Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Shortcuts
WikiProject Stub sorting
Information
Project page talk
- Stub types (sections) talk
- Stub types (full list) talk
- To do talk
- Naming conventions talk
- Redirects category talk
Wikipedia:Stub talk
Discussion
Proposals
(A)
talk
- Current month
Discussion talk
Criteria (A) (discontinued) talk
Deletion (Log) (discontinued) talk
Category

On this

talk page
.

Proposing new stub types – procedure

Important: If you wish to propose the creation of a stub ARTICLE you've come to the wrong place. If you don't have a username yourself, please go to

Helpme
}} to your user talk page to request help from other editors. This page only deals with stub TEMPLATES and CATEGORIES; we cannot help you with creating articles.

Proposing new stub types
If you wish to propose a new stub category and template, please follow these procedures:
  1. Check the List of stub types or under Category:Stub categories to make sure that your proposed new stub does not already exist.
  2. List it at the top of the current month's section, under a header, like the ones shown (if any). Sign it with a datestamp (~~~~).
    • Please bear in mind that a stub category isn't about the importance or notability of the topic!
  3. Find a good number[1] of stub articles, as many as you can, that will fit that template. You may use this tool to scan through categories; tagged stubs are always in
    asbox
    }}. Each of these articles can be:
    • currently marked with {{stub}};
    • currently marked with another type of stub tag (in which case you should justify why your tag is better for the article than the current one);
    • a stub whose categorisation is highly ambiguous or questionable;
    • not marked as a stub.
  4. If you use any category scan (from the tool mentioned above or from any other), please link to it so that other users can confirm that the results are still accurate.
  5. Others may do the same, if they so desire.
  6. 5 days after listing it here, if there is general approval or no objection, go ahead and create the new category and/or template following the format on Wikipedia:Stub. List the new stub type on the stub types list in an appropriate section. If consensus is not clear, or discussion is still ongoing, the proposal will remain open until consensus can be reached.
  7. If you wish to propose a stub type which does not currently have 60 articles that could use it, you may propose an upmerged template in a similar way. An upmerged template would feed into currently existing stub categories until such time that there are enough stubs for a separate stub category. At that point a category for it may be separately proposed. Some times, it may be difficult to be sure how many stubs would get a tag - in which case you can also start with an upmerged stub tag until you're sure there are enough.

DO NOT place a proposal here for any stub type which has already been created and is being discussed at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. The proposal page is only for stub types that have not yet been created, and it is better to keep any discussion of such stub types in one place rather than splitting it between different pages. Wikipedia:Categories for discussion is the correct page for proposals to delete a stub type.

^ Good number means about 60 articles or more, or 30 or more if it is the primary stub type of a WikiProject, though this figure may vary from case to case.

"Speedy creation"

A stub type may be proposed for "speedy creation" if it meets one of the following criteria:

  • S1 - the creation of a category for which an approved upmerged template already exists and is now in use on more than 60 articles.
  • S2 - the creation of an upmerged national-level template for a subject in which other such national-level templates currently exist (e.g., X-bio-stub, X-hist-stub, or X-geo-stub, where X is the name of an internationally widely recognised country) or other instances where a clearly established pattern of similar subtypes exists. The proposed topic may not be controversial in scope.

List speedy creation proposals in the same proposal listings as normal stub proposals below.

Proposals, March 2025

Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.

NEW PROPOSALS

Category:Nepal road stubs

{{Nepal-road-stub}} has over 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 08:16, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Perm Krai river stubs

See here for the full list of pages (approx. 120 of them); these use {{PermKrai-geo-stub}} and {{Russia-river-stub}}, whose categories are a bit large... - OpalYosutebito (talk) 20:28, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support keeps them off the list. Waacstats (talk) 18:21, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ormož geography stubs

{{Ormož-geo-stub}} has 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 17:39, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support matches other subcat in format. Waacstats (talk) 18:23, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kaduna State geography stubs

{{Kaduna-geo-stub}} has 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:38, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support again matches all the other State level categories. Waacstats (talk) 18:26, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Northern Mindanao geography stubs

