User talk:Das osmnezz

Thank you and my best regards! 2806:105E:C:3302:9543:9C34:782E:6C5A (talk) 05:11, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username TheLongTone, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Charlie Morgan (entrepreneur), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Morgan (entrepreneur).

You might like to note that such

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLongTone (talk) 14:28, 20 February 2023 (UTC) Clearly a nudnik.TheLongTone (talk) 14:32, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on

Hello! Hopefully you have a good day today. Thanks for creating this article. I encouraged you to make more! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:09, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Fritz Neumayr that you were involved in has been marked for deletion - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fritz Neumayr KatoKungLee (talk) 20:06, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Gerry Cranham is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 09:03, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You overwrote my !vote; please be more careful. GiantSnowman 19:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GiantSnowman:, Sorry about that Id dint realize since there was a webpage error. I found many sources though. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 21:37, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you've been de-PRODing sports figures such as

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steven Juncaj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Juncaj until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alvaldi (talk) 20:34, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malcolm Stewart (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malcolm Stewart (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:27, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya. You created a redirect from Jarvis Vaai to Jarvis Filimalae and I was wondering why as there is no apparent reason why Jarvis Filimalae's family name would change - it would appear from a cursory search that there are two Jarvises here, but I thought you might know better! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:28, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexandermcnabb:, this source lists details "Jarvis Vaai" that are the same as that of Jarvis Filimalae, also this profile gives "Jarvis Vaai" birthdate as the same as that of Jarvis Filimalae, so they are the same person. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 11:10, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Boris Ovcin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the

]

Delano McCoy-Splatt

moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:13, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ömer Aysan Barış, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kocaeli.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SSSniperwolf

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SSSniperwolf

. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Mccapra (talk) 09:02, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nabela Noor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nabela Noor, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See
  Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations
  for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See
  section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
  .

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 19:51, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion nomination of My Linh Tran

Hello Das osmnezz,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged My Linh Tran for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bensci54 (talk) 16:45, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Patrick Schnetzer

Hello Das osmnezz,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Patrick Schnetzer for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bensci54 (talk) 16:46, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zebelyan

I'd recommend next time not editing/commenting on an AFD 81 times - this will be seen as bludgeoning and could lead to a block. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:41, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Phaedra Al-Majid for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phaedra Al-Majid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phaedra Al-Majid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

 // Timothy :: talk  02:47, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop creating sub-stubs

Please stop creating one-sentence articles. They have very little value. Normal readers expect to get information from Wikipedia, not be

WP:REFBOMBed by everything and nothing at once. For football club articles, you must at least provide information about the level the club is currently playing at - as well as the highest level the club has played at. 2A01:799:19A1:C100:8D84:E25F:A091:9EAF (talk) 04:21, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Apologies, I will try to do that and make larger articles with more info. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 04:51, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Grégoire Nitot

moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to

Grégoire Nitot

. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – robertsky (talk) 19:30, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think Darcy McFarlane is salvageable?

Do you think

Draft:Darcy McFarlane is worth a wikipedia article? Dwanyewest (talk) 09:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

@Dwanyewest:, I defineoty, think she is worth an article, however if other agree is another matter and whether it is draftified or deleted as soon as it is created is another matter... I couldn't find any more sources not in the article that Onel draftified already so I did not move it back to mainspace. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 18:37, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding

Draft:Ersid Pllumbaj

request

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 21:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of Carlos Fernández (footballer, born 1992)

The article

reliable source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 20:29, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lukas Browning Lagerfeldt

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lukas Browning Lagerfeldt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 747pilot (talk) 00:04, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sini Laaksonen

The article Sini Laaksonen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Usually youth players are not notable unless they make it big in the international playing field.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 747pilot (talk) 00:09, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:BASIC. You are of course free to take the article to AfD if you still doubt that it passes our notability guidelines. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:09, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Maybe state the clubs she played for

Andrea Norheim 89.11.168.122 (talk) 20:52, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Categories

Stop copy/pasting old categories over and over again to the new articles, don't you see that the categories have been moved? You have to use specific men's / women's categories for players positions, and not generic ones like [[Category:Association football defenders]]. Snowflake91 (talk) 09:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Žan-Luk Leban

The article Žan-Luk Leban has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

doesn't meet football notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the

talk) 09:00, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of Mba Vitus Onyekachi

The article Mba Vitus Onyekachi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks sufficient coverage to pass

