Search results
The page "Wikipedia talk:Vital articles/Level/5/include/js/navigation.js" does not exist. You can click on "Wikipedia talk:Vital articles/Level/5/include/js/navigation.js" to create the page directly, or you may request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Chemistry articles)of the Editorial Team's banners, including v0.5, v0.7, v1.0, {{WPCD}}, and templates for Vital articles and core topics. Currently, it is still in beta...103 KB (15,242 words) - 17:07, 3 April 2023would probably help to have two forms of navigation: a top tab bar with 5 or fewer "big item" navigational items, and a sidebar that lists out all the...96 KB (8,848 words) - 14:29, 20 March 2022Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Usability (section Proposal to collapse the vital article tag into the project banner shell)follow-up discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Vital Articles#TfD follow-up: Fate of the vital article talk banner. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 19:42, 27 May...58 KB (4,206 words) - 19:05, 6 March 2024adding references or images. So I am worried that improving vital or difficult articles and recruiting new editors may be incompatible objectives. One...103 KB (11,764 words) - 23:11, 21 August 2023that through referencing is vital to our scientific articles in establishing Wikipedia's credibility and overall quality levels. You can not assume that...125 KB (19,684 words) - 14:46, 4 February 202313 December 2022 (UTC) RC · Talk RC User_talk:Evad37/SPS.js#Problem_if_the_page_includes_the_word_"null" I guess we should update the style guide until...253 KB (16,914 words) - 01:55, 27 July 2024conflict) The 10 longest featured articles by byte count (obtained by running User:Dr pda/generatestats.js on articles transcluding {{Featured article}})...88 KB (11,815 words) - 00:34, 5 June 2022the encyclopedia works, on social and technical levels. danah boyd could be helpful here. It's vital that the designer(s) understand how everything works;...17 KB (2,594 words) - 01:12, 13 August 2009js to your monobook. Administrators will have to go through every single image anyways, so I argue that it would be better to include the arguments...153 KB (22,763 words) - 13:38, 18 February 2023Can we alter the archive template to include a search box like WT:MILHIST, for one, does? It's not necessarily for new users, although they can use it...102 KB (14,334 words) - 06:20, 14 March 2023
- -- Stbalbach 05:27, 5 March 2006 (UTC) I don't believe we should include such annotations. Wikisource:What Wikisource includes explains our mission of
)