Language deprivation
Language deprivation is associated with the lack of linguistic stimuli that are necessary for the
Cases of language deprivation
Genie
The most well-documented case of a language-deprived child was that of
The first tests of language were taken three years after her discovery. She was given a variety of language test measures to test her sound skills, comprehension skills, and grammatical skills. She was able to discriminate between initial and final consonants. However, she lacked pitch and volume control, her speech was described as high pitched and breathy with sound distortions,
Kaspar Hauser
An alleged case of language deprivation was of Kaspar Hauser, who was said to have been kept in a dungeon in Germany until the age of 17 and claimed he'd only received contact from a hooded man not long before his release. Sources stated that he had a small amount of language; other sources state that upon discovery he spoke a garbled sentence. He was able to learn enough language to attempt to write an autobiography and to also become a legal clerk. However, five years after his discovery he died of a stab wound.[5]
Anna
Isabelle
Another case of a child deprived at a young age is that of Isabelle. Confined to a room with a
Feral children
Feral children are children discovered by society to be living in the wild with the assumption that they were raised by animals. It is stated that such children are deprived of human associations and are too strongly conditioned with animal behaviours, such that the human development is permanently inhibited and the animal inhibitions are never lost throughout life. There are several known cases of feral children relearning language, the most well-known of which is Victor.[9] Victor was found at the age of 13 and was given to Dr. Itard, who "experimented" on the child. Victor was also known as the "wild boy of Aveyron". He was characterized to be insensitive to temperature, uncivilized and to run on all fours. Dr. Jean Marc Gaspard Itard conducted training over a period of 5 years, during which time Victor was able to recover some speech.[10]
Deaf children
Deaf children who do not have access to fluent language models could be at risk of permanent, irreversible effects to their brains. These effects include not only a detrimental impact on language acquisition, but other cognitive and mental health difficulties as well.[11][12] Hearing parents of deaf infants typically work with audiologists and other medical professionals who offer medical interventions for their child's hearing loss, including hearing aids and cochlear implants. They may be advised to use sign language as a last resort when the child has failed to learn spoken language.[13] While most deaf infants who receive cochlear implants and auditory therapy early in life will achieve spoken language skills on par with their hearing peers, this effect is not universal; without appropriate supports, or in children with complicating medical conditions, those with cochlear implants exposed only to spoken language can still show a lack of spoken language ability when compared to hearing peers.[14]
The effects of language deprivation in deaf children, like hearing children, can include permanently affecting their ability to ever achieve proficiency in a language. Deaf children who do not learn language until later in life are more likely to process signed languages not as linguistic input, but as visual input, contrasting with children exposed from birth, who process signed language in the same region of the brain in which hearing people process spoken language.[11] Additionally, studies show a notable decrease in sign language grammar skills of deaf adults who were not exposed to sign until after age 5 when compared to those exposed from birth, and an even greater decrease in those who were not exposed until after age 8, in some cases being so poor as to have near-coincidence levels of accuracy.[15]
There is conflicting evidence as to whether sign language exposure interferes with the development of spoken language. While some analysis has suggested that early sign language exposure may not hinder later spoken language development,[16] other clinical research on children who use cochlear implants has found that those without exposure to sign language were almost twice as likely to achieve age-appropriate spoken language compared with children who were exposed to visual communication for 3 or more years.[14] In either case, however, exposure to fluent language models was effective in mitigating risk for language deprivation.
Research
The "critical period of learning" hypothesis states that a person must be exposed to language within a certain time period to acquire language effectively. The certain time period ranges from early childhood to end of puberty.[17] Evidence has shown that learning language during critical period will provide native-like abilities in morphology, phonology, and syntax.[17] Late learners that miss the critical period can still obtain basic syntactic abilities along with good use of vocabulary, but they will not achieve native-like abilities when it comes to grammar.[17]
Besides critical period, another period of learning is called sensitive period. Sensitive period is described as any specific time period where learning is still possible even after critical period of learning.[18] It has several sensitive periods. Evidence has demonstrated that it can affect language development including morphology, phonology, and syntax.[17] However, as long as the language is learned at an earlier age, the language acquisition will not be affected.[18]
See also
- Language deprivation experiments
- Language deprivation in deaf and hard of hearing children
References
- ^ Cummins, Jim. "The Relationship between American Sign Language and English". Research Gate. Retrieved 12 February 2018.
- ^ Shattuck, Roger (1994) [1980]. The Forbidden Experiment: The Story of the Wild Boy of Aveyron. Kodansha International.
- ^ Tartter, V. C. (1998). Language Processing in Atypical Populations. California: SAGE publications. pp. 113–121
- ^ Pines, M. (1981). The Civilizing of Genie. Psychology Today, 15(9), 28. Accessed 3/11/2012
- ^ Tartter, V. C. (1998). Language Processing in Atypical Populations. California: SAGE publications. pp. 111–112
- ^ Davis, K. (1940) The Extreme Isolation of a Child. American Journal of Sociology, 45(4), 554–565. Accessed 3/9/2012.
- ISBN 0761914684.
- ^ Tartter, V. C. (1998). Language Processing in Atypical Populations. California: SAGE publications. p. 113.
- ^ Dennis, W. (1941) The Significance of a Feral Man. The American Journal of Psychology, 54(3), 425–432.
- ^ Tartter, V. C. (1998). Language Processing in Atypical Populations. California: SAGE publications. p.104-111
- ^ PMID 28185206.
- )
- PMID 22472091.
- ^ PMID 28759398.
- ISSN 1469-1817.
- PMID 25368567.
- ^
- ^