Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Assessment/Top-important

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

This is the WikiProject assessment department "Top-Important" page belonging to Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels. It is used as a basis for those trying to agree the "Top" priority or importance of existing articles.

In other words a forum to discuss agreement on which Novel articles should "Always" be present in representations of this on-line encyclopedia. See also the

WP:0.5
WikiProjects.

N.b. Please bear in mind that the aim is not to assess the relative qualities of the novels themselves, but to determine how important (of what priority) it is the have an article about the subject in this on-line encyclopedia or any variant outtake from it. (see the

WP:0.5
rationales.) It is not about literary merit, but how much expectation would the average encyclopedia reader have of finding the novel article present.

Please keep to starting the entry with emboldened class names (i.e. "Top", "High", "Mid" or "Low") only so it is clear for those following and so that the rating is clear regardless of where the entries are moved, (promote etc. are relative terms in this context).

Current Top-important items

n.b. please list strictly alphabetically

A Christmas Carol

Summary status ( 5 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 10:12, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

A Farewell to Arms

Summary status ( 2 for | 2 against) Top class - as at 09:55, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Adventures of Huckleberry Finn

Summary status ( 5 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 09:54, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Top --Sordel 14:32, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top
    john k 18:40, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top Applejuicefool 16:18, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top One of the three or four seminal novels of American literature. Mandel 06:23, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top
    ee 15:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Alice's Adventures in Wonderland

Summary status ( 7 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 15:53, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

All Quiet on the Western Front

Summary status ( 4 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:32, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Anna Karenina

Summary status ( 4 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 10:13, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Top - Tolstoy's masterpiece, along with War and Peace.
    Errabee 12:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Silverthorn 11:58, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Often regarded as the greatest novel of all time.
    john k 18:40, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bleak House

Summary status ( 7 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 10:14, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Brave New World

Summary status ( 6 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 09:48, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Catch-22

Summary status ( 5 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:34, 10 March 2008 (UTC)


Crime and Punishment

Summary status ( 6 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 15:47, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

David Copperfield

Summary status ( 4 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 10:15, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Dead Souls

Summary status ( 3 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:50, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Doctor Zhivago

Summary status ( 4 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 10:17, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Don Quixote

Summary status ( 6 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 13:30, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Dracula

Summary status ( 6 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 09:56, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Dream of the Red Chamber

Summary status ( 1 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 09:57, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

East of Eden

Summary status ( 2 for | 4 against) Top class - as at 13:32, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Eugene Onegin

Summary status ( 4 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 15:45, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Fathers and Sons

Summary status ( 3 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 15:48, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Top - Masterpiece from important Russian writer Ivan Turgenev.
    Errabee 12:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Quite important.
    john k 18:40, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rerate - it would be nice to have something Turgenev, but I can well image encyclopedia withou it. --Wikimol 15:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frankenstein

Summary status ( 5 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 09:39, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Germinal

Summary status ( 3 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 15:48, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Top - Zola was one of France's most important novelists of the 19th century, and this is generally considered his masterpiece.
    john k 18:59, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top -
    ee 15:41, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Great Expectations

Summary status ( 4 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 15:49, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Gulliver's Travels

Summary status ( 5 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 15:50, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Harry Potter

Summary status ( 5 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 15:51, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Heart of Darkness

Summary status ( 3 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 15:54, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Howards End

Summary status ( 0 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 15:54, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

In Search of Lost Time

Summary status ( 5 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 13:28, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Jane Eyre

Summary status ( 5 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:51, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Jin Ping Mei

Summary status ( 1 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 15:55, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

discovery today

  • Top - Would enhance Wikipedia's reputation as a serious world encyclopedia. Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Lady Chatterley's Lover

Summary status ( 3 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 13:27, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Lazarillo de Tormes

Summary status ( 4 for | 0 against) Top class - as at :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 16:42, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - I must confess that I'm basing this solely on having read the article, but if this novel invented the picaresque genre, then it probably deserves top-importance. --Sordel 18:47, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - The novel did start the picaresque genre. It's considered one of the most remarkable novels in Spanish literature, maybe only second to Don Quxote. Well known to anyone with high-school education in many (probably most) Spanish speaking countries, althought not as widely known elsewhere. Known by anyone with a serious interest in Spanish literature.--Rataube 15:44, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Wikimol 15:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Le Père Goriot

Summary status ( 2 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 15:55, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Top - Probably the best known work by Balzac, one of the most important French novelists (and novelists in general) of the 19th century).
    john k 18:59, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - aka above. Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Les Liaisons dangereuses

Summary status ( 4 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 15:56, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Les Misérables

Summary status ( 5 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 15:54, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Lolita

Summary status ( 5 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 15:57, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Top - Magnum opus from Nabokov; very influential on society and language.
    Errabee 12:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Ibis3 21:05, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top -
    john k 18:40, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - well known, CZMyBookPoll #137 --Wikimol 15:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lord of the Flies

Summary status ( 4 for | 2 against) Top class - as at 15:57, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Top - Most famous novel by Nobel laureate; widely accepted into popular culture. --Sordel 20:40, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Masterwork even without the film version adding to it's popularity. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 08:13, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - I really hated this novel, but agree that it should be top-important.
    Errabee 10:06, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - Not convinced this should be top. Seems like a book used by the establishment to tell children that they are innately bad - not much positive comes out of the book, hmmm --Lethaniol 17:38, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - Admittedly well-written, but if it weren't part of the US High School curriculum, would anybody read it? -- llywrch 20:35, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Madame Bovary

