Search results
The page "Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Chinese)/NPOV/include/css/styles.css" does not exist. You can click on "Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Chinese)/NPOV/include/css/styles.css" to create the page directly, or you may request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- Naming conventions/Archive 13)Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese), Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Clergy), Wikipedia:WikiProject College football/Naming Conventions, Wikipedia:Naming conventions...145 KB (21,395 words) - 05:20, 4 April 2023"standard" in naming. That is, those icons does NOT follow the naming convention prefix-ID-suffix (xxxXXXxxx), but change to another naming style prefix-ID1-suffix-"-"-ID2...82 KB (11,339 words) - 18:00, 11 March 2023stylistic conventions for the consideration of Wikipedia participants. No one should feel obligated to follow such (stylistic) conventions--it's important...147 KB (23,963 words) - 22:45, 2 April 2023Wikipedia:Naming conventions (categories) doesn't make it explicit, but I think "Ships of XYZ Navy" is most in line with the logic of the conventions. The...200 KB (31,179 words) - 09:59, 22 February 2022way NPOV attempts to work. I am not trying to strip titles/styles (things such as inline use of "King" are fine by me, and I'm aiming more at styles), just...400 KB (63,800 words) - 15:27, 4 February 2023revert the naming conventions until a new consensus is reached. Charles 23:51, 30 May 2008 (UTC) The reason for reverting to established conventions is to...335 KB (51,365 words) - 00:28, 3 March 2023go with the Naming Conventions policy and the common name. The first section of the naming convention policy Wikipedia:Naming Conventions#Use the most...461 KB (71,307 words) - 14:46, 30 May 2022supersede scientific convention? Forgive me but that smacks of arrogance. Comparing scientific conventions to editorial conventions and relegating it to...886 KB (123,139 words) - 18:19, 31 July 2022other Wikipedia articles using the approach laid out in Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Arabic). That does raise another question for me: A lot of the relevant...150 KB (21,604 words) - 14:34, 17 December 2023might check out Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Arabic), Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese), Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Cyrillic), etc. etc. etc. – Quadell...90 KB (12,868 words) - 18:33, 3 March 2023rules out WP:CONSISTENCY; naming on Wikipedia would be exactly as random as implied by taking the median of all naming conventions on any given topic outside...271 KB (40,194 words) - 16:02, 20 May 2022(UTC) Tennis expert, article naming is subject to "Naming conventions", which is policy and must prevail. As far as style guides go, some of your colleagues...281 KB (41,572 words) - 17:46, 22 June 2022they use, or include a transliteration table. My Ukraine: A Concise Encyclopædia includes about 2-1/2 pages describing their naming conventions, which I described...108 KB (16,397 words) - 16:10, 4 February 2023years at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (city names). Last time I checked, the consensus was to remain with the American convention of using city, state...114 KB (17,409 words) - 00:49, 22 May 2022what not exactly positive: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 194#Merge draft WP:Naming conventions (identity) to MOS:IDENTITY?. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 ...502 KB (62,524 words) - 19:19, 16 January 2023above about style guideline pages on WP and their page naming, there's not really even a solid reason not to have the naming convention pages be renamed...506 KB (73,348 words) - 15:45, 15 April 2023
- disappeared. I consider naming conventions as something less important, and I do not want to impose my views on how to name 'main' author pages, also
)