Search results
Appearance
The page "Wikipedia talk:Administrators' noticeboard/Community sanction/include/css/styles.css" does not exist. You can click on "Wikipedia talk:Administrators' noticeboard/Community sanction/include/css/styles.css" to create the page directly, or you may request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- the preloaded text at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring/Example was recently changed and now includes the text Remember, you do need *4*...250 KB (35,410 words) - 21:40, 26 March 2022
- you start a community ban discussion? Quote from WP:BAN: "Community sanctions may be discussed on the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents."...252 KB (34,134 words) - 07:06, 4 July 2024
- The administrators' noticeboard should be moved to Wikipedia:Community noticeboard, to take over from the present community sanction noticeboard and address...255 KB (36,119 words) - 08:17, 3 April 2023
- not the role of administrators to be in charge of disputes. It is the role of administrators to use specific tools to enforce community consensus when...246 KB (34,994 words) - 06:48, 22 April 2023
- @CactiStaccingCrane: The proper page for this is Wikipedia talk:Administrators' noticeboard (if moving you can omit this comment). —Alalch E. 12:27, 12 January...122 KB (15,513 words) - 07:59, 18 July 2024
- be to take this to a noticeboard? Any particular noticeboard? And mon, the issue here wouldn't be css, just your particular css and tendency to ignore...156 KB (19,791 words) - 09:39, 10 October 2023
- Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Archive 21 (section Discretionary Sanctions: Awareness and alerts: Motion)The Arbitration Committee has authorized uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on users who edit pages related to (a) GamerGate, (b)...204 KB (29,264 words) - 12:57, 20 February 2024
- Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Archive 11 (section Adding States by powerstatus to Discretionary sanctions)Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Sortan#Preferred styles: Wikipedia does not mandate styles in many different areas; these include (but are not limited to) American vs...244 KB (35,337 words) - 04:31, 4 February 2023
- can be handled by normal community processes and no longer needs the specific constraints that come from an arbcom sanction, it's better to do exactly...264 KB (35,796 words) - 19:24, 7 October 2023
- Wikipedia talk:Signatures/Archive 7 (section Signatures must include at least one internal link, elevation to policy?)negligible. I agree however with he pre-defined styles because it would give users some choices that could be css linked and kept up to date with accessibility...133 KB (16,633 words) - 09:39, 10 October 2023
- Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard/request - it turns out that it wasn't appearing correctly with styling etc, because it relied on a CSS dependency that was...99 KB (12,859 words) - 06:50, 30 January 2023
- Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Archive 11 (section Can editing restrictions be imposed on the articles (not on the users) per discretionary sanctions?)Sanctions have been used exclusively by uninvolved administrators. I would be deeply concerned if involved administrators or any non-administrators (who...252 KB (36,648 words) - 20:26, 2 March 2023
- for arbitration/Sortan#Preferred styles (2006): Wikipedia does not mandate styles in many different areas; these include (but are not limited to) American...652 KB (95,284 words) - 04:38, 4 February 2023
- to discretionary sanctions. I would like to edit the answer to Q10 to give examples of other dispute resolution mechanisms, to include 3O, RFM, RFC, BLPN...118 KB (17,458 words) - 14:04, 4 March 2023
- that the community doesn't really want us to consider intermediate sanctions: Ultimately, I wish there was an acceptable intermediate sanction for administrators—I...497 KB (71,501 words) - 17:40, 22 December 2023
- Flatscan (talk) 04:57, 1 July 2009 (UTC) The administrators' noticeboard is usually the forum used for community discussion of concerns over the conduct of...295 KB (40,383 words) - 19:51, 16 December 2023
- Google 39 Community sanction noticeboard 39 Articles for deletion/Ouze Merham 30 WikiProject on open proxies 30 Administrators' noticeboard 29 Citing...26 KB (3,737 words) - 18:33, 4 February 2023
- (UTC) Not logging or recording it makes it a personal sanction, not a community or project sanction. Aside from other admins having it to make further administrative...250 KB (33,501 words) - 11:28, 25 May 2022
- case page's sanction log: "Pmanderson (talk · contribs) restriction re-widened to include the pages and talk pages of all MOS and style guidelines due...405 KB (54,917 words) - 07:33, 24 January 2022
- the biggest U.S. legal citation styles (and all international styles by extension, because they copy common local styles as much as possible) and also consistent...500 KB (69,457 words) - 00:20, 5 April 2023