Summary status ( 3 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 10:05, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Top - Who hasn't heard of this novel?
    Errabee 12:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Interesting comment that, about 95% of the world's population I should imagine. Many won't have heard of a novel let alone this one. Still highly importance work though. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 16:10, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Let me rephrase then. Of all the people interested in literature, who hasn't heard of this novel?
Errabee 09:54, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Middlemarch

Summary status ( 3 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 15:58, 10 March 2008 (UTC)


Moby Dick

Summary status ( 5 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 10:05, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Nineteen Eighty-Four

Summary status ( 6 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 10:01, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Top - Big Brother is watching you has become general knowledge.
    Errabee 12:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Silverthorn 12:04, 12 August 2006 (UTC
  • Top - I suppose.
    john k 18:40, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - where would be without newsspeak --Lethaniol 17:38, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Btw cca #7 English literature book in CZMyBookPoll (To give some comparison - nothing from Dickens qualified in that poll. For most readers here, Dickens is one of the authors you've learned about on high school, read a book or two, and that's all. On the other hand, 1984 is well alive "handbook" to totaliaran regimes, prohibited durring communist rule.) --Wikimol 15:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Novel

Summary status ( 2 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 09:34, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Novella

Summary status ( 2 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 09:35, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Novelette

Summary status ( 2 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 09:35, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Oliver Twist

Summary status ( 3 for | 3 against) Top class - as at 10:02, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich

Summary status ( 5 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:07, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Top - Solzhenitsyn should be represented and this novel is very accessible to readers and a great insight into labour camp conditions under Stalin. Loyola 08:42, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - although if it was novel, The Gulag Archipelago would be better. --Wikimol 15:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Weakish support. Not a Solzhenitsyn fan.
    ee 15:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Important. Mandel 15:25, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - His mosst accessible novel and also his most well known. --Alabamaboy 01:23, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One Hundred Years of Solitude

Summary status ( 7 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 10:03, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Top - Nobel price winner García Marquez's materpiece.
    Errabee 09:35, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - The seminal work in magical realism. --Ibis3 21:40, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - This work not only important as a premier example of magic realism, but its impact on the understanding of Latin American literature. --chemica 00:28, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - One of the major novels of the 2nd half of the 20th century, I think.
    john k 18:40, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • High - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Best known Latin American novel, had a great impact.--Rataube 14:07, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - all of the above --Lethaniol 17:39, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - as above, CZMBP#56 --Wikimol

Out of Africa

Summary status ( 1 for | 3 against) Top class - as at 07:23, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Top - Another editor has rated this as Top. Personally I can see no reason to object but it should be debated here. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 07:23, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - Compared to the other novels listed here it's not that important. There's many other 20th century novels I think should be on here before this.
    john k 21:47, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • High - Wikimol 15:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - Only became known after the movie with Meryl Streep.
    ee 15:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Pride and Prejudice

Summary status ( 5 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Robinson Crusoe

Summary status ( 6 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:44, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Sherlock Holmes

Summary status ( 4 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 09:37, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Short story

Summary status ( 2 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 09:34, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Tarzan of the Apes

Summary status ( 1 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Top. Cultural icon.
    ee 15:47, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Tess of the D'Urbervilles

Summary status ( 5 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:48, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

The Big Sleep

Summary status ( 3 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 18:17, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

The Brothers Karamazov

Summary status ( 3 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 15:48, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

The Catcher in the Rye

Summary status ( 2 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 09:38, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

The Count of Monte Cristo

Summary status ( 5 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 16:41, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

The Fall

Summary status ( 3 for | 3 against) Top class - as at 16:01, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

The Good Soldier Švejk

Summary status ( 3 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 18:28, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Top - Without this anti-war novel (one the first written in this genre), Catch-22 could not have been written.
    Errabee 17:53, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - proably the most world-known piece of Czech literature. (CZMBP#12) --Wikimol 15:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Grapes of Wrath

Summary status ( 5 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:02, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

The Great Gatsby

Summary status ( 3 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:03, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Top - Gatsby is perhaps the most famous American novel of the 20th century, and is read in school by almost everyone. It is also reasonably well respected critically.
    john k 19:06, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top -
    ee 15:50, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top -
    talk) 02:14, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling

Summary status ( 2 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:17, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

The Hound of the Baskervilles

Summary status ( 7 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 16:35, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
  • High - I'd rather that the character has top-importance in this case, but I don't massively object to this novel having top-importance. --Sordel 14:47, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Anyone who has head of Sherlock has almost certainly heard of this novel. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 08:18, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Probably the best known of the Sherlock Holmes works. Silverthorn 09:12, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top -
    Errabee 10:11, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Hugely influential in both horror and mystery fiction. Badbilltucker 23:33, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Agree most famous of Sherlock Holmes stories, (and of course I come from Devon too :):) ) Lethaniol 17:30, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - the best known of the Sherlock Holmes --Wikimol 15:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Definitely the best known of the Sherlock Holmes works. -- 9muses 15:16, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Hunchback of Notre Dame

Summary status ( 5 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:46, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

The Idiot

Summary status ( 5 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

The Lord of the Rings

Summary status ( 5 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:04, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

The Magic Mountain

Summary status ( 3 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 18:22, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Top - Generall considered Mann's masterpiece, and one of the most important German novels of the twentieth century.
    john k 19:04, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Again, one of the most important German novels of the 20th century, and we should strive to be inclusive of books that are not English language. Badbilltucker 14:23, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Master and Margarita

