Los Angeles School
The Los Angeles School of Urbanism is an academic movement which emerged during the mid-1980s, loosely based at
History
The first published identification of the Los Angeles (L.A.) School as such was by
Members
There is no official list of present or historic members of the Los Angeles School of Urbanism. Some thinkers who are commonly considered members include:
- Michael Dear
- Mike Davis
- Steven Flusty
- Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris
- Allen J Scott
- Edward W. Soja
- Michael Storper
- Jennifer Wolch
Ideas
The L.A. School has no official doctrine, and there is great diversity in the works of its various members. Nevertheless, there are several influences, themes, and concepts which are relatively consistent in the school's scholarship. Perhaps the central characteristic of the thought of the L.A. School is a sustained focus on Los Angeles in both empirical and theoretical work, often with the underlying claim that L.A. is the paradigmatic American metropolis of the 20th and 21st centuries. A further stream of work emerging from the LA School is represented by Scott and Storper's many publications on flexible specialization, agglomeration, and the economic dynamics of the contemporary metropolis. Scott and Storper's work differs from that of Dear and Soja by approaching urban theory from the perspective of
Criticism
A number of criticisms have been raised against the Los Angeles School. In particular, critics question the L.A. School's fundamental claim that Los Angeles should be considered the paradigmatic postmodern American city. This stems both from external comparisons which have been made between Los Angeles and other cities,[14][15] and findings that in certain cases urban phenomena in Los Angeles do not match those of other American cities.[16]
In a 2023 response to critiques of the LA School as "postmodern,"
See also
References
- ISBN 9780415252256.
- ISBN 978-1-84467-568-5.
- ^ Dear, Michael J (2002). "The Resistible Rise of the L.A. School" pp3-16 in Dear, Michael J. (ed.)From Chicago to L.A.: Making Sense of Urban Theory. Sage Publications.
- ^ Dear, Michael J. and Flusty, Steven (2000). “Postmodern Urbanism.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 90(1): 50-72
- ISBN 978-0-8166-6668-3.
- ^ Dear, Michael J. (ed.); 2002; From Chicago to L.A.: Making Sense of Urban Theory; Sage Publications
- ^ Halle, David; Beveridge, Andrew (December 2008). "Changing Cities and Directions: New York and Los Angeles". On-Line Working Paper Series. California Center for Population Research.
- .
- .
- ^ Dear, Michael J and Dahmann, Nicolas (2008). “Urban Politics and the Los Angeles School of Urbanism.” Urban Affairs Review. 44(2): 266-279
- ^ Davis, Mike (1985). “Urban Renaissance and the Spirit of Postmodernism” New Left Review. I/151
- ISBN 0-86091-936-6.
- ISBN 0-631-20988-3.
- ^ Nijman, Jan (2000). The Paradigmatic City. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90(1): 135-145.
- ^ Bacon, Nicholas A (2010).“Lost in Dialectic: A Critical Introduction to Urban Space in Greater Hartford, 1633-2010.” Undergraduate Honors Thesis, Trinity College, CT. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-05-28. Retrieved 2011-03-28.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) pp.32-55. - ISBN 978-0-8014-7303-6.
- .
External links
- LA School of Urbanism at University of Southern California