ottoman Bessarabia

No consensus Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: no consensus

(pokémon character)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

2021 Chinese FA Super Cup

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 22#2021 Chinese FA Super Cup

Law of fives

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Law of fives

Tantras

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Dependence liability

Needs adequate inclusion.

Hildeoc (talk) 05:58, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment: As the creator of this redirect, I would like to mention that this term features in most articles using the | dependency_liability parameter in Infobox drug such as Caffeine, Cocaine or MDMA, where it pipes to the same article as the redirect's destination. That being said, it could be expanded into an article since there's probably enough information on the subject, or at the very least something like List of psychoactive substances by dependence liability could be created to further establish the term. — Mugtheboss (talk) 12:08, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Another thing, I had a look through
WP:R#DELETE to refresh my memory, and there isn’t a criterion for redirects not having adequate usage. I also thought that maybe my redirect could be seen to fall under 8 or 10, but the term "dependence liability" is mentioned in this section of the target page, and that section does delve into the topic, albeit pretty shallowly, so my view is that neither apply. — Mugtheboss (talk) 18:13, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
@
Hildeoc (talk) 03:14, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
@
Hildeoc: The term "dependence liability" should be self-explanatory in the context of that article, I.E. how liable a substance is to cause dependence. As I mentioned, the term is present in practically every article using Template:Infobox drug with the | dependency_liability parameter being active, making it widespread across the wiki. — Mugtheboss (talk) 10:22, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
@
Hildeoc (talk) 04:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
@
Hildeoc: If you believe that it fails RPLA, then the best option would be to redirect it to the section of the target page I linked above, which would make it adhere to this part of the guideline: "Normally, we try to make sure that all "inbound redirects" … are mentioned in the first couple of paragraphs of the article or section to which the redirect goes." If you agree, I'd happily do it myself. — Mugtheboss (talk) 10:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
@
Hildeoc (talk) 22:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
@
Hildeoc: Substance dependence#Dependence potential. — Mugtheboss (talk) 13:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 20:17, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Okmrman (talk) 03:07, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Ukraine missile strike

Obviously problematic redirect. Inclusionists let's use common sense. Just delete the redirect. We don't have disambiguation pages like 2022 Ukraine missile strike or 2023 Ukraine missile strike. There is few people who would look up something as general as this. Let's simply delete the redirect, it is of not much use. Super Ψ Dro 00:32, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete My first reaction was to keep, as it seemed like this was "2024 strike" (singular) to "2024 strikes" (plural). Then I noticed the "22 March" part of the target. Delete as per nom, definitely don't keep on current target. (A potential target if kept MIGHT be to Russo-Ukrainian War, which takes a more wide-shot, general look at the concept... but if any missile strikes happen in Ukraine NOT part of the Russo-Ukranian War, the reasoning for that retarget falls apart.) 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 00:47, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget as per Pppery, although I do recommend adjusting to Timeline of the Russian invasion of Ukraine (1 December 2023 – present)#January 2024 given this one doesn't specify March. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 15:35, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:11, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Okmrman (talk) 03:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 13

Environmental Analysis of Computing

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Jake the Jailbird

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Jake the Jailbird

Finite dimensional Hilbert spaces

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Finite dimensional Hilbert spaces

Royal tart

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Royal tart

Animals (2023 film)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Animals (2023 film)

Microsoft Company, Ltd.

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Verticon

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Psychological addiction

Needs adequate inclusion.

