William the Conqueror

William the Conqueror

In the 1050s and early 1060s, William became a contender for the throne of England held by the childless Edward the Confessor, his first cousin once removed. There were other potential claimants, including the powerful English earl Harold Godwinson, whom Edward named as king on his deathbed in January 1066. Arguing that Edward had previously promised the throne to him and that Harold had sworn to support his claim, William built a large fleet and invaded England in September 1066. He decisively defeated and killed Harold at the Battle of Hastings on 14 October 1066. After further military efforts, William was crowned king on Christmas Day, 1066, in London. He made arrangements for the governance of England in early 1067 before returning to Normandy. Several unsuccessful rebellions followed, but William's hold was mostly secure on England by 1075, allowing him to spend the greater part of his reign in continental Europe.

William's final years were marked by difficulties in his continental domains, troubles with his son, Robert, and threatened invasions of England by the

Background

William was born in 1027 or 1028 at

William faced several challenges on becoming duke, including his illegitimate birth and his youth: the evidence indicates that he was either seven or eight years old at the time.^[17][18][h] He enjoyed the support of his great-uncle, Archbishop Robert, as well as King Henry I of France, enabling him to succeed to his father's duchy.^[21] The support given to the exiled English princes in their attempt to return to England in 1036 shows that the new duke's guardians were attempting to continue his father's policies,^[2] but Archbishop Robert's death in March 1037 removed one of William's main supporters, and conditions in Normandy quickly descended into chaos.^[21]

The anarchy in the duchy lasted until 1047,

King Henry continued to support the young duke,^[27] but in late 1046 opponents of William came together in a rebellion centred in lower Normandy, led by Guy of Burgundy with support from Nigel, Viscount of the Cotentin, and Ranulf, Viscount of the Bessin. According to stories that may have legendary elements, an attempt was made to seize William at Valognes, but he escaped under cover of darkness, seeking refuge with King Henry.^[28] In early 1047 Henry and William returned to Normandy and were victorious at the Battle of Val-ès-Dunes near Caen, although few details of the actual fighting are recorded.^[29] William of Poitiers claimed that the battle was won mainly through William's efforts, but earlier accounts claim that King Henry's men and leadership also played an important part.^[2] William assumed power in Normandy, and shortly after the battle promulgated the Truce of God throughout his duchy, in an effort to limit warfare and violence by restricting the days of the year on which fighting was permitted.^[30] Although the Battle of Val-ès-Dunes marked a turning point in William's control of the duchy, it was not the end of his struggle to gain the upper hand over the nobility. The period from 1047 to 1054 saw almost continuous warfare, with lesser crises continuing until 1060.^[31]

Consolidation of power

William's next efforts were against Guy of Burgundy, who retreated to his castle at

On the death of Hugh of Maine, Geoffrey Martel occupied Maine in a move contested by William and King Henry; eventually, they succeeded in driving Geoffrey from the county, and in the process, William had been able to secure the Bellême family strongholds at Alençon and Domfront for himself. He was thus able to assert his overlordship over the Bellême family and compel them to act consistently with Norman interests.^[35] However, in 1052 the king and Geoffrey Martel made common cause against William at the same time as some Norman nobles began to contest William's increasing power. Henry's about-face was probably motivated by a desire to retain dominance over Normandy, which was now threatened by William's growing mastery of his duchy.^[36] William was engaged in military actions against his own nobles throughout 1053,^[37] as well as with the new Archbishop of Rouen, Mauger.^[38]

In February 1054 the king and the Norman rebels launched a double invasion of the duchy. Henry led the main thrust through the

One factor in William's favour was his marriage to

No authentic portrait of William has been found; the contemporary depictions of him on the Bayeux Tapestry and on his seals and coins are conventional representations designed to assert his authority.^[50] There are some written descriptions of a burly and robust appearance, with a guttural voice. He enjoyed excellent health until old age, although he became quite fat in later life.^[51] He was strong enough to draw bows that others were unable to pull and had great stamina.^[50] Geoffrey Martel described him as without equal as a fighter and as a horseman.^[52] Examination of William's femur, the only bone to survive when the rest of his remains were destroyed, showed he was approximately 5 feet 10 inches (1.78 m) in height.^[50]

There are records of two tutors for William during the late 1030s and early 1040s, but the extent of his literary education is unclear. He was not known as a patron of authors, and there is little evidence that he sponsored scholarships or other intellectual activities.^[2] Orderic Vitalis records that William tried to learn to read Old English late in life, but he was unable to devote sufficient time to the effort and quickly gave up.^[53] William's main hobby appears to have been hunting. His marriage to Matilda appears to have been quite affectionate, and there are no signs that he was unfaithful to her – unusual in a medieval monarch. Medieval writers criticised William for his greed and cruelty, but his personal piety was universally praised by contemporaries.^[2]

