Kappos v. Hyatt
Appearance
Kappos v. Hyatt | |
---|---|
![]() F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2010); certiorari granted, 131 S.Ct. 3064 (2011) | |
Holding | |
There are no limitations on a plaintiff's ability to introduce new evidence in a §145 proceeding other than those in the Federal Rules of Evidence and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Thomas, joined by unanimous |
Concurrence | Sotomayor, joined by Breyer |
Laws applied | |
35 U.S.C. § 145 |
Kappos v. Hyatt, 566 U.S. 431 (2012), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that there are no limitations on a plaintiff's ability to introduce new evidence in a §145 proceeding other than those in the Federal Rules of Evidence and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.[1] The petitioner in the case was David Kappos, who was then serving as Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
See also
References
- ^ Kappos v. Hyatt, No. 10-1219 (2012), Slip. Op. at 14
External links
- Text of Kappos v. Hyatt, 566 U.S. 431 (2012) is available from: CourtListener Google Scholar Justia Oyez (oral argument audio) Supreme Court (slip opinion) (archived)
- Coverage of the case on SCOTUSblog