User talk:CleverChris68
Statusletters on league tables
Hi, Since you have been editing statusletters for league table I wanted to inform you about the discussion at Module talk:Sports table#Statusletters on league tables. From what I am aware of, statusletter was not used last season until team actually qualified, but now that edit seems to want them, perhaps using X,Y, and Z with optional wording (see example at Template:2014–15 Eredivisie table) is the best to explain the individual situation, otherwise T might also be used. We can not put Q if teams may qualify for something else. If you have something to say please join the discussion at Module talk:Sports table#Statusletters on league tables or feel free to ask me at my talkpage. QED237 (talk)
Every action...
Hello Chris. Thanks for updating the Braintree article with their new manager – but remember
Wwe battleground 2015
Just wondering if i could edit the ppv because im gussing nikki bella defends against paige Cjrko17 (talk) 21:27, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Cjrko17: Wait until confirmation from reliable websites such as WWE.com before adding new matches, as work on Wikipedia needs reliable sources and we could see another match happen instead. ChrisMorris1234 21:41, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
ok thanks just wondering — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cjrko17 (talk • contribs) 23:41, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
RfC: boxing
Greetings. Since you edit boxing articles regularly, you might like to participate in an RfC about how weight classes are formatted on WP. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 19:26, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Re: The new major changes
Greetings! There's been a lot of movement at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Boxing, which so far seems to have the following covered:
- Ditching flagicons is gathering steam, but there are still the occasional dissenters (1, 2), neither of whom have much interest in actually discussing their objections
- Two-word weight classes should be hyphenated if a boxer is not from the US or Mexico, so "super-featherweight" for boxers from Europe, Canada, Africa, Oceania, etc.
- Discard the hyphen if they are from the US or Mexico, or are based in the US like Sergey Kovalev, i.e. "light heavyweight"
- Weight classes are not proper nouns, therefore it should "UFC's way of using proper nouns to describe their weight classes works on a different principle.
- Bouts with nothing of note (no titles or eliminators at stake, etc.) should discard any blank instances of |align=left| so as to avoid the unnecessary grid lines
- The rowspan idea is something with I'm only experimenting at the moment. I'm not yet at the stage where I'm going to attempt to include it as part of the MOS that I'm writing up, but I do think it streamlines the tables nicely.
If you have any other suggestions or feedback, I'd very much like to hear it. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 00:19, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Mac Dreamstate: I really like these, it makes the records look tidier and eliminates confusion on settings such as locations and hypens. ChrisMorris1234 01:10, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- However, it looks like ownership of the Floyd Mayweather Jr. article, it's likely only a matter of time before he'll say to me, "I can care less about your discussion. You ain't no damn admin." Charming fella, I'm sure. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 01:23, 6 December 2015 (UTC)]
- However, it looks like
The Apprentice (UK) - Articles on each Series of the show
Hi, I thought I would send out a message to prominent editors who work upon the articles that cover each Series of the The Apprentice (UK). I have begun to start wondering if we, as editors, are doing the right thing by writing out these articles in a manner that seems to be not encyclopedic as they should be in regards to the general principle of Wikipedia. I state this because, over all of the Series that have been done, all information on each episode that has been broadcast, editors write out the Episodes in term of detailing a general review of a task, the setup of teams, who won and who lost, the reward provided, who was fired and why, and noting down notable events and such like associated to the episode.
Now, when QI's main article was made, editors decided to cover each Series by writing out everything that was discussed as an answer to a question, as if it was a fact of importance; even I was one such editor who did this. Eventually, a Wikipedian finally decided to end this by deleting the pages and just ensuring that the episodes were listed in terms of their number, title, the guests on it and who won that episode, and the Air Date it was first broadcast on (including QI XL).
The fact is, I believe that this is happening again in regards to this show, in that any Wikipedian who comes to the articles in each Series, are generally writing out information that appears to make the site appear more like a Blog, than an online encyclopedia. I fear that unless action is taken now to discuss what should be going into these articles, someone may come along and decide it may be necessary to delete these pages. I have started a discussion on this matter, over on the
I hope that by discussing the matter, we can generally determine what action should be taken on this issue. Please take time to consider this, when you can, and do pass this on to any Wikipedian that you know, has been editing these articles alongside yourself. Thank you for reading this. GUtt01 (talk) 15:41, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Weight classes/mixing and matching
Greetings. Just wanted to let you know about how the weight classes are formatted now, so that it won't appear as though I'm reverting your edits for no reason. The consensus via
Feedback needed: a tweak to professional boxing records
This is a message I am leaving for users who regularly edit the record tables for boxers, or at least those keeping an eye on them. I have proposed to ditch "Professional debut" from the #1 fight slot on most contemporary records, and it would be appreciated if you could comment at the WikiProject Boxing talk page. Much thanks. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 21:08, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
RfC: location of Foxwoods Resort Casino (MOS:BOXING)
Greetings. There has been extensive discussion at
Sockpuppet investigation
{{Ivmbox |An editor has opened an investigation into
|
Finishing touches
Hello boxing buddy! I started on a project for an upcoming boxer and needed a few Suggestions on finishing up! I’m pretty much done with the draft. Mythical09 (talk) 21:35, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
WikiProject Boxing
Sad to see you leave the Project. You were one of the OGs when the MOS came in, and your contributions helped a lot and have been greatly appreciated. All the best in your editing quests! Mac Dreamstate (talk) 14:57, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
2023–24 Ardal SW moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to 2023–24 Ardal SW. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 02:04, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- I've moved this back to 2023–24 Ardal SW because it did, in fact, have sources. – Joe (talk) 14:38, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
2023–24 Ardal SE moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 06:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
2023–24 Ardal NW moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 06:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
2023–24 Ardal NE moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 06:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, CleverChris68. Thank you for your work on
Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:43, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
2023–24 Gozo Football League First Division moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 21:53, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to join New pages patrol
Hello CleverChris68!
- The New Pages Patrolis currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
- We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
- Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
- Kindly read project talk pagewith questions.
- If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at 2023–24 Gozo Football League First Division has been accepted
Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023–24 Ardal NW has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Utopes (talk / cont) 22:57, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023–24 Ardal SE has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Utopes (talk / cont) 22:57, 17 March 2024 (UTC)