Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The

Cartagena Declaration and the 2009 Kampala Convention. The 1969 Refugee Convention's historical context is the era of decolonization, Apartheid, as well as internal political and military uprisings.[1]

It was signed by 41 states or governments and has currently been ratified by 46 of the 55 member states of the African Union. It is the only binding, regional legal instrument on refugee issues in the developing world and a regional complement of the 1951 Refugee Convention.[2]

Legal innovations

The 1969 Refugee Convention has made some significant advances from the 1951 Refugee Convention.

  • Discrimination against refugees is prohibited on the additional grounds of membership of a particular social group, nationality, or political opinion. These grounds were absent in the 1951 Refugee Convention.
  • Any refugee who has "committed a serious non-political crime outside his country of refuge after his admission to that country as a refugee" or who "acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the OAU" will be excluded from the definition.[3] It also contains a prohibition for refugees and asylum seekers to engage in any subversive activities against any member states.
  • It contains suggestions for burden- and responsibility sharing, solidarity and cooperation between the member states, such as regional resettlement and financial support.
  • It de-politicized the concept of asylum, a peaceful and humanitarian act, and declared that it shall no longer be perceived by member states as an unfriendly act and it urges the member states to grant asylum to those individuals who fall within the refugee definition. Whereas it advances here from the 1951 Refugee Convention it does still not grant an individual the right to asylum (it remains the state's discretion to grant this right).[2]
  • It introduced the "absolute" prohibition of
    refoulement, whereas the 1951 Refugee Convention allowed return or expulsion of refugees if the national security of the state would be at risk. However, if asylum seekers commit certain serious crimes, they will be excluded from the refugee definition and could still be returned or expelled. Refoulement is thus only limited but not absolutely prohibited.[2]
  • The principle of
    voluntary repatriation was first codified. However, the situation in the country of origin to which the refugee would return, was not defined and thus a fundamental change in circumstances and human rights standards in that country is not needed.[4]

Expansion of the definition of the term refugee

The 1969 Refugee Convention expanded the 1951 definition of who is a refugee:

References

  1. ^ "The 1969 OAU Convention and the continuing challenge for the African Union | Forced Migration Review". Archived from the original on 2018-08-13. Retrieved 2017-01-22.
  2. ^ a b c "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-03-29. Retrieved 2017-01-22.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  3. ^ a b "Ambf CMS". Archived from the original on 2019-11-21. Retrieved 2017-01-22.
  4. ^ "Alternative Standards Specific to Refugees - the Regional Level — Forced Migration Online". Archived from the original on 2017-02-19. Retrieved 2017-01-22.