File talk:NirvanaNevermindalbumcover.jpg

This file does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Alternative music: Nirvana This file is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles This file is within the scope of the Nirvana task force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive. Albums This file is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

I´m not a native englisch speaker. What is the meaning of "then-three-month-old" ? Thirteen months old? 84.172.116.208 10:54, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Three months old, at that time. 72.241.161.212 14:48, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I ul'ed a lower-resolution replacement and added the new template. I think this image purging thing blows, but this appears to be the only thing to do to keep images in articles. Tarc 13:39, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, the image needs a separate fair use rationale written for each article in which it is used - see

WP:NFCC#10c. Videmus Omnia 15:09, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

"The bureaucracy must expand to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy" indeed. Its unlikely that there'd be time to bang out a dozen rationales in 48 hrs, so I would hope that since rationale is provided for at least one article that the solution will not be image deletion. Tarc 19:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the assumption is that the current rationale is for Nevermind and I don't see deleting it from that article. But the fair use in most of the other articles is unjustified or marginal, though I'd be willing to see rationales for their use before removing the image from those articles. Videmus Omnia 19:27, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I added more. I took the liberty of combining a few rationales, as the rationale for why it should be in hard rock is literally no different from that in alternative rock. So, check it out. Tarc 05:04, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]