Hildeoc (talk) 05:56, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Tagged the redirect as a "R from merge" and notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 07:34, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Okmrman (talk) 15:59, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nominator's follow-up comment. Steel1943 (talk) 17:33, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abdur Rahim (politician)

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Tracy Grandstaff

Delete due to no suitable target, since Grandstaff is not only known for voicing Daria and is mentioned in several other articles, including those related to Beavis and Butt-Head, The Real World (TV series), and Taina (TV series) (see [41]). — Goszei (talk) 21:31, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak oppose. While Grandstaff may have been involved with those other series, I would argue that Daria remains what she is primarily known for. DonIago (talk) 14:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per
    WP:REDYES (to encourage article creation). Basically nothing about her at the current target anyway. A7V2 (talk) 04:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Striking my above, I'm not sure now. This has history as an article, but it was merged (though I don't see that much, if anything, has been added from the old article) after a brief discussion here Talk:Daria#Merge. I still don't think this is a suitable redirect as things stand, and I wonder how appropriate it would be to add information about Grandstaff's other roles at the current target. A7V2 (talk) 05:01, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree that the current situation isn't ideal. I'm not aware of any precedent for a scenario like this, nor do I have ideas for the best way to proceed other than leaving the redirect in place. Part of the problem seems to be that there aren't many sources that talk about Grandstaff herself, which makes having her own article (the best-case scenario) challenging, and wedging what we do have into Daria, for instance, is a bit awkward. It's not even clear to me whether we have any information regarding the casting of Grandstaff as Daria; presumably it's based on her involvement in B&B and TRW, but we obviously can't just say that. So, essentially, I'm left with being open to suggestions while feeling that deleting the redirect doesn't really benefit anyone. DonIago (talk) 13:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:27, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there a primary topic?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Tagged the page with {{R with history}} and {{R from merge}}. The page has been repeatedly turned to redirect and restored. The subject is not suitable as a redirect, and I would prefer it to be deleted but at AfD because of its history. Jay 💬 11:22, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nominator comment: In light of the redirect's history, I agree with Jay that it should be discussed at AfD. — Goszei (talk) 23:50, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hail eris

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Avanturine glance

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: Withdrawn by nominator

Punctured plane

No consensus Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: no consensus

Differential algebraic variety

No consensus Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: no consensus

Filtered ring

No consensus Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: no consensus

Order of Accendo

Split or bespoke decisions Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: restore article

POEE

No mention at target, I propose deletion. Veverve (talk) 22:21, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep/Restore POEE, Delete POEE.org & Poee.org (which, from wayback snapshots, does not appear to be operated by the original POEE) DefaultFree (talk) 15:57, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The WP article should not be restored, as per
WP:BURDEN. Veverve (talk) 18:32, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Even if it turns out there are no non-primary sources to restore POEE in the article, that doesn't call for deletion of the redirect.
WP:RFD#K5 and the POEE pageview stats - it has several daily pageviews, even before being RfD'd. DefaultFree (talk) 00:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Keep and restore. This is associated with the topic. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:58, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no mention at target. #8 above "If the redirect is a novel or very obscure synonym for an article name that is not mentioned in the target, it is unlikely to be useful. " and #10 from above "If the redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject." This cannot be expanded into an article based on current information. And the article should not be restored unless independent sourcing can be found and based on BURDEN. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 03:23, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at the page history the term used to have its own page and was merged. Merges usually get redirects, yes? Randy Kryn (talk) 03:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Some articles get merged, then the merged content is deleted, then the redirect is deleted. This happens often. Veverve (talk) 18:13, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:01, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • POEE was the original organizatioanal denomination of Discordianism, and is mentioned at the article on the book. What seems determinative to this nomination is that this used to have its own article, which was merged in 2005 (the redirect/merge is the subject of this discussion), which goes to show its connection to the redirect target is substantial enough to allow this redirect to stay. The original article contained: "Paratheo-Anametamystikhood Of Eris Esoteric or POEE is a manifestation of the
    magicians, scientists, artists, clowns, and similar maniacs who are intrigued by Eris goddess of confusion and her doings. Furthermore it states that 'POEE subscribes to the Law Of Fives of Omar's sect' and 'POEE also recognizes the Holy 23..'. Paratheo-Anametamystikhood can be taken to mean "equivalent deity, reversing beyond-mystique". Randy Kryn (talk) 12:04, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Keep, section has been partially restored with a third-party source and others are available. Skyerise (talk) 18:54, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Randy Kryn and Skyerise: Can you also give your opinion on Poee.org and POEE.org? Jay 💬 06:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I would say thay both could be deleted. RK may feel otherwise. Skyerise (talk) 23:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Agree. My comments above are about Poee as a redirect. I don't even know if it's common practice or not to have .com eddresses etc. as redirects. Randy Kryn (talk) 02:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, websites, domain names, IP addresses, all are allowed as rediredcts. Not just .com, any domain. See {{
    R from website}} and Category:Redirects from domain names. Jay 💬 05:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]

