Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 8

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
< May 7
May 9 >

May 8

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 8, 2023.

I told you long ago on the road

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep Consensus that this is an {{
(non-admin closure) estar8806 (talk) ★ 00:16, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

First line of song, improbable search term ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 22:36, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – It being an {{R from lyric}} per above makes it a probable search term by people who either don’t know or don’t remember the name of the song while still knowing how it opens. Randi Moth TalkContribs 08:43, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:58, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep, it is a plausible, even if not especially likely, search term for someone who doesn't know the name of the song, which is a reason we have {{R from lyric}}s in the first place. No significant downside to keeping this around; net positive. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 01:31, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Meru Prastara

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 11:25, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target section (or anywhere else in the target article). Pichpich (talk) 22:59, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This used to be mentioned, but editing over the last few months has removed a great deal of material related to India from the history section. It think it is likely that at some point some of that material will be restored. --JBL (talk) 23:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Soft delete, allowing recreation if that happens. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:58, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Soft delete, agree with Pppery, and per explanation by JBL. Possibly confusing at present, but potentially helpful if the history section is expanded in the future. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 01:21, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Hell legion

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 19#Hell legion

Akiki Nyabongo/Bibliography

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 11:31, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Our further reading sections are not typically accessed through this kind of redirect so it makes "Akiki Nyabongo/Bibliography" a very unlikely search term. Pichpich (talk) 22:28, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep or retain in another form for attribution. J947 † edits 00:42, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Citations aren't copyrightable, so there's no need for that. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:58, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yup, quite right. Thanks. Comment voided. J947 † edits 03:58, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • This was a separate page, created by Deborahw20 (a student editor who also created Akiki Nyabongo), until MPGuy2824 merged it into the article with the summary "copied contents to that section". It looks like most if not all of the entries are redundant with the references used in the article, and I suspect it was originally created to aid in writing the article or perhaps to satisfy a course requirement. Given it's redundant copying it into the article was probably unnecessary; would likely have been better to just move it to user space. That said, it's probably safe to delete the redirect (per Pppery). – Scyrme (talk) 01:27, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Russell Fritz

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 19#Russell Fritz

Inmates

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
(non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:06, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

I suggest retargetting to prisoner and creating Inmate (disambiguation) for the various other things called "inmate" or "inmates" (The Inmate, Operation Inmate, Inmates (The Walking Dead), The Inmates). gnu57 21:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Swine Kampf

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
(non-admin closure) J947 † edits 06:10, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - Implausible search term. Estar8806 (talk) 21:14, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Librium Liz

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:52, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Turks in Luxembourg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
(non-admin closure) feminist🇭🇰🇺🇦 (talk) 08:20, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

No mention in the target article. Pelmeen10 (talk) 07:40, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as not mentioned in target. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak retarget to Islam in Luxembourg which mentions 487 Muslim Turks. Jay 💬 08:32, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    So Turk is a synonym for Muslim now? Dronebogus (talk) 00:13, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Hence "weak". But now that you have brought it up, per Turkish people#Religion Most ethnic Turkish people are either practicing or non-practicing Muslims, per Turkish people#Definition Turkish Jews, Christians, and Alevis are not considered Turks by some., and Since the 1960s, "Turkish" was even seen as synonymous with "Muslim" in countries like Germany..., the quotes notwithstanding. I don't know why Germany is brought into context in the article, but Luxembourg borders it, and all this is good enough in a redirect discussion for me. Jay 💬 21:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Strikes me as prejudiced no true Scotsman-ism, but this is kind of a digression already. Dronebogus (talk) 22:59, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Continuing on the digression... thanks for that article! Isn't no true Scotsmanism already a result of prejudice? I had no knowledge on the Turkey-Muslim synonymity, but the question made me look it up. I still have no opinion, but what I have are selectively quoted lines from the current target! Jay 💬 14:49, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    In English (and probably other European languages), "Turk" has commonly been used as a synonym for "Muslim" since the Elizabethan era. The usage is metonymic: back then, the Ottoman empire (whose dominant ethnicity was Turkish) controlled almost the entire Muslim world as Europeans knew it. The usage outlived that reality, in part because Turkey did continue to be the only Muslim country of great relevance to European affairs for several centuries. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 16:39, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Struck off earlier vote in preference of the diaspora retarget per Uanfala. Jay 💬 13:16, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:27, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom., there is no good retarget. Veverve (talk) 14:27, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete random intersection of no obvious significance. And of course it could also just be a redirect to Luxembourg, so the targeting is arbitrary as well. Dronebogus (talk) 00:13, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For consideration of the recently-created alternate target candidates.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 18:44, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Old Bible

