Search results
The page "Wikipedia talk:No original research/include/images/usa.png" does not exist. You can request that it be created, or you may create the page "Wikipedia talk:No original research/include/images/usa.png" directly, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- Image copyright tags/Archive 6)low-resolution images of promotional material" Does this mean that promotional images must be reduced before they're uploaded? What if the original image wasn't...181 KB (26,243 words) - 20:52, 13 December 2023Per F2, images of PNGs and GIFs that are bigger than 12.5 MP can be speedy deleted. The same as archival file formats for which we simply don't render...343 KB (42,046 words) - 08:00, 3 April 2023--Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:50, 2 October 2008 (UTC) Image:Financial_Leverage_Profit_Engine.png is an example of an original user created chart. If it was a chart of...170 KB (25,743 words) - 06:41, 30 January 2023made in 2003 80 years in the USA and 75 years in most other countries isn'it ? Ericd 17:12 Apr 16, 2003 (UTC) There is no one answer to how long a copyright...83 KB (13,557 words) - 07:26, 8 October 2021Wikipedia talk:Graphics Lab/Archive 2 (section Fair use image warning for images that are going to be improved upon the graphic lab)PNG images don't scale well on wikipedia or on other websites unless one wants to spend an inordinate amount of time tweaking every scaled PNG image....72 KB (9,947 words) - 23:25, 26 March 2023Image:Finder icon.png Image:Pages icon.png Image:Apple Dictionary Icon.png Image:ICal Icon.png Image:IPhoto Icon.png Image:Apple iDisk Icon.png Image:ISync...107 KB (17,463 words) - 16:37, 3 October 2021Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities/Archive 18 (section Should infoboxes for USA towns have US pushpin maps?)be original research. Quoting WP:IG, "A gallery is not a tool to shoehorn images into an article", and if we got Smithville to an FA, these images would...72 KB (10,602 words) - 10:49, 4 February 2023
- (UTC) Is there any danger of our being held to run foul of the WP No Original Research guidelines in any of this? I am thinking of the use of the term 'pre-published'
)