Summary status ( 4 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

The Picture of Dorian Gray

Summary status ( 6 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 10:52, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Top - Wilde's only novel. For argument based on reputation see the article. --Sordel 15:50, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - I agree with Sordel. Known also outside the English speaking community.
    Errabee 10:12, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Rataube 15:59, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - I beg to differ. Little known also outside the English speaking community. Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - as Wilde's only novel, his fame means it should be top --Lethaniol 17:31, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Famous. --Wikimol
  • Top world famous.--Rataube 04:17, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Plague

Summary status ( 1 for | 3 against) Top class - as at 16:08, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

The Portrait of a Lady

Summary status ( 4 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 15:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Top - Best known novel by Henry James, who is clearly a novelist of the first rank. Could be joined by The Ambassadors, The Golden Bowl and The Wings of the Dove for snob value, but this one has the widest reputation. --Sordel 07:24, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Something by James should be at top, and this is the obvious one.
    john k 18:47, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - keep at top only if The Turn of the Screw, arguably a more pivotal and important work by the same author, is ineligible. Badbilltucker 14:48, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment - We shouldn't have quotas as per author, at least not at 1! 15:17, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Top.
    ee 15:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The Red and the Black

Summary status ( 3 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:09, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

The Satanic Verses

Summary status ( 2 for | 3 against) Top class - as at 16:49, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Top - Very controversial novel, caused fatwa over Rushdie.
    Errabee 12:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Silverthorn 13:19, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - It may have caused a stir when it was first published, but in terms of literary importance, it is thought to be inferior to Midnight's Children.--Ibis3 21:30, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - I agree with Ibis - Midnight's Children is the one to include.
    john k 18:47, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • High or Medium - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Scarlet Letter

Summary status ( 4 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:49, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Top - Widely regarded as one of the most important early American novels and frequently used as a cultural reference. --Sordel 10:33, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Every American high school student (except me, apparently) has to read the thing.
    john k 18:52, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Often-adapted, well-written, highly influential early American book. Badbilltucker 14:55, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Sorrows of Young Werther

Summary status ( 4 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:26, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Top - Goethe's masterpiece, along with Faust. Defined the Sturm und Drang period in Germany.
    Errabee 12:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top -
    john k 18:47, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - User:Wikimol|Wikimol]] 15:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

The Sound and the Fury

Summary status ( 3 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 18:24, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde

Summary status ( 7 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:26, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

The Tale of Genji

Summary status ( 5 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:44, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

The Three Musketeers

Summary status ( 5 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:44, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

The Tin Drum

Summary status ( 4 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 16:46, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

The Trial

Summary status ( 4 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 15:53, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Top - Kafka's masterpiece.
    Errabee 12:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top -
    john k 18:47, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - User:Wikimol|Wikimol]] 15:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

The Turn of the Screw

Summary status ( 5 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 15:50, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Top - A fine literary horror novella, canonical example of the development of the unreliable narrator and adapted for Benjamin Britten's opera. --Sordel 21:33, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - User:Rataube|Rataube]] 16:19, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Top - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - most influential book by the author, both in the horror genre and in greater literature and other media. Badbilltucker 16:42, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - 9muses 15:31, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The War of the Worlds

Summary status ( 6 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 16:00, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Top - Very influential science-fiction book. Radio adaptation by Orson Welles caused wide-spread panic.
    Errabee 12:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Has had significant influence. Silverthorn 12:07, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - One of the few science fiction classics that is very widely read outside genre specialists. Latest film version only confirms cultural currency. --Sordel 10:14, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top -
    john k 18:47, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - I think the radio play is more important than the novel, in the same way some films can become more important than the novel, and there should be only one entry in 1.0 for War of the Worlds (the music is cool too) --Lethaniol 17:43, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top. Best known work by H. G. Wells, one of the fathers of science fiction. If shelley and Verne have their works in the list so should Wells. Plus all the influenced alredy mentioned.

The Wonderful Wizard of Oz

Summary status ( 4 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:10, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

To The Lighthouse

Summary status ( 4 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:50, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Top - Woolf's masterpiece, of great significance for its participation in Modernism and Feminist Literature. --Sordel 18:39, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - As Sordel says.
    john k 18:52, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Rataube 16:16, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Treasure Island

Summary status ( 4 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:28, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Tristram Shandy

Summary status ( 3 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 18:28, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Top - Major early novel, vastly influential on postmodernism. Article says "one of the greatest comic novels in English, as well as a forerunner for many modern narrative devices". (Not my text by the way!) --Sordel 07:47, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - As Sordel says.
    john k 18:52, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea

Summary status ( 4 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:29, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Ulysses

Summary status ( 5 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:02, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Uncle Tom's Cabin

Summary status ( 5 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 12:36, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Vanity Fair

Summary status ( 3 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 18:28, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Top - One of the big Victorian novels, valued for its social satire and authorial manipulation. --Sordel 18:41, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - As Sordel says.
    john k 19:08, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

War and Peace

Summary status ( 4 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:32, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Winnie-the-Pooh

Summary status ( 3 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 16:30, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Wuthering Heights

Summary status ( 4 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 12:29, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Candidates for inclusion

n.b. please list strictly alphabetically

A Passage to India

Summary status ( 3 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 16:31, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Top - although perhaps something else by Forster would be a better choice.
    john k 20:32, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • High - I dont think Forster is that important or good. Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Top - Ok, maybe we shouldn't get too critical. This is a lucid and important cross-cultural book at least. Mandel 15:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - Interwiki links clearly demonstrate this certainly isn't a work every encyclopedia have to include --Wikimol 15:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Also well known outside the English speaking zone.
    ee 15:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
    ]

A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man

Summary status ( 3 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 11:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