{{NMindanao-geo-stub}} has over 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:34, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support first look at the parent I thought what a mess, some are Regions, some are not, but then looked at the parent category and that is the mess we have to follow and this continues that (in the tidiest way possible). Waacstats (talk) 18:31, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Zambian politician stubs

{{Zambia-politician-stub}} has 78 transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:32, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support as long as you dont mind me hijacking this with a suggestion for the Botswana politician stubs which is even large at 82 ( and dont forget on the Zambians we have an used mayor template). Waacstats (talk) 18:35, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'll propose that one too - OpalYosutebito (talk) 13:55, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Novo Goražde geography stubs

{{NovoGoražde-geo-stub}} has 63 transclusions, and its parent category looks pretty big to me... - OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:24, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support looks good Waacstats (talk) 18:47, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1940s American film stubs

340 of these are also under comedy films, plenty for a category even allowing for some false positives, this wont clear it off the oversized list but would make a good start

Waacstats (talk) 20:00, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1950s American film stubs

120 of these are also under comedy films, plenty for a category even allowing for some false positives, this should clear it off the oversized list or at least make a good start, depending on how many false positives there are.

Waacstats (talk) 20:00, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Canada island stubs

bubbling under at over 780 stubs. Propose splitting this by province, I believe the Nunavut subcats and British Columbia will probably take the vast majority of these and leave the parent around 80 but in case any other province reaches 60 I will propose all categories and templates but categories only to be created if the templates pass 60.

Waacstats (talk) 20:00, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe try "PEI-island-stub"? Or "PrinceEdward-island-stub"? - OpalYosutebito (talk) 20:09, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I was thinking more of the category m=name than the template name, but looking at it that might not be a problem. Waacstats (talk) 18:48, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Until we need to form the category name, I think {{PrinceEdwardIsland-island-stub}} would be fine; it corresponds to other PEI geo stub names.Her Pegship (?) 19:43, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Italian cycling team stubs

85 articles that could use the following

Waacstats (talk) 20:00, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tidy up of sports teams

A number of countries have enough articles tagged foo-sport-stub and bar-team-stub to make the foo-sport-team-stub and category viable add to that existing potential subcats like footyclub, waterpolo-team etc

The following template exists and is passed 60:

  • Switzerland-sports-team-stub
    }}

The following countries have at least 40 articles and for the sake of helping to count in the future I propse the following templates

Waacstats (talk) 20:00, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Various speedies

these existing templates all have over 60 transclusions, propose categories for them all.

Waacstats (talk) 20:00, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom :D - OpalYosutebito (talk) 01:49, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vietnamese railway station stubs

{{Vietnam-railstation-stub}} has 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 19:05, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Islands District geography stubs

See here for the full list of articles awaiting the new template and category; Hong Kong geography stubs is a bit oversized - OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:54, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

North District, Hong Kong geography stubs

See here for the full list of articles awaiting the new template and category; Hong Kong geography stubs is a bit oversized - OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:50, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sha Tin District geography stubs

See here for the full list of articles awaiting the new template and category; Hong Kong geography stubs is a bit oversized - OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:46, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind; there aren't enough transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 01:53, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tsuen Wan District geography stubs

See here for the full list of articles awaiting the new template and category; Hong Kong geography stubs is a bit oversized - OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:13, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind; there aren't enough transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 01:53, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sai Kung District geography stubs

See here for the full list of articles awaiting the new template and category; Hong Kong geography stubs is a bit oversized - OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:09, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Yuen Long District geography stubs

See here for the full list of articles awaiting the new template and category; Hong Kong geography stubs is a bit oversized - OpalYosutebito (talk) 23:49, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Tai Po District geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
See here for the full list of articles awaiting the new template and category; Hong Kong geography stubs is a bit oversized - OpalYosutebito (talk) 22:03, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support all these look speedy eligible to me. Waacstats (talk) 16:53, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Waacstats good to know! I'm going to start creating the templates. I'll let you know if I need any more help - OpalYosutebito (talk) 01:49, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sport speedy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
UPmerged templates with more than 60 articles:

Waacstats (talk) 19:52, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

US women football biography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
Category is starting to get large, propose we split same as we have with the general footy-bio-stubs ie by position:

Once done with this, depending on how many it takes out of the US-footy-position stub cats it may be worth while splitting the usual three by decade of birth as they are also creeping up.Waacstats (talk) 19:52, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

19th Century Paintings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
Currently oversized, perm cat is further split by decade, i propose the same here

obviously categories only if the templates pass 60, but I think they all should do. Once this is off the list it might again be worth looking at some of the other by century painting stubs for the same treatment as they are slowly getting larger.Waacstats (talk) 19:52, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Greek Mythology stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
Greek myths are currently overrsized, according to petscan over 100 of these are Kings, even taking into account false positives there will definitly be plenty of articles on Kings, Queens, Princes and Princesses for the following which I propose as an initial split:

Waacstats (talk) 19:52, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

American film biography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
Currently oversized, Petscan is showing enough article for each of the following:

Obviously templates first, just in case of falses positives on my count, then templates if and when they reach 60.Waacstats (talk) 19:52, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Polish politician stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
currently oversized, we have two by party splits but no other party perm cat has enough articles for a stub category, even if all the articles were stubs. Propose we split out all the politicians who served in the polish parliament, the Sejm. I'm not that happy with the name if anyone can come up with a better idea

Waacstats (talk) 19:52, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Estonian politician stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
1200 articles, I propose we split out the parliamentary politicians, this is likely to be over 800 its self so propose sub cats by parliamentary year, templates first then categories once they are over 60

Waacstats (talk) 19:52, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Basketball team stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
There is a large overlap between the European basketball team stubs (over 600 articles) and National basketball team stubs (over 400 articles), therefore I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 19:52, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Handball club stubs

Category has over 500 articles, a large number are for various national teams I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 19:52, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Handball stubs

59 of these articles are for national federations, by the time we add the existing clubs category as a potential subcat (in the permcats it comes under handball directly and under handball organisations) we should be sizeable enough to propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 19:52, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

16th-century English MPs

Significantly oversized, we already have two sub cats basaed on which parliament they sat in , propose continuing this with a few more, the names are based on the existing sub cats categories and the permenant categories.If anyone can come up with better names for the 1953 and 1954 categories as I think these are a bit of a mess as I have propsed them:

Waacstats (talk) 19:52, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Missouri River stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Doesn't look like any counties are going to be breaking out of this massively oversized category any time soon, So I propose following the Missouri geography stubs split, hopefully I have cut and paste the Missouri split right but given how many templates there are here I would appreciate anyone giving it an extra check:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Raebareli district geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
{{Raebareli-geo-stub}} has over 350 transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 04:39, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me.Waacstats (talk) 14:04, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Unnao district geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
{{Unnao-geo-stub}} has over 70 transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 04:35, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Waacstats (talk) 14:05, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Ladakh geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
{{Ladakh-geo-stub}} has over 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 05:29, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Waacstats (talk) 14:05, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Nagaland geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
{{Nagaland-geo-stub}} has over 80 transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 05:27, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support looks good. Waacstats (talk) 14:05, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Purba Mednipur geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
{{PurbaMedinipur-geo-stub}} has 60 transclusions and Category:West Bengal geography stubs is oversized - OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:11, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All the other subcats have district in the title, I assume this one should have it aswell. Waacstats (talk) 13:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sure - OpalYosutebito (talk) 14:51, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy footballers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
The follwing templates all have 0ver 60 pages, propose the relevant categories:

Note that the Brazilian forwards born in 1950s only has 37 articles so not proposing yet, unless anyone thinks we should for continuity of categories. Waacstats (talk) 22:58, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

English goalkeepers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Parent category is a little bit large and we have already split out two decades, I propose the following templates with categories for any over 60

I think 1890,1900 and 1940 will end up with categories but lets see once everything is sorted. Waacstats (talk) 22:58, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

US politician stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
We have 3 oversized categories( Florida, Minnesota and New Hampshire). Based on other states (OH and NY) I propose splitting out those that served in the various state legislatures, ( a quick look using petscan suggests a big enough overlap in at least two of these states so that we could have a category for those that served in both houses, but I am not going down that road)

