Talk:WikiProject

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconWebsites: Computing Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.
WikiProject iconWikipedia High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia articles
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Additional sources

"Cross-cutting WikiProjects are not just places to do types of work you enjoy, but they're also excellent places to discuss the finer nuances of article construction and how to get the most out of Wikipedia's powerful software tools".[1]

"WikiProjects are platforms for discussion about general issues, rather than cooperation and coordination centres".[2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by BD2412 (talk • contribs) 15:53, 10 August 2015‎

References

  1. Wikipedia: The Missing Manual
    (2008), p. 165-175.
  2. ^ Jerzy Kociatkiewicz, ‎Monika Kostera, Liquid Organization: Zygmunt Bauman and Organization Theory (2014).
  • Bilogur, Aleksey (15 February 2016). "Analyzing WikiProjects". residentmar.io.

Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:29, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization

This article is titled WikiProject, but variously uses that capitalization and "Wikiproject", with the lede suggesting that the former is correct. Usage in sources appears to be mixed. I would think "WikiProject" would be correct, especially since it's so dominant here. And we invented WikiProjects, didn't we? --BDD (talk) 13:54, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review/Help

I just created a new article about Legacy House. Can anyone give me some feedback/suggestion or even revise my article. Here are the website for Legacy House website with some notability news: Legacy House official site and news links

Enwiki WikiProject data

I have just removed all the data about the enWP's WikiProjects and their role in article assessment. This article is supposed to be about wikiprojects in general, giving such excessive information about their usage on a specific wiki is just inappropriate. Besides, the data is already duplicated across the articles on Wikipedia and English Wikipedia. 103.6.159.86 (talk) 07:05, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I disagree. Apparently, I'm not the only one. bd2412 T 22:14, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What's this article's intent?

What's the intention of this article? Why does it exist in addition to

Wikipedia:Wikiproject? See the TeaHouse. BthompsonHV 01:23, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Answered on the TeaHouse page. BD2412 T 01:52, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft English Wikipedia Page Noon khe

Hi, I created an English article called Noon Khe and it has been drafted. I want to let you know as soon as possible. Thanks ≈≠≤≥° — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohammadhosseinrr4 (talk • contribs) 02:10, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How do you make a wikiproject?

I really want to make a wikiproject covering Youtube so how do i make one? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilikecats1801 (talk • contribs)

talk) 19:38, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Short description

The

short description is a bit too long-how can we shorten it? EthanGaming7640 (talk) 17:07, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Can wiki save the world?

Could wiki produce a page for collaboration? Just a button people can click to denote support after viewing. People can pitch ideas and see the amount of people who could donate time or fund raise. If this is a feature already then please put the link. I will check tomorrow at same time. Thank you. 67.14.193.70 (talk) 04:40, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Medicine

This article is heavily focused on

WikiProject Medicine. Perhaps there's enough content and sourcing specifically about WikiProject Medicine to justify forking out a separate entry? Thoughts? ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:49, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

I think so, yeah. Manny Manatee (talk) 17:39, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:24, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
good job 👍 Manny Manatee (talk) 16:36, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Surely there's a lot more content to add about the topic. Improvements welcome! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:39, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProjects

How do you find out what wikiprojects there are? Manny Manatee (talk) 17:38, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Manny Manatee You may find Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory helpful. ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:41, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Manny Manatee (talk) 17:43, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

I suggest adding the following sentence to

medical volunteering.[1]
". I am suggesting this through COI as the reference I suggest is my own work. I believe it is the most recent and relevant work to make this statement.

References

  1. doi:10.15347/wjm/2023.005.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link
    )

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:41, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reply 21-NOV-2023

  Needs discussion  

  • In March 2023, the section covering Wikiproject Medicine was proposed to be forked to its own article. Shortly after this move was completed, a merger discussion then ensued, with the result being the information was placed back into this article. However, the result of that discussion was 2 supports (to merge), 1 delete, and one which prevaricated between support and delete. Figuratively taken this may indicate a tie. IMO, it signals that editor consensus was mixed at best as to whether the section should remain.
  • Seeing the consensus as possibly being mixed gives me pause in adding additional information to a section one editor from the discussion labeled as "naval gazing". To that end, it is requested that the proposing editor here discuss this addition with (at least) the editors involved in the earlier forking and merge discussions, as well as any other local editors who may be interested in this topic, in order to see if this information should be added to the article.

Regards,  Spintendo  01:47, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:WikiProject&oldid=1208121021"