Wikipedia:The grey zone
This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
This page is located somewhere on the brink between light and darkness, between shadow and substance, between matter and antimatter, between essay and humour, and between ignoring the rules and following procedure. This threshold is commonly known as The Twilight Zone... Doo Doo Doo Doo Take a break from editing if fatigue is a problem, it's very refreshing |
Sometimes we are
This is the grey zone the twilight zone that evening time when things lose their distinction, and every move may be wrong, a
- Remember to keep a neutral point of view.
- Don't fall between the cracks, into the grey zone.
Working together
Building Wikipedia is a collaborative process. So what happens when the process is not working optimally?
EditorA makes an edit to an article, a “bad edit”, which does not adhere to a
EditorC comes along, notices that EditorB has been uncivil. And posts to the discussion page, “EditorB, you have been uncivil, please withdraw your statement”.[1]
What has gone wrong here? Well EditorB did not act perfectly, neither did EditorA (perfection being unavailable to human beings). But what did EditorC do wrong? Well, EditorD
Just checking on INCIVILITY is only part of the work. The accuracy of edits must be checked, even if the editor who brought the problem to the community’s attention was to some degree incivil in doing so. This is not, though, an excuse for incivility. The background to the incident at hand should also be taken into account, and pointers made to appropriate Wikipedia policy.
And if there is no EditorD? Then, in that case, we just hope that most editors, in the role of EditorC, are experienced enough to know that they might have to do BOTH of these things (deprecate any incivility, AND check the original edit). In practice, the likelihood of EditorC doing this is similar to the likelihood of stumbling over the Hope Diamond as one is walking across the street.
See also
- Avoid personal remarks – It is very important to discuss edits, and refrain from commenting on Editors
- When you wonder what to do
- Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
- WP:NPOVFAQNeutral Point of View – Frequently asked questions
- Don't take the bait – Avoid responding to provocation
- Writing for the opponent The intent is to show that you understand another person's perspective
- Wikipedia:The interaction between policies - A more general version of this essay
- Applying the duck test
- Do not feed the trolls
- Gray Area
- Gray lines
Notes
- Edit summaries are difficult to fix.