Search results
Appearance
The page "Wikipedia talk:Autoconfirmed Proposal/include/js/navigation.js" does not exist. You can request that it be created, or you may create the page "Wikipedia talk:Autoconfirmed Proposal/include/js/navigation.js" directly, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- accesskeys from existing code in wikibits.js akeytt(); return li; } It adds a "Newpages" link in the navigation sidebar. John Reaves 03:01, 5 January 2007...83 KB (11,254 words) - 22:42, 13 March 2023
- button (See Button, JS Form (currently unused)) use the same JS form as protection (See Button, JS Form) and unprotection (See Button, JS Form), as this presents...98 KB (11,983 words) - 13:29, 29 May 2024
- Wikipedia talk:HotCat/Archive 3 (section Village Pump proposal for enabling this by default for most editors)Please see Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#Proposal:_enable_HotCat_for_all_editors_by_default. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here...75 KB (9,770 words) - 05:36, 26 March 2023
- js'); in your monobook.js with importScript('User:Xaradnam/twinkle.js'); Or, copy the contents of User:Xaradnam/twinklefluff.js into your own...110 KB (13,306 words) - 06:31, 17 May 2022
- Resolved Resolution: Fixed Recent change to morebits.js broke compatibility with popups -- the navigation popups use the same Cookie object, but with different...100 KB (11,204 words) - 06:02, 30 January 2023
- Wikipedia talk:Rollback for non-administrators (section Wikipedia:Rollback for non-administrators proposal)be warned. If they continue to do it, they can be blocked. We include Tools/Navigation popups in the Gadgets that you can enable in your preferences and...23 KB (3,277 words) - 16:54, 15 March 2023
- twinklefluff.js =================================================================== --- twinklefluff.js (revision 300255047) +++ twinklefluff.js (working...121 KB (13,555 words) - 09:40, 10 October 2023
- User:SD0001/twinkle.js (though its a bit dated version) Load the ResourceLoader dependencies first, then load morebits.js and select2.js, and finally load twinkle.js. The...199 KB (23,446 words) - 18:24, 3 March 2023
- non-autoconfirmed users. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 17:58, 7 July 2020 (UTC) Amorymeltzer, last thing. With the exclusion of MediaWiki:Gadget-Twinkle.js where...200 KB (22,578 words) - 20:10, 11 October 2022
- Wikipedia talk:User access levels/Archive 4 (section “Pseudo-group” is used to describe autoconfirmed editors)address the redirect Autoconfirmed. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 30#Autoconfirmed until a consensus...84 KB (10,265 words) - 14:00, 20 April 2024
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Archive 5 (section Another category-renaming proposal)a js User:Graeme Bartlett/js/afc-helper.js for this purpose, but when trying to use fancy template format as well it was beyond me (I can write js but...215 KB (30,006 words) - 18:56, 8 May 2022
- specific understanding of what we are trying to implement. My proposal does not include specifics for how a test-run would be conducted, but I feel that...94 KB (13,518 words) - 09:49, 21 March 2023
- it's true AfC is not strictly obligatory (right? at least for anyone autoconfirmed, which this creator was even when they started the entry), and I sort...75 KB (11,273 words) - 06:04, 20 September 2018
- difference between the two. An autoconfirmed editor and a confirmed editor have the exact same rights. Autoconfirmed is done by the software and confirmed...125 KB (15,171 words) - 20:03, 3 May 2022
- the embedding. Add this to your common.js or your vector.js importScript("User:Fred Gandt/embedFeedbackDashboard.js"); Contains no on load hook so needs...90 KB (11,912 words) - 11:13, 25 January 2024
- editsemiprotected and autoconfirmed to ensure all reviewers can review PC1 pages. As for possibly reviewing all the reviewers, this was suggested in proposal 15 of the...150 KB (16,865 words) - 19:02, 4 February 2023
- boxes vs navigational boxes are treated differently. Data boxes have the status of being "raw content" thus are important enough to include in mobile...139 KB (17,969 words) - 02:11, 18 August 2022
- Also, if the article is submitted as a draft, it can help AFC per this proposal, to allow potential reviewers who only want to review articles of a certain...69 KB (9,152 words) - 05:06, 4 February 2023
- think you are confusing autoconfirmed with autopatrolled. One onmy needs 10 edits with a 4 day old account to become WP:AUTOCONFIRMED and for that reason...100 KB (12,749 words) - 19:01, 4 February 2023
- should change this to an autoconfirmed user right. AndrewRT(Talk) 22:24, 7 May 2009 (UTC) Surely not. Not everyone who is autoconfirmed manages to get rollback...100 KB (12,285 words) - 23:39, 2 March 2023