Search results
Appearance
The page "Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Accessibility/assets/include/css/styles.css" does not exist. You can click on "Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Accessibility/assets/include/css/styles.css" to create the page directly, or you may request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- true of WikiProject members, who possess no more authority than any other editors to determine articles' contents. WikiProjects are valuable assets, but...256 KB (38,328 words) - 05:55, 26 December 2022
- not already here, that have relevance to this Project: Many articles in Category:Accessibility Accessibility: People with physical disabilities can be blocked...27 KB (4,142 words) - 18:00, 24 December 2006
- discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Conflicting styles for names of laws, seeking to clarify how to style the names of laws here. ₪ MIESIANIACAL...72 KB (10,207 words) - 08:02, 8 July 2024
- Wikipedia talk:Centralized discussion/Archive 3 (section Proposal to include template {{cent}} on every discussion page)different css options through the accessibility links. It's not about what colour I like, it's about giving due consideration to accessibility issues when...34 KB (4,622 words) - 05:03, 15 March 2023
- over user accessibility and/or simply not aware of accessibility concerns. Not all of us use a mouse - See Wikipedia:WikiProject Accessibility/What is accessibility...245 KB (33,251 words) - 15:40, 4 February 2023
- that styles can be set there (inline as opposed the css stylesheet), so VGP could still strip via the CSS trick without affecting other projects. In cases...257 KB (35,387 words) - 19:23, 14 May 2022
- choice of styles is idiosyncratic but not actually inconsistent as there is no logical tie between dialect and date style. Inconsistency in style from other...145 KB (19,689 words) - 05:08, 17 July 2024
- "ignore" css. It couldn't function if it did. The mechanism is actually that the third-party applies the styling set in MediaWiki:Offline.css, which then...145 KB (21,012 words) - 04:10, 11 October 2019
- Barber#Infobox, about whether to include infoboxes on those articles, or whether "prior determination" prohibits them. WikiProject Classical music has been canvassed...72 KB (9,330 words) - 05:34, 30 January 2023
- not in the infobox. Rather than alter all of these articles, how about a CSS approach? That way, we only need to amend a small number of templates. --Redrose64...89 KB (11,923 words) - 18:13, 24 April 2023
- better". --TheDJ (talk • contribs • WikiProject Television) 14:28, 26 February 2007 (UTC) Read Wikipedia_talk:WIkiproject_The_Simpsons/Archive2#Disambigu...201 KB (30,383 words) - 21:49, 13 November 2023
- embedded in the CSS. Might run afoul of substing guidelines (as I recall barnstars are substed, no?). Might be easier just to include the CSS directly rather...257 KB (34,900 words) - 14:00, 19 September 2022
- don't seem to be coming from the same user, however they all share writing styles, poor or nonexistent referencing and other characteristics. Their submitters...362 KB (51,876 words) - 09:37, 3 April 2023
- style - I said both styles should be allowed because both styles are still in common use. And you're still cherry picking the Chicago Manual of Style...437 KB (59,408 words) - 15:22, 4 February 2023
- 2016 (UTC) Oppose for accessibility reasons, as noted above by Redrose64. The spacing templates that don't present accessibility problems would be very...179 KB (25,623 words) - 15:20, 4 February 2023
- named styles. Do we actually need any styles at all? -- The Anome (talk) 16:15, 24 February 2012 (UTC) No, it doesn't look like we need styles at all...263 KB (37,093 words) - 19:19, 3 April 2023
- Wikipedia talk:Featured article criteria/Archive 3 (section Wikipedia_talk:Summary_style#templates_to_make_summary_style_explicit)facts as some blog. Accessibility is another issue; if we have two reputable sources, we would rather reference the more accessible one to facilitate fact...85 KB (13,658 words) - 23:09, 14 March 2023
- no real concern about video accessibility anymore than anything else. We cite books which often have more accessibility issues, ie getting a hold of...257 KB (35,771 words) - 19:24, 14 May 2022
- reason to override the default set by MediaWiki:Common.css, and doing so violates guidelines set by WP:ACCESSIBILITY. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:29, 25 April...172 KB (19,933 words) - 04:30, 16 December 2023
- time again throughout the entirety of the video games wikiproject. Anyone familiar with the project (or familiar with video games over the last twenty years)...342 KB (50,120 words) - 00:48, 22 May 2022