Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds

The aim of this WikiProject is to set out broad suggestions about how we organise data articles about birds and related topics. In general, these are only suggestions, and you shouldn't feel obliged to follow them.

This

This WikiProject is an offshoot of WikiProject Tree of Life.

WikiProject Biology

WikiProject Tree of Life

WikiProject Animals

(WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, and then

WikiProject Dinosaurs, if you're a cladist)

WikiProject Birds

Domestic pigeon task force (defunct)

Poultry task force (inactive)

Related projects include:

• WikiProject Agriculture
• WikiProject Environment
• WikiProject Ecology
• WikiProject Ecoregions

Categories for discussion

• 11 Mar 2023 – Category:Birds of the Amazon Basin (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by Fayenatic london (t · c); see discussion

Featured list candidates

• 02 May 2023 – List of birds of Tokelau (talk · edit · hist) was FL nominated by AryKun (t · c); see discussion

Good article nominees

• 15 May 2023 – Titanis (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Augustios Paleo (t · c); see discussion

Articles to be merged

• 20 Mar 2023 – Supraorbital gland (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Salt gland by Mooonswimmer (t · c); see discussion
• 21 Feb 2023 – Anjouan sparrowhawk (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Frances's sparrowhawk by FunkMonk (t · c); see discussion

Spoken articles

The list of spoken articles concerning WikiProject Birds is found here.

Feel free to request assistance with references at the

Bird names and article titles

In general, use the formal common name for article titles.

• Peregrine falcon not Falco peregrinus
• Wandering albatross not Diomedea exulans
• Splendid fairywren not Malurus splendens

Sometimes exceptions need to be made; some individual creatures (usually newly discovered ones) do not yet have a formal common name and some groups are known only by their

Ornithology publications usually capitalise the vernacular name of a species to differentiate it from more general terms.^[1] Following discussions, it has been decided that capitals will be used on Wikipedia only for parts of the name that are proper names, consistent with practice in more general-audience publications.^[2]

In publications that capitalise, the phrase "in Australia there are many Common Starlings" clearly indicates a large number of Sturnus vulgaris, while the phrase "in Australia there are many common starlings" could indicate several different types of starling being common. Clearer formulation must be used in a non-capitalising publication like Wikipedia: e.g., "in Australia the common starling is numerous", vs. "in Australia many types of starling are common". Add binomial names in round brackets (parentheses) to reduce any ambiguity if necessary.

The

Per this discussion and as amended in this discussion, the consensus style to write the combination of common name plus scientific name in the lead is bolded common name followed by bolded italicised scientific name in parentheses:

Summary of naming guidelines – common names

• The common name of a particular species is not capitalised, except where proper names appear (e.g. common blackbird, metallic starling, emu, ostrich, New Zealand scaup).
• The name of a group of species is not capitalised (e.g. birds, thrush family, kingfishers, turtle doves, marsh harriers).
• Alternative common names should be mentioned where appropriate; with bold type in the opening line of the article if they are in wide use, elsewhere in the article (with or without the bold type) if they are less-used. This is usually a matter for individual judgement.

Summary of naming guidelines – scientific names

• Orders, families and other taxa above genus level are written with an initial capital and in roman (not italic) text: birds belong to the class Aves; ducks are members of the family Anatidae and the order Anseriformes.
• The names of genera are always italicised and capitalised: Turdus, Falco, Anas.
• Species epithets are never capitalised, always italicised, and always preceded by either the genus name or a one-letter abbreviation of it: Alcedo pusilla or A. pusilla, Cisticola juncidis or C. juncidis. The abbreviation is used only when it is unambiguous in the context of the article.
• The placements in families and genera as well as the boundaries of the species are themselves not always unambiguous or without debate. Although the IOC list is usually up-to-date, new species and large-scale phylogenetic studies may sometimes suggest alternate placements (both binomial combinations as well as higher level classification). These alternate positions are best included with citations with the taxonomic history, older combinations and rationale explained with citations in the article.

Regional lists

It is recommended for the sake of consistency that regional lists are named as List of birds of [Region] rather than List of [Region-adjective] birds.

