Court of Indian Offenses

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Court of Indian Offenses is an

U.S. Department of the Interior's Bureau of Indian Affairs. Also known as a "CFR" (Code of Federal Regulations) Court, a Court of Indian Offenses has criminal and civil jurisdiction over Native Americans in Indian Country, on reservations and other Indian trust land that lacks its own tribal court system. Criminally, the Court of Indian Offenses is a limited jurisdiction court that tries misdemeanor violations of Title 25 of the Code of Federal Regulations
, as well as violations of tribal codes, with permission of the tribe. Civilly, the CFR court holds full civil jurisdiction over matters in its territory.

There are currently five CFR courts operating in the United States. These include:

  1. The Albuquerque CFR Court, serving the
    Kewa Pueblo and the Santa Fe Indian School
    .
  2. The Southern Plains CFR Court, serving the
    Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians, and the Wichita and Affiliated Tribe of Indians
    .
  3. The Western Region CFR Court, serving the
    Te-Moak Band of Western Shoshone Indians
    (Nevada).
  4. The Eastern Oklahoma Region CFR Court, serving the
    Seneca-Cayuga Tribe of Oklahoma
    .
  5. The Southwest Region CFR court serves the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe of Colorado.[1]

In addition to the various Courts of Indian Offenses, there is also an appellate court branch called The Court of Indian Appeals. The Court of Indian Appeals hears all appellate cases from cases originally heard in the CFR Courts.[2]

Dual Sovereignty controversy

The CFR court is an Article I federal court, operating under the authority of the United States Secretary of the Interior.[3] The CFR court only tries misdemeanor crimes, while the jurisdiction to try more serious felony crimes is vested with the United States Attorney’s Offices. However, U.S, Attorneys often decline to prosecute felony cases in Indian Country, which leads CFR court prosecutors to prosecute felony offenders using lesser included misdemeanor offenses in order to ensure that serious offenders receive at least some jail time.

This happened in the case of Denezpi v. United States, where the suspect, Merle Denezpi, an enrolled member of the

dual sovereignty doctrine
is the plurality of the authorities where the offences originated from: since the Aggravated Battery charge was defined by the tribal aurhority and the rape charge was federal, they originated from two different sovereigns and therefore could be both prosecuted.

References

  1. ^ "Court of Indian Offenses". U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs. U.S. Department of the Interior. Retrieved May 11, 2022.
  2. ^ Smith, Gregory (2020). "The Court of Indian Appeals: America's Forgotten Federal Appellate Court". American Indian Law Review. 44 (2): 215. Retrieved May 11, 2022.
  3. ^ Smith, Gregory (2020). "The Court of Indian Appeals: America's Forgotten Federal Appellate Court". American Indian Law Review. 44 (2): 231. Retrieved May 11, 2022.
  4. ^ Eagle, Amanda L. White (June 16, 2022). "Amy Coney Barrett Ignored a Critical Detail About the History of Tribal Courts". Slate Magazine. Retrieved June 16, 2022.
  5. ^ "Denezpi v. United States". Legal Information Institute Supreme Court Bulletin. Cornell Law School. Retrieved May 11, 2022.
  6. ^ "DENEZPI v. UNITED STATES". LII / Legal Information Institute. Retrieved July 14, 2023.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Court_of_Indian_Offenses&oldid=1216394149"