Beloved

Summary status ( 3 for | 2 against) Top class - as at 11:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Top - Pullitzer prize-winning and best-known (?) novel by Nobel laureate Toni Morrison. Regarded as significant to the African American experience. The New York Times "Book Review" named Beloved the best American novel written in the previous twenty five years. --Sordel 20:45, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Silverthorn 11:14, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - Too early to tell. Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - too new --Wikimol 15:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top --Rataube 03:59, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Darkness at Noon

Summary status ( 2 for | 2 against) Top class - as at 09:07, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Death on the Nile

Summary status ( 1 for | 2 against) Top class - as at 11:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
And see what I said about MotOE below while you're about it, please. --Sordel 17:56, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dom Casmurro

Summary status ( 2 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:36, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Top - Masterpiece by Brazil's greatest writer. Macgreco 23:17, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Machado de Assis! Why not? Mandel 15:29, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dune

Summary status ( 3 for | 2 against) Top class - as at 16:51, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Top - Arguably the greatest SF novel. It has depth, complexity and a remarkable internal coherence. Loyola 08:53, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Couldn't agree more. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 09:33, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Definitely important! lordfrikk 05:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - Great SF novel indeed, but wouldn't include it among the top of general literature.--Rataube 04:02, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - Cannot seriously be considered in the same bracket as War and Peace, Lolita, or other major works 69.86.228.200 (talk) 02:29, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Emma

Summary status ( 1 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 11:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Finnegans Wake

Summary status ( 2 for | 4 against) Top class - as at 16:51, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
  • High - Joyce has a pretty clear Top-important novel, and the literary value of FW (a book that is very little read) has long been controversial. --Sordel 18:53, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - I think I agree with Sordel.
    john k 18:59, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • High - Silverthorn 11:28, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - FW is not controversial, just darned difficult. And we should stop dishing quotas to writers. At any rate 1 book per writer is ridiculous. Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - Wikimol 15:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Mandel is right on all counts. FW also made the Modern Library 100 if nothing else. 69.86.228.200 (talk) 02:25, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Five Children and It

Summary status ( 2 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 11:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Top - Classic Children's literature repeatedly dramatised. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 08:13, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Holds a strong claim as a children's classic, but note that
    Edith Nesbit herself be the top-rated article? --Sordel 09:00, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • High - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Foucault's Pendulum

Summary status ( 1 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 16:37, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Gravity's Rainbow

Summary status ( 2 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:37, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Top - Massive, unreadable, highly honoured novel considered to be the best example of American postmodernism and one of the great American novels. --Sordel 21:23, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - Turgid and hardly influential. Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Top. Ok, maybe I shouldn't get too personal. It could be me, not Pynchon. Mandel 15:40, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - A benchmark novel for post war fiction 69.86.228.200 (talk) 02:22, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heidi

Summary status ( 2 for | 2 against) Top class - as at 11:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Top - Again a classic Children's novel. Subject of a number of dramatisations. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 08:13, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - A classic novel which has stood the test of time. Silverthorn 11:26, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - Its influence and status has considerably waned over the past years. More of a 70s icon.
    Errabee 13:30, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • High - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Independent People

Summary status ( 1 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 11:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Top - Something of a test case: one of the two best-known novels by Icelandic Nobel prize-winning novelist Halldor Laxness. Kudos if you've read it. --Sordel 20:36, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Invisible Man

Summary status ( 2 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:39, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

n.b. this is not the work by H.G. Wells

  • Top - Influential work of modernism and one of the more important African-American novels of the 20th century. Widely read in American high schools.
    john k 19:54, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • HighTop - typo. Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph and His Brothers

Summary status ( 1 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 11:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Lucky Jim

Summary status ( 1 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 11:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Top - THE example for literature by the
    Errabee 17:48, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • High - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Midnight's Children

Summary Status (1 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 22:50, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Top - Won the booker prize (1981), the booker of booker (1993), and then the best of the booker prize (2008), amongst many other significant awards. it is also regarded as iconic in post-colonial literature, and is the first and most critically accliamed novel form an indian author to achieve mainstream popularity. Percival500 (talk) 21:54, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Murder on the Orient Express

Summary status ( 2 for | 3 against) Top class - as at 11:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
I don't have much objectivity on Christie, because I'm working on her now, so I'm not going to give a vote as such. It's worth noting that her three most important Poirot novels are Murder on the Orient Express, Death on the Nile and The Murder of Roger Ackroyd, the last of which is so important in detective fiction (due to the furore regarding its twist ending) that it's perhaps the nearest top-importance of the bunch. Personally, I'd rather that Christie herself gained top-importance because And Then There Were None is massively influential (it virtually invented the stalk 'n' slash genre) but is not a Poirot novel. Christie is listed as the most widely published novelist of all time, so I would have thought that top-importance in some form is mandatory (accusations of "hack" notwithstanding!). Over to you. --Sordel 17:53, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - Silverthorn 11:27, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Hack or not Christie and the novels mentioned by Sordel are supremely importance in the genre. Must be in this type of encyclopedia. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 11:02, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • * High or Mid - Nothing by Christie is awfully important, though she is a phenomenon. Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • * High - Clearly not top, could be a mid 69.86.228.200 (talk) 02:15, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Naked Lunch

Summary status ( 2 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 01:32, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Top - An Essential Novel, and a revolution to literature. Also much studied by English students. 80.5.158.244 (talk) 19:08, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Agreed, should be top HangedJonny (talk) 01:33, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Native Son

Summary status ( 1 for | 2 against) Top class - as at 11:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Nostromo

Summary status ( 2 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 11:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Oblomov