List of deputy chief ministers of Puducherry

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#List of deputy chief ministers of Puducherry

George W's palace

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Rajnibala

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Rajnibala

Black French (disambiguation)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Amc interview with the vampire

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Amc interview with the vampire

Garv Sangwan

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Garv Sangwan

Afflux

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Dominika Hašková (Q105156345)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

April 11

CounterfeitElectronicComponents

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Bruce Shotland

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Qwertqwert

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Great Expectations (upcoming TV series)

Delete in the spirit of

WP:UFILM. Minimal page views, target was released over a month ago. Steel1943 (talk) 21:50, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:27, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 14:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom.
    (obligatory talk page) 14:41, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Delete - We generally should not be using relative terms like "upcoming" in page titles, full stop, doubly so for a show that's already premiered. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 17:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom.—Alalch E. 17:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep here we go again. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:20, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep for a few more weeks/months as needed. We can delete it after usage dies down. No need to jump the gun here. Fieari (talk) 23:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Personally, I wouldn't consider 13 months after the series' release "jumping the gun"; not useful for editor time to sit around the rhetorical microwave, waiting for the redirect to cool off if it's just going to end up in the trash anyway. Not sure what a "re-look in a few weeks" would do after over a year. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:44, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Y'know, maybe someone should make a bot that would scan for (upcoming) redirects, check to see if pageviews have died down yet, and auto-nominate after a redirect falls below a certain threshold. Would cut down on the editor time needed here.
    That said, a redirect like this one can still be useful for a while after a series releases for two reasons: one, like other pagemove redirects, external links could be pointing towards the redirect that feed in a steady amount of traffic. Two, it can serve to alert someone who didn't know that the series/movie/game/book had released yet that "hey, it's out now, go watch/play/read it!" Both of those mean that such a redirect is still useful, and I'll note that one of the two scenarios I presented (that I'm not suggesting is operating here, although given how long it's been, it could be) does bar UFILM from actually functioning-- if an external source is linking to the redirect, it could take years before pageviews actually naturally die off. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 08:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Steel1943: Just for the record, can you correct the nomination? The series was released in March 2023 (a year ago, as was pointed out by some voters), and not a month ago. Jay 💬 15:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jay: I have nothing to correct: "over a month ago" includes "a year ago". Steel1943 (talk) 19:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. The redirect's name is no longer accurate (a year ago), so it is unlikely many readers will find it useful as long as incoming links are updated. To those !voting keep "for now", since the redirect has already been nominated, why waste time forcing us to wait and then make another nom? InfiniteNexus (talk) 00:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pedalanka, Bhattiprolu mandal

Split or bespoke decisions Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: wrong venue

Curse bowl

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Chat Control 2.0

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Favorability

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Favorability

Macmillan Digital Publishing

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Gullible.info

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Forced-birther

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Grizzly-1

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Gris (card game)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Gribbly

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Gribbly

Great September

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Great Firewall of America

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Goulash (magazine)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Goulash (magazine)

Gorbino's Quest

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Gorbino's Quest

Good Thing (Jake Miller song)

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

FIFA 2003

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Gib gnab

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Paramount Television International Studios

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Paramount Television International Studios

German Low German language

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

General OneFile

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#General OneFile

Gender and authoritarianism

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Gender and authoritarianism

Wikipedia:RFDd10

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

DZHH-AM

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#DZHH-AM

Chen Mazzig

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Untitled Guy Ritchie project/film

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: withdrawn

Snow White (live action)

