Anton Dilger

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Anton Dilger
University of Heidelberg
Scientific career
FieldsBiology

Anton Casimir Dilger (13 February 1884 – 17 October 1918) was a

1918 flu pandemic.[2][3]

Early life and career

Dilger was born in

summa cum laude
in 1912.

Dilger was the grandson of anatomist Friedrich Tiedemann (1781–1861), who was the Director of the Institute of Anatomy at Heidelberg University. Dilger was also the cousin of Generalmajor Hubert Lamey (1896-1981), the commander of the 118 Jager Division, as well as General der Kavallerie, Carl-Erik Koehler (1895–1958), the commander of the 20th Army Corps.

There are reports that Dilger served as a surgeon in the

U.S. Army Medical Corps, that he carried the rank of colonel in the Imperial German Army Medical Corps, and that he directed hospitals for the German Red Cross. None of the reports is substantiated.[citation needed
]

World War I

When

Washington, DC, in which cultures of the causative agents of anthrax and glanders (Bacillus anthracis and Burkholderia mallei) were produced. A 1941 report revealed that the bacteria were to be painted onto the nostrils of horses.[4]

In the U.S., Baltimore

stevedores, who were at first recruited by German officers to plant incendiary devices among ships and wharves, were eventually given bottles of liquid culture with orders to infect horses near Van Cortland Park
. The stevedores claimed to have done the deed with rubber gloves and needles.

The U.S. biological sabotage program is thought to have ended sometime in late 1916 after which Anton returned to Germany. Upon his return to the U.S., Dilger found himself under suspicion of being a German agent by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and fled to Mexico, where he used the surname "Delmar."

Sabotage program

The United States was the only target of German biological sabotage to which Dilger traveled personally, but Romania, Norway, Spain, and South America were all wartime targets of the program. Dilger was the only known individual with the required medical knowledge to have presided over the program in Germany even if he was not directly involved in each country. The methods of infecting livestock became more advanced as the war progressed and went from crude needles to capillary tubes of bacterial culture hidden inside sugar cubes.

The effects of the German effort to sabotage the neutral support of Allied countries is unknown. Since reports were made of disease outbreaks among livestock, it is not known whether the cultures used were pathogenic or even viable. Certainly, the amateurish method by which the U.S. stevedores infected horses would have given rise to accidents, but none was reported. That alone is cause for suspicion among researchers of the cultures used. Indeed, in the treaties signed in the wake of World War I, no specific provisions were made for the prohibition of biological warfare; it is presumed officials either did not know about the German effort or did not consider it a serious threat.

His relative Jürgen Schöfer, Ph.D., now writes about biosafety in science magazines.

References

  1. ^ David Woodbury (16 January 2007). "Sometimes Heroes Sire Scoundrels (review of The Fourth Horseman by Robert Koenig)". obab.blogspot.com. Retrieved 17 September 2008.
  2. ^ "Experts Q & A". Public Broadcasting Service. 15 December 2006. Archived from the original on 20 May 2009. Retrieved 22 May 2009.
  3. ^ An American waged germ warfare against U.S. in WWI SFGate
  4. ^ Wheelis 1998.

Further reading

External links