On Breath

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

On Breath (

Corpus Aristotelicum but usually regarded as spurious. Its opening sentence raises the question: "What is the mode of growth, and the mode of maintenance, of the natural (or 'connate': emphutos) vital spirit (pneuma
)?"

Authorship

Among the ancient catalogues of

In 2008, however, Bos and Ferwerda published a commentary in which they maintain that On Breath is a genuine work of Aristotle whose doctrines respond to those of Plato's Timaeus and constitute an important part of Aristotle's philosophy of nature. They list a number of positions that On Breath defends such as that fish don't breathe because there is no air in water that Aristotle is known to have held.[3] They also consider the position on the soul to be that of Aristotle.[4]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Roselli, p. 13
  2. ^ Roselli, pp. 17ff. with nn. 17–20
  3. ^ Aristotle, on the life bearing Spirit (De Spiritu) p18-19
  4. ^ Aristotle, on the life bearing Spirit (De Spiritu) p18-19

References

Commentaries
  • Daniel Furlanus, Theophrasti Eresii, Peripateticorum post Aristotelem principis pleraque... (Greek text with Latin translation and commentary), Hanover, 1605 (available online).
  • Amneris Roselli, [Aristotele]: De spiritu (Greek text with Italian translation and commentary), Pisa: ETS Editrice, 1992.
  • Abraham P. Bos and Rein Ferwerda, Aristotle, On the Life-Bearing Spirit (De Spiritu): A Discussion with Plato and his Predecessors on Pneuma as the Instrumental Body of the Soul (with English translation and commentary), Leiden: Brill, 2008.

External links