Zahiri school
Part of a series on Sunni Islam |
---|
Islam portal |
The Ẓāhirī school (
After a limited success and decline in the
Zahirism is characterized as a fifth school of thought (madhhab) within the Sunnī branch of Islam,[13][14][15] and still retains a measure of influence and is recognized by contemporary Muslim scholars. In particular, members of the Ahl-i Hadith movement have identified themselves with the Ẓāhirī school of thought.[16][17]
History
Emergence
During his formative years, al-Ẓāhirī relocated from
The Ẓāhirī school was initially called the Dāwūdi school after Dawud al-Ẓāhirī himself, and attracted many adherents, although they felt free to criticize his views, in line with the Ẓāhirī school's rejection of
Umm al-Qura University professor Abdul Aziz al-Harbi has argued that the first generation of Muhammad's closest companions (ṣaḥāba) followed the methods and rulings of the Ẓāhirī school, and therefore it can be regarded as "the school of the first generation."[30]
Westward expansion
Parallel to the school's development in the east, Ẓāhirī ideas were introduced to North Africa by theologians of the
It was not until the rise of the
Decline
The Ẓāhirī school enjoyed its widest expansion and prestige in the fourth Islamic century, especially through the works of Ibn al-Mughallis, but in the fifth century it lost ground to the Hanbalite school.[34] Even after the Zahiri school became extinct in Baghdad, it continued to have some followers in Shiraz.[35] Ẓāhirism maintained its prestige in Syria until 788 A.H. and had an even longer and deeper impact in Egypt.[34] In the 14th century C.E., the Zahiri Revolt marked both a brief rekindling of interest in the school's ideas as well as affirmation of its status as a non-mainstream ideology.[citation needed] Al-Muhalla, a Medieval manual on Ẓāhirī jurisprudence, served in part as inspiration for the revolt and as a primary source of the school's positions.[36][failed verification] However, soon afterwards the school ceased to function and in the 14th century Ibn Khaldun considered it to be extinct.[37][38] With the Reconquista and the loss of Iberia to Christian rule, most works of Ẓāhirī law and legal theory were lost as well, with the school only being carried on by individual scholars, once again on the periphery.[citation needed]
Modern history
In the modern era, the Ẓāhirī school has been described as "somewhat influential", though "not formally operating today".
Principles
Of the utmost importance to the school is an underlying principle attributed to the founder Dawud ibn 'Ali; who had robustly denounced the delicacies and ambiguities in Fiqh sciences. According to Dawud, the validity of religious issues is only upheld by certainty, and that speculation cannot lead to the truth. This certainty is to be determined by the outward or literal (Zahir) meaning of the Qurʾān and Hadith.[46][47] Most Ẓāhirī principles return to this overarching maxim. Japanese Islamic scholar Kojiro Nakamura defines the Ẓāhirī schools as resting on two presumptions. The first is that if it were possible to draw more general conclusions from the strict reading of the sources of Islamic law, then God certainly would have expressed these conclusions already; thus, all that is necessary lies in the text. The second is that for man to seek the motive behind the commandments of God is not only a fruitless endeavor but a presumptuous one.[48] Another major characteristic was their fierce condemnation of Qiyas (analogical reasoning) as a heresy and distortion of Sharia (Islamic law).[47]
The Ẓāhirī school of thought generally recognizes three sources of
Certain followers of the Ẓāhirī school include religious inference as a fourth source of Islamic law.[49][verification needed]
The school differs from the more prolific schools of Islamic thought in that it restricts valid consensus in jurisprudence to the consensus of the first generation of Muslims who lived alongside Muhammad only.