Summary status ( 2 for | 2 against) Top class - as at 11:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Top - Another masterpiece from Russia's Golden Age of Literature (19th century).
    User:Errabee
Question to Errabee - is what John below says true or is this better known - regarded in Russia in which cas should the Top stand. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 15:41, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is an English encyclopedia. Knownness in the English-speaking world should generally be the main criteria, especially for languages like Russian and French where English-speakers are familiar with many works originally in the language.
john k 15:45, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
]
Although I can't now find it is did see a wikipedia main page that discuss just this issue of geographical relevance and indicated that this is not the case. i.e. significance / notability; transcends language / natinoality / culture etc. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 16:03, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, compared with the 5 major novels (
Errabee 18:16, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

On the Road

Summary status ( 2 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 11:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Peter Pan

  • Really a play more than a novel.
    john k 15:24, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Quo Vadis

Summary status ( 2 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 11:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Sense and Sensibility

Summary status ( 2.5 for | 4 against) Top class - as at 21:04, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Sons and Lovers

Summary status ( 2 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 11:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Top - Probably most famous work by Lawrence. Number 9 on Modern Library list.
    john k 19:49, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Steppenwolf

Summary status ( 1 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 11:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Top - While perhaps not as good as The Glass Bead Game, the cultural impact of this work is significant. Loyola 08:22, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stranger in a Strange Land

Summary status ( 4 for | 3 against) Top class - as at 18:15, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Top - Arguably Heinlein's most influential work. -- Gizzakk 22:32, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not sure this one should go as top, but if does then Dune by Frank Herbert should go too. I understand they achieved a similar cult status.--Rataube 16:25, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree that Dune is equally, and maybe more, obvious. I don't have the sci fi knowledge to comment on this one, though. --Sordel 16:49, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - Who is Heinlein? Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Extremely influential to the 60's counter-culture, even if I think it is a bit overrated myself. Robert A. Heinlein is probably counted one of the top science fiction writer of the 20th century. Badbilltucker 23:26, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Wikimol 15:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - top science fiction's work but not among the top in general literature
  • Top - Showers 20:26, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - influential within sci fi and popular with Ayn Rand types but clearly not top 69.86.228.200 (talk) 02:19, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Betrothed

Summary status ( 2 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 11:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

The Charterhouse of Parma

Summary status ( 2 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 11:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

The Da Vinci Code

Summary status ( 6 for | 10 against) Top class - as at 08:16, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm still strongly opposed to this having top-importance. A top-important article should be one that one would anticipate retaining top-importance for a century to come. I agree that DVC deserves an entry, and like many mid/high novels it has one, but surely top-importance for this is absurdly generous? --Sordel 11:33, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
My heart says agree with you, but my head says otherwise!. Why "for a century to come" by the way. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 11:43, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"Century to come" is just criterion to cover the same idea expressed by "must be in an encyclopedia" or "should eternally be in an encyclopedia". It's true that we can't foresee the future value ascribed to DVC - it might be this generation's Ulysses (well no, probably not) - but when a novel has only been popular for five years (or however long it is) one is surely entitled to say: "I'd be mighty surprised to see this included in a printed encyclopedia even in twenty years". --Sordel 12:28, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed about the "printed" but this isn't a printed. And it (wikipedia) will change as times change. I would be surprised to see it in in 10 years time, but at present it is a "must". Shame to say! :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 16:03, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - I hate the novel but it, and its pre/sequels have had such a response from the public it should be included. I feel ashamed of myself. Lethaniol 11:36, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - The only reason this article even deserves an entry is because it's a fad and therefore well-known. Aside from that, it has very little merit -- literary or otherwise. --Todeswalzer | Talk 18:41, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - or lower. The popularity of the novel is due to the theories the author "borrowed" from the book
    Holy Blood, Holy Grail. I could argue that, right now, the original non-fiction book might qualify as very or top importance, but this novel, which is basically only a very weak regurgitation of that book with some additional laughable and almost unprecedented opinions about Leonardo da Vinci's "Last Supper", borrowed from yet another book wikipedia already has a page on, does not. Badbilltucker 23:32, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Mid - or lower. This book is neither original nor particularly good. The storm it created will blow over. Loyola 13:43, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - book of movie fame. --Wikimol 15:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mid - or lower. This is merely The Celestine Prophecy for the 21st century.--Alabamaboy 01:33, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top- This book has had a massive impact on popular culture, and that needs to be recognised.I will not specify what I did to Mr. Jameson, I will just verify that I was present when the murder happened. 07:27, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Top - While I admit that it is not a particularily interesting piece of literature, it is not our job here to judge books quality. We can only quantify their reception into popular culture. Given the Da Vinci code's popular success, and the amount of contrerversy it has spawned I feel it as an extremely worthy candidate for further analysis.207.164.21.130 00:55, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Low - The fact that it generated controversy makes it notable for generating controversy not for being a good novel. Loyola (talk) 10:51, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Day of the Triffids

Summary status ( 0 for | 2 against) Top class - as at 11:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • High - The current article has a mid-importance rating. Why are we raising it two steps in one move? I agree that the novel is a classic of Science Fiction, but don't see its having top-importance. --Sordel 15:42, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Death of Ivan Ilyich

Summary status ( 3 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 12:27, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

The Decameron

Summary status ( 2 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 12:25, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Top - Most important piece of Italian literature, after Dante's Divina Commedia (which isn't in scope, unfortunately).
    ee 19:28, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Silverthorn 11:58, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: this is not a novel...? 121.6.49.48 10:42, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
But they are novellas :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 16:44, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Famous Five

Summary status ( 2 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 11:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

