Glacial survival hypothesis

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

According to the northern cryptic glacial refugial hypothesis (or glacial survival hypothesis), during the

Norwegian lemmings) persisted in ice-free microrefugia north of the Alps in Europe.[1][2][3][4][5][6] The alternative hypothesis of no persistence and postglacial immigration of plants and animals from southern refugia in Europe (southern refugia paradigm)[7] is sometimes also called the tabula rasa hypothesis.[8]

Nunatak mountains on the east coast of Greenland in the Amassalik area. Seen from 15.000ft altitude. July 1996, by Michael Haferkamp

Over the past plants and animals have persisted through long periods of climate change including several glacial and interglacial periods. There is a long-standing debate on what happened to the species that were inhabiting high-latitude regions during the Pleistocene ice age. Two main scenarios are usually considered. The first scenario proposes a total extinction of species within glaciated areas with survival events in peripheral refugia in the south and successive massive postglacial migration into empty areas (tabula rasa hypothesis).[8] The second scenario proposes long-term in situ survival within glaciated regions (glacial survival hypothesis), either in isolated northern ice-free micro-refugia at the edge of the ice sheet, or on exposed mountains not covered with ice within the ice sheet (nunatak hypothesis).

For boreal and cold-tolerant species the glacial survival hypothesis is credible, though controversial,[9][10][11] and a growing body of Molecular biology data support it for both plant and animal species.[4][5][12][13] A number of recent studies indicate that several northern regions (above latitudes >45° N) supported low-density boreal and temperate tree populations during the late-glacial or Early Holocene [e.g. North America, Eurasia, Alps, Scandinavia].[4][14][15][16][17]

In recent years several studies have combined lines of evidence coming from three major disciplines to infer the existence of past refugia: fossil records, species distribution models and molecular/phylogeographic surveys.[18] In this way, it should be possible to better describe complex migration routes followed by species and populations in and out of refugia through time and space.

There has also been research to suggest that certain cold-tolerant tree species were able to survive the low temperatures thanks to the presence of a co-dependent beetle by the name of G. intermedia.[19]

See also

References

  1. ISSN 0277-3791
    .
  2. ISSN 0169-5347
    .
  3. S2CID 129510569
    .
  4. ^
    S2CID 4839282
    .
  5. ^
    PMID 11345325
    .
  6. S2CID 83710675
    .
  7. PMID 24091207
    .
  8. ^
    JSTOR 3647444
    .
  9. PMID 24091207
    .
  10. PMID 23139314
    .
  11. PMID 30019412
    .
  12. S2CID 25459159
    .
  13. S2CID 14564699
    .
  14. S2CID 54038544. Archived from the original
    (PDF) on 2018-07-23. Retrieved 2019-12-10.
  15. ^ McLachlan JS, Clark JS, Manos PS. 2005. Molecular indicators of tree migration capacity under rapid climate change. Ecology 86: 2088–2098.
  16. PMID 28805959
    .
  17. PMID 35288569
    .
  18. PMID 25039238
    .
  19. PMID 28592679
    .
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Glacial_survival_hypothesis&oldid=1193792765"