WP:BIO

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 14:27, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Koegathe Rabithome PROD removal

Hello Das osmnezz. I hope you're doing well. I am leaving this note because I think your removal of the BLPPROD from this article without adding any reliable sources that plausibly contribute to meeting the GNG is disruptive. It's true that a BLPPROD can generally be removed whenever a reliable source is added (and some people believe NFT or 11v11 are reliable sources), but NSPORTS2022 and SPORTCRIT make it abundantly clear that a sports biography must include at least one reliable source that plausibly contributes towards SIGCOV in the article. This has been clear since April 2022, and you typically attempt to include such sources when you create sports biographies. Please be sure to do the same when you remove a BLPROD from a sports biography as actions like this are wasting editors' time. Jogurney (talk) 12:37, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mba Vitus Onyekachi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mba Vitus Onyekachi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mba Vitus Onyekachi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 21:15, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Patricia Carballo

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Patricia Carballo, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

false positive, you can report it to my operator

. Thanks,

talk) 15:39, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of Susan Whelan (executive)

The article Susan Whelan (executive) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is extremely short (one sentence) and should be drafted until suitable for mainspace

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

talk) 18:05, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Infobox

Hey mate, mind adding infoboxes to the pages of footballers you make? It makes it easier to see the career and statistics of the players, not sure why you stopped having them in. Good job otherwise, you're very prolific. Cheers!--Ortizesp (talk) 21:00, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Susan Whelan (executive)

moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to

Susan Whelan (executive)

. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs to be extended and use the sources effectively; may be a work in progresss. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 05:23, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

who is last known to have played as a

Hello my friend, I hope you are fine. I am concerned by your use on all the pages you create of the phrase "who is last known to have played as". It adds the impression of uncertainty and mystery. It would be better just to say "who last played as". This is just advice, but I hope you will at least reflect upon it. Keep up the great work!!! Best wishes, BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 03:22, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adding to the above: For retired players "last played as" is not a good choice. It unduly emphasises the player's last club; See

WP:RECENTISM. I've been fixing this at a bunch of articles, most recently at Mariano Dalla Libera. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 09:45, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Concern regarding Draft:Jirijoonas Kanth

request

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 10:01, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination of Inma Puig for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inma Puig is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inma Puig until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chiserc (talk) 09:51, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Trần Minh Toàn

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Illusion Flame and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started,

deletion review process

instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Illusion Flame}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

- 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 13:21, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Jean-Philippe Saïko

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jean-Philippe Saïko, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

false positive, you can report it to my operator

. Thanks,

talk) 23:23, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Stavros Papadopoulos

moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. EdmHopLover1995 (talk) 02:15, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Alessandro Iannuzzi

moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to

WP:BLP

. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Pbritti (talk) 16:02, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Archi Fataki for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Archi Fataki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archi Fataki until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jogurney (talk) 17:34, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dahlia Salah

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

deletion discussion, at [[2]

]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. JoelleJay (talk) 00:55, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Dear das omnezz

I Need your help to create my Wikipedia page. I will give you sample of my sandbox that I made. Im the person of the profile information everything is authentic.

thank you

rim soheng

Cambodian football player

Rim Soheng (រីម សុហេង​)

Personal information
Full name	Rim Soheng
Date of birth	(2004-05-08) 8 May 2004 (age 20)
Place of birth	Battambang, Cambodia
Height	1.86 m (6 ft 1 in)
Position(s)	Center back
Team information
Current team	Angkor tiger football club
Number	19
Youth career
2019-2021	National football academy
Senior career*
Years	Team	Apps	(Gls)
2021-	Angkor tiger football club	2	(0)
International career
2019–	Cambodia U-16	15	(0)
*Club domestic league appearances and goals, correct as of 20:12, 10 February 2023

Rim Soheng​ (born 8 May 2004), is a Cambodian

Cambodian League, and the Cambodia national team.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.gofootballtogo.com/team/cambodia-u16/24105/

https://globalsportsarchive.com/people/ Rim soheng (talk) 15:10, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of

SSSniperwolf

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

SSSniperwolf is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SSSniperwolf (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:27, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Jirijoonas Kanth

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created,

welcome page

if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:48, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on

page curation process

, I had the following comments:

Hello! Hopefully you have a nice day today. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by creating an article. As your article have adhered to the policies of Wikipedia, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a good day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:58, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kitson Cécile for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kitson Cécile is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitson Cécile until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 19:49, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hello Das osmnezz!