Norman administration

Norman government under William was similar to the government that had existed under earlier dukes. It was a fairly simple administrative system, built around the ducal household,^[54] which consisted of a group of officers including stewards, butlers, and marshals.^[55] The duke travelled constantly around the duchy, confirming charters and collecting revenues.^[56] Most of the income came from the ducal lands, as well as from tolls and a few taxes. This income was collected by the chamber, one of the household departments.^[55]

William cultivated close relations with the church in his duchy. He took part in church councils and made several appointments to the Norman episcopate, including the appointment of

In 1051 the childless King Edward of England appears to have chosen William as his successor.[59] William was the grandson of Edward's maternal uncle, Richard II of Normandy.^[59]

The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, in the "D" version, states that William visited England in the later part of 1051, perhaps to secure confirmation of the succession,^[60] or perhaps William was attempting to secure aid for his troubles in Normandy.^[61] The trip is unlikely given William's absorption in warfare with Anjou at the time. Whatever Edward's wishes, it was likely that any claim by William would be opposed by Godwin, Earl of Wessex, a member of the most powerful family in England.^[60] Edward had married Edith, Godwin's daughter, in 1043, and Godwin appears to have been one of the main supporters of Edward's claim to the throne.^[62] By 1050, however, relations between the king and the earl had soured, culminating in a crisis in 1051 that led to the exile of Godwin and his family from England. It was during this exile that Edward offered the throne to William.^[63] Godwin returned from exile in 1052 with armed forces, and a settlement was reached between the king and the earl, restoring the earl and his family to their lands and replacing Robert of Jumièges, a Norman whom Edward had named Archbishop of Canterbury, with Stigand, the Bishop of Winchester.^[64] No English source mentions a supposed embassy by Archbishop Robert to William conveying the promise of the succession, and the two Norman sources that mention it, William of Jumièges and William of Poitiers, are not precise in their chronology of when this visit took place.^[61]

Count

In England, Earl Godwin died in 1053 and his sons were increasing in power:

Harold was crowned on 6 January 1066 in Edward's new

Harold's brother Tostig made probing attacks along the southern coast of England in May 1066, landing at the Isle of Wight using a fleet supplied by Baldwin of Flanders. Tostig appears to have received little local support, and further raids into Lincolnshire and near the Humber met with no more success, so he retreated to Scotland, where he remained for a time. According to the Norman writer William of Jumièges, William had meanwhile sent an embassy to King Harold Godwinson to remind Harold of his oath to support William's claim, although whether this embassy actually occurred is unclear. Harold assembled an army and a fleet to repel William's anticipated invasion force, deploying troops and ships along the English Channel for most of the summer.^[74]

William's preparations

William of Poitiers describes a council called by Duke William, in which the writer gives an account of a great debate that took place between William's nobles and supporters over whether to risk an invasion of England. Although some sort of formal assembly probably was held, it is unlikely that any debate took place, as the duke had by then established control over his nobles, and most of those assembled would have been anxious to secure their share of the rewards from the conquest of England.^[79] William of Poitiers also relates that the duke obtained the consent of Pope Alexander II for the invasion, along with a papal banner. The chronicler also claimed that the duke secured the support of Henry IV, Holy Roman Emperor, and King Sweyn II of Denmark. Henry was still a minor, however, and Sweyn was more likely to support Harold, who could then help Sweyn against the Norwegian king, so these claims should be treated with caution. Although Alexander did give papal approval to the conquest after it succeeded, no other source claims papal support prior to the invasion.^[n][80] Events after the invasion, which included the penance William performed and statements by later popes, do lend circumstantial support to the claim of papal approval. To deal with Norman affairs, William put the government of Normandy into the hands of his wife for the duration of the invasion.^[2]

Throughout the summer, William assembled an army and an invasion fleet in Normandy. Although William of Jumièges's claim that the ducal fleet numbered 3,000 ships is clearly an exaggeration, it was probably large and mostly built from scratch. Although William of Poitiers and William of Jumièges disagree about where the fleet was built – Poitiers states it was constructed at the mouth of the