Article sections

Most of the bird species articles have a common structure which include various combinations of the following:

• Taxonomy and systematics (including subspecies, relation to related species, history of naming, alternate names, and evolution)
• Description (often including details on immature plumage, moult, vocalisations, identification, and similar species)
• Distribution and habitat
• Behaviour and ecology
  • Breeding
  • Food and feeding
  • Threats or Survival
• In culture or Relationship to humans
• Status

Additional sections may be included to cover aspects that are particularly interesting or well studied in that species.

Taxoboxes

Barn swallow
H. r. rustica
Scientific classification
Kingdom:	Animalia
Phylum:	Chordata
Class:	Aves
Order:	Passeriformes
Family:	Hirundinidae
Genus:	Hirundo
Species:	H. rustica
Binomial name
Hirundo rustica Linnaeus, 1758
Range of H. rustica   Breeding range   Resident year-round   Non-breeding range

In general, bird articles should have

See Wikipedia:Automated taxobox system for the full details on constructing a taxobox.

There are several example bird taxoboxes, suitable for cut-and-paste insertion into entries:

• /family taxobox example with picture
• /genus taxobox example
• /species taxobox example
• /species taxobox with subspecies example

Adding images

Images in bird articles should be added with care and captioned carefully. If the taxobox is empty - consider adding one that shows the full bird, preferably facing into the text. If the species is sexually dimorphic, you may consider adding a second image to the taxobox, or distribute the other images in the text carefully. Do not add images to the lead section. If a bird article is well-illustrated, examine the quality of the images before adding your own, and do not add an image just because you took the picture. If the species has multiple subspecies with distinctive plumage variations, make a note of the features in the caption and the general region (not to the accuracy of a delivery address - accurate locations and dates should be included in the image metadata on Wikimedia Commons). Photos of live birds are preferred in an article's taxobox, but artwork or photos of stuffed specimens can be used if the first are unavailable or of inadequate quality

Illustrate specific behaviours or plumages in the appropriate location. If absolutely necessary, add a gallery towards the end of the article to accommodate multiple images, there is no need to explicitly add a section called "Gallery". The captions ideally need to add value to the text, calling attention to specifics mentioned in the article where possible. If the text flow is being disrupted or if the images are flowing into the reference section, it probably means that there are more images than needed for the article, consider researching and improving the article with more text. Remember that people can always visit the images in the appropriate Commons categories or gallery pages which should linked using the appropriate template at the end of the article.

Distribution maps

A good way to show a bird's area of occurrence is to add a distribution map; see the above example on how. Species with tiny areas of occurrence should get larger maps which are displayed thumbnailed.

As for colors, the following are generally accepted as literature standard, for example by the

•    Breeding visitor
•    Non-breeding visitor
•    Resident
•    Introduced range

For species that do not migrate, a single color can be used as in the example. At-sea range of birds like albatrosses is usually marked in darker or lighter blue. Small islands can be marked with a larger dot and/or shown magnified in inserts. Migration flyways are often indicated with arrows. Areas of irruptive occurrence- more regular and plentiful than casual vagrancy, such as in crossbill species–can be indicated by colored stippling.

It is good to use basic,

The "HBW standard" colors have one major advantage: they can also, due to differences in brightness, be distinguished by almost all people with some sort of color blindness.

The headlined glossary article (Wikipedia's only featured glossary) contains definitions for many terms that may be useful to link to in bird articles. (Nevertheless, please be mindful of

• {{Infobox book}}
• {{Infobox journal}}
• {{Infobox park}} – for nature reserves

• {{Taxonbar}} – see Documentation.

• {{Barn Owl Barnstar}} - To use this template, add {{subst:Barn Owl Barnstar|1=Put your message here. ~~~~}} to the talk page of the user to whom you wish to award it.

• {{WPBIRDS Invite}} - To invite a user to this project, add {{subst:WPBIRDS Invite|~~~~}} to the talk page of the user that you wish to invite. You can also use {{subst:WPBIRDS Invite|article=article name|~~~~}}, replacing article name with the name of the article.