Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Nepal

I think we should do nothing about maps until reliable

WP:THIRDPARTY

sources do.

We seem to have jumped the gun already with Kalapani territory, which Wikipedia maps are showing coloured yellow. I don't know who made this decision and what sources they used. I was thinking of taking it to

WP:NPOVN at some point, when Nepal began to amplify its claims even further. Our practice has generally been to colour the disputed areas as per the administering country. Only with regard to Kashmir do we use hatched areas, because THIRDPARTY sources do so. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:49, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

As for the area, it doesn't matter particularly, as long as it is stated whether it includes claimed areas. We need to be judicious about it though. For instance, do we calculate population densities while including claimed areas but not their populations? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:55, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kautilya3, I would just like the consensus figured out on all of these issues, whatever it may be. I have stopped reverting for the time being, as in the absence of others to back me up, I would be edit-warring against immediate local consensus in those articles.

These things are not solved in a day. For example, the

China-Tajikistan border was altered in 2011 and I started changing the maps to reflect this on Wikipedia only in 2020 (following the CIA World Factbook). Geographyinitiative (talk) 11:01, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Geographyinitiative, the immediate question is what to do with the driveby editors: leave their edits alone (I am sure when enough Indians become aware, they'll be here to swing it the other way), or keep reverting them however much they outnumber me by (what policy/consensus do I stand on while doing that?). Usedtobecool ☎️ 11:13, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My suggestion is to put dotted lines around territories claimed by a given country but not administered by that country following the way that Jammu and Kashmir maps are done. Geographyinitiative (talk) 11:23, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree, until RS cover it we should not.Slatersteven (talk) 11:04, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Slatersteven, and what exactly would that mean? I am guessing we are not counting Nepalese and Indian newspapers. Are you saying that we should go with the old area as long as, for example, the CIA or the UN don't list the new area in their data, and disregard news altogether? Usedtobecool ☎️ 11:27, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The only convention I'm aware of regarding disputed territories on maps is that used in the country infoboxes, which is to colour any claimed territory that the country doesn't actually control as light green instead of the regular dark green. As for other maps, I suspect it's mostly a case by case basis. Could you link to some of the new maps you've seen?

As for area, we shouldn't update it based on this single declaration, that's

WP:RECENTISM and doesn't therefore reflect a consensus among sources. CMD (talk) 11:05, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Chipmunkdavis, there was File:15-32-58-new-political-map-of-nepal-2052020112623-1000x0.jpg which seems to have been deleted. The government released this map;which is all I have seen, whatever filenames they may have been uploaded under. Kautilya3 has mentioned a map as well. Usedtobecool ☎️ 11:23, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That would mean that RS (I.E. third party independent sources), its is not just a question of reliability, but also of weight. No we should not disregard news, but wP:news is clear we also should not allow it to dictate content.Slatersteven (talk) 11:40, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, the current Jammu and Kashmir maps are ideal. No colouring, no shading, no hatching. Just dotted lines around the claimed areas.

WP:3RR still applies to me, even if I am on the side of the right (Sorry I am no practical experience with conflict). Usedtobecool ☎️ 12:57, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

It is not our problem. The

WP:NPOV

. Since the Indian and Nepalese claims neutralise each other, how are they able to give priority to one over the other? It is their problem to demonstrate and convince us.

If we run up against 3RR, we ask for help from other editors at the project pages or NPOV editors we know. If they exceed limits, we request page protection. Once we bring it to the admin attention, they take care of things quite well. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:13, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We can also make judicious use of

WP:In-text attribution. Nepal says X. India says Y. We state it and we are done. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:16, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

I agree, something like this needs to be standardized on all pages with the "New" map. The map used by the government of Nepal is non-neutral by definition and I think should not be used as per

WP:NPOVN. For examples, maps that reflect the Indian government's territorial claims do not appear on the India page. There are edits being done to the Infobox as well, which counter template norms used by other countries, there is a discussion there too on disputed territories which was helpful to go through. I also think this map has no place in the infobox. Thanks Usedtobecool for putting this together. Redpandamoon (talk) 05:18, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks for the image link Usedtobecool. I have nominated File:Nepal map 2020.jpg for deletion based on copyright.

In my experience waves of edits such as those pushing this new info will subside in time. The reason will no doubt vary per the edit being reverted. There will also be positive and constructive edits emerging from this event.

Territorial disputes of India and Nepal can be expanded, and perhaps we might now even be able to create a map for it. CMD (talk) 13:30, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

We recently had a preliminary discussion at #Nomination for deletion of Template:Rukum District on what to do regarding District templates. It seems to me, clarity on the subject would help going forward. I have looked at some, and:

1. For districts that exist now and did before, I like what GERNPL has done at {{Kathmandu District}} (diff).
2. For districts that no longer exist, we should list VDCs and municipalities of the time, and make no mention of the new ones; since the district was gone when the new system came in. {{Nawalparasi District}} is an existing example.
3. For new districts, we should list rural and urban municipalities and make no mention of the old VDCs or municipalities (if any). The old divisions were before their time, so they need not bother with them. {{Eastern Rukum District}} seems like the template to follow.
   Thoughts?
   Pinging SS49 who's been known to edit the templates. Pinging @CAPTAIN MEDUSA: from previous discussion, and procedural ping to pegship. Everyone feel free to ping anyone else who might have an interest in this area. Usedtobecool ☎️ 07:47, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
   fixing ping to @Raju Babu:. Usedtobecool ☎️ 07:50, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think VDCs should be listed only with the former two districts:

As mentioned by Raju Babu, all former VDCs are now parts of either Rural or Urban municipalities so these former VDCs should not be listed in the district templates. Should list current municipalities and rural municipalities and district headquarters. ~SS49~ {talk} 12:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The templates' function is to link related articles together. We need a template to link the former VDCs. I think putting them into a historical section of existing templates would be just the right amount of work necessary. If consensus is reached against inclusion of former VDCs in the district templates, we will need separate sub-templates for each district. VDCs are a significant part of the history of any district, except the four new ones. So, I would favour including them in the existing templates, marking them properly as historical. Usedtobecool ☎️ 13:38, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from User talk:Gotitbro § Nepalese

 – ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 15:29, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you reverted my edits at Manisha Koirala. In that edit, I changed the word Neplaese to Nepali. I believe it should be Nepali. You said Nepalese is the standard term on enwiki, can you direct me to a discussion that led to this change (as being the standard term).

Prakash Sharan Mahat, former minister for foreign affairs of Nepal once said People who live in Nepal, we call them Nepali ... Let us start saying Nepali in English as well, instead of saying Nepalese [1] Here are few sources [2] Martin Chautari also uses Nepali [3] Even NRN USA uses Nepali. [4] [5] ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 12:00, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@CAPTAIN MEDUSA: "Nepali" is a recent trend affected by the Indo-Aryan demonym usage for Nepal (Nepali is more generally used for the language in English). Nepalese has been the standard adjective/demonym in English and on this Wikipedia since the beginning as is evident by the categories on the page itself. And I don't see a reason why this or any other page should be an exception to that. Gotitbro (talk) 12:15, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly disagree with this. Even the The Kathmandu Post has been using Nepali for decades. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 12:28, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@CAPTAIN MEDUSA: This the current standard adjective form for Nepal here on enwiki and its precedent is evident by the myriad cats and titles related to it. You can disagree but the consensus for your change is not there. Gotitbro (talk) 12:36, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK! there might "not" be consensus. Let's talk about Koirala. The Media usage: Republica Nepali actress Manisha Koirala [6], The Rising Nepal Manisha Koirala is getting huge support from Nepali people, A book students in Indore disrupted the screening of a movie by the Nepali Bollywood actress Manisha Koirala [7] Outlook Manisha will live in Nepal and will mostly devote time to Nepali films.

Using Google: If you search for Manisha Koirala "Nepali actress", it bring 189,000 results. Manisha Koirala "Nepalese actress" brings 5,600 results. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 13:08, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are missing the point, leads use standard terminology and this article is not an exception to that;

WP:GOOGLEHITS hardly matter here. Gotitbro (talk) 13:20, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

That is a different matter. This is not about AfD. The numbers matter because it shows that Nepali is widely used. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 13:30, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sidenote: Even the Wikipedia article about the people refers to them as "Nepalis" not Nepalese. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 14:04, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I specifically didn't refer to that article as it has been the subject of multiple edit wars, disputes and moves. Changing of a demonym/adjective would require a sitewide consensus. Gotitbro (talk) 14:20, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tulsi Bhagat, Usedtobecool, Biplab Anand, Coolboi567, Learnerktm: Your thoughts? ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 14:56, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@

talk ] 04:59, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

I think cats on this project use "Nepalese", so new cats should follow that, and any movement toward "Nepali" would require a massive CFD or an RFC. That is just for consistency among cats, so there is no way that automatically translates into article space consensus in favour of "Nepalese". The two words are synonyms and are mostly interchangeable. I think it's not necessary to make an edit specifically to change from one to another unless it would be confusing or in error. If the majority of the sources use "Nepali" as the Cap'n claims is the case with

WP:BRD for local consensus should be the way to go, in absence of any overriding global one.. Nepali politicians, just like any other, say all the things all the time, I don't think just that fact makes it official or correct. I think there is a general movement toward "Nepali" even in International media, but I am not basing that on any data. I am not aware of any guideline which would justify favouring one over the other, and if there were actually an attempt to get Wikipedia to favour one usage over another, I think the result would be something similar to datevar/engvar/citevar. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 05:38, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

I think "Nepalese" is correct in English language. "Nepali" is adjective/demonym in Nepali language. In Nepali language we say Japani for people from Japan but in English we say Japanese. Nepalese is English translation of Nepali. ~SS49~ {talk} 11:43, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The first known use of "Nepali" to mean "Inhabitant of Nepal" goes back to 1882, according to Merriam-Webster. So, it's not true that "Nepali" is a neologism, or just a Nepali/Sanskritic word which is properly translated into English as "Nepalese". The -i suffix isn't something unheard of in English; there's Pakistani (is there Pakistanese?) and Azeri, and those two are just off the top of my head. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 12:00, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Found this from

The Associated Press. Apparently, they were confused when reporting the 2015 earthquake and asked a Nepali linguist.Usedtobecool ☎️ 12:10, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

FWIW, I think "Nepali" is dominant in the South Asia region at least, so one could always add a "Use Indian English" when they begin an article to run away with "Nepali". Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 12:10, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Formally we have to use "Nepalese" term instead of "Nepali". The Constitution of Nepal 2015^[1] says

Every Nepalese community residing in Nepal shall have the right to preserve and promote its language, script, culture, cultural civilization and heritage.