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Snow White remake

Could refer to most films listed at {{Snow White}}, such as Mirror Mirror (film) and Snow White and the Huntsman. There really is no expectation that this redirect references Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937 film) since there have been so many film versions of Snow White that are not Disney-related. Steel1943 (talk) 03:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget Snow White (disambiguation), basically everything on that list after the first is a remake by definition. Alternatively, delete due to being vague and unhelpful (deletion is probably my first choice now that I think about it more), Wikipedia is not a search engine to figure out what article people are imagining in their heads by typing "remake" nowadays. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:21, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    On second thought, I'm striking my retarget !vote. Wikipedia is not a search engine, "remake" is not useful in the form of a redirect. Currently it refers to anything on that list, but it's too vague and subjective in doing so (as remake isn't mentioned). Would be ridiculous to have Foo remake target any disambiguation page with multiple pieces of fiction with the same title, so let Google or Wikipedia's search function figure it out. Delete. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Retarget to Snow White (disambiguation) as plausible search by a reader. I'm also fine with delete due to the malformed "remake" modifier --Lenticel (talk) 05:18, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget as per Utopes, and tag as R from incomplete disambig. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 17:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nominator preference: Delete per above. The existence of the word "remake" and since it makes it so the redirect is not a word-for-word title variation of "Snow White" leave me to believe that the nominated redirect is better deleted than targeting a disambiguation page. Steel1943 (talk) 16:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Snow White (franchise) that has got hatnotes to anything else the reader may be interested in. I find this a better alternative to Snow White (disambiguation). I find suffixing of "remake" to a film as a valid search term. I would do the same if I was looking for a film remake, or the latest remake if there are multiple. Jay 💬 06:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep As far as I'm aware, the upcoming Disney remake is the most notable (if not the only) remake of a previous film titled Snow White. Mirror Mirror (film) is not a remake of a prioer film; neither is Snow White and the Huntsman. InfiniteNexus (talk) 00:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Per InfiniteNexus's argument. Fieari (talk) 23:49, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Infinite. Disney's remake is the only one I've seen referred to as this and is the most notable as Infinite said. The others do not qualify as a remake. Retargeting to a DAB page and deleting are not viable options as we are supposed to help guide readers, and with the amount of traction the upcoming film has gotten already, I'm sure this will remain a useful search term as those looking for the "Snow White remake" are most likely looking for the 2025 film. Trailblazer101 (talk) 00:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TDVC

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

TDOTJ

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

LVER

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

"Getting high" and "Being high"

Split or bespoke decisions Closed discussion, see
Getting high

GittiGidiyor

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Nahdonnis Praji

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Jerus Jannick

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Quiggold

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Vober Dand

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

April 10

Grind Time Now

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

William Melling (actor)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy delete

Wally Francis (CBSO)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Galactic Federation of Free Alliances

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Gagori Kokalot

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Gagori (album)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Gagori

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Gabby and Ty

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

$10 calculator

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

$299

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Sonichu.com

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedily deleted

Season 7, 2016

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Pehli Nazar Mein Dari Thi

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Oncotype DX Colon Cancer Assay

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Oncotype DX Colon Cancer Assay

Mahjong Horoki Classic

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Insurance goal

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Insurance goal

Hockey bag

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Hockey bag

Newbridge Capital

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Efinancialcareers.com

Deletion, eFinancialCareers is no longer owned by DHI Group or Dice.com[1] Mjhobson (talk) 13:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/dhi-group-inc-completes-spinoff-of-efinancialcareers-and-guides-to-a-return-to-total-revenue-growth-in-its-second-quarter-ended-june-30-2021-301323740.html

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bundled with the other similar redirect mentioned by Jay.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and
WP:REDLINK Okmrman (talk) 22:52, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Keep both.
    DHI Group, Inc. to eFC's management team. The press release quoted by the nominator says, "DHI will retain a 40% equity interest in eFC and have board representation." This is still significant ownership. This does not mean that eFinancialCareers should no longer redirect to Dice.com, where it is mentioned twice (once in the "History" section and once in the "Acquisitions by DHI Group, Inc" section. The remedy is to update Dice.com to note that eFinancialCareers is now 40% owned by Dice.com, not to delete the redirects. The redirects remain useful for readers who can read information about eFinancialCareers in Dice.com. Cunard (talk) 05:05, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Keep pretty much per Cunard. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:46, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jeez