Tostig Godwinson and Harald Hardrada invaded

After defeating Harald Hardrada and Tostig, Harold left much of his army in the north, including Morcar and Edwin, and marched the rest south to deal with the threatened Norman invasion.^[81] He probably learned of William's landing while he was travelling south. Harold stopped in London, and was there for about a week before marching to Hastings, so it is likely that he spent about a week on his march south, averaging about 27 miles (43 kilometres) per day,^[82] for the distance of approximately 200 miles (320 kilometres).^[83] Although Harold attempted to surprise the Normans, William's scouts reported the English arrival to the duke. The exact events preceding the battle are obscure, with contradictory accounts in the sources, but all agree that William led his army from his castle and advanced towards the enemy.^[84] Harold had taken a defensive position at the top of Senlac Hill (present-day Battle, East Sussex), about 6 miles (9.7 kilometres) from William's castle at Hastings.^[85]

The battle began at about 9 am on 14 October and lasted all day, but while a broad outline is known, the exact events are obscured by contradictory accounts in the sources.

First actions

William remained in England after his coronation and tried to reconcile the native magnates. The remaining earls – Edwin (of Mercia), Morcar (of Northumbria), and

While William was in Normandy, a former ally, Eustace, the Count of Boulogne, invaded at Dover but was repulsed. English resistance had also begun, with Eadric the Wild attacking Hereford and revolts at Exeter, where Harold's mother Gytha was a focus of resistance.^[98] FitzOsbern and Odo found it difficult to control the native population and undertook a programme of castle building to maintain their hold on the kingdom.^[2] William returned to England in December 1067 and marched on Exeter, which he besieged. The town held out for 18 days, and after it fell to William he built a castle to secure his control. Harold's sons were meanwhile raiding the southwest of England from a base in Ireland. Their forces landed near Bristol but were defeated by Eadnoth. By Easter, William was at Winchester, where he was soon joined by his wife Matilda, who was crowned in May 1068.^[98]

English resistance

In 1068 Edwin and Morcar revolted, supported by Gospatric, Earl of Northumbria. The chronicler Orderic Vitalis states that Edwin's reason for revolting was that the proposed marriage between himself and one of William's daughters had not taken place, but another reason probably included the increasing power of fitzOsbern in Herefordshire, which affected Edwin's power within his own earldom. The king marched through Edwin's lands and built Warwick Castle. Edwin and Morcar submitted, but William continued on to York, building York and Nottingham Castles before returning south. On his southbound journey, he began constructing Lincoln, Huntingdon, and Cambridge Castles. William placed supporters in charge of these new fortifications – among them William Peverel at Nottingham and Henry de Beaumont at Warwick. Then the king returned to Normandy late in 1068.^[98]

Early in 1069, Edgar the Ætheling rose in revolt and attacked York. Although William returned to York and built another castle, Edgar remained free, and in the autumn he joined up with King Sweyn.

In 1075, during William's absence,

The exact reason for the rebellion is unclear, but it was launched at the wedding of Ralph to a relative of Roger, held at Exning in Suffolk. Waltheof, the earl of Northumbria, although one of William's favourites, was also involved, and some Breton lords were ready to rebel in support of Ralph and Roger. Ralph also requested Danish aid. William remained in Normandy while his men in England subdued the revolt. Roger was unable to leave his stronghold in Herefordshire because of efforts by Wulfstan, the Bishop of Worcester, and Æthelwig, the Abbot of Evesham. Ralph was bottled up in Norwich Castle by the combined efforts of Odo of Bayeux, Geoffrey de Montbray, Richard fitzGilbert, and William de Warenne. Ralph eventually left Norwich in the control of his wife and left England, finally ending up in Brittany. Norwich was besieged and surrendered, with the garrison allowed to go to Brittany. Meanwhile, the Danish king's brother, Cnut, had finally arrived in England with a fleet of 200 ships, but he was too late as Norwich had already surrendered. The Danes then raided along the coast before returning home.^[110] William returned to England later in 1075 to deal with the Danish threat, leaving his wife Matilda in charge of Normandy. He celebrated Christmas at Winchester and dealt with the aftermath of the rebellion.^[115] Roger and Waltheof were kept in prison, where Waltheof was executed in May 1076. Before this, William had returned to the continent, where Ralph had continued the rebellion from Brittany.^[110]

