Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc.
Kiowa Tribe v. Manufacturing Technologies | |
---|---|
Case history | |
Prior | Okla. Court of Civil Appeals, First Division (not reported) |
Holding | |
Reversed. Held that an Indian Nation were entitled to sovereign immunity from contract lawsuits, whether made on or off reservation, or involving governmental or commercial activities. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Kennedy, joined by Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Souter and Breyer |
Dissent | Stevens, joined by Thomas and Ginsburg |
Laws applied | |
Tribal Sovereignty, Tribal Immunity |
Kiowa Tribe v. Manufacturing Technologies, 523 U.S. 751 (1998), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that an Indian Nation were entitled to sovereign immunity from contract lawsuits, whether made on or off reservation, or involving governmental or commercial activities.[1]
Background
The
Opinion of the Court
Reversed. Justice Anthony Kennedy delivered the opinion of the court.[1]
Justice Kennedy noted that the contract stated that "Nothing in this Note subjects or limits the sovereign rights of the Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma." He then noted that unless Congress provides for the abrogation of tribal sovereignty or the tribe waives its immunity, a tribe is not subject to answering a suit in state courts. The tribe is immune, regardless of whether the matter involves governmental or commercial activities, and regardless of whether the activity occurs on or off of tribal property.[1]
Dissent
Justice
Subsequent developments
Subsequent cases have further defined the concept of tribal immunity.
References
External links
- Text of Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc., 523 U.S. 751 (1998) is available from: Cornell CourtListener Findlaw Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)