Richard Weikart

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Richard Weikart
BornJuly 1958 (age 65)
OccupationProfessor of History at California State University, Stanislaus
Known forHistorian of modern Germany, Advocate of intelligent design
SpouseLisa Weikart
ChildrenJoy, John, Joseph, Miriam, Christine, Hannah, and Sarah
Websitecsustan.edu/History/Faculty/Weikart/

Richard Weikart (born July 1958) is a professor of history at California State University, Stanislaus,[1] advocate of intelligent design and senior fellow for the Center for Science and Culture of the Discovery Institute.[2] In 1997 he joined the editorial board of the Access Research Network's Origins & Design Journal.[3] Weikart's work focuses on claims about the impact of evolution on social thought, ethics and morality.

Weikart received a bachelor's degree in 1980 from Texas Christian University, a master's from Texas Christian University in 1989, and a doctorate in history from University of Iowa in 1994.[4] He is married to Lisa Weikart with seven children.

Biography

As a Christian in the 1970s, Weikart began studying intellectual history on the belief "that much modern thought had debased humanity."[5] Weikart wrote in The Human Life Review, published by an anti-abortion organization, that "Darwinism has indeed devalued human life, leading to ideologies that promote the destruction of human lives deemed inferior to others . . . Darwinism really is a matter of life and death."[6] In an article published by Books and Culture: A Christian Review, he wrote "we need to counter our hedonistic, materialistic, and self-centered culture with true Christian compassion, self sacrifice, and self denial."[7] Weikart is also a supporter of intelligent design.[8]

Weikart is the author of four books, the first being The Myth of Dietrich Bonhoeffer: Is His Theology Evangelical? about the relationship of the

Frederick Engels, August Bebel, Karl Kautsky and Eduard Bernstein "biologized" social theory for a "scientifically grounded socialist theory."[10] Historian Daniel Gasman reviewed the book saying it should be read with "caution," and "Weikart's book inaugurates research into an important area of intellectual history, but the theoretical framework offered does not keep pace with the demanding complexity of the subject."[11]

His third book,

"intentionalist" argument invites skepticism in some respects, especially in its attempt to explain World War II and the Holocaust."[18] Additionally, Larry Arnhart, a professor of Political Science at Northern Illinois University wrote, "As Weikart indicates, Hitler was a crude genetic determinist who believed that not only physical traits but even morality and culture were inherited genetically along racial lines, so that moral and cultural evolution depended on genetic evolution. But Weikart doesn't indicate to his readers that Darwin denied this."[19] Weikart has responded to this review.[20]

In 2016, Weikart published two books with Regnery Publishing, a conservative publishing house: The Death of Humanity: and the Case for Life (which was also translated in Dutch in 2019) and Hitler's Religion: The Twisted Beliefs that Drove the Third Reich. Weikart's The Death of Humanity: and the Case for Life "charts how influential atheist thinkers have approached ethical questions" with "many brief summaries of the thought processes of influential authors, scientists, philosophers, and lawyers who have rejected Judeo-Christian ethics".[citation needed] In Hitler's Religion, "Weikart offers no new scholarship: his strength is in his ability to organize existing, mostly primary-source, documentation into a readable and convincing whole" to show that Hitler was a pantheist.[21]

From Darwin to Hitler

Weikart is best known for his 2004 book From Darwin to Hitler: Evolutionary Ethics, Eugenics and Racism in Germany.[22][23] The Discovery Institute, the hub of the intelligent design movement, funded the book's research.[24] The academic community has been widely critical of the book.[25][12] Regarding the thesis of Weikart's book, University of Chicago historian and Darwin scholar Robert Richards wrote that Hitler was not a Darwinian and criticized Weikart for trying to undermine evolution.[26] Richards said that there was no evidence that Hitler read Darwin, and that some influencers of Nazism such as Houston Stewart Chamberlain were opposed to evolution.[26] Weikart replied to Richards' criticisms by claiming Richards made several historical mistakes and anachronisms and was overly selective in his assertion of Hitler's beliefs.[27]