Additionally, the Ẓāhirī school does not accept
Distinct rulings
- Some followers of the Ẓāhirī school differ with the majority in that they consider the Virgin Mary to have been a female prophet.[57]
- Qatadah.[citation needed]
- Admission in an Islamic court of law is seen as indivisible by Ẓāhirīs, meaning that a party cannot accept some aspects of the opposing party's testimony and not other parts. The Ẓāhirīs are opposed by the Hanafi and Maliki schools, though a majority of Hanbalites share the Ẓāhirī position.[59]
- Another example of the ignoring of analogical reasoning by Ẓāhirīs and how it separates that school from most madhhab, is their attitude towards dogs. Pious Muslims commonly avoid dogs, arguing the hadith -- "If a dog drinks from your bowl then you must wash it seven times" -- indicate that dogs are unclean on the grounds that there is no other reason for thoroughly cleaning what dogs have used. Ẓāhirīs, in contrast, maintain that (in the words of one adherent), "if the prophet meant 'the dog is an unclean animal', ... he would have said 'the dog is an unclean animal'".[60]
Reception
Like its founder Dawud, the Ẓāhirī school has been controversial since its inception.[61] Due to their some so-called rejection of intellectual principles considered staples of other strains within Sunni Islam, adherents to the school have been described as displaying non-conformist attitudes.[62]
Views on the Ẓāhirī within Sunni Islam
The Ẓāhirī school has often been criticized by other schools within Sunni Islam. While this is true of all schools, relations between the Hanafis, Shafi‘is and Malikis have warmed to each other over the centuries; this has not always been the case with the Ẓāhirīs.
Not surprisingly given the conflict over al-Andalus, Maliki scholars have often expressed negative feelings regarding the Ẓāhirī school. Abu Bakr ibn al-Arabi, whose father was a Ẓāhirī, nevertheless considered Ẓāhirī law to be absurd.[58] Ibn 'Abd al-Barr, himself a former Ẓāhirī, excluded Dawud al-Ẓāhirī along with Ahmad ibn Hanbal from his book on Sunni Islam's greatest jurists,[63] though Ignác Goldziher has suggested that Ibn Abdul-Barr remained Ẓāhirī privately and outwardly manifested Maliki ideas due to prevailing pressures at the time. At least with al-Ballūṭī, one example of a Ẓāhirī jurist applying Maliki law due to official enforcement is known. Ẓāhirīs such as Ibn Hazm were challenged and attacked by Maliki jurists after their deaths.[58]
Followers of the Shafi‘i school within Sunni Islam have historically been involved in intellectual conflict with Ẓāhirīs.[64] This may be due to Al-Shafi'i being a major proponent of the principle of Qiyas; rejected by the Zahiris.[65] [66] [67] [68][69]
Hanbali scholar
The position adopted by the most exacting of scholars is that those who deny analogy are not considered scholars of the Umma or conveyers of the Shari‘a, because they oppose out of mere obstinacy and exchange calumnies about things established by an overwhelming preponderance of the evidence, conveyed by whole groups from whole groups back to their prophetic origin (tawatur). For most of the Shari‘a proceeds from ijtihad, and the unequivocal statements from the Qur’an and hadith do not deal [n: in specific particulars by name] with even a tenth of the Shari‘a [n: as most of Islamic life is covered by general principles given by Allah to guide Muslims in every culture and time, and by analogy (qiyas) from established rulings], so these [Dhahiris] are considered like unlearned, common people.”
— Dhia' ul-Dīn 'Abd al-Malik ibn Yūsuf al-Juwaynī al-Shafi'ī, Dhahabi, Siyar A‘lam al-Nubala’ [Beirut: Mu’assasa al-Risala], 13.105 (1984)
Zahirism and Sufism
The relationship between Ẓāhirism and Sufism has been complicated. Throughout the school's history, its adherents have always included both Sufis as well as harsh critics of Sufism. Many practitioners of Sufism, which often emphasizes detachment from the material world, have been attracted to the Ẓāhirī combination of strict ritualism and lack of emphasis on dogmatics.[71][72]
Zahiris
Discerning who exactly is an adherent to the Ẓāhirī school of thought can be difficult. Harbi has claimed that most Muslim scholars who practiced independent reasoning and based their judgment only on the Qur'an and Sunnah, or Muslim prophetic tradition, were Ẓāhirīs.[30] Followers of other schools of thought may have adopted certain viewpoints of the Ẓāhirīs, holding Ẓāhirī leanings without actually adopting the Ẓāhirī school; often, these individuals were erroneously referred to as Ẓāhirīs despite contrary evidence.[73]
Additionally, historians would often refer to any individual who praised the Ẓāhirīs as being from them. Sufi
Imam Bukhari
Scott Lucas states "The most controversial aspect of al-Bukhari's legal principles is his disapproval of qiyas" and "A modern study of personal status laws in the Arab world by Jamal J. Nasir contains one sentence that explicitly mentions that the Ẓāhirīs and al-Bukhari rejected qiyas..."[79][80]
Lucas also points out that the legal methodology of Bukhari is very similar to that of Ibn Hazm.[81][82]
Followers of the Ẓāhirī school
- Abd Allah al-Qaysi (died 885), responsible for spreading the school in Spain.
