Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 August 20

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Log
< August 19 August 21 >

August 20

Template:Jokerit roster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:26, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and blanked back in June. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:19, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever happens the page will have to be re-instated or re-created when Jokerit return from hiatus in 2023. Triggerbit (talk) 15:19, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 18:37, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:KNVB Cup Winners 2021-present

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:34, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bas1411, who created this template, agrees (see here) that this template should be deleted since I made some minor adjustments to another template. Dutchy45 (talk) 10:56, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Whit monday

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:32, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single use template of insufficient complexity to need a separate template. Izno (talk) 02:12, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose the question is whether to re-add the table to the parent article. To be honest I think this is fairly random almanac data and can just be deleted. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:06, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Usually the template is substed and anyone who prefers to delete it from the page has that luxury and can take the responsibility for removing it. Izno (talk) 17:03, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Lookbehind

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:30, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Used in only two mainspace pages and with insufficient complexity.

The styles internal to the table are also odd. Izno (talk) 02:08, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've substituted them. Feel free to delete. cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 18:35, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Voting images

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:29, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single non-mainspace use Izno (talk) 02:04, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:06, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Userfy. The non-mainspace use of the template is a usse within a userspace draft. Rather than simply deleting the template (and the work that the user put into it), it would be better to userfy the template and allow the user to continue work on their draft. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:45, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    A draft which has not been meaningfully edited in a decade. Izno (talk) 05:24, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete >>> Extorc.talk 04:26, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_August_20&oldid=1106981363"