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 18#Old Bible

Reference desk/Miscellaneous

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:53, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As prod-ed earlier: Some general consensus that CNRs to WP areas shouldn't be allowed, so anyone who feels REALLY strongly about it can contest this if they want. Otherwise it's probably not wise to have it, per the reasons at Wikipedia:Cross-namespace redirects. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 18:27, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Lists of Indonesian villages

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 19#Lists of Indonesian villages

February 6 earthquake

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 16#February 6 earthquake

Kloreen

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 16#Kloreen

Bungee bus

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 19#Bungee bus

HIM (Minecraft)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:53, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Very vague. Could refer to any "HIM" in Minecraft. Even if there is proof that Herobrine is

reliable sources actually mentions this supposed alternative name for Herobrine. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 15:41, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Delete Not a reliably sourced and supported alternative name for Herobrine, and there is nothing else in Minecraft that could be conceivably referred to as "HIM".
The Night Watch (talk) 18:26, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Prince Philippos of Greece and Denmark and Edinburgh

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:55, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unlikely search term. Philip’s time as a Prince of Greece and Denmark and Duke of Edinburgh (not Prince of Edinburgh) were separate. In any case, he was never called “Prince Philippos” after he renounced his titles relating to Greece and Denmark. Estar8806 (talk) 14:03, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Impractical. Unused. DrKay (talk) 14:58, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete It is both incorrect and a very unlikely search term. Not used in any sources. Keivan.fTalk 18:24, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Incorrect and anachronistic.98.228.137.44 (talk) 22:15, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Monochromium

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:55, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Monochromium is a song, not a synonym for monochrome. I have no opinion on its notability, but the current redirect is wrong. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 13:17, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't think the song has a mention on Wikipedia; I wasn't able to find one. Searching on Google, it seems the band is called "Glass Remnant" but I don't think they have an article either. Neither the song nor monochrome seem to be the primary topic for this term in English. Virtually all results on Google Scholar and Google Books are for Chromium compounds. – Scyrme (talk) 13:53, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: no plausible target page currently in Wikipedia. Just possibly target Chromium compounds, but no mention there yet. Nothing about the band in Wikipedia, so whatever we decide, redirecting to that is not an option. The current target is grammatically incorrect and implausible as a search term expecting "black-and-white". Lithopsian (talk) 14:05, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Pichpich (talk) 22:43, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No mention anywhere in Enwiki. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:14, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Alejandro Nogués Acuňa

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep.
(non-admin closure) feminist🇭🇰🇺🇦 (talk) 16:51, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The person's surname is Acuña, with a tilde in the n. 109.12.6.224 (talk) 12:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak delete: Keep: Oddly I have found that ň in Slovak and Czech can make a sound similar to ñ in Spanish. Having said that, this is still rather unlikely as it uses a Spanish diacritic combined with a Slovak or Czech spelling. Weak deletion as opposed to regular deletion as the sound can be similarKeep because it was at this location for 3 years. TartarTorte 16:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep –
    K4. J947 † edits 20:56, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]
I missed that it was at the current redirect for 3 years somehow. Changed my vote to keep. TartarTorte 19:06, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

2023 Monaco ePrix

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 21#2023 Monaco ePrix

Scottish Trans

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 16#Scottish Trans

List of football clubs in Wales

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was revert the redirect move.. Jay 💬 12:49, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't give sufficient redirect-ion to women's clubs, so wondering if a better redirect target might be available? Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 23:31, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Multiple suggestions, but no clear outcome yet…
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:04, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Revert move w/ redirect per Trödel and Presidentman. Up until 29 January 2023, List of football clubs in Wales actually was the big list we now have at List of men's football clubs in Wales, with, unfortunately, no women's clubs. I agree it would be better to include any women's clubs (I presume there are some, and that we know of them) on an all-inclusive List of football clubs in Wales, to which end the January rename should be reverted. — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 06:54, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Bridges Over Borders

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep.
(non-admin closure) feminist🇭🇰🇺🇦 (talk) 16:49, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The article was redirected per

WP:NALBUM as it did not contain any references or sources for more than five years when the maintenance tag was added. I could not seem to find any sources covering on the album itself, so I think it is looking closer for the article to face deletion. HorrorLover555 (talk) 00:47, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To delete, or not to delete…
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:59, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per obviousness. The phrase is mention 5 times in the article, and other mentions in Enwiki are all about the song or album. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:22, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Vikværsk

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget Vikvaersk to Norwegian dialects, delete Wickish. signed, Rosguill talk 00:57, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. Briefly listed at Norwegian dialects (not "Wickish", however). 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:02, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Unclear what should be done with these redirects…
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:57, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget 1 and 2 per Fieari, Delete 3 per Fieari and Scyrme Jay 💬 12:58, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Chittem

