Preventing Persons from Concealing Their Identity during Riots and Unlawful Assemblies Act
Bill C-309 | |
---|---|
House of Commons of Canada | |
Long title
| |
Citation | Bill C-309 |
Enacted by | |
First reading | October 3, 2011[1] |
Second reading | February 15, 2012[1] |
Third reading | November 31, 2012[1] |
Second chamber: Senate of Canada | |
Bill title | Bill C-309 |
First reading | November 31, 2012 |
Second reading | February 6, 2013 |
Third reading | May 23, 2013 |
Conference committee bill passed by House of Commons of Canada | May 14, 2012[1] |
Conference committee bill passed by Senate of Canada | April 25, 2013 |
Status: In force |
The Preventing Persons from Concealing Their Identity during Riots and Unlawful Assemblies Act (
The proposal was introduced in the context of the 2012 Quebec student protests, and the riots following the 2011 Stanley Cup championship in Vancouver.[2] However, in both circumstances a vast majority present were not wearing masks.
On June 19, 2013, Bill C-309 became law, banning the wearing of masks during a riot or unlawful assembly, carrying a maximum ten-year prison sentence with a conviction of the offence.[3] The Liberal and Conservative parties voted unanimously in favour of the legislation. The Bloc Quebecois, Green Party and NDP cast 96 votes against the bill.[4]
History and content of the bill
At the time of introduction, there was an existing law in Canada entitled "disguise with intent" which already criminalised the wearing of a disguise during a criminal action with a jail sentence of up to 10 years; but supporters of the bill said it had a "higher burden of proof" that the wearer intended to commit a crime. Richards stated that the new bill lowers the burden of proof necessary for a five-year jail sentence and that he is open to reducing the burden of proof necessary for a 10-year conviction as well.[4][5][6]
The pre-existing law only criminalised the offence for wearing a disguise if one was also either committing a crime or intending to commit a crime. Richards stated that his bill allows courts to convict Canadians wearing masks at unlawful assemblies or riots, who have been preemptively arrested without evidence of conspiracy or crime.[7]
The bill was meant to grant police the authority to arrest, and courts to convict, anyone who is wearing a mask after there is evidence of rioting, or after police declare a peaceful demonstration to be an "unlawful assembly".[8] Richards has said this will "change the stakes dramatically" in Canadian protests.[8]