Mother and Child Scheme
This article needs additional citations for verification. (January 2013) |
The Mother and Child Scheme was a
The scheme was referred to as the Mother and Child Service in legislation. A brochure, "What the new service means to every family", was prepared. It explained the new service but was not issued to the public. The scheme was engulfed in crisis before this could happen.
Background
Since the establishment of the Irish Free State in 1922 responsibility in the government for healthcare had lain with the Minister for Local Government and Public Health. No significant reform of healthcare occurred in this time and the Catholic Church still retained effective control through the ownership of hospitals and schools, while family doctors still largely practised in isolation of other medical professionals.
The
Regarding healthcare, international trends such as in the
The scheme
In 1948 Dr. Noël Browne, a new T.D. for Clann na Poblachta, and a socialist, became Minister for Health in a coalition government. Browne was an admirer of Fianna Fáil's 1947 Health Act[4] and intended to implement its provisions as part of a plan to reduce the alarmingly high rate of child mortality (especially from tuberculosis) in Ireland,[5][6][7] modernise the Irish healthcare system and make it free and without means-testing for mothers and their children up to the age of 16.[4] He was impressed with the National Health Service in the United Kingdom[8] and successful medical procedural reforms in Denmark which reduced child mortality.[9] He tackled the domestic health issues and was acclaimed for the results.[10]
In July 1950, Browne's department formally submitted the scheme to the
More important was the opposition of the
Several bishops, McQuaid included, feared that the scheme could pave the way for abortion and birth control. Though some clergy might have been privately sympathetic to Browne and wished to reach an accommodation, what was viewed as Browne's tactless handling of the Catholic Church forced the moderates into silence, allowing the anti-Mother and Child Scheme members of the hierarchy under McQuaid to set the agenda.[16]
Many in the Anglican Church of Ireland community also disagreed with the scheme. The Church of Ireland Gazette saw it as 'communist' interference in the family.[citation needed]
Numerous doctors disapproved of the scheme, some on principle, others because they feared a loss of income and a fear of becoming a kind of
In April 1951, MacBride demanded Browne's resignation as a minister. Browne duly submitted his resignation to the Taoiseach John A. Costello for submission to President O'Kelly.[19] The resignation took effect from 11 April 1951. In his resignation statement, Browne told the House:
I had been led to believe that my insistence on the exclusion of a means test had the full support of my colleagues in the Government. I now know that it had not. Furthermore, the Hierarchy has informed the Government that they must regard the mother and child scheme proposed by me as opposed to Catholic social teaching. This decision I, as a Catholic, immediately accepted without hesitation.[20]
During the subsequent Dáil debate on the resignation, Tánaiste and Labour Party leader William Norton claimed:
...if this matter had been handled with tact, with understanding and with forbearance by the Minister responsible, I believe we would not have had the situation which has been brought about to-day.[21]
Browne explained his approach to the Dáil by saying:
I might say that my question to their Lordships was: Is this contrary to Catholic moral teaching? The reply, as you all know, was that it is contrary to Catholic social teaching. I was not aware — the Taoiseach can verify this — until I had asked each member of the Cabinet separately what he proposed to do, what he had been given to understand by Dr. McQuaid when that decision was taken. He then told us that that morning he had been informed by Dr. McQuaid that Catholic social teaching and Catholic moral teaching were one and the same thing.[22]
Aftermath
The following month a general election was called and in June 1951 a new government was formed as a result.
A derivative of the scheme was implemented subsequently by the
References
Citations
- ^ Ministers and Secretaries (Amendment) Act, 1946 Archived 30 November 2005 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Health Act, 1947 Archived 28 November 2005 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Kelly; Hogan; Whyte (2003). The Irish Constitution (4th ed.). LexisNexis Butterworth. §4.5.110.
- ^ a b c (Browne 1986, p. 149)
- ^ Kelly, S. (2011). "Stigma and silence: oral histories of tuberculosis" (PDF). Retrieved 2 January 2015.
- ^ Condon, D. (2008). "Pre-immunisation — Ireland in the bad old days". Irish Health. Retrieved 2 January 2015.
- ^ Hunter, N (2013). "Record low TB rate in Ireland". Irish Health. Retrieved 2 January 2015.
- ^ a b c (Browne 1986, p. 157)
- ^ (Browne 1986, p. 111)
- ^ a b O'Brien, M.; O'Brien, C.C. (1977). A Concise History of Ireland. London: Thames & Hudson. p. 161.
- ^ (Browne 1986, p. 156)
- ^ [letter quoted from] O'Dowd, M. (ed.) (2002) The Field Day Anthology of Irish Writing Volume V: Irish Women's writing and traditions. New York: New York University Press, p170
- ^ (Browne 1986, p. 158)
- ^ A medical stalwart now happy in exile. Irish Health [online] http://www.irishhealth.com/clin/sexual_health/features2.html?artid=18437. [accessed 2 January 2015]
- ^ (Browne 1986, p. 142)
- ^ According to James Dillon, Browne's cabinet colleague, he (Dillon) had a quiet word with the moderate Archbishop of Tuam, Dr Walsh, in an attempt to defuse the row. Walsh agreed to try to calm down the controversy and secretly meet Browne. When Dillon told Browne of this development, Browne went down to Walsh's residence without first arranging an appointment. Walsh was away on Church business. In what Dillon saw as a disastrous error, Browne travelled to meet the neighbouring bishop, Dr. Dignan, a "lunatic" in Dillon's view and one of Browne's most trenchant critics. They had an argument that inflamed the situation. In revealing that he had originally gone down to see Walsh, Browne compromised the position of the potential go-between, who was forced to accede to the demands of his more hardline colleagues.
- ^ Gabriel Kelly et al. (eds), Irish Social Policy in Context (UCD Press, 1999) p. 29.
- ^ Maurice Manning, James Dillon: A Biography (Wolfhound Press, 2000) p. 228.
- ^ Dáil Debates: 11 April 1951 Vol. 125 Col. 641.
- ^ Dáil Debates: 12 April 1951 Vol 125 Col 667.
- ^ Dáil Debates: 17 April 1951 Vol 125 Col 954.
- ^ Dáil Debates: 17 April 1951 Vol 125 Col 947–948.
- ^ Health Act, 1954
- ^ Health Act, 1970
- ^ Corbett, Teresa (27 January 2015). "A brief history of healthcare in Ireland". NUIG Health Psychology Blog. Retrieved 17 July 2021.
- Independent.ie. The Argus. 1973. Retrieved 17 July 2021.
Sources
- Browne, Noel (1986). Against The Tide. Dublin: Gill & McMillan.
- Counihan, H. E. (2002). "The Medical Association and the Mother and Child Scheme". Irish Journal of Medical Science. 171 (2): 110–115. ISSN 0021-1265.
- Department of Health (July 1952). Proposals for improved and extended health services July, 1952 (PDF). Official publications. Vol. Pr.1333. Dublin: Stationery Office. Retrieved 13 November 2016.
- McKee, Eamonn (November 1986). "Church-State Relations and the Development of Irish Health Policy: The Mother-and-Child Scheme, 1944-53". Irish Historical Studies. 25 (98): 159–194. JSTOR 30008527.
External links
- Mother and Child Scheme Controversy History Hub, University College Dublin
- 1950s - Mother and Child Scheme Oireachtas Library & Research Service