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 18#Chittem

Gran Matador Brandy

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 16#Gran Matador Brandy

11 Piscis Austrini

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 16#11 Piscis Austrini

Daniel Shulman

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Dan Shulman. signed, Rosguill talk 00:52, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Currently a primary redirect to a non-notable musician; a better target is sportscaster Dan Shulman. 162 etc. (talk) 16:28, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • This was an article for a long time, and it ended up as a redirect after the freshly concluded
    primary topic for the term. – Uanfala (talk) 20:40, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Compassionate727 (T·C) 22:15, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Disambiguate on a disambiguation page at
    Daniel Shulman if there's no primary topic. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:57, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For opinion on a primary target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 08:58, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A draft of the disambiguation page, please.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 † edits 07:34, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Gregory R. Smith

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. While coverage that could be used to support readding him to the list was provided, editors equivocated on whether such coverage is truly appropriate. No prejudice to recreation if relevant content is added to the target. signed, Rosguill talk 00:50, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in redirect target since 2019, so these redirects should be deleted. I made the former page from an article into a redirect in 2007 after a no-consensus AFD. At its talk page, the article creator said in 2007 that he was OK with the article's deletion. I was reminded of this situation by this village pump policy thread. Graham87 08:39, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete both, as our redirects shouldn't lead the reader to an empty marsh where there's nothing to see. — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 13:31, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • If the subject is notable, then the pre-BLAR content may be restored and enhanced. There was no consensus for deletion even in 2007. The subject will be in his 30s now and the arguments about privacy may have changed. Jondel was not really the article creator, but one among multiple authors of the article. If the subject is not notable, delete. I don't believe content at the page history was merged to any article, so there won't be a need to retain it. Jay 💬 14:37, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Jay: Jondel was *indeed* the article creator in this case; the edit that's listed as being from January 2003 has an incorrect date/timestamp due to a clock reset (see T4219 and musings on this bug in my userspace). Graham87 07:57, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      Interesting bug! In any case, being the creator and substantial contributor has benefits when it comes to speedy deletion. Here, there were other authors, hence the opinion as article creator is only symbolic. And it was a long time ago. Jay 💬 08:05, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Struck off the delete. One of the links by casualdejekyll is from 2016, so I'll assume there is still interest about the subject, and he can be added back to the target. Jay 💬 13:53, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For further opinions over whether the article content should be procedurally restored.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 † edits 07:31, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, there's probably enough coverage [2][3][4] to justify re-adding him to the list, but if he isn't added to the list then it makes sense to delete. Privacy concerns are still probably valid - he's definitely a
relatively unknown, non-public figure. casualdejekyll 20:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Urgrund

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Support for deletion over soft-redirection enjoys a slight numerical and argumentative advantage. signed, Rosguill talk 00:46, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect used to be a disambiguation page (an albeit ineffective one) to which Urgrund (disambiguation) redirected. Enwiki has no substantive explanation of Urgrund (and no mention at the current target) so a {{Wiktionary redirect}} may be appropriate here. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 07:42, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Courtesy link: wikt:urgrund
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 † edits 07:27, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Either delete or soft redirect to wikt:urgrund on the Wiktionary, as per above. Veverve (talk) 15:18, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No incoming links, no mention on enwiki, oppose soft redirect per
    WP:SSRT. Jay 💬 06:52, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Taiwan Semiconductor

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Don't worry about this until the draft is accepted.
(non-admin closure) J947 † edits 00:39, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - TSMC or TSM is comment terms of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company in resource or news, and Taiwan Semiconductor is another company called "Taiwan Semiconductor Company Limited" founded earlier than TSMC.

talk) 07:16, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Ben Carlton

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 16#Ben Carlton

Ice Blonde

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 16#Ice Blonde

Maria Mironova (Q4296110)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:38, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects with Wikidata identifiers are not useful per several prior discussions. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:52, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

English Nation

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 15#English Nation

Alexandrina Victoria von Wettin, nee Hanover

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 16#Alexandrina Victoria von Wettin, nee Hanover

A. F. A. George

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 04:55, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No idea where this would've come from. A quick search of this redirect returns nothing relating to George VI. Implausible & unlikely search term. Estar8806 (talk) 01:15, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"A. F. A." stands for "Albert Frederick Arthur" Globg (talk) 01:18, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Unknown search term. DrKay (talk) 04:55, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Not used in any books or research papers. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:16, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete He has never been referred to as such. It is an unlikely search term and is not used in any sources. Keivan.fTalk 18:34, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. For one thing, George wasn't his surname.98.228.137.44 (talk) 22:17, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_May_8&oldid=1156128173"