Troubles at home and abroad

Earl Ralph had secured control of the castle at

Word of William's defeat at Gerberoi stirred up difficulties in northern England. In August and September 1079 King Malcolm of Scots raided south of the River Tweed, devastating the land between the River Tees and the Tweed in a raid that lasted almost a month. The lack of Norman response appears to have caused the Northumbrians to grow restive, and in the spring of 1080 they rebelled against the rule of Walcher, the Bishop of Durham and Earl of Northumbria. Walcher was killed on 14 May 1080, and the king dispatched his half-brother Odo to deal with the rebellion.^[120] William departed Normandy in July 1080,^[121] and in the autumn his son Robert was sent on a campaign against the Scots. Robert raided into Lothian and forced Malcolm to agree to terms, building a fortification (the 'new castle') at Newcastle upon Tyne while returning to England.^[120] The king was at Gloucester for Christmas 1080 and at Winchester for Whitsun in 1081, ceremonially wearing his crown on both occasions. A papal embassy arrived in England during this period, asking that William do fealty for England to the papacy, a request that he rejected.^[121] William also visited Wales in 1081, although the English and the Welsh sources differ on the exact purpose of the visit. The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle states that it was a military campaign, but Welsh sources record it as a pilgrimage to St Davids in honour of Saint David. William's biographer David Bates argues that the former explanation is more likely, explaining that the balance of power had recently shifted in Wales and that William would have wished to take advantage of the changed circumstances to extend Norman power. By the end of 1081, William was back on the continent, dealing with disturbances in Maine. Although he led an expedition into Maine, the result was instead a negotiated settlement arranged by a papal legate.^[122]

Last years

Sources for William's actions between 1082 and 1084 are meagre. According to the historian David Bates, this probably means that little of note happened, and that because William was on the continent, there was nothing for the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle to record.^[123] In 1082, William ordered the arrest of his half-brother Odo. The exact reasons are unclear, as no contemporary author recorded what caused the quarrel between the half-brothers. Orderic Vitalis later recorded that Odo had aspirations to become pope. Orderic also related that Odo had attempted to persuade some of William's vassals to join Odo in an invasion of southern Italy. This would have been considered tampering with the king's authority over his vassals, which William would not have tolerated. Although Odo remained in confinement for the rest of William's reign, his lands were not confiscated. More difficulties struck in 1083 when William's son Robert rebelled once more with support from the French king. A further blow was the death of Queen Matilda on 2 November 1083. William was always described as close to his wife, and her death would have added to his problems.^[124]

Maine continued to be difficult, with a rebellion by

As part of his efforts to secure England, William ordered many castles,

At first, most of the newly settled Normans kept household knights and did not settle their retainers with fiefs of their own, but gradually these household knights came to be granted lands of their own, a process known as subinfeudation. William also required his newly created magnates to contribute fixed quotas of knights towards not only military campaigns but also castle garrisons. This method of organising the military forces was a departure from the pre-Conquest English practice of basing military service on territorial units such as the hide.^[128]

By William's death, after weathering a series of rebellions, most of the native Anglo-Saxon aristocracy had been replaced by Norman and other continental magnates. Not all of the Normans who accompanied William in the initial conquest acquired large amounts of land in England. Some appear to have been reluctant to take up lands in a kingdom that did not always appear pacified. Although some of the newly rich Normans in England came from William's close family or from the upper Norman nobility, others were from relatively humble backgrounds.^[129] William granted some lands to his continental followers from the holdings of one or more specific Englishmen; at other times, he granted a compact grouping of lands previously held by many different Englishmen to one Norman follower, often to allow for the consolidation of lands around a strategically placed castle.^[130]

The medieval chronicler William of Malmesbury says that the king also seized and depopulated many miles of land (36 parishes), turning it into the royal New Forest region to support his enthusiastic enjoyment of hunting. Modern historians have concluded that the New Forest depopulation was greatly exaggerated. Most of the lands of the New Forest are poor agricultural lands, and archaeological and geographic studies have shown that it was likely sparsely settled when it was turned into a royal forest.^[131] William was known for his love of hunting, and he introduced the forest law into areas of the country, regulating who could hunt and what could be hunted.^[132]

Administration

After 1066, William did not attempt to integrate his separate domains into one unified realm with one set of laws. His seal from after 1066, of which six impressions still survive, was made for him after he conquered England and stressed his role as king, while separately mentioning his role as duke.^[t] When in Normandy, William acknowledged that he owed fealty to the French king, but in England no such acknowledgement was made – further evidence that the various parts of William's lands were considered separate. The administrative machinery of Normandy, England, and Maine continued to exist separate from the other lands, with each one retaining its own forms. For example, England continued the use of writs, which were not known on the continent. Also, the charters and documents produced for the government in Normandy differed in formulas from those produced in England.^[133]

William took over an English government that was more complex than the Norman system. England was divided into

Besides taxation, William's large landholdings throughout England strengthened his rule. As King Edward's heir, he controlled all of the former royal lands. He also retained control of much of the lands of Harold and his family, which made the king the largest secular landowner in England by a wide margin.[v]

