Mandate (politics)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

As an example, though US President Donald Trump repeatedly promoted his 2024 victory as a mandate—to inflate the actual degree of voter support—he failed to receive 50% of the popular vote.[1] His 1.5 percentage point margin of victory in 2024 (shown in chart) place it in only the 20th percentile of presidential elections since 1828.[2]

In

median voter may be used to determine what policies have a mandate for implementation. The modern concept of a political mandate first developed around the 16th century and became a prominent aspect of politics after the French Revolution
.

Development and function

A mandate is a

monarchies, may also claim to have a popular mandate to rule.[8]

Mandates develop from the interpretation of elections.

median voter on a left–right political spectrum.[11] This presents its own challenges when applied, as policy preferences are often more complex and have multiple dimensions.[12]

Modern democracies do not consistently provide a majority mandate, as several competing parties offer different policies, requiring coalition governments to make compromises between their members. In the United States, the two-party system always results in one party having a majority in government that can be interpreted as a mandate.[13] In the event of a coalition government, there is no single party with a popular mandate, as every party was supported by less than half of voters.[14] Some political systems, such as that of the United Kingdom, frequently give a majority of legislative seats to a party that received only a plurality of the vote. In this case, the majority only carries a mandate if it is representative of the median voter.[15] Policy does not necessary correspond to the platform of the dominant party, as it may still have to negotiate with other parties or otherwise have limits on its power to implement certain policies.[16] Proportional representation allows for more nuanced voter preferences, but it also allows for a party with only plurality support to receive a majority of seats.[16] In any coalition-based system, voters are unable to know what coalitions may form after an election, further distancing voter preferences from electoral results.[17]

The existence of political mandate as a concept is challenged by supporters of deliberative democracy, who believe that parties are elected as representatives to negotiate and compromise between different policy proposals.[13] Direct democracy bypasses the issue of mandates entirely as it allows voters to choose policies directly.[18]

History

constituencies.[23]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Bump, Philip (18 November 2025). "Trump's 2024 'mandate' isn't as robust as Biden's was in 2020". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 18 November 2024.
  2. ^ Woolley, John T. and Peters, Gerhard, Eds. "Presidential Election Margin of Victory". The American Presidency Project (University of California). 6 November 2024. Archived from the original on 29 March 2025.
  3. ^ a b Grossback, Peterson & Stimson 2006, p. 32.
  4. ^ McDonald & Budge 2005, p. 3.
  5. ^ Grossback, Peterson & Stimson 2006, pp. 27–28.
  6. ^ Bendix 1978, p. 415.
  7. ^ a b c Grossback, Peterson & Stimson 2006, p. 28.
  8. ^ Bendix 1978, p. 4.
  9. ^ Grossback, Peterson & Stimson 2006, p. 27.
  10. ^ Grossback, Peterson & Stimson 2006, pp. 28–29.
  11. ^ McDonald & Budge 2005, pp. 4–5, 10.
  12. ^ McDonald & Budge 2005, p. 11.
  13. ^ a b McDonald & Budge 2005, p. 4.
  14. ^ McDonald & Budge 2005, p. 5.
  15. ^ McDonald & Budge 2005, p. 7.
  16. ^ a b McDonald & Budge 2005, p. 9.
  17. ^ McDonald & Budge 2005, p. 10.
  18. ^ McDonald & Budge 2005, pp. 8–9.
  19. ^ a b Bendix 1978, p. 8.
  20. ^ Bendix 1978, pp. 5–7.
  21. ^ Bendix 1978, p. 9.
  22. ^ Bendix 1978, p. 7.
  23. ^ Bendix 1978, p. 249.

References

Further reading