Dollar voting

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Dollar voting is an analogy that refers to the theoretical impact of consumer choice on producers' actions by means of the flow of consumer payments to producers for their goods and services.

Overview

In some principles textbooks of the mid-20th century, the term "dollar voting" was used to describe the process by which consumers' choices influence firms' production decisions.[citation needed] Products that consumers buy will tend to be produced in the future. Products that do not sell as well as expected will receive fewer productive resources in the future. According to this analogy, consumers vote for "winners" and "losers" with their purchases. This argument was used to explain market allocations of goods and services under the catchphrase "consumer sovereignty".[citation needed]

Consumer

boycotts sometimes aim to change producers' behaviour. The goals of selective boycotts, or dollar voting, have been diverse, including cutting corporate revenues, removal of key executives, and reputational damage.[1]

The modern idea of dollar voting can be traced back to its development by

taxation without representation.[4]

If voters feel disenfranchised politically, they may instead use their spending power to influence politics and the economy. Consumers use dollar voting because they hope to impact society's values and the use of resources.[4]

Criticisms

Dollar voting has faced criticism in modern America for being class-bound. Dollar voting is archetypically used by middle and upper middle class consumers who spend their money at local farmers markets, community agricultural programs, and the preparation of "slow food".[5] These purchases do not affect low-income producers and consumers in the food market.[5] Dollar voting has also been criticized as a form of conspicuous consumption for the well-off.[5]

Dollar voting has also been criticized for being a sort of consumer vigilantism. While most economists and economic philosophers accept that consumers have a right to their personal moral choices in the market, large-scale movements to influence

example needed][6]

Efforts to encourage corporations and firms to act in environmentally friendly ways have become popular. It is unclear whether firms that create negative environmental externalities will actually change their method of production to satisfy such desires.[7] Dollar voting also could dissuade citizens from law-making efforts to check unmitigated self-interest in firms and consumers, instead shifting this responsibility over to the market.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Godfrey, Neale. "Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is. Vote With Your Dollars." The Huffington Post February 20, 2017. Accessed June 10, 2018.
  2. S2CID 153750341
    .
  3. JSTOR 1827235
    .
  4. ^
    JSTOR 23056348
    .
  5. ^
    JSTOR 43653954
    .
  6. JSTOR 23261269
    .
  7. JSTOR 40211036
    .

References

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dollar_voting&oldid=1227701693"