Gajabahu synchronism

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Gajabahu synchronism is the chronological device used by historians to help date early

The Cult of the Goddess Pattini
(1984) as ahistorical and invalid.

The 'synchronism'

From a mention in the

Senguttuvan. The genuineness of Gajabahu synchronism as an instrument to date early Tamil literature is accepted by most scholars today.[2][3]

Dating of Senguttuvan

See also:
List of rulers of Sri Lanka

In the

Silappatikaram
, there is reference to a certain Kayavaku, the king of Sri Lanka. He is said to have attended the coronation of the Chera king Senguttuvan.

The 30th Canto, 160, in translation, reads -

The monarch of the world circumambulated the shrine thrice and stood there proffering his respects. In front of him the Arya kings released from prison, kings removed from central jail, the Kongu ruler of Kudagu, the king of Malva and Kayavaku, the king of sea-girt Ceylon, prayed reverently to the deity thus...[2]

Kayavaku here, despite some disagreement has been conjectured to mean Gajabahu.

Gajabahu I
reigned between 113 - 134 CE, while Gajabahu II reigned in the 12th century CE.

Kanakasabhai's reasoning for not considering Gajabahu II as the king mentioned is as follows:

In the long list of kings of Sri Lanka preserved in Singhalese chronicles, the name Gajabahu occurs only twice. Gajabahu I lived in the early part of the second century A.D. and Gajabahu II in the twelfth century. If the latter was king referred to in the Cilappathikaram, Karikala Chola, the grandfather of the Gajabahu contemporary, Imaya Varamban should have lived in the eleventh or twelfth century A.D. But in many Tamil poems and inscriptions on copper plates recording the grants of Chola kings who lived in the tenth and the eleventh centuries, Karikala Chola I is described as one of the earliest and most remote ancestors of the Chola kings then reigning. It is evident therefore that the Gajabahu referred to in the Cilappathikaram could not be Gajabahu II, but must have been Gajabahu I, who was king of Ceylon from about A.D. 113 to A.D. 125.[5]

This, in turn, has been used to imply that the Chera king kuttuvan, who, according to the

Satavahana and Andhra dynasties as an additional proof for the synchronism.[7]

Scholar Tieken criticizes this synchronism as of

circular logic.[8]

References

  1. ISBN 81-206-0150-5
    .
  2. ^
    ISBN 90-04-03591-5
    . The opinion that the Gajabahu Synchronism is an expression of genuine historical tradition is accepted by most scholars today
  3. ^ Pillai, Vaiyapuri (1956). History of Tamil Language and Literature; Beginning to 1000 AD. Madras, India: New Century Book House. p. 22. We may be reasonably certain that chronological conclusion reached above is historically sound
  4. ^ P. T. S. Iyengar in his "History of the Tamils"(p335) advances the theory that Kayavaku ought to be read as Kaval
  5. ^ V. Kanakasabhai, pp 6 - 7.
  6. ^ V. Kanakasabhai, The Tamils Eighteen Hundred Years Ago, Asian Educational Services, pp 6 - 9.
  7. ^ V. Kanakasabhai, pp 7.
  8. ^ Tieken, Herman Joseph Hugo. 2001. Kavya in South India: old Tamil Cankam poetry. Groningen: Egbert Forsten.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gajabahu_synchronism&oldid=1124708711"