The French Lieutenant's Woman

Summary status ( 1 for | 2 against) Top class - as at 11:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Top - Best known novel by John Fowles and a major example of British postmodernism. --Sordel 10:33, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - I don't think this quite meets the standard.
    john k 18:52, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • High - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Gambler

Summary status ( 1 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 11:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Top - Another masterpiece by Dostoevsky.
  • The Idiot, The Possessed, and Notes from Underground should be upgraded first.
    john k 17:57, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • High - ack john k --Wikimol 15:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Man Without Qualities

Summary status ( 3 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 21:13, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Top - One of the great German language novels of the last century. Various critics have put it alongside Ulysses and In Search of Lost Time as one of the novels of the century.
  • High - It's an unfinished novel, and I can speak from personal experience when I say that even those who put it on their bookshelves don't read it. I agree that it is considered to be a masterpiece, but there are plenty of masterpieces rated high. --Sordel 07:01, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - A very great, though little read novel. Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Hey, I've read it. Well, most of it: I got bogged down in the third volume. Italo Calvino gives it high praise. -- llywrch 21:13, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Moonstone

Summary status ( 3 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 11:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

The Name of the Rose

Summary status ( 1 for | 2 against) Top class - as at 21:08, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Top - not sure about English, but certainly world novel, at the same time famous and influential. Best known and possibly best from Eco. (see also the interwikis... contemporary encyclopedia should not miss thiss one) --Wikimol 15:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)\[reply]
  • High - I remember hearing it was the most famous book no one had read a few years ago, and, if no one read it, it ain't that important. Also, personally, I think it's probably too new to really qualify. Badbilltucker 17:15, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - I read it years ago; it's the DaVinci Code of the 1980s. While a very strong and well-written book, it just isn't the quality & influence of (to pick examples from different genres) The Big Sleep, A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, or The Stranger. -- llywrch 21:09, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Necklace

Summary status ( 1 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Top. At least one work (preferably a short story) of de Maupassant should be of Top importance.
    ee 16:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The Old Man and the Sea

Summary status ( 1 for | 2 against) Top class - as at 18:29, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

The Railway Children

Summary status ( 2 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 17:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Top - Another classic English children's novel. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 08:18, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - Silverthorn 09:27, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - Children's classics should never be top category unless they have world renown (eg pinnochio). Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Can't see why, we have all numbers of examples of articles of top importance in there own arena. The English speaking world should be sufficient. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 17:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It is very well known in the UK, but not necessarily outside it. Mandel 121.6.49.48 10:49, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Secret Garden

Summary status ( 1 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 17:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

The Waves

Summary status (1 for | 0 against) Top Class - as at 22:05, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Top - Arguabely Virginia Woolf's most significant novel. Many elements of her previous work are present in The Waves, making this a prime example of modernism, feminism and experimental fiction. Percival500 (talk) 21:01, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Way We Live Now

Summary status ( 2 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 10:46, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

The Wind in the Willows

Summary status ( 2 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 11:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Your description is almost self contradictory - "Children's classics"! almost ensures inclusion surely. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 11:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Children's books then. Mandel 121.6.49.48 10:53, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Things Fall Apart

Summary status ( 2 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 16:48, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Waverley

Summary status ( 1 for | 0 against) Top class - as at 11:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Top - I think something by Scott should be at top importance, and this was the first of 'em. Alternately, there's
    john k 19:08, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top Silverthorn 15:42, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Romance of the Three Kingdoms

Summary status ( 3 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 10:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Here I prepare a list of candidates since there were not a single Chinese language novel above. Besides those classics, some people claims China has no really good novels written in 20th century. Personally speaking, I somewhat agree with this view. But if Harry Potter was in the list, I think at least one or two 20th century Chinese languages novels could be good enough too. But it would be difficult to decide which one could be better. Here is a list of top 100 20th century Chinese language novels for references. [1] This list covers both mainland China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and overseas.

  • Top - These novels are widely considered as best five in China. I'll look for some references if I have time. Among the five novels,
    Fengshen Yanyi could be number six. — Yao Ziyuan 13:34, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - to balance Western centricity. Mandel 17:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - as Mandel and also for their own merit which is considerable. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 10:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • High. Notability outside of China (but not necessarily in Western world) has to be asserted.
    ee 16:21, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    • Since when has the West been the sole arbriter of literary significance? Talk about colonial chauvinism! :) These novels are popular in Japan and Korea too, and their critics don't need white eggheads to tell them what is good from bad. Mandel 11:05, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top for the 4 greats at least. One of them is the basis for Monkey!, and they are known in the UK at least. Yobmod (talk) 09:07, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Water Margin

Summary status ( 3 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 10:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Here I prepare a list of candidates since there were not a single Chinese language novel above. Besides those classics, some people claims China has no really good novels written in 20th century. Personally speaking, I somewhat agree with this view. But if Harry Potter was in the list, I think at least one or two 20th century Chinese languages novels could be good enough too. But it would be difficult to decide which one could be better. Here is a list of top 100 20th century Chinese language novels for references. [2] This list covers both mainland China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and overseas.