I believe that the Representatives categories will still be over 700 but we will hopefully be able to see better what we have after sorting. Waacstats (talk) 22:58, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

United States Supreme court stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another oversized category, I can see two ways of splitting this from the perm cat's subcats, either by decade(not widely used) or by the court that heard it it therefore propose splitting this by the court with the following templates and categories where these pass 60, Being neither an American nor an expert on this field I am open to changin this to by year/decade if people see that as a better fit:

Waacstats (talk) 22:58, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this is necessary, TBH. The SCOTUS-stub category is not "overstuffed"; there are a lot of cases. We should only subcategorize the stub if we foresee people actually doing work based on the subcategorization. I find it difficult to believe someone would sit down and go "It is my goal to make sure the Hughes Court's cases do not have stubs." Additionally, someone interested in such a project could just use Category Intersection to achieve this. No need to write it into templates. But, hypothetically, if we were to do this, it should not be a separate template for each justice. It should be {{SCOTUS-stub|Roberts}}, {{SCOTUS-stub|Hughes}}, etc. lethargilistic (talk) 02:44, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure how that would be implemented based on the stub sorter extension I use (see my JavaScript for further details) - OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:14, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Well, if there's a technical limitation, then disregard that suggestion. I'm still skeptical of the value of this initiative, but I suppose it's ultimately harmless. lethargilistic (talk) 06:00, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Haryana railway station stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Haryana-railstation-stub}} has 60 transclusions, and Indian railway station stubs is becoming oversized... - OpalYosutebito (talk) 16:56, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

One of the transclusions is from its own talk page, which makes 59; but Support because of the existing category tree. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:17, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wouldn't say the parent is anywhere near oversized but this fits the system. Waacstats (talk) 23:03, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposals, February 2025

Missouri state judge stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Missouri-state-judge-stub}} has over 60 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 19:23, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support easily follows precedent. Waacstats (talk) 23:01, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

College football season stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
We have seven oversized subcats and a number of very large subcats. I propose splitting the following by decade categories by year, as per existing splits of subcats.

Waacstats (talk) 23:12, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sports venues

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
The following templates have over 60 articles propose the matching categories

Waacstats (talk) 23:12, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

athletics-bios part 1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
Asia is oversized and the following templates have over 60, I propose the matching categories

Waacstats (talk) 23:12, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

athletics-bios part 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
other countries whose templates have passed 60

Waacstats (talk) 23:12, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Football biography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
We have a number of large categories, not oversized but it would be nice to keep them off the list. I propose the following templates with categories where the template passes 60, inline with how we have split other countries, some of these already exist but I have listed them all for completeness:

Waacstats (talk) 23:12, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Ampullariidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Ampullariidae-stub}} has 68 transclusions; it is currently upmerged into Category:Architaenioglossa stubs. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 04:57, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Ramanathapuram district geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Ramanathapuram-geo-stub}} has over 60 transclusions, and Tamil Nadu geography stubs is becoming oversized... - OpalYosutebito (talk) 01:45, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Pectinidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Pectinidae-stub}} has 86 transclusions; it is currently upmerged into Category:Bivalve stubs. jlwoodwa (talk) 00:36, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Mytilidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Mytilidae-stub}} has 63 transclusions; it is currently upmerged into Category:Bivalve stubs, which has 651 stubs. I think this is worth diffusing. jlwoodwa (talk) 00:03, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Tiruvannamalai district geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Tiruvannamalai-geo-stub}} has 60 transclusions, and Tamil Nadu geography stubs is becoming oversized... - OpalYosutebito (talk) 16:57, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposals, January 2025