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Jeez

Moira Sullivan (Smallville)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Moira Sullivan (Smallville)

Linda Baldwin (Coronation Street)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Linda Baldwin (Coronation Street)

Fucktarded

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Fucktarded

Bhumi(Chennai)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Double the Trouble (album)

Salt evasion of Double the Trouble. Not mentioned at the current target or The Pussycat Dolls discography. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: This existed in April 2007 before the salting on December 2007, this is not salt evasion. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The base name was unprotected in 2011 and re protected a few weeks later. I'm anyway not sure such salting should be indefinite as people who re create often go and notability changes. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • No such album either at The Pussycat Dolls discography or anywhere else. The content originally at this page was moved to Double the Trouble and deleted at AfD. The resulting redirect then has a long history of IPs trying to get the rumoured album restored, until it was protected. Delete to be consistent with the non-disambiguated deletion. Jay 💬 06:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 14:33, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Desmond Cook (Lost)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Cort and Fatboy Show

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Cheaper by the Dozen 3: The White House Wreck

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Bella Bathrooms (company)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Beavecoon iCarly

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Balita sa IBC Huling Ulat

Salt evasion of Balita sa IBC. Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt per nom Okmrman (talk) 14:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aegis Limited (BPO)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Adi Gallia (Star Wars)

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Kitster

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

G-Whizz

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Po Nudo

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Democratic Labor Party (historical)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete
@
WP:AWB's bread and butter (i.e., collecting a list of all the pages that link to Democratic Labor Party (historical), and replacing the link to Australia, 1855). Utopes (talk / cont) 18:18, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
@Utopes I guess your wrist suffered more here, hehe, but yeah, this is something should be easier with AWB or JWB…? I guess next time. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Joever

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Joever

Augastus Ekka

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Comedy Shorts Gamer (entertainer)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Comedy Shorts Gamer (entertainer)

Clorinda (Once Upon a Time)

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Amazonas Region

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Raman Raheja (entrepreneur)

This is a weird case. The only reason this page exists is due to the creator working around the

WP:BLAR'd into the cricket league. Because there is only a passing mention of Raheja at the target, and no indication that Raheja is an entrepreneur, this redirect does not seem very useful without any content about Raheja being an entrepreneur at the cricket league page. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, while the redirect IS pointing to the correct location as per the BLAR'd article, I'm similarly in Utopes's boat in that I'm unsure Raheja counts as an entrepreneur. The only reason this redirect would be any help, is... to get around the salt, because nobody can put a redirect at
can't, have the page Raman Raheja, someone typing Raman Raheja into the searchbar would quite quickly have their query autocompleted to Raman Raheja (entrepreneur), which... would then lead them to Legends League Cricket.
On the one hand, as shown by it being the only thing said BLAR'd article talked about, it's pretty clear that Legends League Cricket is the only thing Raheja is notable for, meaning a redirect to here (where he's the CEO) is warranted; however, THIS redirect is probably a bad idea. The only possible way forward I can think of is to Delete this redirect, then-- with a big MAYBE attached, because I'm not sure that we should do this-- unsalt and create Raman Raheja as a redirect to Legends League Cricket, before immediately protecting the redirect. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 00:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
For the record, I am not opposed to the solution proposed by Jay and Rosguill. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 21:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more go...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flying Theme

Multiple flying themes exist inside and outside of soundtracks.