Domesday Book

At Christmas 1085, William ordered the compilation of a survey of the landholdings held by himself and by his vassals throughout his kingdom, organised by counties. It resulted in a work now known as the Domesday Book. The listing for each county gives the holdings of each landholder, grouped by owners. The listings describe the holding, who owned the land before the Conquest, its value, what the tax assessment was, and usually the number of peasants, ploughs, and any other resources the holding had. Towns were listed separately. All the English counties south of the River Tees and River Ribble are included, and the whole work seems to have been mostly completed by 1 August 1086, when the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle records that William received the results and that all the chief magnates swore the Salisbury Oath, a renewal of their oaths of allegiance.^[138] William's exact motivation in ordering the survey is unclear, but it probably had several purposes, such as making a record of feudal obligations and justifying increased taxation.^[2]

Death and aftermath

William left England towards the end of 1086. Following his arrival back on the continent he married his daughter

William left Normandy to Robert, and the custody of England was given to William's second surviving son, also called William, on the assumption that he would become king. The youngest son, Henry, received money. After entrusting England to his second son, the elder William sent the younger William back to England on 7 or 8 September, bearing a letter to Lanfranc ordering the archbishop to aid the new king. Other bequests included gifts to the Church and money to be distributed to the poor. William also ordered that all of his prisoners be released, including his half-brother Odo.[139]

Disorder followed William's death; everyone who had been at his deathbed left the body at Rouen and hurried off to attend to their own affairs. Eventually, the clergy of Rouen arranged to have the body sent to Caen, where William had desired to be buried in his foundation of the

William's grave is currently marked by a marble slab with a Latin inscription dating from the early 19th century. The tomb has been disturbed several times since 1087, the first time in 1522 when the grave was opened on orders from the papacy. The intact body was restored to the tomb at that time, but in 1562, during the French Wars of Religion, the grave was reopened and the bones scattered and lost, with the exception of one thigh bone. This lone relic was reburied in 1642 with a new marker, which was replaced 100 years later with a more elaborate monument. This tomb was again destroyed during the French Revolution but was eventually replaced with the current ledger stone.^[141][w]

Legacy

The immediate consequence of William's death was a war between his sons Robert and William over control of England and Normandy.^[2] Even after the younger William's death in 1100 and the succession of his youngest brother Henry as king, Normandy and England remained contested between the brothers until Robert's capture by Henry at the Battle of Tinchebray in 1106. The difficulties over the succession led to a loss of authority in Normandy, with the aristocracy regaining much of the power they had lost to the elder William. His sons also lost much of their control over Maine, which revolted in 1089 and managed to remain mostly free of Norman influence thereafter.^[143]

The impact on England of William's conquest was profound; changes in the Church, aristocracy, culture, and language of the country have persisted into modern times. The Conquest brought the kingdom into closer contact with France and forged ties between France and England that lasted throughout the Middle Ages. Another consequence of William's invasion was the sundering of the formerly close ties between England and Scandinavia. William's government blended elements of the English and Norman systems into a new one that laid the foundations of the later medieval English kingdom.

William and his wife Matilda had at least nine children.[49] The birth order of the sons is clear, but no source gives the relative order of birth of the daughters.^[2]

1. Sybilla, daughter of Geoffrey, Count of Conversano.^[148]
2. Richard was born before 1056, died around 1075.^[49]
3. William was born between 1056 and 1060, died on 2 August 1100.^[49] King of England, killed in the New Forest.^[149]
4. Henry was born in late 1068, and died on 1 December 1135.^[49] King of England, married Edith, daughter of Malcolm III of Scotland. His second wife was Adeliza of Louvain.^[150]
5. Adeliza (or Adelida,^[151] Adelaide^[150]) died before 1113, reportedly betrothed to Harold Godwinson, probably a nun of Saint Léger at Préaux.^[151]
6. Cecilia (or Cecily) was born before 1066, died 1127, Abbess of Holy Trinity, Caen.^[49]
7. Matilda^[2][151] was born around 1061, died perhaps about 1086.^[150] Mentioned in Domesday Book as a daughter of William.^[49]
8. Constance died 1090, married Alan IV, Duke of Brittany.^[49]
9. Adela died 1137, married Stephen, Count of Blois.^[49]
10. (Possibly) Agatha, the betrothed of Alfonso VI of León and Castile.^[x]

There is no evidence of any illegitimate children born to William.^[155]