The Government of the United Kingdom uses Nepali:

The UK and Nepal have reaffirmed their strong friendship following a visit by Nepali Prime Minister Oli to the UK, and set out areas to deepen the relationship.

UK praises strong Nepal relationship following Prime Minister Oli’s visit ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 12:59, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GOV.UK Nepal’s development efforts under the new polity. The MFA on behalf of the Government of Nepal appreciated DFID’s work to help the Nepali people ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 13:47, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Nepal Citizenship Act, 2063 (2006) [18] ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 15:53, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Found beautiful and worth skimming conversation going here. As for the words, both words are possibly interchangeable. However, Nepalese has been consistently used in most of the wiki articles of/related to Nepal. For the common understanding and commonness 'Nepalese' has been accepted. Although the word 'Nepali' is generally seen in current trends, Nepalese is frequently and mostly used. I don't see why this should be argued more as both the words have no dissimilar meanings.

More, the word Nepali will be accepted as this conversation will slightly lighten the issue.

Thankyou for the ping. Capt. Medusa :) 18:38, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Hallo,

Thank you PamD, I made some improvements to a few articles, as well as the geo-stub template and category. ​ The templates and cats require consensus at WP:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals before they get created, so they should not have been created at all. I have been having a hard time keeping up with the recent level of WPNEPAL page creations. I had found a few minor formatting issues before, and was fixing them as I went but nothing like this. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 01:39, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CAPTAIN MEDUSA, perhaps we need a WP:Nepal Chautari, the talk page of the 10,000 challenge page perhaps? Usedtobecool ☎️ 01:43, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Usedtobecool, Maybe we need to update the challenge, like writing a how-to guide for writing stubs/start. I think by redirecting users to here, they can get most of it, this page is watched many users. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 10:13, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CAPTAIN MEDUSA I was thinking more of a discussion/QA page more like the Teahouse or CVU/NPP schools specifically for new editors from Nepal. A bit friendlier than this page. Precisely because this page is the mainboard of the project and everyone is watching it, it's not suited to function as a training page or help desk. It doesn't have to be 10000's talk page, we could have a whole new project subpage for the purpose. Let's try it out for a couple of months; see if anyone shows up with questions. Of course I agree with your suggestion for a help page or a quick guide to creating the new articles or at the very least, a list of resources (help and PAG pages). I'll try to throw something together in the next couple of days... unless you beat me to it. Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 07:04, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The same editor has been creating categories such as Category:Places of Pokhara, Category:Ward of Pokhara and Category:Chowks of Pokhara, with no parent categories. I've added a parent category to the first as at least a temporary fix (is it a useful category or not?) and proposed the other two for deletion, but Nepal editors might like to help out here. PamD 07:55, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The number of India-Nepal boarder related articles are growing with likely political motives and most likely increase. I think admins should set some guidelines on creation of such articles . eg. articles

WP:ARBIPA as India is "broadly construed" in it. Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 06:50, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Ok. Understood. nirmal (talk) 07:43, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Please note that scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:06, 14 September 2020 (UTC) on behalf of the TAFI team[reply]

From 1 October to 31 December, Women in Red is running a virtual contest on Asian women. In November, this will coincide with Wikipedia Asian Month. We look forward to strong participation from all those interested in improving coverage of Nepalese women.--Ipigott (talk) 16:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I was wondering if someone fluent (or at least fluent enough) in Nepalese could search for sourcing for Champa (novel). It's currently up for deletion and I have a feeling that the bulk of sourcing will not be in English and I'd like to make sure that if it's deleted (or kept), it would only be after a good search for sourcing. The author looks to be very notable, so I'd be surprised if there wasn't sourcing out there. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A complex RfC is going on, after a long bout of edit war. Uninvolved editors needed at the discussion. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 06:39, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A quick headsup: Yudhir Aacharya (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has been busy moving lots of articles, on the basis of assertions about correct terminology. See my note at User_talk:Yudhir_Aacharya#Article_moves.

This is outside my area of expertise, so I don't know whether these changes are justified ... but it seems to me that such such widespread changes should not be without some discussion. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:36, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Province No. 5 that was officially named today. They went with Lumbini Province, which is inconsistent with the rest of our articles but objectively a superior choice I think. They likely noticed that the rest of the articles were using "Pradesh" and moved the ones they could find. It seems they are done, and I doubt they'll return. So, I'll revert rest of their moves, which, you're correct, should not have been done without discussion, as it requires an organised effort to update everything after any such moves. This will have the Lumbini Province as an odd one out for the time being. But considering the resources at our disposal vs the number of things that are urgent on WikiProject Nepal, I think that's ok. So, I have requested a speedy rename of the adjoining category, Category:Province No. 5 and its subs. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 14:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks, Usedtobecool. Good to know that you are on the case. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:22, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the confidence, BrownHairedGirl! My plan didn't work. I have withdrawn the speedies and started a RM to get it done the proper way once and for all (notice below this section). I have tried to lay out the context well enough that editors unfamiliar would also be able to participate, or at least give a general opinion if not a specific !vote. You are welcome too, if you'd like. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 05:12, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A requested move discussion to rename all articles on

There is a discussion on the talk page about a disputed sentence. Is it possible for members of this project to make a comment there? Aditya^{(✉ • ⚒)} 03:05, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me to complete this Template which is in need to attach with articles of

