Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 June 1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:33, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PacifiCat ferries (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is an orphan and the three ferries concerned are not unique enough to warrant their own articles. Gwsk55970 (talk) 21:36, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, mostly redirects. Frietjes (talk) 16:06, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• delete Kingjeff (talk) 00:14, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The 3 core links are all redirects. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:05, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not enough useful links for navigation -- Whpq (talk) 20:14, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep, appears another link was added, but I will rename it to match the article to address the IPs concern. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:28, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tag Team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Fails

• keep, has enough core links. Frietjes (talk) 16:05, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or rename not about
  Tag Team ; if kept, it should match the main article. -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 06:58, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. Only 4 core links, so fails
  WP:NENAN. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:09, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - not enough useful links for navigation (I count only 4 core links) -- Whpq (talk) 20:15, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:25, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:U.P.O. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Fails

• weak delete, there are five core links, but the artists are already well connected to the main band article. Frietjes (talk) 16:05, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The record labels don't belong in the template, because they are not defined by their relationship with U.P.O.. The two artists are already linked to from each article on an album, so that just leaves the two albums ... and two albums is not enough to need a navbox. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:06, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not enough useful links for navigation -- Whpq (talk) 20:15, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:16, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Quad City DJ's (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Fails

• weak delete, only three core links since one of the singles is a redirect. Frietjes (talk) 16:04, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Only 3 core links, so fails
  WP:NENAN. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:03, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - not enough useful links for navigation -- Whpq (talk) 20:16, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisting on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 June 9. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:22, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:53, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Digable Planets (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

fails

• weak delete, does not have enough relevant links. Frietjes (talk) 17:26, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • a compilation album was added, but that article is very weak, and I still think it doesn't have enough core links. Frietjes (talk) 16:02, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not enough useful links for navigation. The addition of the compilation album ups the core links to 4 so still short. -- Whpq (talk) 20:19, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep, more links were added. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:23, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jocelyn Enriquez (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

fails

• Keep, has enough relevant links. Frietjes (talk) 17:27, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not enough useful links for navigation. There are only 4 core links aside form the link for the main article. -- Whpq (talk) 20:20, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • added If You Could Read My Mind. Frietjes (talk) 16:42, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:48, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Arson Anthem (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

fails

• weak delete, does not have enough relevant links. Frietjes (talk) 17:27, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not enough useful links for navigation -- Whpq (talk) 20:21, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:23, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Scary Kids Scaring Kids (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

fails

• Delete. Not enough relevant links. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:15, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not enough useful links for navigation -- Whpq (talk) 20:21, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisting on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 June 9 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisting on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 June 9 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:23, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep, more links were added. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:22, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Robbie Nevil (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Fails

• Delete. Not enough relevant links. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:18, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, has enough relevant links. Frietjes (talk) 17:25, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • added Dominoes, which increases it to five. Frietjes (talk) 00:12, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not enough useful links for navigation. There are only 4 core links aside from the main article. -- Whpq (talk) 20:25, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:22, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Boo-Yaa T.R.I.B.E. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Fails

• Delete. Not enough relevant links. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:22, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• weak delete, does not have enough relevant links. Frietjes (talk) 17:31, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not enough useful links for navigation -- Whpq (talk) 20:25, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.