Robert V. Gentry

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Robert Vance Gentry
radiohalos
Scientific career
FieldsNuclear physics

Robert Vance Gentry (July 9, 1933 – January 28, 2020) was an American

Thesis

Gentry noted that the 218 polonium radio halos only formed at temperatures below 300 degrees and were visible for less than 3 minutes, thus requiring the Precambrian granites where they are to have formed by a quick process yet "mysterious"[clarification needed] [13] cold, highlighting the singularities of the continental crust [14][15] in relation to the oceanic crust. When questioned in debates that defended the thermal paradigm in the formation of the earth's rocks, Gentry challenged them to then reproduce Precambrian granites containing the same,[16] in miniature, since such a process should then be able to imitate the formation of granites containing halos. After unanswered decades, Australian geologist Andrew Snelling proposed "a model in which hydrothermal fluids separated 222 Rn and their parents' Po isotopes 238 U in zircons and transported them over very short distances along cleavage planes in the host and adjacent, biotites until 222 Rn decays and the Po isotopes were chemically concentrated in radiocentres, to later produce the Po radiohalos.[17]

Career

Gentry received a master's degree in

age of the Earth for his dissertation.[18]

By this time he was convinced that

radiohalos might be the key to determining the age of the Earth, and might be capable of vindicating flood geology. He continued to work on the subject at home using a small microscope and attempted to publish his results (minus his creationist conclusions) in one or more peer reviewed scientific journals. In 1969, while Gentry was affiliated with an Adventist college in Maryland, Oak Ridge National Laboratory invited him to use their facilities, as a guest scientist in the hope that his work on radiohalos might lead to discovering super-heavy elements. This relationship was terminated as a result of his participation in McLean v. Arkansas.[11]

Claims and criticism

Gentry has had strong disagreements with other creationists over some details of flood geology.[19] A number of creationists, including fellow Seventh-day Adventists, have criticised his work.[11]

In the late 1970s, Gentry challenged the scientific community to synthesize "a hand-sized specimen of a typical

G. Brent Dalrymple stated:[11]
"As far as I am concerned, Gentry's challenge is silly. … He has proposed an absurd and inconclusive experiment to test a perfectly ridiculous and unscientific hypothesis that ignores virtually the entire body of geological knowledge."

In 1981, Gentry was a defense witness in the McLean v. Arkansas case over the constitutional validity of Act 590 that mandated that "creation science" be given equal time in public schools with evolution.[20] Act 590 was ruled to be unconstitutional (a verdict that was upheld by the Supreme Court in Edwards v. Aguillard).

Gentry has devised his own

territorial jurisdiction, as neither defendant in the case was considered to have a significant presence in the state of Tennessee.[22]

His self-published book Creation's Tiny Mystery was reviewed by geologist Gregg Wilkerson, who said that it has several logical flaws and concluded that "the book is a source of much misinformation about current geologic thinking and confuses fact with interpretation." Wilkerson also noted that the book contains considerable autobiographical material and he observed that "[i]n general I don't think educators will find it's worth their time to tread through this creationist's whining."

Ronald L. Numbers, a historian of science.[11]

Selected publications

References

Further reading

  1. Wise, Kurt (March 1989). "Radioactive Halos: Geological Concerns". Creation Research Society Quarterly. 25 (4). Creation Research Society. Archived from the original on 2009-08-05.
  2. Baillieul, T.A. (2001–2005), "Polonium Haloes" Refuted: A Review of "Radioactive Halos in a Radio-Chronological and Cosmological Perspective" by Robert V. Gentry, TalkOrigins Archive
  3. Brawley, J. (1992), Evolution's Tiny Violences: The Po-Halo Mystery, TalkOrigins Archive
  4. Ellenberger, C.L., with reply by Gentry, R.V. 1984. "Polonium Halos Redux," Physics Today. December 1984. pp. 91–92
  5. Ellenberger, C.L. 1986. "Absolute Dating," unanswered surrebuttal to Gentry, Physics Today. March 1986. pp. 152, 156
  6. Gentry, R.V. (1970), "Giant Radioactive Halos: Indicators of Unknown Alpha-Radioactivity?" (PDF), Science, 169 (3946) (published August 1970): 670–673,
    S2CID 33001798
    .
  7. Gentry, R.V. (1975), "Spectacle Haloes", Nature, 258 (5532) (published October 1975): 269–270, .
  8. Gentry, R.V. (1973), "Radioactive Halos", .
  9. Gentry, R.V. (1974), "Radiohalos in a Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective" (PDF), Science, 184 (4132) (published October 1974): 62–66,
    S2CID 21556640
    .
  10. Gentry, R.V. (1992), Creation's Tiny Mystery, Earth Science Associates (published 2004).
  11. Osmon, P., 1986, "Gentry’s pleochroic halos: Creation/Evolution," Newsletter, Feser, Karl D., Editor, v. 6, no. 1, Concord College, Athens, West Virginia
  12. Schadewald, R., 1987. "Gentry’s tiny mystery, Creation/Evolution" Newsletter, Fezer, Karl D, Editor, v. 4, no. 2 & 3. Concord College. Athens. West Virginia, p 20.

External links