--- 👤Raju💌 13:32, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

talk) 14:05, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

I am looking to connect with any Nepalese Wikipedians interested in GLAM (Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums) articles on wikipedia. If any wikipedians are interested please connect with me on my wikipedia page to explore GLAM article editing collaborations. Arunram (talk) 20:42, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Christianity in Nepal needs a thorough rewriting. It is currently entirely based on Christian missionary sources and is extremely slanted in favor of Christianity (even citing that Christians would constitute 10% of the population while according to census they are 1.4%). There is a user who guards the article impeding any modification and the addition of problem tags. Based on the nickname, he is the very same author of many of the cited sources, a Christian missionary, and thus has a strong conflict of interest.--37.161.136.19 (talk) 22:18, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, There is currently a discussion about the edit on the Gurkha page HERE and HERE, due to inaccurate mentions of India and other similar inaccuracies. They don't seem to act according to the clearly stated Wikipedia policies but rather act on their personal judgement. It'll be very beneficial if anyone could include what you think. Thank you. ---AWikiGenius (talk) 01:39, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WikiProject Nepal,

This article is in terrible shape and is almost without any sources if anyone wants to take it on as a writing project. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:49, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol needs experienced volunteers

• New Page Patrol
  is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles, including Nepal related articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; Wikipedia needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference.
• If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the granting conditions and review our instructions page. You can apply for the user-right HERE. --John B123 (talk) 14:26, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have created an article on Ram Saroj Yadav who is a minister of Physical Infrastructure from province no. 2 hich is presently in Draft. How can it be verified by speedy process? If it's possible, please help me do it as it shows it may take 5 month or more. Curious boy np (talk) 14:55, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done

WP:BLP. Please feel free to reinstate them with it. Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 16:06, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, WikiProject Nepal,

This article has been the subject of an edit war that resulted in several editors being blocked. I have reverted to the last version before the edit war broke out but I do not know if everything that was removed in this reversion was appropriate. If someone who has a NPOV could look over this article, I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:04, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Second oli cabinet and Third oli cabinet are not different and the only difference is they come under second premiership and third premiership respectively as mentioned above. So a section for third premiership in same article, Second Oli cabinet can address both. Even the national medias term this as cabinet reshuffle. Can we deny this? It can be termed as second term of same cabinet as all the ministers remained same and same ministers took oath. Even their article suggest no Third Oli cabinet!^[1] Can wiki deny this? Fifth Deuba Cabinet, 2021 mentions it's preceded by Second Oli cabinet. Second Oli cabinet says it's succeeded by Fifth Deuba Cabinet, 2021. Isn't it? Except this article, you may not find this awkward topic, Third Oli canet any where. For your clarification:-

What is a cabinet?

Answer:the committee of senior ministers responsible for controlling government policy.(as found in dictionary)

If group of ministers is same in both Second and Third term of Oli, how can they be represented by different articles?

Previously, I had a merger reqest on Wikiproject Nepal but none was interested to duscyss on this topic. This proves how much unnotable this topic is. Please someone create a deletion discussion here in the page Deletion shorting else proceed deletion to prevent wrong message being transmitted. 110.44.124.181 (talk) 19:55, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please help also to clean up the

Draft:2021 split in the People's Socialist Party, Nepal for tone and NPOV. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:10, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Further input on Talk:People's Socialist Party, Nepal § Article Split/New article titled 2021 split in the People's Socialist Party, Nepal to be formed from a section. would be very welcome. Thank you. MarioGom (talk) 11:01, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I request someone here to check the article. The major contributor to this article seems to be family member of subject of article. Its ok but no reference! why? Please help maintain this page. Maybe his son has made such changes withour reference. Ujjwal Jha, whos major contributor here is former Minister Jha's son. I hope, you understand this. This article seems story or advertising co tent. Nothing seems encyclopedic here from top to bottom. Hence, I request someone to make a productive edit here!Curious km (talk) 20:38, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The old Sadbhawana Council has broken infinitely many times. They were led by Rajemdra Mahato, Anil Jha, Anandi Devi, Laxman Lal Karna, Sarita Giri,etc. On every member, there was a party but unauthorized. Wikipedia has articles on them. Many of these parties had no any place in country politics or elections and they remained in shadow. Some of these splinter groups were unable to be registered at Election commission. This includes the Anandi Devi factions. These Sadbhawana Parties broke and meged almost every year till 2017. Hence, they are not clearly notable. Even see the view count if these articles to get a clear image. These articles lack proper citations. Please share your valuable views on Talk: Nepal Sadbhawana Party. Thank you!Curious km (talk) 20:33, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think that

I don't think that will work. A VDC is not the same as a village. There are usually many villages in a VDC. And all VDCs are notable per

WP:NGEO but not all villages are. So, converting them to villages would reduce the articles' scope and make them non-notable. VDCs are a historical entity which are Wikipedia notable irrespective of current status. There is no reason to overwrite them. If there are notable villages, new articles can be created on them. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 15:31, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

The article at newiki just says that he was born in Sarlahi District and he has been singing for more than a decade. It also lists a couple of his songs and that's it. Clog Wolf _Howl 10:50, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Jailwang#Requested move 4 September 2021 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 00:17, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Requested move at

Talk:Yenya#Requested move 21 September 2021

talk • श्रीमान् गम्भीर) 11:30, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Requested move at

Talk:Bir Shumsher Jang Bahadur Rana#Requested move 26 September 2021

talk • श्रीमान् गम्भीर) 10:57, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Informal Talk