  • Top - These novels are widely considered as best five in China. I'll look for some references if I have time. Among the five novels,
    Fengshen Yanyi could be number six. — Yao Ziyuan 13:34, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - to balance Western centricity. Mandel 17:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - as Mandel and also for their own merit which is considerable. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 10:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • High. Notability outside of China (but not necessarily in Western world) has to be asserted.
    ee 16:21, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    • Since when has the West been the sole arbriter of literary significance? Talk about colonial chauvinism! :) These novels are popular in Japan and Korea too, and their critics don't need white eggheads to tell them what is good from bad. Mandel 11:05, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top for the 4 greats at least. One of them is the basis for Monkey!, and they are known in the UK at least. Yobmod (talk) 09:07, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Journey to the West

Summary status ( 3 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 10:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Here I prepare a list of candidates since there were not a single Chinese language novel above. Besides those classics, some people claims China has no really good novels written in 20th century. Personally speaking, I somewhat agree with this view. But if Harry Potter was in the list, I think at least one or two 20th century Chinese languages novels could be good enough too. But it would be difficult to decide which one could be better. Here is a list of top 100 20th century Chinese language novels for references. [3] This list covers both mainland China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and overseas.

  • Top - These novels are widely considered as best five in China. I'll look for some references if I have time. Among the five novels,
    Fengshen Yanyi could be number six. — Yao Ziyuan 13:34, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - to balance Western centricity. Mandel 17:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - as Mandel and also for their own merit which is considerable. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 10:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • High. Notability outside of China (but not necessarily in Western world) has to be asserted.
    ee 16:21, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    • Since when has the West been the sole arbriter of literary significance? Talk about colonial chauvinism! :) These novels are popular in Japan and Korea too, and their critics don't need white eggheads to tell them what is good from bad. Mandel 11:05, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top for the 4 greats at least. One of them is the basis for Monkey!, and they are known in the UK at least. Yobmod (talk) 09:07, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dream of the Red Chamber

Summary status ( 3 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 10:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Here I prepare a list of candidates since there were not a single Chinese language novel above. Besides those classics, some people claims China has no really good novels written in 20th century. Personally speaking, I somewhat agree with this view. But if Harry Potter was in the list, I think at least one or two 20th century Chinese languages novels could be good enough too. But it would be difficult to decide which one could be better. Here is a list of top 100 20th century Chinese language novels for references. [4] This list covers both mainland China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and overseas.

  • Top - These novels are widely considered as best five in China. I'll look for some references if I have time. Among the five novels,
    Fengshen Yanyi could be number six. — Yao Ziyuan 13:34, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - to balance Western centricity. Mandel 17:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - as Mandel and also for their own merit which is considerable. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 10:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • High. Notability outside of China (but not necessarily in Western world) has to be asserted.
    ee 16:21, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    • Since when has the West been the sole arbriter of literary significance? Talk about colonial chauvinism! :) These novels are popular in Japan and Korea too, and their critics don't need white eggheads to tell them what is good from bad. Mandel 11:05, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top for the 4 greats at least. One of them is the basis for Monkey!, and they are known in the UK at least. Yobmod (talk) 09:07, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jin Ping Mei

Summary status ( 3 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 10:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Here I prepare a list of candidates since there were not a single Chinese language novel above. Besides those classics, some people claims China has no really good novels written in 20th century. Personally speaking, I somewhat agree with this view. But if Harry Potter was in the list, I think at least one or two 20th century Chinese languages novels could be good enough too. But it would be difficult to decide which one could be better. Here is a list of top 100 20th century Chinese language novels for references. [5] This list covers both mainland China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and overseas.

  • Top - These novels are widely considered as best five in China. I'll look for some references if I have time. Among the five novels,
    Fengshen Yanyi could be number six. — Yao Ziyuan 13:34, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - to balance Western centricity. Mandel 17:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - as Mandel and also for their own merit which is considerable. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 10:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • High. Notability outside of China (but not necessarily in Western world) has to be asserted.
    ee 16:21, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    • Since when has the West been the sole arbriter of literary significance? Talk about colonial chauvinism! :) These novels are popular in Japan and Korea too, and their critics don't need white eggheads to tell them what is good from bad. Mandel 11:05, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • High High for other 2. Yobmod (talk) 09:07, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fengshen Yanyi

Summary status ( 3 for | 1 against) Top class - as at 10:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Here I prepare a list of candidates since there were not a single Chinese language novel above. Besides those classics, some people claims China has no really good novels written in 20th century. Personally speaking, I somewhat agree with this view. But if Harry Potter was in the list, I think at least one or two 20th century Chinese languages novels could be good enough too. But it would be difficult to decide which one could be better. Here is a list of top 100 20th century Chinese language novels for references. [6] This list covers both mainland China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and overseas.

  • Top - These novels are widely considered as best five in China. I'll look for some references if I have time. Among the five novels,
    Fengshen Yanyi could be number six. — Yao Ziyuan 13:34, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - to balance Western centricity. Mandel 17:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - as Mandel and also for their own merit which is considerable. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 10:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • High. Notability outside of China (but not necessarily in Western world) has to be asserted.
    ee 16:21, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    • Since when has the West been the sole arbriter of literary significance? Talk about colonial chauvinism! :) These novels are popular in Japan and Korea too, and their critics don't need white eggheads to tell them what is good from bad. Mandel 11:05, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • High High for other 2. Yobmod (talk) 09:07, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Novels previously assigned Top-importance but now reassigned

This list is now so large it is normally "shrunk" - use the "Show" on the right hand side to expand it.