Notes

Citations

1. ^ ^{a b c d} Bates William the Conqueror p. 33
2. ^ ^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x} Bates "William I" Oxford Dictionary of National Biography
3. ^ Potts "Normandy, 911–1144" p. 31
4. ^ Collins Early Medieval Europe pp. 376–377
5. ^ Williams Æthelred the Unready pp. 42–43
6. ^ Williams Æthelred the Unready pp. 54–55
7. ^ Huscroft Norman Conquest pp. 80–83
8. ^ Huscroft Norman Conquest pp. 83–85
9. ^ "William the Conqueror" Royal Family
10. ^ ^{a b c d e} Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 379–382
11. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror p. 417
12. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror p. 420
13. ^ van Houts "Les femmes" Tabularia "Études" pp. 19–34
14. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 31–32
15. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 32–34, 145
16. ^ ^{a b} Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 35–37
17. ^ Bates William the Conqueror p. 36
18. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror p. 37
19. ^ Crouch Birth of Nobility pp. 132–133
20. ^ Given-Wilson and Curteis Royal Bastards p. 42
21. ^ ^{a b} Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 38–39
22. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror p. 51
23. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror p. 40
24. ^ Bates William the Conqueror p. 37
25. ^ Searle Predatory Kinship pp. 196–198
26. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 42–43
27. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 45–46
28. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 47–49
29. ^ Bates William the Conqueror p. 38
30. ^ Bates William the Conqueror p. 40
31. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror p. 53
32. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 54–55
33. ^ ^{a b} Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 56–58
34. ^ Bates William the Conqueror pp. 43–44
35. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 59–60
36. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 63–64
37. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 66–67
38. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror p. 64
39. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror p. 67
40. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 68–69
41. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 75–76
42. ^ Bates William the Conqueror p. 50
43. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 391–393
44. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror p. 76
45. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror p. 391
46. ^ ^{a b} Bates William the Conqueror pp. 44–45
47. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror p. 80
48. ^ Bates William the Conqueror pp. 66–67
49. ^ ^{a b c d e f g h i j k} Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 393–395
50. ^ ^{a b c} Bates William the Conqueror pp. 115–116
51. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 368–369
52. ^ Searle Predatory Kinship p. 203
53. ^ Huscroft Norman Conquest p. 323
54. ^ Bates William the Conqueror p. 133
55. ^ ^{a b c} Bates William the Conqueror pp. 23–24
56. ^ Bates William the Conqueror pp. 63–65
57. ^ ^{a b} Bates William the Conqueror pp. 64–66
58. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 111–112
59. ^ ^{a b} Barlow "Edward" Oxford Dictionary of National Biography
60. ^ ^{a b} Bates William the Conqueror pp. 46–47
61. ^ ^{a b} Huscroft Norman Conquest pp. 93–95
62. ^ Huscroft Norman Conquest pp. 86–87
63. ^ Huscroft Norman Conquest pp. 89–91
64. ^ Huscroft Norman Conquest pp. 95–96
65. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror p. 174
66. ^ ^{a b} Bates William the Conqueror p. 53
67. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 178–179
68. ^ Huscroft Norman Conquest pp. 98–100
69. ^ Huscroft Norman Conquest pp. 102–103
70. ^ Huscroft Norman Conquest p. 97
71. ^ Miller "Ætheling" Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England pp. 13–14
72. ^ Huscroft Norman Conquest pp. 107–109
73. ^ Huscroft Norman Conquest pp. 115–116
74. ^ ^{a b c} Huscroft Ruling England pp. 12–13
75. ^ Bates William the Conqueror p. 78
76. ^ Thomas Norman Conquest p. 18
