Harry Braverman

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Harry Braverman
BornDecember 9, 1920
Honesdale
, Pennsylvania

Harry Braverman (1920–1976)

Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century,[3] "a text that literally christened the emerging field of labor process studies" and which in turn "reinvigorated intellectual sensibilities and revived the study of the work process in fields such as history, sociology, economics, political science, and human geography."[4]
: 33 

Political struggle and development

Braverman was one of the many thousands of industrial workers who became radicalized by the events of the

Stalinist politics and distortions.[4]: 35–36  Braverman was not afraid of unpopular positions. He sought repeatedly to deepen socialist politics by dispensing with simplistic formulations of Marxian theory. "Marxism," Braverman cautioned, "is not a ready-made slot-machine dogma, but a broad theory of social development which requires application and re-interpretation in every period."[5]

Agitating during the Red Scare

After serving in the shipbuilding industry during

FBI. Undeterred by the witch-hunts, Braverman continued his political work but disguised his activities by writing under the pseudonym "Harry Frankel".[4]
: 36–37 

Socialist Unity

In the 1950s, Braverman was one of the leaders of the so-called "Cochranite tendency", a current led by

It was in these pages that Braverman first began to think more concretely about labor, the labor process, machinery and class consciousness—what would become the key themes of Labor and Monopoly Capital just over a decade later.

From metal worker to editor

During the early 1960s, Harry Braverman worked as an editor for

Paul Sweezy, and particularly their book Monopoly Capital
, had a significant influence on Braverman as he was developing his analysis of the labor process of twentieth-century capitalism.

Revolutionary theory as a "tool for combat"

Labor and Monopoly Capital

Braverman's criticism of the labor process of

Labour and Monopoly Capital,[3] Braverman extended Marx's writings on the impact of capitalist industrial growth on the labor process, paying specific attention to the growth of giant corporations and oligopolistic industries.[7] Marx saw that the emergence of machinery and the increasing workers' control over the labor process since workers' skills shifted into tending the machines. This was seen as strengthening the owners of capital since they controlled the knowledge and skills needed to operate the factory, run the machines, and employ the workforce. This argument was furthered by Braverman who contended that such a labor force was defined by a weakened position relative to capital. Work became transformed from being a utilization of skills and experience into a mindless, machine-based, and powerless activity. He summarized the tenets of scientific management developed by Frederick Taylor as 1. disassociation of the labor process from the skills of workers, 2. separation of conception from execution, 3. use of monopoly power over knowledge to control each step of the labor process and its mode of execution.[2] Braverman argued that Taylor's prescriptions for the workplace were "nothing less than the explicit verbalization of the capitalist mode of production".[3]
: 86 

References

  1. ^ Frank W. Elwell, "Harry Braverman and the Working Class".
  2. ^ .
  3. ^ .
  4. ^ .
  5. ^ Braverman, Harry. 1956. "Which Way to a New American Radicalism?" The American Socialist (April). Available at the Marxist Internet Archive.
  6. .
  7. ^ Foster, John Bellamy. "New Introduction." Braverman, Harry (1998) [1974]. Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press. .

External links

See also