I saw the logo of wiki Project Nepal in one article which was published by me. I want know more about this Page.13:43, 26 September 2021 (UTC) Endrabcwizart (talk) 13:43, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Let's start contribute together

Hello need feedback for publish this article. Link : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sushma_Adhikari Endrabcwizart (talk) 13:17, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There already seems to be enough feedback on the draft's talk page. Clog Wolf _Howl 15:01, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Film Development Board

Film Development Board seems to have published their film database online. [19] This can be used to verify film release dates and cast. They also have awards but they are very limited (only the recent ones are available).

talk • श्रीमान् गम्भीर) 21:48, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Re: Ishwar Pokhrel

Regarding Ishwar Pokhrel, I'm not familiar with naming customs so is it Ishwar or Ishwor? The article I've linked uses both spellings and I just think for consistency's sake, he should be referred to by one name. A general Google search for either name returns hits to the same person, so I don't know which to go with. Which spelling is preferred or does it matter? Just curious. Thank you. Snickers2686 (talk) 23:41, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Snickers2686, Ishwar Pokhrel is to be preferred. It may be advisable to note that "Ishwar" is sometimes spelt "Ishwor" and "Pokhrel" "Pokharel" if you can find a non-clunky way to do it, but redirects should be enough if you can't. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 06:03, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gagan Thapa

Important one!!! The article

Gagan Kumar Thapa, his official name as to be made to this article.Bedbhandari23 (talk) 10:27, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Bedbhandari23, Ok, Thank you for pointing out this problem. I will look after it. Fade258 (talk) 06:01, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for Darjeeling

I have nominated

featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 06:36, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Nepali calendar date format

Would someone from this WikiProject mind taking a look at

MOS:ERA, but there should be also some kind of conversion provided for readers to a more commonly used date format to improve understanding. At least one of the categories also seems to be screwed up a bit because of this since a person born in BS 1989 wasn't born in 1989 AD and shouldn't be placed in the category Category:1989 births. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:58, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Marchjuly, better? Usedtobecool ☎️ 15:29, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Thank you for taking a look at this Usedtobecool. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:17, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lalita Niwas Scam

Add Lalita Niwas Scam known as "Lalita Niwas land grab scam" is one of the biggest political-financial scam in Nepal. Constitutes grabbing of public lands of Lalita Niwas by some politically charged private parties.

https://kathmandupost.com/national/2022/01/12/why-case-filing-in-document-forgery-in-lalita-niwas-land-grab-scam-has-been-delayed

https://thehimalayantimes.com/kathmandu/police-probe-incomplete-district-attorney

https://myrepublica.nagariknetwork.com/news/kathmandu-district-court-issues-arrest-warrants-against-130-individuals-involved-in-lalita-niwas-land-scam/

https://thehimalayantimes.com/nepal/rod-signed-to-strengthen-cyber-bureau https://risingnepaldaily.com/main-news/lalita-niwas-scam-cib-submits-report-to-district-attorney

https://kathmandupost.com/national/2020/02/13/what-is-the-land-scam-that-has-shaken-the-government-s-seat-all-about

https://thehimalayantimes.com/nepal/300-accused-face-charges-in-lalita-niwas-land-grab-scam

https://myrepublica.nagariknetwork.com/news/cib-hands-over-investigation-report-on-multi-billion-worth-lalita-niwas-land-grab-scam-to-public-prosecutors-office/

https://theannapurnaexpress.com/news/arrest-warrant-issued-against-gachhadar-basnyat-3934

https://thehimalayantimes.com/nepal/absconding-subedi-couple-arrested-in-capital

https://english.onlinekhabar.com/explained-what-is-lalita-niwas-land-controversy-all-about.html

https://risingnepaldaily.com/nation/district-attorneys-office-returns-lalita-niwas-report

https://www.aninews.in/news/world/asia/nepali-congress-obstructs-parliament-proceedings20200207224915/

https://kathmandupost.com/national/2022/01/06/baluwatar-land-scam-arrest-warrants-issued-against-300-individuals-for-document-forgery

https://www.msn.com/en-xl/asia/nepal/cib-hands-over-investigation-report-on-multi-billion-worth-lalita-niwas-land-grab-scam-to-public-prosecutors-office/ar-AASv5Zi

https://kathmandupost.com/national/2020/02/05/three-former-ministers-among-175-individuals-indicted-over-lalita-niwas-scam

https://myrepublica.nagariknetwork.com/news/series-of-republica-investigation-on-lalita-niwas-land-scam/

https://devr.nagariknetwork.com/news/writ-petition-filed-at-supreme-court-against-ex-pms-nepal-bhattarai-for-their-alleged-involvement-in-lalita-niwas-land-scam/

https://english.onlinekhabar.com/from-the-kathmandu-press-monday-april-22-2019.html

https://thehimalayantimes.com/kathmandu/ciaa-summons-58-individuals-in-lalita-niwas-land-grab-case/

https://thehimalayantimes.com/kathmandu/list-of-86-persons-summoned-by-anti-graft-body-in-lalita-land-grab-case/

https://myrepublica.nagariknetwork.com/news/58-linked-to-lalita-niwas-scam-get-7-days-to-appear-at-ciaa/

https://risingnepaldaily.com/nation/case-filed-against-175-individuals-including-four-former-ministers

https://thehimalayantimes.com/nepal/commission-for-the-investigation-of-abuse-of-authority-summons-86-individuals-to-record-statements/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2400:1A00:B011:DE28:697D:A9D0:D76F:8654 (talk) 01:34, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding, Template:Infobox Nepalese political party

I feel the template is to be developed else not remain isolated. In opinion, let's use Infobox Nepalese political party removing template infobox political party from Nepalese political parties. It will be much helpful in long run. Someone experienced here needs to develop the infobox before doing this. For example: All Indian parties use Infobox Indian political party. 110.44.125.11 (talk) 08:03, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation links to Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist)

Could you take a look at the links to the disambiguation page Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) shown at Disambig fix list for Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist)? It is often unclear from the articles which link should be used.— Rod ^talk 10:53, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the article related to CPN (Maoist Centre)/Maoist/UCPN (Maoist)!