• The
  New Pages Patrol
  is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read
  project talk page
  with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider
  applying here
  .

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 10:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joey Ciochetto for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joey Ciochetto is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joey Ciochetto until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 19:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Raboama Koloti

Hi. You know better than to +1 invalid rationales as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raboama Koloti. Having played for a national team does not confer notability. Robby.is.on (talk) 23:40, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Giulia Dragoni

On 20 July 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Giulia Dragoni, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in July 2023, Giulia Dragoni became the youngest person to represent any Italian senior national football team – including both men and women – in the 21st century? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Giulia Dragoni. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Giulia Dragoni), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 12:02, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jacques Herzog

request

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 11:01, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

New articles

Hey Das osmnezz,

Good job on all your articles on footballers from around the world. It's impressive how find all these random players from different decades. I'm curious how you look around for new players to create and how you make a decision? Cheers! JTtheOG (talk) 02:16, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JTtheOG:, Thanks, it depends, two ways among other wats I find players are seeing players without Wikipedia pages on random list/season/club articles and also read news articles online and then search up if the player has a wiki page etc.

I also noticed you went to UCD on ur user profile... many of my friends are going to UCD, I got into UCD this year but chose UCSC instead, despite my friends begging me to go to UCD cuz its better academically and they were going there lmao. Das osmnezz (talk) 17:52, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. It's definitely fun to just scroll through articles and see who has red links. It's amazing how many notable players there are out there waiting for an article to get created. Well, keep up the good work. I'm interested in seeing your progress, if in fact you continue using Wikipedia in the future.

And yeah, I just graduated last year. The campus and the town itself is so beautiful; it's actually what caught my attention in the first place. I'm not sure I've ever been to Santa Cruz, though I'm sure it's beautiful as well. It is California after all. JTtheOG (talk) 22:06, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JTtheOG:, Thanks, also what did u major in Das osmnezz (talk) 22:30, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I studied international relations and minored in Spanish. How about you? JTtheOG (talk) 22:37, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JTtheOG:, Nice, if I went to UCD I would've majored in international relations as well, one of my UCD friends is majoring in it. At UCSC im majoring in sociology for now but im prob gon switch to Econ later. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 22:45, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck, man! I encourage you to just have fun and meet lots of people. The college years really go by quickly. Grades are important (I guess), but you should really focus on learning and critically thinking about things that you find interesting, getting exposed to different kinds of cultures, and growing as a person overall. That's what I took away. JTtheOG (talk) 23:32, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adrian Galliani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adrian Galliani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Galliani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Angelo (talk) 14:55, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ryan McLean

I have restored the draft - it is not ready. GiantSnowman 08:28, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New articles

Hello Das osmnezz, I would like to ask your support please in creating the articles of

WP:FOOTY

. I would really appreciate your help.

Thank you and my best regards! 2806:105E:C:36D5:317D:7CA1:5B09:C06 (talk) 14:51, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dennis Kutrieb

The article Dennis Kutrieb has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not managed in any professional league

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Telfordbuck (talk) 22:34, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on

page curation process

, had the following comments:

Good work on the article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Tails Wx}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Tails Wx (they/them) 11:57, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of C.W. Raines for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article C.W. Raines is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C.W. Raines until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

IncompA 00:17, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Charlie Morgan (entrepreneur)

request

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 06:02, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

MfD nomination of User:Das osmnezz/Portland Red Star

sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Das osmnezz/Portland Red Star during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Unknown Temptation (talk) 10:55, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Short descriptions

Hi. You're a quite prolific article creator. Going forward, could you please include short descriptions when creating articles? They usually come in this format: {{Short description|English footballer (born 2004)}}, so nationality – if it's not ambiguous – and date of birth.

I've been going through hundreds of articles where short descriptions were missing and it would be nice if no new articles would crop up without short descriptions. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 09:24, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Arguments at AfD

Hi Das osmnezz. When you !vote to keep an article at AfD, could you please try to provide links to sources you think count toward GNG, or refer to the !vote of another editor who does so, or provide hard evidence of the subject meeting a different notability criterion? You clearly feel strongly about keeping a lot of football BLPs that other editors are less keen on; and that's perfectly okay. But I have seen you write "Keep: subject meets GNG" a dozen times, but when closing the discussion I can't give that sort of !vote any weight at all. If you want your opinion to carry weight, you need to make it actionable. I find it helpful to link the three best sources I have, when making a similar argument. Happy editing, Vanamonde (Talk) 20:54, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to second that motion. Writing "Keep per above" or "Keep per meeting GNG" is the same thing as saying "The Bible is the truth because it is". That doesn't prove anything, it just restates what is trying to be proved. You need to defend your arguments, not just put your opinion out there. Paul Vaurie (talk) 03:35, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about

Adifane Noussoura

Hello, Das osmnezz, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username North8000, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created,

Adifane Noussoura, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adifane Noussoura

.