- Abu l-'Abbās "Ibn Shirshīr" Al-Nāshī Al-Akbar (died 906 CE), prominent kalām theologian and teacher of Niftawayh.[83]
- Muhammad bin Dawud al-Zahiri (died 909), son of the school's namesake.
- Ibn Abi Asim (died 909), early scholar of hadith.
- Ruwaym (died 915), spiritual pioneer from the second generation of Sufism.
- Niftawayh (died 935), student of the school's namesake and teacher of his son.
- Ibn al-Mughallis (died 936), credited with popularizing the school across the Muslim world.
- Al-Masudi (died 956), early Muslim historian and geographer.
- Mundhir bin Sa'īd al-Ballūṭī (died 966), early judge in Spain for the Caliphate of Córdoba.
- Al-Qassab (died 970), Muslim warrior-scholar.
- Ibn Khafif (died 982), early mystic from the third generation of Sufism.
- Ibn Hazm (died 1064), Andalusian polymath, author of numerous works.
- Al-Humaydī(died 1095), hadith scholar, historian and biographer in Spain and then Iraq.
- six hadith booksof Sunni Islam.
- Ibn Tumart (died 1130), founder of the Almohad Empire
- Abd al-Mu'min (died 1163), first Almohad Caliph.
- Abu Yaqub Yusuf (died 1184), second Almohad Caliph, memorized Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim.
- Ibn Maḍāʾ(died 1196), Andalusian judge and linguist, and an early champion of language education reform.
- Abu Yusuf Yaqub al-Mansur(died 1199), third Almohad Caliph, authored his own collection of hadith.
- Muhammad al-Nasir (died 1213), fourth Almohad Caliph.
- Idris I al-Ma'mun(died 1232), renegade who issued a challenge for the Almohad throne.
- Ibn Dihya al-Kalby (died 1235), hadith scholar from Spain and then Egypt.
- Abu al-Abbas al-Nabati (died 1239), Andalusian botanist, pharmacist and theologian.
- Abu Bakr Ibn Sayyid al-Nās (died 1261), Andalusian-Tunisian scholar of hadith.
- Fatḥ al-Din Ibn Sayyid al-Nās(died 1334), Andalusian-Egyptian biographer of the prophet Muhammad.
- Abu Hayyan Al Gharnati(died 1344), Andalusian linguist and Qur'anic exegete.
- Al-Maqrizi (died 1442), Egyptian historian, especially of the Fatimid Caliphate.
Contemporary followers of the school
- Hasan al-Hudaybi (died 1973), Second General Guide of the Muslim Brotherhood and Islamic author.[84]
- Qur'an, former prayer leader at Islam's two holiest mosques and professor at multiple universities.
- Sa'id al-Afghani (died 1997), former Arabic language professor at Damascus University, correspondent member of the Academy of the Arabic Language in Cairo and proponent of language education reform.
- Abu Turab al-Zahiri (died 2002), Indian-born Saudi Arabian linguist, jurist, theologian and journalist.
- Ihsan Abbas (died 2003), Palestinian scholar of Arabic and Islamic studies, widely considered to be at the forefront of both fields during the 20th century.
- Muqbil_bin_Hadi_al-Wadi'i (died 2001), A Yemeni hadīth scholar and founder of the Dar al-Hadīth Institute in Damaaj, Yemen.
- Abu Abd al-Rahman Ibn Aqil al-Zahiri (living), Saudi Arabian polymath and correspondent member of the Academy of the Arabic Language in Cairo.
- Muhammad Abu Khubza (died 2020), Moroccan polymath, authored the library catalog for the Bibliothèque générale et Archives.[citation needed]
- Abdul Aziz al-Harbi (living), professor of Qur'anic exegesis at Umm al-Qura University.
- Abū 'Abd ur-Rahmān al-Misrī (living), a Muhaddith from Jordan [85]
- Dr. Muhammad Ibrāhīm Ibn Tamīm Al-Rayhān (living), a well known Kuwaiti Dhāhirī scholar [85]
- Yahya al-Bahrumi
References
- ^ Ẓāhirī school, founded by his student, the Persian Dawud al-Zahiri (c. 815–883), and later popularized by Andalusian jurist Ali Ibn Hazm (994–1064). The Zahiris would outright reject analogical reasoning (qiyās) as a method for deducing jurisprudential rulings while considering consensus (ijmāʿ) to be binding only when comprising a first-generation consensus of the Companions of the Prophet.
