Maurice Morgann

Edit links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Maurice Morgann (1725-1802) was a colonial administrator and

Shakespearean
literary scholar. He is best known for An Essay on the Dramatic Character of Sir John Falstaff.

Colonial administrator

Morgann was born in

Pitt's militia bill and reflected Tory opposition to a standing army and increased taxation.[1]

From 1762, Morgann served as personal secretary and political adviser to the

Privy Council to Canada and visited Quebec in 1768.[2]

Morgann argued for the toleration of Catholicism in the Canadian province and thus contributed to the formulation of the Quebec Act of 1774. He was also opposed to the slave trade, believing it would bring "terror and destruction" in America. These views were expressed in his Plan for the Abolition of Slavery in the West Indies (1772).[3]

In 1782 Morgann embarked to New York with the aim of reuniting the colonies and Great Britain. Congress refused to receive him and it is possible that Morgann's report of the situation in America convinced Shelburne, now Prime Minister, to conclude the treaty with the American Commissioners in Paris which recognized the independence of the former colonies.[4]

Morgann returned to England in 1783 and he retired from active duty under Shelburne in 1786. In 1795 he published his Considerations on the Present Internal and External Condition of France. This work called for an alliance between the United States and Britain to meet the threat of French radicalism which Morgann considered to be a dangerous form of anarchy. His analysis met with the approval of Richard Brinsley Sheridan.[5]

He died unmarried in March 1802.

Literary critic

An Essay on the Dramatic Character of Sir John Falstaff was published in 1777. It belonged to a genre of criticism, well-established at the time, that defended a Shakespeare character against charges of immorality.

Gads Hill, for example, Falstaff does not flee "until he had been deserted by his companions, and had even afterwards exchanged blows with his assailants".[7]

Morgann summarises the complexity of Falstaff: "he is a character made up by Shakespeare wholly of incongruities; - a man at once young and old, enterprising and fat, a dupe and a wit, harmless and wicked, weak in principle and resolute by constitution, cowardly in appearance and brave in reality; a knave without malice, a lyar without deceit; and a knight, a gentleman and a soldier, without either dignity, decency or honour".[8]

According to

Henry IV, Part I and it inspired the literary approaches of Edward Dowden and A. C. Bradley in particular.[10] Edward Elgar's interpretation of the character for his symphonic poem, Falstaff (1913), also owed much to Morgann's character study.[11]

Notes

  1. ^ a b c d e Cornish 2004.
  2. ^ Fineman 1972, p. 6.
  3. ^ Fineman 1972, p. 7.
  4. ^ Fineman 1972, p. 8.
  5. ^ Fineman 1972, p. 10.
  6. ^ Vickers 1982, p. 18.
  7. ^ Fineman 1972, p. 193.
  8. ^ Fineman 1972, p. 200.
  9. ^ Fineman 1972, p. 12.
  10. ^ Fineman 1972, p. 26.
  11. ^ Elgar 1913, pp. 575–576.

Bibliography

  • Cornish, Rory T. (2004). "Morgann, Maurice (1725–1802)".
    doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/19246. (Subscription or UK public library membership
    required.)
  • JSTOR 908045
    .
  • Fineman, Daniel A., ed. (1972). Maurice Morgann: Shakespearean Criticism. Oxford:
    ISBN 0-19-812015-X
    .
  • Vickers, Brian (1982). "The Emergence of Character Criticism, 1774–1800". In
    Cambridge Core
    .

External links
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maurice_Morgann&oldid=1116581174"