Hello fellow editors! I found three articles on same party or with some relation! The contents of Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist), Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) are mentioned even in the article Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist Centre). Well though I am unknown of what they all are related to, they seem same organisation. I feel either a merger is required else the content of article Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist Centre) needs trimming. I see this was previously done by someone and got reverted by @Vif12vf:. Please share your healthy thoughs! Krish edits675 (talk) 09:29, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!

Hello, Please note that scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 21 March 2022 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team[reply]

Merger proposal

BackoffIndia --> 2015 Nepal blockade

I have proposed the aforementioned merger, your views are welcomed at the discussion. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 12:46, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User script to detect unreliable sources

Main page: User:Headbomb/unreliable

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to

predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia

. The idea is that it takes something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on

WP:CITEWATCH

and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

-

b

}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal:

2021 split in Nepalese Communist Parties

There is a current merge proposal regarding the political events in Nepal 2020-1, to which input would be much appreciated. The merge discussion can be found here Felix QW (talk) 07:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance requested

The disambiguation page All Nepal National Free Students Union has 16 incoming links. Those links should go to the correct articles, not to this disambiguation page. Unfortunately, I know nothing about Nepali politics. That is why I request your assistance in solving these links. The articles can be found here. Thanks in advance. The Banner talk 11:40, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Article Save Award for Darjeeling

There is a

Featured Article Save Award nomination at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review/Darjeeling/archive2. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:51, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Requested move at Talk:Nepal Socialist Party#Requested move 10 August 2022

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Nepal Socialist Party#Requested move 10 August 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – robertsky (talk) 18:25, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources for Nepal

What are considered to be the most reliable sources (no matter which language) for news and events in Nepal? —Lights and freedom (talk ~ contribs) 19:37, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at

Talk:Newari literature#Requested move 13 August 2022

Talk:Newari literature#Requested move 13 August 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – robertsky (talk) 03:15, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Gopal Gurung's nationality/citizenship

Can anybody provide a reliable source to settle once and for the question of Gopal Gurung's nationality citizenship or even his place of birth (currently listed as Darjeeling)? It was listed as Indian for a long time, which seemed reasonable based on birth in India, but people have repeatedly changed it to Nepalese without citing a source. I've been reverting it but finally realized that there isn't a source there to support a claim of Indian nationality either, so I've removed that. It would be nice to put an end to this back-and-forth with a decent footnote. Largoplazo (talk) 18:43, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Pallas's cat#Requested move 6 October 2022

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Pallas's cat#Requested move 6 October 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. UtherSRG (talk) 21:50, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback requested at Gautama Buddha move request

Hello. Your feedback would be appreciated at

Talk:Gautama Buddha#Requested move 5 October 2022. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 11:20, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Requested move at Talk:The Buddha

The page which had been

Buddha

. Your input and expertise would be most welcome at: Talk:The_Buddha#Requested_move_25_November_2022 Best, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 04:32, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rastriya Swatantra Party

Can anybody look at the edits that I have added to Rastriya Swatantra Party? My changes have been reverted by two separate editors and I would like somebody else to take a took at it. The relevant discussion on this topic can be found at User talk:Wiki Master World#Rastriya Swatantra Party and User talk:PenGear#Rastriya Swatantra Party. I would appreciate any help. @Usedtobecool @Yeti Dai I know that both of you are old editors on Nepal related topics and I would appreciate any feedback. PenGear (talk) 05:12, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation of links to Madhesi Jana Adhikar Forum, Nepal

Could you help to disambiguate links to Madhesi Jana Adhikar Forum, Nepal. There are over 100 articles which link to this dab page - shown here. Presumably most of the links should go to Madheshi Jana Adhikar Forum, Nepal or Madheshi Jana Adhikar Forum, Nepal (Loktantrik) but I am not expert enough to know which. Help appreciated.— Rod ^talk 09:11, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User: PenGear is vandalising articles break WP:BIAS and WP:POV

If you see this users recent edits in 2022 Nepalese general election and all of his other edits so far, he/she is a clear fan of CPN UML and KP Oli and is hell bent on making all articles relatedto nepal politics glorify oli and UML party. Please stop and revert his edits. 138.25.4.69 (talk) 02:30, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania 2023 : Singapore, 16-19 August

Wikimedians! You are highly encouraged to apply for travel scholarship for Wikimedia Movement's largest gathering, Wikimania 2023. Wikimania 2023 will happen in Singapore and online from 16-19 August, 2023. There is a pre-conference on the 15th and a post-conference on the 20th. It is back on Asia since Hong Kong in 2013. Application deadline is on 5 February 2023 at 23:59 AoE. Regular registration will happen around May 2023. --Exec8 (talk) Exec8 (talk) 07:41, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance for editor creating articles about Nepali politicians

Hi all,

Please see Special:Contributions/Gunjan Raj Giri.