Flying (Taehyung Theme) exists as a redirect to BTS World: Original Soundtrack, as well as any other theme that plays while flying. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Retarget to a disambiguation page (yet to be created) consisting of the aforementioned pages. signed, Pat talk 01:51, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:56, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After some thinking, I think having this Retarget to a disambiguation page wouldn't hurt. Okmrman (talk) 04:35, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Changing to Dabify per above Okmrman (talk) 21:08, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Changing vote to delete Okmrman (talk) 14:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think this should retarget to the dab page-- I think this should BE the dab page. Dabify. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 11:36, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and let search results do the work. The treatment of "flying theme" in the articles identified so far in this discussion is too brief for a disambiguation to be useful to readers. signed, Rosguill talk 14:56, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Big Nose

Disambiguate Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: disambiguate

Mos:english idioms

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Nashid Al-Huriya

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

April 9

The One Piece is real!

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#The One Piece is real!

You know the rules, and so do I

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

We're no strangers to love

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

My, my, this here Anakin guy

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#My, my, this here Anakin guy

Freeze, everybody clap your hands!

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Freeze, everybody clap your hands!

Everybody clap your hands

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Flexes

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Flexes

Fil d'Ecosse

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Fil d'Ecosse

Fifi Bradlaugh

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Eric Rodríguez, Adam Scott (baseball)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Fictional Jimbo Wales

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Isaac ben bassat

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Facebook Analytics

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Facebook Click Identifier

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Faketoshi

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Factor through

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Factor through

Evolved Apes

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Aaron Antonini, Grant Black, Dalton Roach

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Email etiquettes

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Ehlron Tay

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

EEUU

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Frugality rules

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Pic (Star Wars character)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Wikipedia:Room101

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Watch channel

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 16#Watch channel

(London)derry

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: Withdrawn.

Wikipedia:Wretched hive of scum and villainy

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Wikipedia:Users for deletion

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Kannagi (upcoming film)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 16#Kannagi (upcoming film)

The beach that makes you old

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 16#The beach that makes you old

Monkey squat

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Sorority squat

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Sam Pate

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Logoic plane

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Monadic plane

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Phone computer

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 16#Phone computer

Redirects with trailing.

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Public Transport in Newcastle

First thing that is wrong is that the second and subsequent words should not be capitalized unless its a proper noun. But anyway, the thing is

Australia so I am not sure if this could either serve as a redirect to Newcastle or a new dab page. In case of the latter, the article title needs to change to 'Public transport in Newcastle'. I am leaning towards creating a dab page btw. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JuniperChill (talk • contribs) 14:33, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 07:19, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Disambiguate per Rosbif73 and Joseph2302. A7V2 (talk) 04:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The disambiguation page would be inherently redundant and unmaintainable - anyone who sees Wikipedia doesn't have an article on this will probably search for either just "Newcastle" or Transport in the specific Newcastle they are referring to. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:38, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 14:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per comments above. Okmrman (talk) 14:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Lich (Extinct World)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

BMO (Extinct World)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Ice King (Extinct World)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Paradise Airport

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 16#Paradise Airport

Adult anime

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

🌼

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Dulah, California

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Dulah, California

Larissa Aurora

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Larissa Aurora

Genie (feral child and etc.

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Well, in for a penny, in for a pound... this nomination consists of every remaining redirect with unclosed parenthesis, of which there are now only twelve. All of these typos are not plausible to intentionally make on their own. Because there's been cumulatively 1000+ or so of these redirect types deleted over the last few months, this nomination seeks to determine whether there's a threshold that makes these redirects acceptable, or if one even exists. Most of these redirects have come to exist through erroneous links, which are updateable. While it's good to have redirects from common misspellings lying around for ease of navigation on Wikipedia, the presence of implausible redirect errors sets unreasonable expectations and portrays the faulty notion to readers that "infinite typo variations are encouraged, regardless of likelihood", when this is not currently the case. For the most part, spelling variations are accepted in redirects; especially with words that are tricky to spell, having a set of titles with minor differences can be useful to capture likely, intentional errors. When it pertains to disambiguation, though, there will never be a time where errors in the act of disambiguation are expected, for any title. While someone might spell a title like

