Search results
Appearance
Did you mean: Wikipedia_talk:wikipedia_is_not_a_reliable_source_for_citations_elsewhere_on_wikipedia included js speeches
The page "Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia/include/js/speech.js" does not exist. You can click on "Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia/include/js/speech.js" to create the page directly, or you may request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- me that the source of the information is wikipedia. (and wikipedia is not a reliable source) I'd appreciate third/fourth opinions. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 06:34...354 KB (55,638 words) - 05:46, 5 April 2022
- Is this my imagination, or is this a circular definition ? Reliable sources are credible. Reliable sources are reliable. Reliable sources are trustworthy...259 KB (39,371 words) - 20:48, 2 March 2023
- those news sources that appear in Google news be taken as Reliable Sources? My personal belief is that we should take them all to be reliable publications...138 KB (19,817 words) - 17:22, 4 February 2023
- on reliable, secondary sources, but we can of course judiciously include primary sources, subject to certain strictures that are detailed elsewhere....329 KB (47,135 words) - 18:44, 3 March 2023
- information, and Wikipedia is not a forum for unregulated free speech. ---J.S (t|c) 16:06, 20 June 2006 (UTC) wikipedia is NOT CENSORED' PERIOD! well EXCLAMATION...248 KB (38,349 words) - 01:11, 23 April 2022
- list is helpful for editors, as evidenced by its page views and Special:WhatLinksHere/Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. Most discussions on RSN...186 KB (20,966 words) - 06:23, 22 January 2020
- That is a good point. But "short footnote citations" is a bit verbose, and it could not be used within Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Short_citations, because...506 KB (70,819 words) - 10:16, 3 April 2023
- Wikipedia talk:Tools/Navigation popups/Archive 11 (section Preview not showing content of templates, and proposal for a solution)\"rvslots\" was not specified, a legacy format has been used for the output. Sorry for reporting dups if this was fixed: my global.js is fixed to the specific...125 KB (15,937 words) - 02:42, 18 May 2023
- in citations that sometimes end like .". --Adoniscik(t, c) 04:56, 25 November 2008 (UTC) Can someone help me. I'm trying to cite a speech which is reprinted...151 KB (20,501 words) - 08:38, 17 May 2022
- some reliable sources on the multiple uses of citations, if that is not deemed obvious. That a specific citation is not applicable to an article as a whole...364 KB (47,444 words) - 12:47, 10 October 2023
- Researchgate is a website that hosts articles published elsewhere. If that "elsewhere" is a good academic journal, then the article is a reliable source. However...210 KB (27,743 words) - 14:14, 14 February 2024
- may not be possible to find elsewhere through a similarly reliable source. Is there any reason this couldn't be used as a source? I'd consider a caption...148 KB (21,005 words) - 23:26, 21 September 2021
- Wikipedia talk:External links/Archive 14 (section Nofollow back on URL links on en.wikipedia.org articles for now)Don't. That page is a copyvio of this one. ---J.S (T/C) 19:39, 4 January 2007 (UTC) Probably not a good idea, since the meta version is only an essay. --Barberio...278 KB (42,544 words) - 16:30, 28 March 2022
- Wikipedia talk:External links/YouTube (section Avoiding metacomment about edit warring (Potentially infringing links should be reviewed on a case by case basis. vs. other))not have to be reliable sources unless used as part of a citation. If it's reliable source or not is irrelevant if it's not being used as a citation....250 KB (39,797 words) - 10:13, 5 March 2022
- Spanish Wikipedia is going to pay! FallingGravity (talk) 22:04, 1 April 2016 (UTC) Jimbo's acceptance speech: "Imagine a world in which America is great...54 bytes (4,322 words) - 22:12, 2 December 2022
- and not a reliable source. That won't ever change for some topics with a deterrent to people with a COI who understand the topic. Some of this is covered...190 KB (27,073 words) - 18:28, 13 March 2023
- more might be useful if the best source is hard to access, so a more accessible but less reliable source is required. For example: "Humpty Dumpty fell off...252 KB (36,611 words) - 08:42, 8 April 2023
- test/sps.js is a fork of the script, with the added step 14 of requesting the mass message. See the changes I made at https://en.wikipedia...143 KB (18,850 words) - 19:51, 8 November 2023
- Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Archive 1 (section Material for which no reliable published source could be found)that is not attributable to a reliable source. It includes unpublished arguments, concepts, data, ideas, statements, and theories. It also includes any...203 KB (31,303 words) - 23:04, 15 December 2023
- think it is more than just Peterson. I would be fine with, and think we should just link to the broader Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources, or mirror...107 KB (14,045 words) - 15:41, 2 July 2024
- by a further problem: There we are working on a literature that is composed of source texts that include numerous commentaries (source texts, not our