The user's account was created in 2015 but only became active in February 2023.

Could you possibly look into this and give some advice about their article creations?

User:Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 09:52, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance requested 15 Feb 2023, none given by 17 Feb 2023.--User:Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 11:43, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at

WP:AN § Procedural quirk in WP:GS/CASTE

 You are invited to join the discussion at

WP:AN § Procedural quirk in WP:GS/CASTE. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 20:31, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

FAR for Gangtok

I have nominated

featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 18:09, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Party article enhancement

I see some changes to be made in the article Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist Centre), the ruling party of Nepal. The article seems to long while it lacks some information. While the party name has changed at various point of time, all those information are in same article. So I feel a senior editors needs to look into this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Franked2004 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nepal A.P.F. Club

See my latest edits regarding duplicated page 78.0.30.114 (talk) 14:34, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Project-independent quality assessments

Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 17:21, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

regions of India

Recently added to the infoboxes for (at least some) Districts is this:

subdivision_type1 = [[List of regions of India|Region]]

which I thought might be about natural or historic regions of the Subcontinent, but no, it redirects to Administrative divisions of India. I respectfully question whether this was a good idea. —Tamfang (talk) 21:11, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

trade routes

Thadi and Siraha District both say:

Thadi is one of the few towns which is a part of agreed route for Mutual Trade between India and Nepal.

with a link to the agreement, which appears to list twenty-six such crossings (plus air routes). Is there an article listing these? If so, it ought to be cited in the articles for the relevant towns (and perhaps districts). —Tamfang (talk) 21:15, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gyanendra Bahadur Karki

I'm not familiar with Nepalese naming customs, however I'm wondering to differentiate the different articles (or potential articles) of Gyanendra Bahadur Karki. The current Gyanendra Bahadur Karki (born 1966) article is for former member of the 2nd Nepalese Constituent Assembly. However, there is also Gyanendra Bahadur Karki (1930-1992) who was a former foreign minister (see: Minister of Foreign Affairs (Nepal) at #14) and there's also the Hon'ble Justice Mr. Gyanendra Bahadur Karki (born 1950) who was a former justice of the Supreme Court of Nepal; source: [20] Of course, the obvious differentiation would be by birth year, but I didn't know if there were other names these individuals may be known by that would help. Any feedback or ideas are welcome. Thanks! Snickers2686 (talk) 19:51, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at

Talk:Venkateshvara#Requested move 10 June 2023

Talk:Venkateshvara#Requested move 10 June 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. UtherSRG (talk) 20:43, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Request for AfC review

I was wondering if any reviewers here at this WikiProject would be interested in reviewing Draft:Prakash Neupane. I reviewed it a while back but I haven't felt any interest in reviewing it again. TipsyElephant (talk) 11:19, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Content assessment

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Content assessment#Proposal: Reclassification of Current & Future-Classes as time parameter, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. This WikiProject received this message because it currently uses "Current" and/or "Future" class(es). There is a proposal to split these two article "classes" into a new parameter "time", in order to standardise article-rating across Wikipedia (per RfC), while also allowing simultaneous usage of quality criteria and time for interest projects. Thanks! —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 21:04, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Shunga Empire#Requested move 5 July 2023

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Shunga Empire#Requested move 5 July 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 13:51, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rail Transport in Nepal

There has been informations all over the place about Rail Transport in Nepal. It's because the non existence of the right page they belong to, which is Rail Transport in Nepal, after realizing this I've put an effort to rebuild this once existing page. It's so inappropriate to redirect such a broad subject as Country's Rail Transportation to a Train operating company which runs only on one line. How can a country wide transport subject can be merged to a passenger service providing single company ? To fix this I tried to bring together all the scattered articles in wrong pages to the right page, first transferring railway transport related topics to Department of Railway's page as it's the authority in charge, then I found this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_transport_by_country where Nepal's link is directed to all transportation page while other countries have a separated Rail Transportation page, some of which have no railway at all till date ? So it's hard to comprehend why Nepal Rail Transportation can't have it's page where all the history,current status and future project could be consisted ? As I was working towards it by moving all articles currently everywhere to the proper page, next day I come to take it further it's all gone ! Now have to start it all over again ! If it's going meet the same fate what's the point of trying to rebuild. But honestly, a country's Rail Transportation can't be in a company's page, it's like merging a country's entire river system into a boat service operator on one river. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NeelAbodh (talk • contribs) 16:23, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Green's 5th Edit-a-thon

Hello WikiProject Nepal:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Grnrchst (talk) 13:28, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit warring regarding "Nepali" or "Nepalese"

Not sure if this WikiProject is active, but I'll try anyways. There's been some recent activity might I say with some editors changing "Nepalese" to "Nepali" without discussion/consensus. The articles involved include: Nepalese rupee, Nepalese Civil War, Nepalese royal massacre, Nepalese Americans, Nepalese Armed Forces, Nepalese passport, Nepalese cuisine, Nepalese Army Air Service, and Nepalis.

User:Uzzwalkhanal was blocked regarding this after a discussion at WP:ANI (diff) raised by another editor.

Is there local WikiProject consensus on this? Does this need to be changed reflecting something that has changed recently? I'm completely unaware of this topic. Fork99 (talk) 02:13, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was aware of the incident. It looked more a problem of conduct to me. People who are not willing to slow down and discuss get blocked even if they are right; he probably is not.

