Edwin Durning-Lawrence
Sir Edwin Durning-Lawrence, Bt | |
---|---|
Member of Parliament for Truro | |
In office 1895–1906 | |
Preceded by | John Charles Williams |
Succeeded by | George Hay Morgan |
Personal details | |
Born | 2 February 1837 |
Died | 21 April 1914 | (aged 77)
Political party | Liberal Unionist |
Spouse | Edith Jane Smith |
Occupation | Politician, author |
Sir Edwin Durning-Lawrence, 1st Baronet (2 February 1837 – 21 April 1914) was a British lawyer and Member of Parliament.
He is best known for his advocacy of the
Life
He was born Edwin Lawrence, the seventh son and last child of William Lawrence and Jane Clarke. His father, who built up his fortune in construction, held political posts in London. His brothers Sir William Lawrence and Sir James Lawrence were Lord Mayors of London and also members of parliament. His nephew was Frederick Pethick-Lawrence, the suffragette[Footnote 1] and pacifist MP.
Edwin studied law at London University and was admitted to
He was also a prominent
He married Edith Jane Smith, daughter of
He is buried in Kensal Green Cemetery south of the main east-west path not far from the main east entrance.
Writings
Durning-Lawrence was a prolific author. He wrote The Progress of a Century; or, The Age of Iron and Steam (1886), The Pope and the Bible (1888) and A Short History of Lighting from the Earliest Times (1895).
Lawrence became most famous as an advocate of Baconian theory, to which he was converted after reading Ignatius L. Donnelly's The Great Cryptogram. He wrote a number of books on the topic, the most notable of which was Bacon is Shake-Speare (1910). He also wrote The Shakespeare Myth (1912), "Macbeth" Proves Bacon is Shakespeare (1913), and Key to Milton's Epitaph on Shakespeare (1914).[5]
Following Donnelly, Durning-Lawrence believed that the key to proving Bacon's authorship was the discovery of cyphers within the plays which were hidden there by Bacon. His writings were also notable for the virulence with which he heaped abuse on William Shakespeare of Stratford:
England is now declining any longer to dishonour and defame the greatest Genius of all time by continuing to identify him with the mean, drunken, ignorant, and absolutely unlettered, rustic of Stratford who never in his life wrote so much as his own name and in all probability was totally unable to read one single line of print.[6]
Durning-Lawrence's vehemence and assertiveness in promoting his views was widely remarked upon. He sent copies of his book to public libraries in Britain and to schools, prompting expressions of concern from Shakespeare scholars who believed unwary readers would be misled.[5]
Durning-Lawrence's most famous argument in Bacon is Shake-Speare was his suggestion that the word
University of London Archive
Durning-Lawrence's archive was donated to the University of London library in 1929, and established there in 1931. It has been described as "a very important collection of about 7,000 volumes largely of seventeenth-century literature containing one of the best collections in the world on Sir Francis Bacon and valuable collections on Shakespeare and Defoe."
He also left an endowment to the university. In the 1920s the artist
Wilmot controversy
In 1932, the year after the library was opened, the Shakespeare scholar Allardyce Nicoll published an article on a manuscript it contained written by James Corton Cowell, entitled "Some reflections on the life of William Shakespeare". The manuscript was a lecture delivered to the Ipswich Philosophic Society in 1805. It stated that an 18th-century clergyman, James Wilmot, had identified Bacon as the hidden author of Shakespeare's works. Wilmot's study of local history in the Stratford area convinced him that Shakespeare could not have authored the works attributed to him. He came to this conclusion in 1781, more than 80 years before the Baconian argument was first published by Delia Bacon and W.H. Smith.[15] Wilmot destroyed all evidence of his theory, confiding his findings only to Cowell.[16][17][18]
The authenticity of Cowell's "Reflections" was accepted by Shakespearean scholars for many years, but was challenged in 2002–2003 by John Rollett, Daniel Wright and Alan H. Nelson. Rollett could find no historical traces of Cowell, the Ipswich Philosophic Society, or its supposed president, Arthur Cobbold.[19] In 2010, James S. Shapiro declared the document a forgery based on facts stated in the text about Shakespeare that were not discovered or publicised until decades after the purported date of composition.[20] It is not known whether the forgery was introduced to Durning-Lawrence's archive during his life or after his death; however he never refers to it in his own writings.
Notes
- ^ ch 3, Rowe, Mortimer, B.A., D.D. The History of Essex Hall. London: Lindsey Press, 1959.
- ^ "No. 26937". The London Gazette. 11 February 1898. p. 871.
- ^ "No. 26946". The London Gazette. 11 March 1898. p. 1504.
- ^ ISBN 0806305215
- ^ .
- ^ Durning-Lawrence, E., Bacon is Shakespeare, p. 82
- ^ Baconian theory. encyclopedia.com
- ^ K. K. Ruthven, Faking Literature, Cambridge University Press, 2001, p.102
- ^ Samuel Schoenbaum, Shakespeare's Lives, Oxford University Press, 2nd ed.1991 p.421
- ^ Deborah J. Leslie and Benjamin Griffin (5 March 2003) Transcription of early letter forms in rare materials cataloging Archived 20 May 2011 at the Wayback Machine. Prepared for the DCRM Conference, 10–13 March 2003
- ^ Durning-Lawrence also claims that other engravings by Droeshout "may be similarly correctly characterised as cunningly composed, in order to reveal the true facts of the authorship of such works, unto those who were capable of grasping the hidden meaning of his engravings." Edwin Durning-Lawrence, Bacon Is Shake-Speare, John McBride Co., New York, 1910, pp. 23, 79–80.
- ^ Raymond Irwin and Ronald Staveley (eds), The Libraries of London, 2nd ed, London, 1964, p. 146.
- ^ "Durning-Lawrence Library". Senate House Library. Archived from the original on 22 October 2013.
- ^ University College, History of Art department Archived 21 November 2010 at the Wayback Machine. ucl.ac.uk
- ^ Nichol, A, "The First Baconian", Times Literary Supplement, 25 February 1932, p. 128. Reply by William Jaggard, 3 March, p. 155; response from Nicoll, 10 March, p. 17.
- ^ Alfred Harbage, Alfred. Conceptions of Shakespeare, Harvard University Press, 1966, p. 111
- ISBN 1564145247
- ^ Shapiro, James. "Forgery on Forgery," TLS (26 March 2010), pp. 14–15.
- ^ Niederkorn, William S. "Absolute Will", The Brooklyn Rail (April 2010); Baca, Nathan. "Wilmot Did Not; The 'First' Authorship Story Called Possible Baconian Hoax", Shakespeare Matters 2 Archived 11 April 2011 at the Wayback Machine (Summer 2003); Brenda James, W. D. Rubinstein, The Truth Will Out: Unmasking the Real Shakespeare, Pearson Education, 2005, p. 325.
- ISBN 1416541632.
References
- Rowe, Mortimer, B.A., D.D. The History of Essex Hall. London:Lindsey Press, 1959. Full text reproduced here [1].
- Williams, Raymond. Essex Church in Kensington 1887–1987: History of a Unitarian Cause. Full text reproduced here [2].
External links
- The Durning-Lawrence library at Senate House Library, University of London Archived 6 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine
- Hansard 1803–2005: contributions in Parliament by Edwin Durning-Lawrence
- Edwin Durning-Lawrence archives
- Works by Edwin Durning-Lawrence at Project Gutenberg
- Works by or about Edwin Durning-Lawrence at Internet Archive