Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Gambling

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconGambling NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
NAThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Things you can do

  • Current collaborations:
Improve an article to FA
Improve an article to A
  • Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
  • Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
  • The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
  • Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Project-independent quality assessments

Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:03, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed for deletion (PROD): iGaming Business

FYI, the article

WP:PROD
). The first sentences summarize the subject thusly:

  • "iGaming Business is a business-to-business (B2B) magazine focusing on the online gambling industry. It launched in 2003, and has two sister magazines - iGaming Business North America and iGB Affiliate."

The nominator wrote this summary of their concerns:

  • "No indication of notability"

If you agree or disagree with deletion, there are instructions on the

deletion notice
for what to do.

Thanks,

--A. B. (talkcontribsglobal count) 23:33, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion/IGaming Business

The PROD above was protested and cancelled. The article is now being discussed for deletion at:

Please express an opinion there if you have one.

Thanks,

--A. B. (talkcontribsglobal count) 06:14, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

B-checklist in project template

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council § Determining the future of B-class checklists. This project is being notified since it is one of the 82 WikiProjects that opted-in to support B-checklists (B1-B6) in your project banner. DFlhb (talk) 11:44, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for helpers/reviewers on Draft:Gamdom

Hey all, I am working on my first article, on the online cryptocurrency casino, Gamdom. I'm looking for some people to go over what I have so far, and add new information/sources if you find interest in the subject. OnlyNano 23:21, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for World Series of Poker bracelet

World Series of Poker bracelet has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Schierbecker (talk) 16:54, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]