Search results
Appearance
The page "Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/include/js/assets/logo.png" does not exist. You can request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- How to review a featured article candidate)article for quite some time, achieved GA status and DYK, and just closed a peer review. I think it is ready now. I hope y'all agree! – The Sharpest Lives (💬•✏️•ℹ️)...4 KB (129,089 words) - 15:11, 17 July 2024here -> MediaWiki_talk:Wdsearch.js#Add_link_to_search. --Superchilum(talk to me!) 08:11, 27 February 2017 (UTC) Is it possible to include Infobox (ex....494 KB (64,157 words) - 10:07, 1 December 2023―Mandruss ☎ 04:47, 27 April 2015 (UTC) For military things I would suggest going to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 05:20...513 KB (65,296 words) - 15:00, 21 April 2023Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1093 (section Can I use photo's on wikipedia web site ? I am writing a book about my father it is a Biography and includes History?)advance!!! The images are: File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-ses.png File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-ti.png File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-vi.png --2001:B07:6442:8903:7DA4:E940:35D8:1126...402 KB (54,067 words) - 16:47, 31 May 2024Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)/Archive 5 (section A peer review thank you template to incentivize, reward, and quantify helpful peer reviews)the new, revitalized project. WikiProject Military History members, as well as members of all region-specific history projects, would be automatically...307 KB (45,081 words) - 10:21, 15 October 2023Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1120 (section Best Way To Include Media Reference For Article Not Available Online)editorial process. This is why peer-reviewed published journals are more favorable as opposed to a doctoral thesis project, even one that is published....402 KB (54,723 words) - 04:40, 18 April 2023
- section of Wikisource:What Wikisource includes#Scientific research in that the first two entries emphasize peer review and the last one emphasizes notability
)