Search results
Appearance
Did you mean: Wikipedia_talk:wikiproject editor retention editor_of_the_week nominations include assets js language changes
The page "Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Nominations/include/assets/js/language-change.js" does not exist. You can click on "Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Nominations/include/assets/js/language-change.js" to create the page directly, or you may request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- to endorse or comment on the current nominees at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Nominations.```Buster Seven Talk 07:45...207 KB (28,991 words) - 14:33, 21 April 2023
- would therefore suggest first that we change this goal to the more inclusive "Increase retention of competent editors at Wikipedia". Secondly, rather than...206 KB (28,247 words) - 06:22, 14 March 2023
- (UTC) Good idea, Auto. Just the other day, I created a second WER Welcome template at Template:WikiProject Editor Retention/Welcome 2. I was going to ask...201 KB (25,753 words) - 10:12, 4 February 2023
- the majority of the sources are in another language. It would be nice to be able to ping an AfC editor who is familiar with the language. Sulfurboy (talk)...263 KB (37,119 words) - 18:36, 18 October 2023
- highly trust DGG's judgement and consider him to be one of the biggest assets to en.wiki as a project, so if he is offering feedback, it's something I think...103 KB (14,057 words) - 18:19, 3 March 2023
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Archive 63 (section Use of Wikipedia policies as rationales for article deletion or retention)September 2011 (UTC) Shooting the messenger isn't going to solve the problem of improper AfD nominations. We now have AfD nominations that openly admit that...272 KB (37,155 words) - 17:46, 5 December 2022
- not the various language Wikipedia's use these official translations or not. My proposal is to create a wikiproject in all participating language-pedias...252 KB (34,928 words) - 13:23, 28 January 2023
- concerns, visit User talk:DASHBot/Wikiprojects. Okip 23:01, 27 March 2010 (UTC) As detailed in last week's Signpost, WikiProject Wikipedia books is undertaking...436 KB (57,402 words) - 15:06, 2 March 2024
- Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Archive 40 (section Banner (similar to Guild of Copy Editors))pulls its data from WP:RSP, WP:NPPSG and WikiProject reliable sources lists. DetectSNG.js - Scans a list of 1,600 SNG keywords such as "National Football...196 KB (28,518 words) - 06:26, 15 December 2021
- (revenue, total assets, equity are connected to "price"); I don't see a reason why initial price shouldn't also be done for products. The point of "not a sales...203 KB (29,665 words) - 05:58, 30 January 2023
- creating the WP:GAN, it stopped being able to include all the nominations after a certain point once we hit around 700 total nominations on the page on...486 KB (69,583 words) - 03:19, 10 July 2023
- Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/Single/2022-01-30 (section WikiProject report: The Forgotten Featured (1,470 bytes · 💬))resist adding that if the WMF had a stock of assets with returns so high that it would dwarf all their other assets, then the CFO should be fired, because...54 bytes (31,003 words) - 22:13, 2 December 2022
- Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Archive 170 (section Should we change the name of the 1929-30 psittacosis pandemic?)nominations/The Titan's Bride July 7: Template:Did you know nominations/RTÉ Does Comic Relief July 9: Template:Did you know nominations/List of The Last...250 KB (34,989 words) - 18:58, 30 April 2022
- Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Archive 95 (section The hook should include a definite fact that is mentioned in the article and interesting to a broad audience.)know nominations/Project Spark June 10: Template:Did you know nominations/Below (video game) June 10: Template:Did you know nominations/London in the 1960s...252 KB (35,509 words) - 11:51, 21 April 2023
- Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GiantSnowman/Proposed decision (section Status of the Proposed Decision)maintaining an article's coherence and structure is also beneficial for editor retention: it gives contributors confidence that they do not have to continually...101 KB (14,076 words) - 17:52, 10 February 2019
- clearly supports retention; the first block has more !votes than the second block; and the decision (keep or delete) with the fewer number of !votes has at...167 KB (22,275 words) - 10:16, 3 April 2023
- debating whether specific nominations have taken over or could be seen as taking over the project. A glut of transport death nominations suggests that an issue...881 KB (123,826 words) - 18:40, 13 March 2023
- Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 49 (section Nominations now open for the 2022 ArbCom elections)input: please make sure that the RFC should consider the implications of when RFCs affect the retention of a large number of articles that should processes...472 KB (66,569 words) - 05:48, 19 March 2023
- provide off-wiki proof of their real-world identities, see WP:OUTING). However, a number of long-time editors are supporting retention of the template,...381 KB (58,971 words) - 13:05, 4 February 2023
- blocking newer editors for vandalism-reasons only. Some will oppose such a right on-principle (creating classes of editors, new editor retention reasons, alleged...206 KB (28,714 words) - 15:44, 25 February 2024