Hampster with an intentional (but incorrect) "P", one can generally have 100% confidence that a title with a left parenthesis will contain a right parenthesis, and, as an extension, typing in a title that doesn't contain a right parenthesis will have a 0% likelihood of being redirected to the correct title, as it will never be correctly expected. The disambiguator is Wikipedia's "official insertion" onto the title based on other article names that co-exist here. The tagline's format can be safely assumed as error-free, or if there is an error in the disambiguation, that it will be corrected ASAP without hesitation. Being locked into keeping tabs on any and all errors within this "topic title guarantee" inherited from Wikipedia disambiguation precedent, just because of one (or twelve remaining) bad links on the internet, is just not worth for titles that are one punctuation mark away from the correctness that was already assumed beforehand. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete all. When typing in to the search bar, the search result will be autocompleted with the missing parentheses. As for websites that cannot handle parentheses, that is, as has been established quite clearly over the last few months, their problem, and not Wikipedia's-- they need to fix their formatting handling. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 04:12, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ship Island, Newfoundland and Labrador

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

April 8

EduTok

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Echo Ranch Bible Camp

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Drinkin About You

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Drew Curtis' FARK.com

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Drew Curtis' FARK.com

Dream Catching

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Dream Catching

Disputed Kings and Queens of Narnia

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Dark Mountain (logo)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Dark Mountain (logo)

Dark Deco

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Dark Deco

Cut fingering

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Clean vocals

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Clean vocals

Chief harbourmaster

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Brut up

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Template:Independent MPs

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Template:Independent MPs

Brain sex

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Ace Deuce

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Ace Deuce

Academic School

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Borgarthings-Lov

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: Delete

List of Barbie: Dreamtopia episodes

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Delete!

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Colonia Ulpia Traiana

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Colonia Ulpia Traiana

Faulty thinking

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 16#Faulty thinking

Colon Bracket

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Mullhausen

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Luxury home

After the merging of

Luxury real estate into the general article, the redirect of "luxury home" does not appear to be super useful as it does not bear a mention at any location. Additionally, while the plural version may indicate "multiple homes" being sought, it doesn't seem specific enough to target something besides what the singular version does. Looking at these two options side by side in the search bar, it's a shot-in-the-dark for readers to figure out where each'll go. Perhaps there's a better alternative, because neither status quo seems necessary currently. (I'll mention that "luxury homes" was repointed to the category in 2020 by a user later blocked for NOTHERE). Utopes (talk / cont) 06:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

@Rich Farmbrough: Thanks for the catch! To clarify, were you referring to the merge of luxury real estate, or luxury home? As this only concerns the "home" titles, there shouldn't be any issue that loses the luxury real estate history, and wouldn't be a backdoor delete of that, unless there was something else that you were referring to. The other title of Luxury Home had a miniscule existence before becoming a "Luxury real estate" redirect, although admittedly I did not catch that in my first go with this nom (I was mainly looking at the lowercase two, and then bundled the uppercase once I realized it existed). Utopes (talk / cont) 06:19, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Restoration of the previous target - Luxury real estate, may not be an option per the recently concluded DRV. We have so far only one vote suggesting targetting all to Real estate "for now" probably pending the discussion of Luxury real estate, but with that now out of the way, we can re-view this RfD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 18:10, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 16:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Preservation of the saints

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

No chance in hell

Disambiguate Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: disambiguate

Raindrops on the Open Road (ROTOR) - EP

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

SpaceX Mars propellant plant

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#SpaceX Mars propellant plant

Immigration control in Russia

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 16#Immigration control in Russia

Sam Boughton

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

-)

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

;-;

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

')