- ^ ISSN 1384-1130.
- ISBN 978-0-521-00580-7.
- ISBN 978-0-19-923049-5.
- ISBN 978-0-7486-3113-1.
- ISBN 9004109528. Retrieved 2016-01-03.
- ^ [1][2][3][4][5][6]
- LCCN 2015954883.
- ^ "Ẓāhirīyah ISLAMIC LAW". Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
- ^ ISBN 9780521653947
- ^ a b M. Mahmood, The Code of Muslim Family Laws, p. 37. Pakistan Law Times Publications, 2006. 6th ed.
- ^ ISBN 9781405178488
- ISBN 978-0-19-025145-1.
- ISBN 978-1-136-72639-2.
- ISBN 978-0-674-01017-8.
- ISBN 978-0-521-65394-7.
Ahl-i-Hadith [...] consciously identified themselves with Zahiri doctrine.
- ^ Wiederhold, Lutz. "Legal–Religious Elite, Temporal Authority, and the Caliphate in Mamluk Society: Conclusions Drawn from the Examination of a “Zahiri Revolt” in Damascus in 1386." International Journal of Middle East Studies 31.2 (1999): 203-235.
- ^ Encyclopedia of Islam, vol. II, C-G, pg. 182. Eds. Bernard Lewis, Charles Pellat and Joseph Schacht. Assist. J. Burton-Page, C. Dumont and V.L. Menage. Leiden: Brill Publishers, 1971. Photomechanical print.
- ^ Al-Dhahabi, Siyar a`lam al-nubala., v.13, Entry 55, pp. 97–108
- ^ Abu Ishaq al-Faqih, Tabaqat al-Fuqaha, pg.92
- ^ Christopher Melchert, The Formation of the Sunni Schools of Law: 9th–10th Centuries C.E., pg. 179. Leiden: Brill Publishers, 1997.
- ^ Dr. Omar A. Farrukh, Zaharism, A History of Muslim Philosophy, Ahlul Bayt Digital Islamic Library Project
- ^ Goldziher, pg.28
- ^ Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani, Lisan al-Mizan, v.2, pg.422
- ^ Al-Dhahabi, Mizan al-'Itidal, v.2, pg.15
- ^ a b Chiragh Ali, The Proposed Political, Legal and Social Reforms. Taken from Modernist Islam 1840-1940: A Sourcebook, pg. 281. Edited by Charles Kurzman. New York City: Oxford University Press, 2002.
- ^ . – via Brill (subscription required)
- ISBN 0-85224-354-5.
- ^ Christopher Melchert, The Formation of the Sunni Schools of Law: 9th-10th Centuries C.E., p. 190. Leiden: Brill Publishers, 1997.
- ^ a b Falih al-Dhibyani, Al-zahiriyya hiya al-madhhab al-awwal, wa al-mutakallimun 'anha yahrifun bima la ya'rifun Archived 2013-07-03 at the Wayback Machine. Interview with Okaz. 15 July 2006, Iss. #1824. Photography by Salih Ba Habri.
- ^ Adang, "The Spread of Zahirism in al-Andalus in the Post-Caliphal Period: The evidence from the biographical dictionaries," pp. 297–346. Taken from Ideas, Images and Methods of Portrayal: Insights into Classical Arabic Literature and Islam. Ed. Sebastian Gunther, Leiden: 2005.
- ISBN 9780415157575
- ^ Shawqi Daif, Introduction to Ibn Mada's Refutation of the Grammarians, p. 6. Cairo, 1947.
- ^ a b Mohammad Sharif Khan and Mohammad Anwar Saleem, Muslim Philosophy And Philosophers, pg. 34. New Delhi: Ashish Publishing House, 1994.
- Hossein Nasr and Morteza Motahhari, "The Religious Sciences." Taken from The Cambridge History of Iran, Vol. 4: From the Arab Invasion to the Saljuqs. p. 476. Ed. Richard N. Frye. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
- ^ Carl Brockelmann, Geschichte der Arabischen Litteratur. Zweite den Supplementbänden angepasste Auflage. Vol. 1, p. 400. Leiden: Brill Publishers, 1937–1949.
- ISBN 978-0-521-58813-3.
- ISBN 978-0-19-512558-0– via www.oxfordreference.com.