Top-important (now reassigned)

Novels previously assigned Top-importance but now reassigned

n.b. please list strictly alphabetically

Clarissa

Summary status ( 4 for | 5 against) Top class - as at 12:46, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Top - This one is considered Richardson's masterpiece and is thought to be the longest novel in English. Influenced much later literature. --Ibis3 22:38, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - I agree with those points, but feel that the promotion might be compromised by the fact that no one seems to read this novel any more. --Sordel 07:38, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Top - although I'd prefer Pamela, as the first epistolary novel and the work by Richardson that is currently more likely to be read.
    john k 18:52, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Top - Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - from non-English viewpoint, I'd say its really obscure piece of literature hardly anybody except English literature student would be interested in. --Wikimol 15:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High. Unknown author and unknown work for me (which I assume is indicative for non-English natives).— Preceding
    Errabee (talkcontribs
    )
  • High. I'd say one in five degree-educated people in this country (UK) would have heard of it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Psmither (talkcontribs)
  • Mid. An obscure novel, and as Wikimol said, only English lit students would know of it (or the author, regardless of importance). Non-native English & European POV.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.11.230.74 (talkcontribs)
  • Mid. Obscure indeed - never heard of it.Yobmod (talk) 09:02, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Erast Fandorin

Summary status ( 2 for | 2 against) Top class - as at 15:45, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Gone with the Wind

Summary status ( 0 for | 2 against) Top class - as at 08:21, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Max Havelaar

Summary status ( 2 for | 3 against) Top class - as at 16:12, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
It got demoted to Mid-importance.
Errabee 19:48, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

My Name is Red

Summary status ( 0 for | 4 against) Top class - as at 15:42, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Mid - Difficult to assess the importance of a novel that was published since 2000 and is, so far as I know, not well known or culturally pervasive. The article makes little case for Top-importance, and even a high rating looks generous. --Sordel 18:36, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High or Mid - Too recent to be of the iconic status necessary for top, I think. Not all that well known.
    john k 18:40, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Mid - Nothing contemporary should be under top class - too early to tell. Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mid - Wikimol 15:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Rated as High as a compromise - can't see this as a Top yet myself either :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 15:42, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No Great Mischief

Summary status ( 0 for | 4 against) Top class - as at 15:48, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Rated as Medium based on concensus :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 15:48, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pigeon Post

Summary status ( 0 for | 3 against) Top class - as at 08:21, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Mid - While there are classic children's novels that justify Top and High importance, I wouldn't think of this as one of them. --Sordel 18:29, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High or Mid - One of an enormous series of children's books I've never heard of. Doesn't seem comparable to Moby-Dick or Crime and Punishment
  • Mid - Agree with Sordel and john k.

Starship Troopers

Summary status ( 0 for | 6 against) Top class - as at 08:21, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong rerate as mid. The film is well-known, the book itself hardly had any impact on society.
    Errabee 12:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Rerate as High. The novel really furthered the
    Military Science Fiction genre, the influences can be seen in even Star Wars. Not to mention that it is by Heinlein, which has to count for something. However, I agree that it is probably not deserving of a Top rating when included in the general "novels" category; if this was just science fiction, then probably. -- Gizzakk 22:28, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Strong rerate as mid.--Ibis3 21:07, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong rerate as mid, never heard of it --Jahsonic 23:34, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong rerate as mid Only of interest within a very specialised genre. --Sordel 07:53, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rerate as High, Of interest within the genre - but it is elitist to say "very specialised". The fact that someone has not heard of it or doesn't rate the genre does not indicate that the novel is of little significance. Please read the article and you might get the notion of it's significance. Please note I have no particular pro-title allegience here, I am no fan, but it is a highly influencial novel. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 09:33, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Very specialised" was a response to the argument above that the novel had furthered the
    Military Science Fiction genre, which seems to me to be a very specific sub-genre of Science Fiction in general. I am not, admittedly, a Science Fiction expert, but at the time that the film came out I had never heard of Starship Troopers whereas I had heard of I, Robot, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, Dune, The Martian Chronicles, Fahrenheit 451, The Time Machine, The Invisible Man etc., none of which are currently rated as Top-important although perhaps they should be. Presumably once the evident classics of Science Fiction have all been rated Top-important it will not be conspicuous when a novel comparatively obscure in broad cultural terms is admitted to this category on its own merits. I accept, nonetheless, that High may be more appropriate for this novel than mid. --Sordel 10:24, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Swallows and Amazons

Summary status ( 2 for | 3 against) Top class - as at 08:21, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
I know of no idea of queue here - or even of the real benefit for one. However if that is what we want, we should get on with those titles you mention. They should all be Top in my view. Even Famous Five as they have had hugh impact on readership particulary in the 20th Century. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 11:50, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just to note, as an American, I'd never heard of this book until I came upon it in the top category. Some children's classics, I suspect, are strongly centered in a single country, and this would appear to be among them. Perhaps I'm wrong, and this is popular outside of Britain, but I'd be interested to see some evidence of that. Beyond that, I largely agree with Sordel - I think an informal "queue" makes a fair degree of sense - basically, starting from a small list of indisputable great novels (Anna Karenina, Don Quixote, Ulysses, and so forth), and gradually building up by putting in books that are of comparable importance to those already on the list. Otherwise we get into a lot of these problems of commensurability.
john k 18:46, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

The Assault

Summary status ( 1 for | 2 against) Top class - as at 08:21, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

The Chrysalids

Summary status ( 0 for | 3 against) Top class - as at 08:21, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

The Life and Adventures of Nicholas Nickleby

Summary status ( 0 for | 3 against) Top class - as at 08:21, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

The Pickwick Papers

Summary status ( 0 for | 4 against) Top class - as at 08:21, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Titus Groan

Summary status ( 0 for | 6 against) Top class - as at 16:11, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  • High - I like Peake, but nothing by him should be of top importance.
    john k 18:47, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • High - --Sordel 19:11, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Medium - Actually this is hardly influential.Mandel 06:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - Titus Groan series is counted as very influential in the fantasy genre, but only the fantasy genre. Badbilltucker 23:22, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • High - --Wikimol 15:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Medium -
    ee 15:55, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply
    ]