Bibliography

References

  1. ^ "Richard Weikart". California State University, Stanislaus. 2013. Archived from the original on 2013-12-03. Retrieved 2011-07-16.
  2. ^ Weikart, Richard (October 10, 2004). "Senior Fellow Richard Weikart responds to Sander Gliboff". Center for Science and Culture. Retrieved 2008-05-17.
  3. ^ "Meet Richard Weikart". Access Research Network. April 1997. Retrieved 2008-05-17.
  4. ^ Weikart, Richard (January 2006). "Curriculum Vitae". California State University, Stanislaus. Archived from the original on 2009-01-20. Retrieved 2008-05-17.
  5. ^ Weikart, Richard (July 18, 2008). "The Dehumanizing Impact of Modern Thought: Darwin, Marx, Nietzsche, and Their Followers". Discovery Institute. Retrieved 2008-05-17.
  6. ^ Weikart, Richard (Spring 2004). "Does Darwinism Devalue Human Life?". Vol. 30, no. 2. The Human Life Review.
  7. ^ Richard Weikart, "Killing Them Kindly: Lessons from the euthanasia movement Archived 2013-12-05 at the Wayback Machine," Books and Culture: A Christian Review (Jan./Feb. 2004), 30-31
  8. Notes and Records of the Royal Society
    .
  9. ^ Peter Arnds Reviewed work(s): "Socialist Darwinism: Evolution in German Socialist Thought from Marx to Bernstein by Richard Weikart," German Studies Review, Vol. 25, No. 1 (Feb., 2002), pp. 131-132
  10. , Vol. 93, No. 4 (Dec., 2002), pp. 727-728
  11. ^ Daniel Gasman, "Richard Weikart, Socialist Darwinism, San Francisco: International Scholar’’s Publications, 1999," Central European History, 34(4): 2001, 573-575.
  12. ^ a b Criticisms include:
  13. Modesto Bee. Archived from the original
    on 2009-01-09. Retrieved 2008-05-17.
  14. ^ Mickelson in the Morning May 19th 2008; Listen to http://media.libsyn.com/media/mickelson/mickelson-2008-05-19.mp3
  15. Modesto Bee
    . September 1, 2009. Retrieved 2009-09-15.
  16. ^ Kaplan, Thomas (2010). "Book Reviews: Hitler's Ethic". Vol. 43. Central European History. pp. 718–720. Retrieved 2011-09-15.
  17. ^ Strobl, Gerwin (2012). "Book Reviews: Hitler's Ethic". Vol. 42, no. 1. European History Quarterly. pp. 204–206. Retrieved 2012-06-15.
  18. ^ Kurlander, Eric (May 2013). "Hitler's Ethic (Review)" (PDF). Vol. 36, no. 2. German Studies Review. pp. 459–460. Retrieved 2013-11-15.
  19. ^ Arnhart, Larry (September 6, 2009). "Richard Weikart's New Book--HITLER'S ETHIC". Darwinian Conservatism. Retrieved 2009-09-17.
  20. Evolution News
    , 22 September 2009.
  21. ^ "Nonfiction Book Review: Hitler's Religion: The Twisted Beliefs That Drove the Third Reich by Richard Weikart. Regnery, $29.99 (352p) ISBN 978-1-62157-500-9".
  22. .
  23. ^ From Darwin to Hitler: A Pathway to Horror (Updated), Jonathan Witt, Evolution News and Views, Discovery Institute, December 15, 2006.
  24. Jay Richards and Steve Meyer
    ), which provided crucial funding and much encouragement..." Weikart, From Darwin to Hitler, page x
  25. ^ "Unlike the claims regarding Haeckel’s embryology, Weikart’s claims regarding a lineage from Darwin to Hitler via Haeckel have been examined by historians of science and indeed have generally been found lacking. Numerous reviews have accused Weikart of selectively viewing his rich primary material, ignoring political, social, psychological, and economic factors that may have played key roles in the post-Darwinian development of Nazi eugenics and racism. Since there is no clear and unique line from Darwinian naturalism to Nazi atrocities, useful causal relationships are difficult to infer; thus, as Robert J. Richards observes, 'it can only be a tendentious and dogmatically driven assessment that would condemn Darwin for the crimes of the Nazis'." Gooday, Graeme Gooday, John M. Lynch, Kenneth G. Wilson, and Constance K. Barsky; Lynch, John M.; Wilson, Kenneth G.; Barsky, Constance K. (2008). "Does Science Education Need the History of Science".
    S2CID 24907434.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link
    )
  26. ^ a b Flam, Faye (October 27, 2011). "Severing the link between Darwin and Nazism". The Philadelphia Inquirer. Archived from the original on 2011-12-29. Retrieved 2013-02-14.
  27. ^ Weikart, Richard. "Was Hitler Influenced by Darwinism?". University of California Stanislaus State. Retrieved 17 March 2022.

External links