- ISBN 9789004109520.
We may guess at some of the reasons for the demise of the original Zahiri school. [...] This is roughly the explanation of Wael B. Hallaq: that the juridical theory of Sunnism recognized qiyas and therefore excluded Zahirism.
- ISBN 9004109528.
- ^ ISBN 9780522857283.
- ISBN 9789004234246
- ^ "Amman Message – The Official Site".
- ISBN 9781845192921. Retrieved 10 May 2015.
- ^ Wood, Graeme (December 16, 2016). "The American Climbing the Ranks of ISIS". The Atlantic.
- ^ Devin J. Stewart, "Muhammad b. Dawud al-Zahiri's Manual of Jurisprudence." Taken from Studies in Islamic Law and Society Volume 15: Studies in Islamic Legal Theory. Edited by Bernard G. Weiss. p. 111. Leiden: 2002. Brill Publishers.
- ^ ISBN 0-85224-354-5.
- ^ Kojiro Nakamura, "Ibn Mada's Criticism of Arab Grammarians." Orient, v. 10, pp. 89–113. 1974
- ISBN 978-90-04-27965-0.
- ^ Hassan, Abu. "Ijma in Brief". Retrieved 14 July 2012.
- ^ Muhammad Muslehuddin, "Philosophy of Islamic Law and Orientalists," Kazi Publications, 1985, p. 81
- ^ Dr. Mohammad Omar Farooq, "The Doctrine of Ijma: Is there a consensus?," June 2006
- ^ Adang, Zahiri Conception, p. 15.
- ^ Hassan, Abu. "Questions on Qiyas". Retrieved 14 July 2012.
- al-Shafi‘i, Kitab al-Umm, vol. 7, pp. 309–320. CairoDar al-fikr, 1990.
- ISBN 978-0759109919, pp. 26–28
- ISBN 9780815630555
- ^ a b c Adang, Zahiri Conceptions, p. 44.
- ^ Subhi Mahmasani, Falsafat al-tashri fi al-Islam, p. 175. Trns. Farhat Jacob Ziadeh. Leiden: Brill Archive, 1961.
- ISBN 978-0-8129-8875-8. Retrieved 22 March 2022.
- ^ Dr. Mohammad Omar Farooq, The Riba-Interest Equivalence Archived 2012-03-12 at the Wayback Machine, June 2006
- ISBN 9780748606979
- ^ Adang, Zahiri Conceptions, p. 20.
- ^ Louis Massignon, The Passion of al-Hallaj: Mystic and Martyr of Islam. Trans. Herbert W. Mason. p. 16. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.
- ^ Schacht, Joseph (1959) [1950]. The Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence. Oxford University Press. p. 1.
- ^ Snouck Hurgronje, C. Verspreide Geschriften. v.ii. 1923-7, p. 286–315
- ^ Étude sur la théorie du droit musulman (Paris : Marchal et Billard, 1892–1898.)
- ^ Margoliouth, D.S., The Early Development of Mohammedanism, 1914, p. 65ff
- ^ Al-Dhahabi, Siyar a`lam al-nubala., v.13, Entry 55, pp. 97–108
- Ibn Qayyim Al-Jawziyya, Ighadah al-Lahfan fi Masayid al-Shaytan, v.1, p. 570
- ^ Carl W. Ernst, Words of Ecstasy in Sufism, pg. 163. Albany: SUNY Press, 1983.
- ^ Ignác Goldziher, The Zahiris, p. 165. Leiden: Brill Publishers, 1971.
- ^ "A History of Muslim Philosophy Volume 1, Book 1". www.al-islam.org. June 9, 2014.
- ^ Mohammed Rustom, Review of Michel Chodkiewicz's An Ocean without Shore
- ^ Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari, History of the Prophets and Kings. Vol. 1, p. 66. Trans. Franz Rosenthal. New York City: SUNY Press, 1989.
- ^ Muhammad Nasiruddin al-Albani, "Shareet al-Khobar," tape #4, 1989: Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
- ISBN 9789004243101
- ISBN 9781438417837
- .
- .
- .
- .
- ^ Ess, Josef van, Theology and Society in the Second and Third Centuries of the Hijra, Vol.4, at page 164.
- ISBN 978-1-134-01229-9.
- ^ a b "Who are the Dhāhirī Scholars nowadays?". Al-Wahyayn. Retrieved 4 September 2020.