You might like to note that such

our guide

about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 03:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ryu Nugraha

The article Ryu Nugraha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non Notable footballer

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jehipuvu (talk) 10:46, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ryu Nugraha

moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to

independent

of the subject.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:39, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on

Its not required, but it'd be nice to include more than just "he was appointed manager of [team] in [year]... he was then appointed manager of [team] in [year]..."

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|BeanieFan11}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:39, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Ryu Nugraha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:31, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Das osmnezz. It would appear to me that the issue here summed up what you wrote on Talk:Ryu Nugraha: "This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because he is clearly prospect in Indonesian football". Essentially, what you have written is, "this page should not be deleted because, while he may not be be a notable player at present, he may be in some time in the future." For the article to be retained in the English language Wikipedia as of 9 Sep 2023, it needs to be demonstrated that it passes notability on 9 Sep 2023.--Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 09:02, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Shirt58:, He is clearly notable now, there are already many sources about him and he has an ongoing pro career. thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 16:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ryu Nugraha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nagano.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SSSniperWolf is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SSSniperWolf (2nd nomination)

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ltbdl (talk) 06:19, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryu Nugraha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryu Nugraha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ltbdl (talk) 06:25, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:30, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:48, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on my article nomination.Mahmood Rasooli - Mahmood Rasooli (nomination)

I have used reliable sources in my article and reliable sources have been used in all my explanations. And someone gives unacceptable reasons and wants to delete my article.

I want you to tell me what you think about my article.

(This text was written with Google Translate.) AbolfazlEbrahimi14 (talk) 10:09, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:05, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Isaidnoway (talk) 09:57, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. As I previously told you in January 2021 (link to discussion) you shouldn't dump references in article like you did here and here today. That is

Instead, as I told you in March 2021 (link to discussion) Template:Refideas could be a useful way of keeping references. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 10:45, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this continues ([3], [4]) I will ask administrators to intervene. Robby.is.on (talk) 09:29, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I will stop doing it from now on 100 percent I only did it cuz I only added like max 5 refs to those guys sorry Das osmnezz (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good. I appreciate how much work you put into searching for references; thanks for that. Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk)

Your Article "Aidana Otorbaeva" Has been Nominated for Deletion, Please See https://w.wi MercuryOxide (talk) 18:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have been spoken to earlier about

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aidana Otorbaeva is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aidana Otorbaeva until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:31, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Remember to add navboxes when applicable as I did here.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|BeanieFan11}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BeanieFan11 (talk) 13:26, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on

Anything about his apparent stint as manager of the national team?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|BeanieFan11}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BeanieFan11 (talk) 13:36, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Football in Tokelau has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Football in Tokelau until a consensus is reached. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:50, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:06, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article M. Basri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 76.14.122.5 (talk) 22:43, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mean to be rude or anything, but you might want to correct your spelling on your post? Regards. Govvy (talk) 10:15, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dylan Scicluna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dylan Scicluna until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Nath1991 (talk) 02:22, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:17, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Matt Dibley-Dias has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

List of facts, so indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 17:32, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Marcel Mendes-Dudziński has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

List of facts, so indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 22:54, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marcel Mendes-Dudziński is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcel Mendes-Dudziński until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMHamo (talk) 11:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matt Dibley-Dias is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Dibley-Dias until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMHamo (talk) 19:15, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Kadisha Martina has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 5 § Kadisha Martina until a consensus is reached. Jõsé ^hola 06:33, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Playermaker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playermaker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bosecovey (talk) 19:49, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Fc fleury 91.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:11, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kraków Dragoons FC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. FromCzech (talk) 09:02, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:58, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:59, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on FK Arkadag requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~ GB fan 13:30, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:03, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:56, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 03:41, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:00, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:06, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Das osmnezz,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ramadhan Singano for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DrowssapSMM 12:38, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:40, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on

Good start. You need to put more material from your sources into the article. happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:44, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Slobodan Lučić is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slobodan Lučić until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Vanjagenije (talk) 19:27, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:35, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:05, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:22, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sabina Rgayeva is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabina Rgayeva until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 07:30, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bryan Joel Rodriguez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan Joel Rodriguez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Joeykai (talk) 04:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on

Please format the reference using

WP:OVERSECTION

so I will fix that for you.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 16:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:25, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:45, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 20:47, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on

Consider expanding; right now you've only got mention that he was a manager, include two quotes and a nickname.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|BeanieFan11}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:15, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating Alex Arce.

