Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Instructions

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

This guide describes the structure of the

reliable sources noticeboard
. Any editor is welcome to update the list using this guide.

Prerequisites

The list is structured as a

wikitext
.

Since the

switch to "Source editing" mode
before editing the list.

A project-level

RfC
is required for the following:

  • Any source that is proposed for deprecation (see also
    the list of deprecated sources
    );

RfCs should be registered at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard using {{rfc|prop}}.

Templates

Several templates are used throughout the list. Some of these templates are located on

subpages
of the list, and they should be transcluded into the list with a leading slash character (/) as a shortcut.

Shortcut Template Description
{{/Last}} Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Last "Last" discussion table cell
{{/Shortcut}} Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Shortcut
Shortcut
box
{{/Status}} Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Status "Status" table cell
{{/Uses}} Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Uses "Uses" table cell
{{
rsnl
}}
Template:RSN link Link to a discussion or
reliable sources noticeboard
or its archives
{{
sbll
}}
Template:SBL link Link to a request at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist or its archives

The list uses a CSS style sheet located at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css.

Examples

Simple

|- class="s-nc" id="Example_Source"
| [[Example Source]]
| {{/Status|nc}}
| {{rsnl|100|Reliable sources noticeboard discussion title|1}} {{rsnl|200|Second discussion|2}}
| {{/Last|2015}}
| Description of source and summary of past discussions.
| {{/Uses|example.com|example.net}}
Source Status
(legend)
Discussions Uses
List Last Summary
Example Source No consensus 1 2 Stale discussions
2015
Description of source and summary of past discussions. 1 HTTPS links HTTP links
2 HTTPS links HTTP links

Advanced

|- class="s-b" id="Blacklisted_Source"
| ''[[Blacklisted Source]]'' {{small|([[BS]], ''[[Nickname]]'')}} {{/Shortcut|WP:BS}}
| {{/Status|gu|b=y}}
| {{sbll|January 2017|Blacklisted Source|2017}} {{rsnl|100|RfC: Blacklisted Source|2020|rfc=y|active=y}}
+8{{efn|See also these discussions of ''Blacklisted Source'':
{{rsnl|1|Discussion 1|1}}
{{rsnl|2|Discussion 2|2}}
{{rsnl|10|Discussion 3|3}}
{{rsnl|11|Discussion 4|4}}
{{rsnl|12|Discussion 5|5}}
{{rsnl|20|Discussion 6|6|active=y}}
[[Talk:Example Source#Discussion A|A]]
''[[Wikipedia:Example#Discussion B|B]]''
}}
| {{/Last|2020|inprogress=y}}
| Description of source and summary of past discussions. 
| {{/Uses|example.com|example.net|example.org|example.info}}
Source Status
(legend)
Discussions Uses
List Last Summary
Blacklisted Source (BS, Nickname)
WP:BS 📌
Blacklisted Generally unreliable Spam blacklist request 2017 Request for comment 2020

+8[a]

Discussion in progress
2020
Description of source and summary of past discussions.
1 HTTPS links HTTP links
2 HTTPS links HTTP links
3 HTTPS links HTTP links
4 HTTPS links HTTP links

Notes

  1. ^ See also these discussions of Blacklisted Source: 1 2 3 4 5 6 A B

Columns

Source

The "Source" column of the table displays up to four items:

  1. Name: The name of the source, linked to the corresponding article. Italicize the name if the article does the same.
    • Sources that do not have a corresponding article or redirect should generally be excluded from the list.
  2. Aspects: (optional) When there are multiple entries covering different aspects of the same source, list the aspects inside parentheses after the name. Examples of aspects include:
    • Media on which a source is published (e.g. website, print)
    • Topics covered by the source (e.g. politics, science)
    • Authors published in the source (e.g. staff, contributors)
  3. Aliases: (optional) If the source is also referred to by at least one alias, list the prominent aliases within parentheses inside a {{small}} template. Aliases can include:
    • Commonly used abbreviations
    • Nicknames, former names, and alternative names
    • Names of closely associated publications and companies (including
      subsidiaries
      )
  4. Shortcut: (optional) A shortcut to the list entry, displayed with the {{/Shortcut
    }} template

Status

The status of a source is indicated in two ways:

  1. The table row uses a
    CSS
    class value that displays a background color.
  2. The {{/Status}} template is set to a value, which shows an icon in the "Status" column.
Status Row class value {{/Status}} value Background color Icon
Generally reliable
s-gr gr
  
No consensus
s-nc nc
  
Generally unreliable
s-gu gu
  
Deprecated
s-d d
  
Blacklisted
s-b One of the above
  

and one of the above

To represent a blacklisted source in the "Status" column, set the {{/Status}} template's b parameter to y. The b parameter is independent from the template's value. For example, a blacklisted generally unreliable source is indicated with {{/Status|gu|b=y}}, while a blacklisted deprecated source is indicated with {{/Status|d|b=y}}. A blacklisted source has a gray background color, and shows both the "X" icon and the icon corresponding to the source's reliability.