77. ^ Huscroft Norman Conquest p. 132
78. ^ ^{a b} Huscroft Norman Conquest pp. 118–119
79. ^ Bates William the Conqueror pp. 79–81
80. ^ ^{a b c} Huscroft Norman Conquest pp. 120–123
81. ^ ^{a b c} Carpenter Struggle for Mastery p. 72
82. ^ Marren 1066 p. 93
83. ^ Huscroft Norman Conquest p. 124
84. ^ Lawson Battle of Hastings pp. 180–182
85. ^ Marren 1066 pp. 99–100
86. ^ Huscroft Norman Conquest p. 126
87. ^ Carpenter Struggle for Mastery p. 73
88. ^ Huscroft Norman Conquest pp. 127–128
89. ^ Huscroft Norman Conquest p. 129
90. ^ Williams "Godwine, earl of Wessex" Oxford Dictionary of National Biography
91. ^ Walker Harold p. 181
92. ^ Rex Harold II p. 254
93. ^ Huscroft Norman Conquest p. 131
94. ^ ^{a b} Huscroft Norman Conquest pp. 131–133
95. ^ ^{a b c d} Huscroft Norman Conquest pp. 138–139
96. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror p. 423
97. ^ ^{a b} Carpenter Struggle for Mastery pp. 75–76
98. ^ ^{a b c} Huscroft Ruling England pp. 57–58
99. ^ ^{a b} Carpenter Struggle for Mastery pp. 76–77
100. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror p. 225
101. ^ ^{a b c} Bates William the Conqueror pp. 106–107
102. ^ ^{a b} Barlow English Church 1066–1154 p. 59
103. ^ Turner "Richard Lionheart" French Historical Studies p. 521
104. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 221–222
105. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 223–225
106. ^ Bates William the Conqueror pp. 107–109
107. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 228–229
108. ^ ^{a b c} Bates William the Conqueror p. 111
109. ^ ^{a b} Bates William the Conqueror p. 112
110. ^ ^{a b c d} Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 231–233
111. ^ ^{a b} Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 230–231
112. ^ Pettifer English Castles pp. 161–162
113. ^ ^{a b} Williams "Ralph, earl" Oxford Dictionary of National Biography
114. ^ Lewis "Breteuil, Roger de, earl of Hereford" Oxford Dictionary of National Biography
115. ^ Bates William the Conqueror pp. 181–182
116. ^ ^{a b} Bates William the Conqueror pp. 183–184
117. ^ Bates William the Conqueror pp. 185–186
118. ^ Douglas and Greenaway, p. 158
119. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 238–239
120. ^ ^{a b} Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 240–241
121. ^ ^{a b} Bates William the Conqueror p. 188
122. ^ Bates William the Conqueror p. 189
123. ^ Bates William the Conqueror p. 193
124. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 243–244
125. ^ Bates William the Conqueror pp. 196–198
126. ^ Pettifer English Castles p. 151
127. ^ Bates William the Conqueror pp. 147–148
128. ^ Bates William the Conqueror pp. 154–155
129. ^ Bates William the Conqueror pp. 148–149
130. ^ Bates William the Conqueror pp. 152–153
131. ^ Young Royal Forests pp. 7–8
132. ^ Bates William the Conqueror pp. 118–119
133. ^ ^{a b c} Bates William the Conqueror pp. 138–141
134. ^ ^{a b} Bates William the Conqueror pp. 133–134
135. ^ Bates William the Conqueror pp. 136–137
136. ^ Bates William the Conqueror pp. 151–152
137. ^ Bates William the Conqueror p. 150
138. ^ Bates William the Conqueror pp. 198–202
139. ^ ^{a b c} Bates William the Conqueror pp. 202–205
140. ^ Bates William the Conqueror pp. 207–208
141. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 362–363
142. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror p. 363 footnote 4
143. ^ Bates William the Conqueror pp. 208–209
144. ^ Bates William the Conqueror pp. 210–211
145. ^ ^{a b} Clanchy England and its Rulers pp. 31–32
146. ^ Searle Predatory Kinship p. 232
147. ^ Douglas William the Conqueror pp. 4–5
148. ^ Thompson "Robert, duke of Normandy" Oxford Dictionary of National Biography
149. ^ Barlow "William II" Oxford Dictionary of National Biography
150. ^ ^{a b c} Fryde, et al., Handbook of British Chronology, p. 35
151. ^ ^{a b c d e} Van Houts "Adelida" Oxford Dictionary of National Biography
152. ^ ^{a b c} Salazar y Acha "Contribución al estudio" Anales de la Real Academia pp. 307–308
153. ^ ^{a b c} Reilly Kingdom of Leon-Castile p. 47
154. ^ Canal Sánchez-Pagín "Jimena Muñoz" Anuario de Estudios Medievales pp. 12–14
155. ^ Given-Wilson and Curteis Royal Bastards p. 59