Thanks for Creating this article but Please add more reliable source are needed to evulate the

Subject

's Notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aviram7}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 12:41, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cardo Siddik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cardo Siddik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spike 'em (talk) 12:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Das osmnezz. You recently created an article at

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

WAGMI United is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WAGMI United until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 14:24, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Imre Vankó is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imre Vankó until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:30, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Das osmnezz, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Goyang Happiness FC, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goyang Happiness FC.

Deletion

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:33, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Das osmnezz, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Shu Shine F.C., should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shu Shine F.C..

Deletion

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:35, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Uncle Bash007 (talk) 10:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julio Barrabes, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julio Barrabes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Darren Middleton (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darren Middleton (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

S.A. Julio (talk) 06:25, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for all of your contributions to articles about footballers. I've noticed that many of them are only a few sentences long. If I can make a suggestion, you might consider keeping these articles in

I will try to create longer articles from now on. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 05:31, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't use "he was described as..." to disguise chunks of text as quotations and avoid actually writing content. These are not warranted uses of quotations, and in several of the stubs you've created, make up such a majority of the text that they probably amount to copyright violations. The result was especially abominable in Sirimongkol Rattanapoom, where you did so with machine translated text that ended up making no sense. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:41, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bruno Davidson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruno Davidson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Htanaungg (talk) 07:14, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:27, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 02:34, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Roberto Malotti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not managed in a professional football league

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Telfordbuck (talk) 15:18, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Women's series was added to the Wikipedia:Did you know/Hall of Fame/Themed sets. You can add this to your list of accomplishments, {{User DYK HoF}}. Cheers! --evrik ^(talk) 02:44, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz. It has been over six months since you last edited the

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:05, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz,

If you want to recreate an article that has been deleted through an AFD deletion discussion, you need to work on a draft in Draft space or User space and submit it to AFC for review or it is likely to be tagged for speedy deletion, CSD G4. I thought I'd let you know that another editor is working on a draft of this player and you can find it at User:BalkanianActuality/Jacek Deniz Troshupa. Perhaps you can work together and see if this draft meets AFC approval. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:03, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz:,

@Liz:, Can you drafifty my article Jacek Deniz Troshupa so I can work on it and/or use it ass metrial to add to BalkanianActuality's draft? Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 02:41, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Das osmnezz, please include accurate article titles in your citations. I might have an idea why you're doing it, but they can border on being misleading. You should not be adding or removing anything. JTtheOG (talk) 03:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 23:00, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mirosław Modzelewski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirosław Modzelewski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As you have done with

Hello Das osmnezz, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Chance Cowell, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chance Cowell.

Deletion

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Anwegmann}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Anwegmann (talk) 22:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Jaami Qureshi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. BlameRuiner (talk) 09:59, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dino Mennillo, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dino Mennillo (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 05:47, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sirimongkol Rattanapoom, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sirimongkol Rattanapoom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Das osmnezz, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Silvio Trucco, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silvio Trucco.

Deletion

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|SafariScribe}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Das osmnezz, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Christian Nanetti, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Nanetti (2nd nomination).

Deletion

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|ComplexRational}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

^Complex/_Rational 17:28, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zander Murray, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zander Murray until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jamath Shoffner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamath Shoffner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Joeykai (talk) 03:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When you created Talk:Roy Terschegget, you included |living=no, even though Roy Terschegget describes and categorizes him as living. Please make sure to set this accurately. jlwoodwa (talk) 03:46, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on James Armson. Another editor, Bruxton, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for the article. Please see

WP:OVERSECTION

vecause there are five one sentence sections.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 03:52, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Das osmnezz, I hope you are doing well. This is a friendly reminder to use

Hello Das osmnezz, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Alexander Frank, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Frank.

Deletion

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|ComplexRational}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

^Complex/_Rational 18:21, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 08:48, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 13:06, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]