Acceptance of responsibility
Acceptance of responsibility is a provision in the
This adjustment is not intended to apply to a defendant who puts the government to its
constitutionalright to a trial. This may occur, for example, where a defendant goes to trial to assert and preserve issues that do not relate to factual guilt (e.g., to make a constitutional challenge to a statute or a challenge to the applicability of a statute to his conduct). In each such instance, however, a determination that a defendant has accepted responsibility will be based primarily upon pre-trial statements and conduct.
Because the vast majority of federal criminal cases are settled by plea bargains, the application of this reduction is extremely common and has a great impact on the number of prisoner-years served altogether throughout the U.S. justice system. Research indicates that the offender's race/ethnicity, controlling for offender and offense characteristics, has a significant influence on the sentence reduction for acceptance of responsibility.
References
- ^ Bibas, Stephanos (2001–2002), Apprendi and the Dynamics of Guilty Pleas, vol. 54, Stan. L. Rev., p. 311
- ^ a b U.S.S.G. §3E1.1, archived from the original on 2010-02-21
- doi:10.1080/07418829900094071)
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link - ^ United States v. Douglas (5th Cir. May 29, 2009), Text.
- ^ O'Hear, Michael M. (1996–1997), Remorse, Cooperation, and Acceptance of Responsibility: The Structure, Implementation, and Reform of Section 3E1.1 of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, vol. 91, Nw. U. L. Rev., p. 1507
- ^ Etienne, Margareth (2003), Remorse, Responsibility, and Regulating Advocacy: Making Defendants Pay for the Sins of Their Lawyers, p. 2103
- ^ US v. Gonzalez, 897 F. 2d 1018 (9th Circuit 1990).
- ^ US v. Oliveras, 905 F. 2d 623 - Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 1990