References

• doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/8516. Retrieved 16 May 2012. (subscription or UK public library membership
  required)
• ISBN 0-582-50236-5
  .
• doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/29449. Retrieved 29 June 2012. (subscription or UK public library membership
  required)
• ISBN 0-7524-1980-3
  .
• doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/29448. Retrieved 26 March 2012. (subscription or UK public library membership
  required)
• Canal Sánchez-Pagín, José María (2020). "Jimena Muñoz, Amiga de Alfonso VI". Anuario de Estudios Medievales (in Spanish). 21: 11–40.
  doi:10.3989/aem.1991.v21.1103
  .
• ISBN 0-14-014824-8
  .
• ISBN 1-4051-0650-6
  .
• ISBN 0-312-21886-9
  .
• ISBN 0-582-36981-9
  .
• OCLC 399137
  .
• Douglas, David C.; Greenaway, G. W. (1981). English Historical Documents, 1042–1189. London and New York: Routledge.
  ISBN 0-203-43951-1
  .
• Fryde, E. B.; Greenway, D. E.; Porter, S.; Roy, I. (1996). Handbook of British Chronology (Third revised ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  ISBN 0-521-56350-X
  .
• Given-Wilson, Chris; Curteis, Alice (1995). The Royal Bastards of Medieval England. New York: Barnes & Noble.
  ISBN 1-56619-962-X
  .
• Huscroft, Richard (2009). The Norman Conquest: A New Introduction. New York: Longman.
  ISBN 978-1-4058-1155-2
  .
• Huscroft, Richard (2005). Ruling England 1042–1217. London: Pearson/Longman.
  ISBN 0-582-84882-2
  .
• Lawson, M. K. (2002). The Battle of Hastings: 1066. Stroud, UK: Tempus.
  ISBN 0-7524-1998-6
  .
• Lewis, C. P. (2004). "Breteuil, Roger de, earl of Hereford (fl. 1071–1087)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography.
  doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/9661. Retrieved 25 June 2012. (subscription or UK public library membership
  required)
• ISBN 0-85052-953-0
  .
• Miller, Sean (2001). "Ætheling". In
  ISBN 978-0-631-22492-1
  .
• Pettifer, Adrian (1995). English Castles: A Guide by Counties. Woodbridge, UK: Boydell.
  ISBN 0-85115-782-3
  .
• Potts, Cassandra (2002). "Normandy, 911–1144". In Harper-Bill, Christopher; Van Houts, Elisabeth M. C. (eds.). A Companion to the Anglo-Norman World. Boydell. pp. 19–42.
• Reilly, Bernard F. (1988). The Kingdom of Leon-Castile Under Alfonso VI. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  ISBN 978-0-691-05515-2
  .
• Rex, Peter (2005). Harold II: The Doomed Saxon King. Stroud, UK: Tempus.
  ISBN 978-0-7394-7185-2
  .
• Salazar y Acha, Jaime de (1992–1993). "Contribución al estudio del reinado de Alfonso VI de Castilla: algunas aclaraciones sobre su política matrimonial". Anales de la Real Academia Matritense de Heráldica y Genealogía (in Spanish). 2: 299–336.
• Searle, Eleanor (1988). Predatory Kinship and the Creation of Norman Power, 840–1066. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  ISBN 0-520-06276-0
  .
• Thomas, Hugh (2007). The Norman Conquest: England after William the Conqueror. Critical Issues in History. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  ISBN 978-0-7425-3840-5
  .
• Thompson, Kathleen (2004). "Robert, duke of Normandy (b. in or after 1050, d. 1134)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford University Press.
  doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/23715. Retrieved 3 April 2012. (subscription or UK public library membership
  required)
• Turner, Ralph V. (1998). "Richard Lionheart and the Episcopate in His French Domains". French Historical Studies. 21 (4 Autumn): 517–542.
  S2CID 159612172
  .
• van Houts, Elizabeth (2004). "Adelida (Adeliza) (d. before 1113)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford University Press.
  doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/164. Retrieved 26 March 2012. (subscription or UK public library membership
  required)
• van Houts, Elisabeth (2002). "Les femmes dans l'histoire du duché de Normandie (Women in the history of ducal Normandy)". Tabularia "Études" (in French) (2): 19–34.
  S2CID 193557186
  .
• Walker, Ian (2000). Harold the Last Anglo-Saxon King. Gloucestershire, UK: Wrens Park.
  ISBN 0-905778-46-4
  .
• "William the Conqueror". The Royal Family. London: the Royal Household. Retrieved 16 March 2023.
• ISBN 1-85285-382-4
  .
• doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/10887. Retrieved 27 May 2012. (subscription or UK public library membership
  required)
• doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/11707. Retrieved 25 June 2012. (subscription or UK public library membership
  required)
• Young, Charles R. (1979). The Royal Forests of Medieval England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  ISBN 0-8122-7760-0
  .

Listen to this article (1 hour and 18 minutes)

Audio help · More spoken articles

)

William the Conqueror House of Normandy Born: 1028 Died: 9 September 1087
Regnal titles
Preceded by Edgar Ætheling	King of England 1066–1087	Succeeded by William II
Preceded by Robert I	Duke of Normandy 1035–1087	Succeeded by Robert II