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Burnie board

No mention of the word "burnie" at the target article. To that effect, there is only one mention of "burnie board" on Wikipedia, which is in the List of buildings designed by architect John Dalton, as the Burnie Board Residence and Administration Building. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:05, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment the history of the camelcase redirect contains an external link [42] which explains the connection "A 1960s advert for Burnie Board – it appeared in an Australian magazine in 1963. [...] 'Burnie Board' is a type of hardboard or Masonite. The Burnie Paper Mill (1937–2010), Burnie, Tasmania, produced paper, high-grade sawn timber and sheet material like 'Burnie Board'" and multiple other web hits also back up that it was also a type of or similar to masonite, but everything seems to indicate it was a product only or primarily of the 1950s-60s so I would expect most reliable sources to be offline. Thryduulf (talk) 12:58, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as per Thryduulf's findings. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 18:46, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Thryduulf. Is "burnished" close enough to "Burnie" that we don't have to add an explicit mention of "Burnie" to the target article? feminist🩸 (talk) 06:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both per nom, unless a mention is added to the target. I would support keeping the camelcase redirect if it were an {{R with old history}}, but considering that it was created just a few months ago, then there isn't any valuable history to preserve. CycloneYoris talk! 23:11, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:11, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • The advert shown in the external link clearly stylises the product name in camelcase, making it a plausible and useful search term. Therefore either both should be kept or both should be deleted. Thryduulf (talk) 12:28, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 12:32, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 14:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Los Bajos, Chile

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Loule Cross Country

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Firestone (Pern)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

7.92

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#7.92

Eddie Yongming WU

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

John B. Clark

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Catherine, Princess of Wales cancer diagnosis

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy keep

Comazant

This is supposedly another name for this fire. I could not find any evidence of this externally. Onwiki did not particularly help, as not only is this title not mentioned at the article, it is also not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia! I did a search and almost all my results were for "Comozant"; gave this a look on Wikipedia and got nothing. From there I refined my search to just "Comazant", and the only thing I got for all of the first page of my search engine was Comazant being the publisher of a book titled "Captured" by India Blake. Nothing about the fire. And at the end of the day, with zero mentions on Wikipedia including at the target, this title would not be helpful to readers who are left confused about the relationship between St. Elmo's fire and Comazant, as no connection is established between them. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:48, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Appears to be a misspelling of comozant, which is apparently a D&D monster made of St. Elmo's fire. Implausible search term, and violates
    WP:LEAST regardless (if I was searching for comozant, I'd probably be wondering if the D&D monster was lifted from real mythology and want info on that... lacking real mythology, I'd probably expect a list of D&D monsters). Fieari (talk) 07:06, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Keep: Latin term used by Galen in De Comate[43], and subsequently in English[44][45][46] ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 09:57, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Wouldn't this be another reason to delete then, per deletion reason #8? "In particular, redirects in a language other than English to a page whose subject is unrelated to that language (or a culture that speaks that language) should generally not be created." This is a Latin word or phrased used in a non-English language historical document. I found no English language sources using the word. Fieari (talk) 01:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Fieari, the three latter sources are all explicitly English language sources using the word either directly or with reference to English language speakers ?! ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 03:40, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Specifically:
    • "When seen on shipboard at the extremity of a mast, it is called by the French and Spaniards St Elmo's fire, and by the English sailors a comazant
    • 1749. Waddell, in Phil. Trans., XLVI. 111. A very hard Storm of Wind, attended with Thunder and Lightning … and sundry very large Comazants (as we call them) overhead...
    • 1751. Franklin, Lett., Wks. 1840, V. 224. In Captain Waddell’s account of the effects of lightning on his ship, I could not but take notice of the large comazants (as he calls them), that settled on the spintles at the top-mast heads, and burned like very large torches (before the stroke).
    • 1753. Phil. Trans., XLVIII. 213. We have heard all our lives of St. Helmo’s fire … and of the comazants of our mariners.
    • Helen’s Fire (feu d’Hélène), a comazant called “St. Helme’s” or “St. Elmo’s fire” by the Spaniards; the “fires of St. Peter and St. Nicholas” by the Italians; and “Castor and Pollux” by the ancient Romans.
    ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 03:44, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:13, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 07:18, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 14:22, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Central Food Hall

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Bitness

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: soft redirect

Antiscarp

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: soft redirect to wiktionary

Deplorable

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Deplorable

Disorganized

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Family Ties (Fat Joe album

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Dune (1984 film and etc.

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion&oldid=1220633340"