A source's status should be consistent with its summary of discussions.

List of discussions

The discussions in the "List" column determine the contents of the source's summary and the value of the source's status.

Ordering discussions

Discussions on the source are linked from the "List" column in the following order:

  1. Major discussions: List major discussions in chronological order.
  2. Ordinary noticeboard discussions: List discussions located on the reliable sources noticeboard or its archives in chronological order.
  3. Ordinary non-noticeboard discussions: List essential discussions located outside of the reliable sources noticeboard and its archives in chronological order.

Do not link to a discussion more than once in the same source entry.

Condensing discussions

When there are 4 or more rows of discussions listed in a "Status" table cell, use {{

explanatory footnote
. In front of the footnote marker, indicate the total number of discussions linked in the footnote.

  • If the entry lists at least one major discussion:
    • Condense the ordinary discussions if all of the discussions take up 4 or more rows, and the ordinary discussions take up 2 or more rows.
      • 1 major discussion: Condense the ordinary discussions when there are at least 11 of them.
      • 2 or more major discussions: Condense the ordinary discussions when there are at least 6 of them, or if there are both noticeboard and non-noticeboard discussions.
    • Add a plus sign (+) in front of the discussion count.
    • The footnote text should begin with See also these discussions of Example:, with Example being replaced with the source's name.
  • If the entry does not list any major discussions:
    • Condense the ordinary discussions if there are at least 14 of them.
    • The footnote text should begin with See these discussions of Example:, with Example being replaced with the source's name.

Last discussion

In the "Last" column, use {{/Last}} to specify the year of the last comment in the most recent discussion listed in the "Status" column. If the discussion is currently active, set the inprogress parameter to y. For example:

  • If the most recent discussion of source ended in 2006, use {{/Last|2006}}.
  • If the source has an active discussion in year 2024, use {{/Last|2024|inprogress=y}}.

Summary of discussions

The "Summary" column describes the

consensus within all non-active discussions indexed in the list of discussions
. The amount of weight assigned to each discussion depends on the following:

  • Uninterrupted
    reliable sources noticeboard
    :
    Uninterrupted RfCs on the noticeboard take precedence over all other discussions.
    • If there is a conflict between an uninterrupted noticeboard RfC and an ordinary discussion, use the result of the RfC in the summary for the conflicting matter.
    • RfCs held in other locations are not prioritized in this way.
  • Age: Newer discussions are weighted more highly than older discussions.
    • If there is a conflict between an older noticeboard RfC and a newer uninterrupted noticeboard RfC, use the result of the newer RfC in the summary for the conflicting matter.
    • If there is a conflict between an older ordinary discussion and a newer ordinary discussion, consider both, but weight the newer discussion more highly.
  • Depth: Discussions that examine the reliability of the source in greater detail are weighted more highly than discussions that examine reliability in less detail.
  • Participation: Discussions with more participants are weighted more highly than discussions with fewer participants.

The summary of the source should explain the following:

The summary may include other guidance on how to appropriately use the source, as long as the information is derived from non-active discussions in the list of discussions.

Qualify the strength of statements in the summary. For example, the phrases "most editors", "some editors", and "a few editors" can be used to communicate a statement's level of support.

Uses

Apply the {{

em dash
(—) to indicate this.

Patrolling the noticeboard

To keep the list up-to-date, volunteers patrol the

reliable sources noticeboard
on a regular basis. As new discussions are started and old discussions are archived, the list should reflect the most current information.

  • New discussion: When an editor creates a new discussion about a source on the noticeboard, record the discussion if there is already an entry for the source.
    • Add the new discussion to the entry's list of discussions with the active parameter set to y.
    • In the "Last" column, update the last discussion year to the current year, and set the inprogress parameter to y.
  • Archived discussion: Lowercase sigmabot III archives noticeboard discussions that receive no replies within five days. Discussions that are tracked in an entry should be updated accordingly.
    • If the archived discussion does not have enough participation to meet the
      inclusion criteria
      , remove the discussion from the entry's list of discussions.
    • Otherwise, update the {{
      rsnl
      }}
      template to target the archive page instead of the main noticeboard, and remove the active parameter.
    • If there are no remaining active discussions, remove the inprogress parameter from the "Last" column.

Noticeboard maintenance

The reliable sources noticeboard should be regularly checked to ensure that everything is running smoothly.

Deprecating a source

Deprecating
a source involves several steps:

  1. Close the RfC with a closing statement indicating that there is consensus to deprecate the source. If there is consensus in the discussion to specifically refrain from one of the standard deprecation measures (
    edit filter
    ), note this in the closing statement and skip the associated step.
  2. Auto-revert: Create a discussion for the source under
    SBHandler to add the domains associated with the source to User:XLinkBot/RevertList and User:XLinkBot/RevertReferencesList
    .
  3. Edit filter: Add the domain to
    edit filter manager
    permission, which administrators can assign to themselves.
  4. Create or update the entry for the source in:

See also

  • WT:RSP
    ) – Feel free to ask for help on the talk page if you get stuck.