Function field (scheme theory)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The sheaf of rational functions KX of a

regular functions on U. Despite its name, KX does not always give a field
for a general scheme X.

Simple cases

In the simplest cases, the definition of KX is straightforward. If X is an (

fraction field of the ring of regular functions on U. Because X is affine, the ring of regular functions on U will be a localization of the global sections of X, and consequently KX will be the constant sheaf
whose value is the fraction field of the global sections of X.

If X is

integral but not affine, then any non-empty affine open set will be dense in X. This means there is not enough room for a regular function to do anything interesting outside of U, and consequently the behavior of the rational functions on U should determine the behavior of the rational functions on X. In fact, the fraction fields of the rings of regular functions on any affine open set will be the same, so we define, for any U, KX(U) to be the common fraction field of any ring of regular functions on any open affine subset of X. Alternatively, one can define the function field in this case to be the local ring of the generic point
.

General case

The trouble starts when X is no longer integral. Then it is possible to have

total quotient ring
, that is, to invert every element that is not a zero divisor. Unfortunately, in general, the total quotient ring does not produce a presheaf much less a sheaf. The well-known article of Kleiman, listed in the bibliography, gives such an example.

The correct solution is to proceed as follows:

For each open set U, let SU be the set of all elements in Γ(U, OX) that are not zero divisors in any stalk OX,x. Let KXpre be the presheaf whose sections on U are
localizations
SU−1Γ(U, OX) and whose restriction maps are induced from the restriction maps of OX by the universal property of localization. Then KX is the sheaf associated to the presheaf KXpre.

Further issues

Once KX is defined, it is possible to study properties of X which depend only on KX. This is the subject of birational geometry.

If X is an

transcendence degree
of this field extension. All finite transcendence degree field extensions of k correspond to the rational function field of some variety.

In the particular case of an algebraic curve C, that is, dimension 1, it follows that any two non-constant functions F and G on C satisfy a polynomial equation P(F,G) = 0.

Bibliography