I am not aware of pre-existing consensus. The words are almost always interchangeable. Rise of nationalism, same as elsewhere, coupled with wider educational opportunities and access to the internet, means more people than usual will be trying to change "Nepalese" to "Nepali", as the former was a name given by the British without asking the Nepalese, and the latter is a Nepali word adopted without modification. Some populist minister tried to popularise "Nepali" a few years ago. That's the only recent change I know of, apart from the ongoing and accelerated in the past decade, general movement of the West, toward respecting other peoples.

We don't have Nepali editors regularly active in the project. Any attempt at consensus either suffers from a lack of participation, or participation from editors who know nothing about the topic, or participation from editors pushing their own POVs. On rare occasions that Nepali editors do show up, they happen to have been canvassed from the Nepali Wikipedia. Usedtobecool ☎️ 09:20, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from Talk:Nepalese Civil War § Nepalese or Nepali .

 – Fork99 (talk) 06:01, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nepali is the word that denotes people of Nepal in the Nepali language. Nepalese was the term introduced by the British. People of Nepal prefer to call Nepali instead of Nepalese . Nepal government has already declared Nepali and Not Nepalese. Samirshass (talk) 04:32, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Use Nepali not Nepalese. Need to use official representation. Thanks 49.181.37.115 (talk) 04:39, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Y'all are demanding a genre change outside of the scope of this article. If we discuss only this article's name specifically, no English-language books or articles have used the term "Nepali Civil War". Yue🌙 05:24, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved the above discussion to here. Fork99 (talk) 06:02, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• When I asked for page protection of some pages regarding this issue, they were protected, however the admin told me that this issue may require a
  Request for Comment (RfC). I think it should be up to the editor(s) who want the change to start an RfC, but we know that they want to edit war first before any attempt at discussion after the fact. And anyways, the original user is blocked and seemingly has no interest in asking for an unblock, so can't discuss in the RfC without using sockpuppet accounts anyway. Oh and they haven't said anything here either. Thoughts? @Usedtobecool: courtesy ping. Fork99 (talk) 20:28, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]

If we're talking about the one article, I'd put my money on Nepalese Civil War over the Nepali Civil War. @Yue:, your link says it's google books ngram, but your comment said "books or articles". Care to clarify? Anyway, I tried a few more: link. Usedtobecool ☎️ 01:54, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Using the "case insensitive" option produces better results, but "Nepalese Civil War" is far more common than "Nepali". Using a case insensitive search in the latter case reorders the lesser options, but still leaves "Maoist insurgency in Nepal" with a clear lead. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 09:21, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request to review Wikipedia page

Dear contributors and editors of the WikiProject Nepal page,

Over the last several weeks I have been editing a page on Wikipedia [Suicide in Nepal] as part of my coursework. I was wondering if you would be able to review the page and give me feedback so I can improve the page. Please let me know if you need any more information from my side. I would highly appretiate any feedback or comments as I am a new editor here. Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thank you

PR PRagyaa2023 (talk) 03:04, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wish you had come sooner,

WP:SYNTH issues. Again, first impressions. I will make some edits on the article. Check them out and review edit summaries. Usedtobecool ☎️ 05:16, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Momo (food)

There's been a continuing argument on Talk:Momo (food) § Plural of Momo over which plural form of "momo" in English should be used in the article. wikt:momo has had similar issues. I would appreciate input from anyone who is able to make constructive contributions based on reliable sources, rather than screaming at me. I'd also appreciate any explanation of why this seems so contentious, if anyone happens to have any insight into that. Apocheir (talk) 01:14, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've never seen momos referred to as anything but "momos". No menu or review I've read has used "momo" as the plural.

It's no different from how English handles some Italian words. Italian panino/panini ⇒ English "panini"/"paninis". Likewise, biscotto/biscotti ⇒ "biscotti"/"biscottis". Maybe to some people this is controversial, but it's life. And it isn't a matter of English linguist imperialism. When other languages borrow nouns, they also mostly apply their own plurals. My favorites are Arabic borrowings from French and English, to which native internal structural changes are applied: "bank"/"banks" ⇒ bank/bunūk, "film"/"films" ⇒ film/aflām. Italian, conversely, doesn't add anything at all: film/film. Nope, neither filmi nor films. Maybe that's how they handle these arguments: they throw up their hands and say "Forget it, we're doing it neither way." Largoplazo (talk) 03:48, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Prithu

Prithu has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:32, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tab Header Mobile Accessibility

The {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Nepal/Tab header}} template that is used to put all of the contents of this page in a box results in mobile accessibility issues. Specifically, it hides all of the contents of the talk page for mobile users, unless they click the "Learn more about this page" button, which is normally used to hide stuff about what WikiProjects a page belongs to that appear at the top of a talk page, but not the talk page discussions themselves. Please fix this template, or remove the use of it altogether; please recall that more English Wikipedia page views occur on mobile than on desktop browsers, and this has consistently been the case for close to four years now. Brusquedandelion (talk) 13:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On the Janata Dal (Samajbadi Prajatantrik) party— does it even exist?

I have opened a discussion at

Samajbadi Prajatantrik Janata Party Nepal)? Or something else? Brusquedandelion (talk) 13:10, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Requested move at Talk:Samajbadi Morcha, Nepal#equested move 5 April 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Samajbadi Morcha, Nepal#equested move 5 April 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 20:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]