File:OUTSOURCING HUMAN SECURITY- THE PROS AND CONS OF PRIVATE SECURITY COMPANIES IN PEACEKEEPING (IA outsourcinghuman1094532906).pdf

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This is a file from the Wikimedia Commons
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 1.67 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 394 pages)

Summary

OUTSOURCING HUMAN SECURITY: THE PROS AND CONS OF PRIVATE SECURITY COMPANIES IN PEACEKEEPING   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
Straub, Daniel G.
image of artwork listed in title parameter on this page
Title
OUTSOURCING HUMAN SECURITY: THE PROS AND CONS OF PRIVATE SECURITY COMPANIES IN PEACEKEEPING
Publisher
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
Description

The United Nations is an international organization that acts in world affairs with the proclaimed aim of ending the scourge of war and promoting world peace. The UN often uses peacekeeping to further this goal. This dissertation considers the potential for private security companies (PSCs) to make a contribution to peacekeeping missions. PSCs claim to offer a flexible capability that can be used to assist organizations and states toward improvements in human security. PSCs offer services ranging in scope from protecting diplomats to providing security for major corporations, NGOs, and the UN. They also claim that their services can be performed better, cheaper, and faster than states or organizations like the UN. For example, supporters of PSCs claim that they could have prevented atrocities such as occurred in Rwanda, Srebrenica, and Congo. Opponents of the increased use of PSCs raise a host of concerns, including cost, morality, legitimacy, loyalty, fraud, accountability, and political will. In an era when states often lack critical capabilities to protect the peace or prevent war, PSCs may offer a temporary solution to fill these gaps. What are the advantages and disadvantages to the use of PSCs for international peacekeeping The analysis in this dissertation focuses on the ability of PSCs to perform not just specific tasks, but on their ability to conduct of peacekeeping with legitimacy, accountability, and impartiality, while protecting human security. Since ending the scourge of war is the most important goal of the UN, then human security must be the guiding principle upon which all structures of integration, communication, and interrelationships in peacekeeping are based. Using the concept of human security as a guiding principle, this dissertation evaluates the pros and cons of the use of PSCs in peacekeeping and finds that PSCs should be used in peacekeeping operations as a hybridized force where their demonstrated strengths, generally speed and flexibility, are used to maximize effectiveness of instituting UN Security Council-mandated peacekeeping.


Subjects: Private Security Company Private Military Company Private Military and Security Company Military Service Provider Armed Security Company Armed Humanitarians Peacekeeper Peacekeeping Operations United Nations Peacekeeping Sierra Leone Bosnia Angola Responsibility to Protect R2P Pros and Cons Human Security Mercenary Mercenaries United Nations Protection of Civilians
Language English
Publication date March 2013
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink
Accession number
outsourcinghuman1094532906
Source
Internet Archive identifier: outsourcinghuman1094532906
https://archive.org/download/outsourcinghuman1094532906/outsourcinghuman1094532906.pdf
Permission
(Reusing this file)
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited

Licensing

Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Items portrayed in this file

depicts

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current16:10, 23 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 16:10, 23 July 20201,275 × 1,650, 394 pages (1.67 MB)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection outsourcinghuman1094532906 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #24302)
No pages on the English Wikipedia use this file (pages on other projects are not listed).

Metadata