Relativistic dynamics
For classical dynamics at relativistic speeds, see relativistic mechanics.
Relativistic dynamics refers to a combination of
Invariant Evolution Parameter Concept
Some researchers view the evolution parameter as a mathematical artifact while others view the parameter as a physically measurable quantity. To understand the role of an evolution parameter and the fundamental difference between the standard theory and evolution parameter theories, it is necessary to review the concept of time.
Time t played the role of a monotonically increasing evolution parameter in classical Newtonian mechanics, as in the force law F = dP/dt for a non-relativistic, classical object with momentum P. To Newton, time was an “arrow” that parameterized the direction of evolution of a system.
The development of non-relativistic quantum mechanics in the early twentieth century preserved the Newtonian concept of time in the Schrödinger equation. The ability of non-relativistic quantum mechanics and special relativity to successfully describe observations motivated efforts to extend quantum concepts to the relativistic domain. Physicists had to decide what role time should play in relativistic quantum theory. The role of time was a key difference between Einsteinian and Newtonian views of classical theory. Two hypotheses that were consistent with special relativity were possible:
Hypothesis I
Assume t = Einsteinian time and reject Newtonian time.
Hypothesis II
Introduce two temporal variables:
- A coordinate time in the sense of Einstein
- An invariant evolution parameter in the sense of Newton
Hypothesis I led to a relativistic probability conservation equation that is essentially a re-statement of the non-relativistic continuity equation. Time in the relativistic probability conservation equation is Einstein's time and is a consequence of implicitly adopting Hypothesis I. By adopting Hypothesis I, the standard paradigm has at its foundation a temporal paradox: motion relative to a single temporal variable must be reversible even though the second law of thermodynamics establishes an “arrow of time” for evolving systems, including relativistic systems. Thus, even though Einstein's time is reversible in the standard theory, the evolution of a system is not time reversal invariant. From the perspective of Hypothesis I, time must be both an irreversible arrow tied to entropy and a reversible coordinate in the Einsteinian sense.[13] The development of relativistic dynamics is motivated in part by the concern that Hypothesis I was too restrictive.
The problems associated with the standard formulation of relativistic quantum mechanics provide a clue to the validity of Hypothesis I. These problems included negative probabilities, hole theory, the Klein paradox, non-covariant expectation values, and so forth.[14][15][16] Most of these problems were never solved; they were avoided when quantum field theory (QFT) was adopted as the standard paradigm. The QFT perspective, particularly its formulation by Schwinger, is a subset of the more general Relativistic Dynamics.[17][18][19][20][21][22]
Relativistic Dynamics is based on Hypothesis II and employs two temporal variables: a coordinate time, and an evolution parameter. The evolution parameter, or parameterized time, may be viewed as a physically measurable quantity, and a procedure has been presented for designing evolution parameter clocks.[23][24] By recognizing the existence of a distinct parameterized time and a distinct coordinate time, the conflict between a universal direction of time and a time that may proceed as readily from future to past as from past to future is resolved. The distinction between parameterized time and coordinate time removes ambiguities in the properties associated with the two temporal concepts in Relativistic Dynamics.
See also
References
- ISSN 1099-4300.
- ^ Fock, V.A. (1937): Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 12, 404.
- ^ Stueckelberg, E.C.G. (1941): Helv. Phys. Acta 14, 322, 588.
- ^ Stueckelberg, E.C.G. (1942): Helv. Phys. Acta 14, 23.
- S2CID 120073749.
- ^ Fanchi, J.R. (2003): “The Relativistic Quantum Potential and Non-Locality,” published in Horizons in World Physics, 240, Edited by Albert Reimer, (Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, New York), pp 117-159.
- ISSN 0031-899X.
- ISSN 0031-899X.
- S2CID 121971249.
- ISSN 0034-6861.
- ^ Horwitz, L.P. and C. Piron (1973): Helv. Phys. Acta 46, 316.
- S2CID 120601267.
- ISSN 0378-4371.
- ^ Fanchi, J.R. (1993): Parametrized Relativistic Quantum Theory (Kluwer, Dordrecht)
- ^ Weinberg, S. (1995): Quantum Theory of Fields, Volume I (Cambridge University Press, New York).
- S2CID 121653916.
- ISSN 0556-2821.
- ^ Fanchi, J.R. (1993): Parametrized Relativistic Quantum Theory (Kluwer, Dordrecht)
- S2CID 119436518.
- S2CID 122902647.
- S2CID 117429211.
- ^ Pavsič, M. (2001): The Landscape of Theoretical Physics: A Global View (Kluwer, Dordrecht).
- PMID 9897446.
- ^ Fanchi, J.R. (1993): Parametrized Relativistic Quantum Theory (Kluwer, Dordrecht)