Category:Hunan railway station stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Hunan-railstation-stub}} has over 130 transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 04:16, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Rewari district geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Haryana geography stubs is oversized and there are over 60 pages in need of a new template; see here for the list of pages awaiting the new template and category. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 22:05, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Bhiwani district geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Haryana geography stubs is oversized and there are over 100 pages in need of a new template; see here for the list of pages awaiting the new template and category. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 22:04, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:West Champaran district geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Bihar geography stubs is oversized and there are over 100 pages in need of a new template; see here for the list of pages awaiting the new template and category. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 17:44, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Solapur district geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Solapur-geo-stub}} has over 110 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 16:02, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Madagascar river stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Madagascar-river-stub}} has over 60 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 23:38, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 00:08, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Al-Hasakah Governorate geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{AlHasakahSY-geo-stub}} has over 70 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 23:28, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 00:08, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Idlib Governorate geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{IdlibSY-geo-stub}} has over 430 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 23:28, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 00:08, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Washington County, Ohio geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{WashingtonCountyOH-geo-stub}} has over 60 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 22:17, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 00:08, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:2020s Canadian documentary film stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{2020s-Canada-documentary-film-stub}} has over 180 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 22:06, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 00:08, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:2010s Canadian documentary film stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{2010s-Canada-documentary-film-stub}} has over 200 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 21:57, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 00:08, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Anguidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Anguidae-stub}} has over 60 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 17:21, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 19:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support - parent category:Lizard stubs is oversized. William Avery (talk) 12:00, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Ancient Greek philosopher stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{AncientGreece-philosopher-stub}} has 190 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 15:04, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 19:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:New Mexico state court judge stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{NewMexico-state-judge-stub}} has over 60 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 14:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 19:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:2010s indie pop album stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{2010s-indie-pop-album-stub}} has over 80 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 14:32, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 19:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2000s Canadian documentary film stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like this to be a sub-category of Category:2000s Canadian film stubs, Category:Canadian documentary film stubs, and Category:2000s documentary film stubs, since {{2000s-Canada-documentary-film-stub}} has over 120 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 02:53, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 19:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2000s Bengali film stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like this to be a sub-category of Category:2000s film stubs and Category:Bengali-language film stubs, since {{2000s-Bengali-film-stub}} has over 100 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 02:52, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 19:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1990s Canadian documentary film stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like this to be a sub-category of Category:1990s Canadian film stubs, Category:Canadian documentary film stubs, and Category:1990s documentary film stubs, since {{1990s-Canada-documentary-film-stub}} has over 60 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 02:42, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 19:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1920s mystery novel stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like this to be a sub-category of Category:1920s novel stubs and Category:Mystery novel stubs, since {{1920s-mystery-novel-stub}} has over 60 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 01:46, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 19:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

