Marland report
The Marland report, officially Education of the Gifted and Talented: Report to Congress, is a 1972 report to the
Office of Education.(pp. xi-xii)
The deleterious effects of failing to provide GT services is corroborated by recent research:
National efforts to increase the availability of a variety of appropriate instructional and out-of-school provisions must be a high priority since research indicates that many of the emotional or social difficulties gifted students experience disappear when their educational climates are adapted to their level and pace of learning." [emphasis added][1]
The other summary conclusions in the Marland Report are as follows:
- The U.S. had between 1.5 and 2.5 million gifted and talented (GT) students, and only a small fraction received appropriate educational services.
- Federal, state, and local authorities considered differentiated education for these students to be a low priority.
- The existing legislation in 21 states was largely ineffective.
- Funding, various crises, and personnel shortages undermined GT services.
- Identification of GT students was hampered not only by testing costs, but by both apathy and hostility among teachers, administrators, guidance counselors and psychologists.
- Services for GT students inherently serve disadvantaged populations (with the implication that GT incidence is universal).
- Effective, measurable means of serving GT students were in existence.
- State and local education agencies looked to the Federal government for leadership.
- The Federal role in the delivery of GT services was virtually non-existent.
Regarding the final point, after nearly five decades, the Federal government's stance is unchanged, allocating 0.02% of its
Further reading
- Marland, S. P., Jr. (1972). Education of the Gifted and Talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education and Background Papers Submitted to the U.S. Office of Education, 2 vols. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. (Government Documents Y4.L 11/2: G36)
- Callahan, Carolyn M.; Hertberg-Davis, Holly L., eds. (21 August 2012). Fundamentals of Gifted Education: Considering Multiple Perspectives. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-88151-7.
- Horowitz, Frances Degen; ISBN 978-1-4338-0414-4.
References
- ^ The Social and Emotional Development of Gifted Children: What Do We Know?, Edited by Maureen Neihart, Sally M. Reis, Nancy M. Robinson, and Sidney M. Moon; National Association of Gifted Children (Prufrock Press, Inc.), 2002, p. 286.
- ^ National Association for Gifted Children. (n.d.). Jacob Javits Gifted & Talented Students Education Act. Retrieved from https://www.nagc.org/resources-publications/resources-university-professionals/jacob-javits-gifted-talented-students
- ^ U.S. Department of Education (2021). Fiscal year 2021 budget summary. https://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/budget/budget21/summary/21summary.pdf
- ^ http://www.valdosta.edu/colleges/education/pcft/document%20/marland-report.pdf[bare URL PDF]