17th-century play stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like this to be a sub-category of Category:Pre-18th-century play stubs, since {{17thC-play-stub}} has over 200 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 01:26, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 19:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Çankırı Province geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like this to be a sub-category of Category:Central Anatolia region geography stubs, since {{Çankırı-geo-stub}} has over 400 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 01:16, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 19:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Yozgat Province geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like this to be a sub-category of Category:Central Anatolia region geography stubs, since {{Yozgat-geo-stub}} has 60 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 01:16, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 19:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Rize Province geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like this to be a sub-category of Category:Black Sea region geography stubs, since {{Rize-geo-stub}} has over 160 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 23:58, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 00:55, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sivas Province geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like this to be a sub-category of Category:Central Anatolia region geography stubs, since {{Sivas-geo-stub}} has over 200 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 23:09, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 00:55, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Changsha Metro stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like a new template and category to be a member of Category:People's Republic of China rapid transit stubs and Category:Changsha Metro, since there are over 60 stub articles that need it. See here for the list of articles awaiting this new template. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 01:13, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Sri Lankan railway station stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
I would like this to be a sub-category of Category:Asian railway station stubs and Category:Railway stations in Sri Lanka, since {{SriLanka-railstation-stub}} has over 60 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 00:25, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists. Her Pegship (?) 01:01, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I think this should probably be formatted as Category:Sri Lanka railway station stubs. Her Pegship (?) 00:55, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What makes you say that? - OpalYosutebito (talk) 15:50, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Some stub cats use the country name without the possessive, some with, and I see that most of the Asian railway station stub cats use Fooian, so I retract my suggestion. Thanks! Her Pegship (?) 00:07, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, good to know. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 00:08, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Kagawa railway station stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created as Kaga Prefecture railway station stubs.
I would like this to be a sub-category of Category:Japanese railway station stubs and Category:Railway stations in Kagawa Prefecture, since {{Kagawa-railstation-stub}} has over 80 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 00:23, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists. Her Pegship (?) 01:01, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Amphisbaenidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Amphisbaenidae stubs, since there are currently over 100 stubs that could use them and the parent category, Category:Lizard stubs, is oversized. William Avery (talk) 13:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 01:01, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Tropiduridae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Tropiduridae stubs, since there are currently over 120 stubs that could use them and the parent category, Category:Lizard stubs, is oversized. William Avery (talk) 13:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 01:01, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Teiidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Teiidae stubs, since there are currently over 100 stubs that could use them and the parent category, Category:Lizard stubs, is oversized. William Avery (talk) 13:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 01:01, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Phrynosomatidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Phrynosomatidae stubs, since there are currently over 120 stubs that could use them and the parent category, Category:Lizard stubs, is oversized. William Avery (talk) 13:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 01:01, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Liolaemidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Liolaemidae stubs, since there are currently over 170 stubs that could use them and the parent category, Category:Lizard stubs, is oversized. William Avery (talk) 13:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 01:01, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Dactyloidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Dactyloidae stubs, since there are currently over 350 stubs that could use them and the parent category, Category:Lizard stubs, is oversized. William Avery (talk) 13:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 01:01, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Hangzhou Metro stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like a new template and category to be a member of Category:People's Republic of China rapid transit stubs and Category:Hangzhou Metro, since there are over 240 stub articles that need it. See here for the list of articles awaiting this new template. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 20:29, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 01:01, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Shenyang Metro stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like a new template and category to be a member of Category:People's Republic of China rapid transit stubs and Category:Shenyang Metro, since there are over 80 stub articles that need it. See here for the list of articles awaiting this new template. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 18:49, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 01:01, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Inner Mongolia railway station stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
I would like this to be a sub-category of Category:China railway station stubs and Category:Railway stations in Inner Mongolia, since {{InnerMongolia-railstation-stub}} has over 60 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 18:49, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists. Her Pegship (?) 01:01, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Tianjin railway station stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like this to be a sub-category of Category:China railway station stubs and Category:Railway stations in Tianjin, since {{Tianjin-railstation-stub}} has over 90 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 01:10, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 23:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Cycloctenidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Cycloctenidae stubs, since there are currently over 60 stubs that could use them. William Avery (talk) 19:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 23:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Desidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Desidae stubs, since there are currently over 70 stubs that could use them. William Avery (talk) 19:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 23:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Orsolobidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Orsolobidae stubs, since there are currently over 90 stubs that could use them. William Avery (talk) 19:33, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 23:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Poeciliidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Poeciliidae stubs, since there are currently 98 stubs that could use them. William Avery (talk) 14:32, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Rivulidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Rivulidae stubs, since there are currently 72 stubs that could use them. William Avery (talk) 14:32, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Nothobranchiidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Nothobranchiidae stubs, since there are currently 66 stubs that could use them. William Avery (talk) 14:32, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Dolomedidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was upmerged template created.
Proposing a category and template for Dolomedidae stubs, since there are currently over 20 stubs that could use them, as well as a further 108 articles to be created shortly that would fall under this category due to their taxonomic placement. Species in this family are generally a neglected group in Wikipedia and in general, hence the high number of redlinks. Mediocre.marsupial (talk) 02:07, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest we wait for a category until more of those articles have been created, but I support creation of an upmerged template. Her Pegship (?) 20:26, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Cottidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Cottidae stubs, since there are currently over 120 stubs that could use them. William Avery (talk) 15:49, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Liparidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for

Liparidae stubs, since there are currently over 150 stubs that could use them. William Avery (talk) 15:49, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply
]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Cottoidei stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Cottoidei stubs, since there are currently over 120 stubs that could use them, assuming that the proposals for Liparidae and Cottidae succeed. William Avery (talk) 15:49, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals&oldid=1278201039"